欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (09): 1446-1451.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

石新733小麦的水分生理特点及节水灌溉效应

马瑞昆;贾秀领;张全国;张丽华;姚艳荣;杨利华   

  1. 河北省农林科学院粮油作物研究所,河北石家庄 050031
  • 收稿日期:2006-08-10 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-09-12 网络出版日期:2007-09-12
  • 通讯作者: 马瑞昆

Physiological Characteristics of Water in Wheat Cultivar SX733: the Effect of Water-Saving Irrigation

MA Rui-Kun, JIA Xiu-Ling, ZHANG Quan-Guo, ZHANG Li-Hua, YAO Yan-Rong, and YANG Li-Hua   

  1. Institute of Cereal and Oil Crops, Hebei Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050031, Hebei, China
  • Received:2006-08-10 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-09-12 Published online:2007-09-12
  • Contact: MA Rui-Kun

摘要:

石新733是一个高产优质小麦新品种,为探明其是否适用于节水高产栽培,于2003—2004和2004—2005年度进行了节水灌溉对其水分生理性状和产量影响的田间试验。结果表明,石新733的叶片渗透调节能力比邯麦9、石麦9和衡7228的平均值高71.6%,叶水势比衡7228约高0.1 MPa。石新733的离体叶片失水速率较高;蒸腾速率、净光合速率和气孔导度与石麦9和邯麦9接近,均高于衡7228;胞间CO2浓度和蒸腾效率品种间没有明显差别。与灌5水处理相比,灌2水处理的叶水势和叶片气体交换参数均相近而灌浆盛期的光合功能和蒸腾效率较高。石新733的产量高于其他3个品种,其中,不灌水和灌2水处理分别比其他3个品种平均产量增加11.3%和7.0%。全生育期只灌拔节和抽穗开花期2水的节水处理比灌4水的常规灌溉处理增产5.6%,说明该品种可在节水高产栽培上应用。

关键词: 小麦, 水分生理, 节水灌溉

Abstract:

The objective of this study was to measure leaf water potential, photosynthesis, transpiration, stomatal conductance, inter-cellular CO2 concentration, transpiration effeciency, water-saving irrigation effects on physiological traits and grain yield using SX733, a new high-yielding and good-quality winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivar and HM9, SM9, and H7228 in the field experiments irrigated with differrent times during 2003–2004 and 2004–2005. The results indicated that the leaf osmotic adjustment capability of SX733 was 0.11 MPa, which was higher than the average (0.065 MPa) of other 3 cultivars by 71.6%. Leaf water potential of SX733 was higher than that of H7228 by about 0.1 MPa, and the excised-leaf water loss rate of SX733 was higher than that of other cultivars when it was well-irrigated. Transpiration rate, photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance of SX733 were similar to those of SM9 and HM9, but higher than those of H7228. There was no remarkable difference among cultivars in inter-cellular CO2 concentration and transpiration efficiency. The 2 times irrigation treatment maintained almost the same level of leaf water potential and leaf gas exchange parameters as the 5 times irrigation treatment with improved photosynthesis and transpiration efficiency during grain-filling period. Compared with other 3 cultivars, the yield of SX733 was increased by 11.3% and 7.0% in non-irrigation and 2 times irrigation treatments, respectively. The yield of 2 times irrigation treatment at stem elongation and heading for SX733 was 5.6% higher than that of 4 times irrigation treatment. It is concluded that water-saving irrigation management can be well implemented in SX733 production.

Key words: Wheat, Water physiology, Water-saving irrigation

[1] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[2] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[3] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[4] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[5] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[6] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[7] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[12] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[13] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[14] 叶凡, 李帅, 李思宇, 陈云, 窦超银, 刘立军. 不同节水灌溉方式对东北稻区水稻产量和群体质量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 895-907.
[15] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!