欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (02): 254-260.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00254

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

棉铃对位叶C/N的变化及其与棉铃干物质积累和分配的关系

胡宏标;张文静;陈兵林;王友华;束红梅;周治国*   

  1. 南京农业大学/农业部作物生长调控重点开放实验室, 江苏南京 210095

  • 收稿日期:2007-03-28 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-02-12 网络出版日期:2008-02-12
  • 通讯作者: 周治国

Changes of C/N Ratio in the Subtending Leaf of Cotton Boll and Its Relation- ship to Cotton Boll Dry Matter Accumulation and Distribution

HU Hong-Biao,ZHANG Wen-Jing,CHEN Bing-Lin,WANG You-Hua,SHU Hong-Mei,ZHOU Zhi-Guo *   

  1. Nanjing Agricultural University /Key Laboratory of Crop Growth Regulation, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, China

  • Received:2007-03-28 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-02-12 Published online:2008-02-12
  • Contact: ZHOU Zhi-Guo

摘要:

以产量差异显著的14个棉花品种为材料, 研究棉铃对位叶C/N的变化特征及其与棉铃干物质积累与分配的关系。结果表明, 棉铃对位叶C/N随铃龄的变化可用y=at2+bt+c拟合[ y为C/N, t为铃龄(d), a、b、c为常数], 其主要特征值(a、b、c和C/N最大值)与单铃干物重(即单个棉铃的铃壳、棉籽和纤维3部分干重之和)和铃重(即棉籽和纤维两部分干重之和)存在极显著相关关系, 而与衣分和铃壳率无显著相关关系。以a、b、c和C/N最大值为变量可将14个棉花品种聚类为Ⅰ(美棉33B等6个品种)、Ⅱ(科棉1号等6个品种)和Ⅲ(中棉所35和中棉所38) 3个类群, 三者棉铃对位叶C/N及单铃干物重的变化特征差异显著, 其中类群Ⅲ铃龄10~17 d期间的棉铃对位叶C/N显著高于类群Ⅰ和类群Ⅱ, 铃龄24 d之后仍保持在2.5左右, 整个铃期内变幅最大, 平均值最高, 其单铃干物重快速增长期最长, 平均增长速率最小, 最终单铃干物重和铃重均最大, 但3个类群棉花棉铃干物质在棉铃各部分分配率的动态变化无明显差异, 最终衣分和皮棉产量与棉铃对位叶C/N变化特性无明显相关性。棉铃对位叶C/N变化的基因型差异显著, 棉铃对位叶C/N在铃龄10~17 d期间高、铃龄24 d之后仍维持在相对较高的水平, 有利于棉铃干物质的积累。

关键词: 棉铃, 棉铃对位叶, C/N, 干物质积累与分配

Abstract:

To study changes of the C/N ratio in the subtending leaf of cotton boll and its relationship with boll dry matter accumulation and distribution, 14 cotton cultivars with significant differences in yield were chosen as materials. The results showed that dynamic changes of the C/N ratio in the subtending leaf of cotton boll could be simulated with quadratic: y=at2+bt+c [y stands for the C/N ratio and t stands for boll age (d)]. Correlation analysis indicated that a, b, c and the maximum C/N ratio were significantly correlated with dry weight per boll (the total of boll shell, seed and fiber dry matter weight per boll) and boll weight (the total of seed and fiber dry matter weight per boll), but not with lint percentage and boll shell percentage. Therefore, a, b, c and the maximum C/N ratio were selected as the variables for clustering analysis. The 14 cotton cultivars were clustered into 3 groups: GroupⅠ(including American Cotton-33B etc.), GroupⅡ(including Ke Cotton 1 etc.) and GroupⅢ(including China Cotton Re-search Institute 35 and China Cotton Research Institute 38). There were significant differences in dynamic changes of the C/N ratio and dry weight per boll among three groups. The C/N ratio of the GroupⅢwas much higher than that of GroupⅠ&Ⅱ during the period from 10 to 17 days of boll age and still maintained around 2.5 after 24 days of boll age, showing a widest changing range and a highest average value during the whole boll developing stage. The boll dry matter accumulation of GroupⅢ had the longest speedy rising period with the lowest velocity, which resulted in the highest final dry weight per boll and boll weight. However, there existed no significant difference in dry matter distribution in each part of cotton boll among three groups and no visible connection between the final lint percentage as well as lint yield and the characters of the C/N ratio in the subtending leaf of cotton boll. In conclusion, dynamic characters of the C/N ratio in the subtending leaf of cotton boll are significantly different among different genotypes, and the C/N ratio declined dramatically from 10 to 17 days of boll age and maintained at a relative higher level after 24 days of boll age, and that is favorable to cotton boll dry matter accumulation.

Key words:

Cotton boll, the subtending leaf of cotton boll, C/N ratio, Dry matter accumulation and distribution

[1] 林祥,王东*. 不同底墒条件下补灌对冬小麦耗水特性、产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(09): 1357-1369.
[2] 郭增江,于振文,石玉,赵俊晔,张永丽,王东. 不同土层测墒补灌对小麦旗叶光合特性和干物质积累与分配的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(04): 731-738.
[3] 高春华,于振文,石玉,张永丽,赵俊晔. 测墒补灌条件下高产小麦品种水分利用特性及干物质积累和分配[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(12): 2211-2219.
[4] 刘敬然,刘佳杰,孟亚利,王友华,陈兵林,张国伟,周治国. 外源6-BA和ABA对不同播种期棉花产量和品质及其棉铃对位叶光合产物的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(06): 1078-1088.
[5] 段文学,于振文,石玉,张永丽,赵俊晔. 施氮深度对旱地小麦耗水特性和干物质积累与分配的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(04): 657-664.
[6] 孙啸震,张黎妮,戴艳娇,贺新颖,周治国,王友华. 花铃期增温对棉花干物重累积的影响及其生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(04): 683-690.
[7] 郑成岩, 崔世明, 王东, 于振文, 张永丽, 石玉. 土壤耕作方式对小麦干物质生产和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(08): 1432-1440.
[8] 刘伟, 张吉旺, 吕鹏, 杨今胜, 刘鹏, 董树亭, 李登海, 孙庆泉. 种植密度对高产夏玉米登海661产量及干物质积累与分配的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(07): 1301-1307.
[9] 骆兰平, 于振文*, 王东, 张永丽, 石玉. 土壤水分和种植密度对小麦旗叶光合性能和干物质积累与分配的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(06): 1049-1059.
[10] 韩占江,于振文,王东,张永丽. 测墒补灌对冬小麦干物质积累与分配及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(3): 457-465.
[11] 赵斌, 董树亭, 张吉旺, 刘鹏. 控释肥对夏玉米产量和氮素积累与分配的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(10): 1760-1768.
[12] 赵新华, 束红梅, 王友华, 陈兵林, 周治国. 播期对棉铃生物量和氮累积与分配的影响及其与棉铃品质的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(10): 1707-1714.
[13] 陈源,王永慧,肖健,栾娜,张祥,陈德华. 高品质陆地棉棉铃发育特点[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(08): 1371-1376.
[14] 陈源,王永慧,杨朝华,肖健,栾娜,张祥,陈德华. 氮肥运筹对高品质棉棉铃形成及纤维品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2009, 35(12): 2266-2272.
[15] 马溶慧;许乃银;张传喜;李文峰;冯营;屈磊;王友华;周治国. 氮素调控棉花纤维蔗糖代谢及纤维比强度的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(12): 2143-2151.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!