欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (05): 859-869.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00859

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

棉花季节桃加厚发育生理特性的差异及与纤维比强度的关系

张文静1,2;胡宏标1;陈兵林1;王友华1;周治国1,*   

  1. 1南京农业大学 / 农业部作物生长调控重点开放实验室, 江苏南京210095; 2 安徽农业大学农学院, 安徽合肥230036
  • 收稿日期:2007-03-27 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-05-12 网络出版日期:2008-05-12
  • 通讯作者: 周治国

Difference of Physiological Characteristics of Cotton Bolls in Development of Fiber Thickening and Its Relationship with Fiber Strength

ZHANG Wen-Jing12,HU Hong-Biao1,CHEN Bing-Lin1,WANG You-Hua1,ZHOU Zhi-Guo1*   

  1. 1 Key Laboratory of Crop Growth Regulation, Ministry of Agriculture / Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, 2 College of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, Anhui, China
  • Received:2007-03-27 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-05-12 Published online:2008-05-12
  • Contact: ZHOU Zhi-Guo

摘要: 选用3类棉纤维比强度差异明显的4个棉花品种, 研究棉花伏前桃、伏桃、早秋桃和晚秋桃纤维加厚发育过程中主要生理特征的差异及与纤维比强度的关系。结果表明, 棉花季节桃纤维加厚发育过程中物质转化特征和相关酶活性存在较大差异, 最终导致纤维比强度差异的形成, 且季节桃间的差异在各类品种内表现一致。伏前桃和伏桃纤维加厚发育处于较为适宜的温度条件(铃龄10~50 d日均温26.0~28.5℃)和棉株生理年龄(3~9果枝)下, 纤维素合成相关酶活性越高, 相关物质转化越多, 纤维素快增持续期长, 纤维素累积速率平缓, 越利于高强纤维的形成。早秋桃纤维发育后期温度条件较伏前桃差且棉株开始衰老, 但其纤维合成相关物质转化率高, 纤维素累积特征优于伏前桃, 最终纤维强度高于伏前桃; 随着铃龄10~50 d日均温降至20℃以下和棉株进一步的衰老(16果枝以上), 晚秋桃纤维素快速累积期延长, 相关物质转化率降低, 纤维累积速率过慢, 纤维细胞发育迟缓, 造成最终纤维比强度较低。

关键词: 棉花, 季节桃, 纤维加厚发育, 生理特性, 纤维比强度

Abstract: Fiber strength is one of the most important quality indexes of cotton (Gossypium) fiber and contributes highly to the yarn strength. Normally, fiber strength is determined by fiber’s secondary wall thickening stage in which many complex physiological and biochemical processes are involved. To investigate the physiological characteristic of cotton fiber thickening in seasonal bolls and its relationship with fiber strength, the experiments were carried out in Nanjing, Jiangsu Province in 2004–2005 by choosing four cultivars with significant difference in fiber strength as materials. Boll samples were labeled on anthesis day (July 15, July 25, Aug. 25, and Sept. 10) and expressed as PSB (pre-summer boll), SB (summer boll), EAB (early autumn boll) and LAB (late autumn boll), respectively. The results of two-year experiments showed that there were great differences in matter transformation and related enzyme activities during cotton fiber thickening in seasonal bolls, and which resulted in different fiber strengths. The diversity of physiological indexes between bolls with different anthesis dates was similar in every cultivar (genotype). Under suitable temperature condition (mean daily temperature 26.0–28.5℃ during boll age from 10 to 50 days) and plant physiological age (about the third-ninth fruit branch), the cotton seasonal bolls (PSB and SB), which had more soluble sugar and sucrose transformed, higher β-1,3-glucan content at the onset of the secondary wall thickening, and higher activities of sucrose synthetase and β-1,3-glucanase, would get longer and tempered cellulose accumulation and higher strength fiber. EAB had worse temperature environment for fiber development than PSB during the later period, but it had higher matter transformation rate and better characteristic of cellulose deposition than PSB. As the result, fiber strength of EAB was higher than that of PSB. With the worse temperature condition (mean daily temperature lower than 20℃ during boll age from 10 to 50 days) and cotton plant se-nescence (above the sixteenth fruit branch), LAB had the longest period for cellulose rapid deposition, the lowest matter transfor-mation rate and cellulose accumulation speed. And all these resulted in the lowest fiber strength.

Key words: Cotton, Cotton seasonal boll, Cotton fiber thickening development, Physiological characters, Fiber strength

[1] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[2] 张曦, 王广恩, 李邵琦, 刘祎, 李俊兰, 钱玉源. 基于转录组测序解析陆海杂交姊妹系马克隆值差异的形成机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1442-1458.
[3] 崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
[4] 周琦翔, 朱艳, 汪楚博, 朱柏林, 李俊博, 宋利兵. 基于DSSAT模型模拟气候变化对新疆棉花物候期及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 590-602.
[5] 郭栋财, 吕涛, 蔡永生, 买吾鲁达·艾合买提, 全家, 曲延英, 郑凯. 棉花纤维品质相关性状QTL元分析及候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1445-1466.
[6] 王亚雯, 戚正阳, 尤佳琦, 聂新辉, 曹娟, 杨细燕, 涂礼莉, 张献龙, 王茂军. 棉花60K功能位点基因芯片的制备及应用[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1178-1188.
[7] 管圣, 廖澳, 王立琦, 李茜, 卢建宁, 荣晶, 崔国贤, 杨瑞芳, 佘玮. 6-BA调控增强苎麻抗旱性的生理机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 823-834.
[8] 朱灿灿, 李君霞, 景雅, 付森杰, 秦娜, 王春义, 代书桃, 魏昕, 张程炀. 不同耐荫性谷子对遮阴的生理响应及转录组分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3211-3223.
[9] 丁俊沣, 许映飞, 张祥, 陈媛, 陈德华. 生长调节剂吲哚丁酸对移栽棉苗成活及生长发育的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3331-3341.
[10] 哈丽哈什·依巴提, 张炎, 李青军, 徐新朋, 何萍. 基于产量反应和农学效率的棉花智能化推荐施肥方法研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 3052-3064.
[11] 李亚玮, 徐盈盈, 左春阳, 刘若男, 梁亚军, 孔杰, 张献龙, 闵玲. 棉花减数分裂进程鉴定体系构建及其对高温胁迫的响应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2570-2580.
[12] 陈佳伟, 林艳, 张明星, 周诗晶, 饶力群, 周池, 李鑫. 贝莱斯芽孢杆菌YCH92对棉花根际土壤微生物群落及棉花产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2821-2835.
[13] 谢章书, 谢学方, 屠小菊, 刘爱玉, 董合忠, 周仲华. 植物激素对棉花蕾铃脱落的调控研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 1-29.
[14] 辛明华, 秘雅迪, 王国平, 李小飞, 李亚兵, 董合林, 韩迎春, 冯璐. 行距配置和种植密度对棉花干物质生产及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 221-232.
[15] 李超, 付小琼. 基于GYT双标图综合评价黄河流域中熟杂交棉花区域试验品种[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 30-43.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!