欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (07): 1169-1178.

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国栽培和野生大豆农艺品质性状与SSR标记的关联分析 I. 群体结构及关联标记

文自翔;赵团结;郑永战;刘顺湖;王春娥;王芳;盖钧镒*   

  1. 南京农业大学大豆研究所 / 国家大豆改良中心 / 作物遗传与种质创新国家重点实验室, 江苏南京210095
  • 收稿日期:2007-10-29 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-07-12 网络出版日期:2008-07-12
  • 通讯作者: 盖钧镒

Association Analysis of Agronomic and Quality Traits with SSR Markers in Glycine max and Glycine soja in China: I. Population Structure and Associated Markers

WEN Zi-Xiang,ZHAO Tuan-Jie,ZHENG Yong-Zhan,LIU Shun-Hu,WANG Chun-E,WANG Fang,GAI Jun-Yi*   

  1. Soybean Research Institute of Nanjing Agricultural University / National Center for Soybean Improvement / National Key Laboratory for Crop Ge-netics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2007-10-29 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-07-12 Published online:2008-07-12
  • Contact: GAI Jun-Yi

摘要: 关联作图是一种利用连锁不平衡(linkage disequilibrium, LD)检测自然群体中基因位点及其等位变异的方法。利用60个SSR标记, 对全国大豆地方品种群体(393份代表性材料)和野生大豆群体(196份代表性材料)的基因组变异进行扫描, 分析两类群体的连锁不平衡位点、群体结构, 并采用TASSEL软件的GLM (general linear model)方法对16个农艺、品质性状观测值进行标记与性状的关联分析。结果表明: (1)在公共图谱上不论共线性的或是非共线性的SSR位点组合都有一定程度的LD, 说明历史上发生过连锁群间的重组; 栽培群体的连锁不平衡成对位点数较野生群体多, 但野生群体位点间连锁不平衡程度高, 随距离的衰减慢。(2) 群体SSR数据遗传结构分析发现, 栽培群体和野生群体分别由9和4个亚群体组成, 亚群的划分与群体地理生态类型相关联, 证实地理生态类型划分有其遗传基础。(3) 栽培群体中累计有27个位点与性状相关; 野生大豆种质中累计有34个位点与性状相关。部分标记在两类群体中都表现与同一性状关联, 检出的位点有一致性, 也有互补性; 一些标记同时与2个或多个性状相关联, 可能是性状相关乃至一因多效的遗传基础; 关联位点中累计有24位点(次)与遗传群体连锁分析定位的QTL一致。

关键词: 栽培大豆[Glycine max (L.) Merr.], 野生大豆(Glycine soja Sieb. et Zucc.), SSR, 群体结构, 关联分析

Abstract: Association mapping is a procedure for detecting QTLs as well as their alleles based on linkage disequilibrium (LD). The genotyping data of 60 simple-sequence repeat (SSR) markers on representative samples of 393 landraces of Glycine max (L.) Merr. and 196 wild accessions of Glycine soja Sieb. et Zucc. were used in the present study. Linkage disequilibrium of pairwise loci and population structure were firstly analyzed for the two populations, then the association analysis between SSR loci and 16 agronomic and quality traits was performed by using TASSEL GLM (general linear model) program. The different degrees of LD were detected not only among syntenic markers but also among nonsyntenic ones, suggesting that there had been historical re-combination among linkage groups. The cultivated soybean population had more LD loci pairs than wild soybean population, while the later had higher degree and slower attenuation of LD than the former. Genetic structure analysis showed that both of the cultivated and wild populations were composed of nine and four subpopulations, respectively, which associated with their geo-graphic eco-types, indicating the classification of geographic eco-types was of sound genetic bases. Twenty seven and thirty four SSR loci associated with the traits were screened out from cultivated and wild populations, respectively. Some loci were found to associate with a same trait in both populations, and there existed both consistent and inconsistent association between the culti-vated and wild populations. There were a few loci associated with two or more traits simultaneously, which might be the genetic reason of correlation among traits or pleiotropic phenomena. In addition, twenty-four associated markers were in agreement with mapped QTLs from family-based linkage mapping procedure.

Key words: Cultivated soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], Wild soybean (Glycine soja Sieb. et Zucc.), Simple-sequence repeat (SSR), Population structure, Association mapping

中图分类号: 

  • 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.01169
[1] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[2] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[3] 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[4] 张颖星, 宋裕祯, 王跃, 曹越, 曹晓宁, 王瑞云. EMS诱导糜子优异性状突变体的筛选及表型分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1388-1400.
[5] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[6] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[7] 田春艳, 陆鑫, 吴才文, 徐超华, 刘家勇, 边芯, 桃联安. 基于荧光SSR的甘蔗创新种质遗传多样性分析及育种潜力评估[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1057-1072.
[8] 张超, 郭欢, 李忠玲, 岳淑宁, 赵娜. 基于BSA-seq技术定位玉米籽粒花青素关联基因[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 780-789.
[9] 鲁雅妮, 丁超杰, 张煜, 杜习军, 齐学礼, 胡琳, 许为钢. 河南省200份小麦品种苗期茎基腐病抗性鉴定与全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 363-375.
[10] 李诗晴, 王茜, 王素华, 张耀文, 王丽侠. 绿豆种质资源苗期耐盐性鉴定及相关基因发掘[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 376-388.
[11] 李璐琪, 程宇坤, 白斌, 雷斌, 耿洪伟. 小麦叶片气孔相关性状全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2266-2284.
[12] 李云香, 郭千纤, 侯万伟, 张小娟. 引进ICARDA小麦苗期根系抗旱性状的全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2387-2398.
[13] 蔡金珊, 李超男, 王景一, 李宁, 柳玉平, 景蕊莲, 李龙, 孙黛珍. 小麦幼苗根系性状全基因组关联分析及TaSRL-3B优异等位基因发掘[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2020-2032.
[14] 李宜谦, 徐守振, 刘萍, 马麒, 谢斌, 陈红. 基于40K SNP芯片的陆地棉产量构成因素全基因组关联分析及单铃重位点挖掘[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2128-2138.
[15] 高梦娟, 赵贺莹, 陈家辉, 陈晓倩, 牛萌康, 钱琪润, 崔陆飞, 邢江敏, 银庆淼, 郭雯, 张宁, 孙丛苇, 阳霞, 裴丹, 贾奥琳, 陈锋, 余晓东, 任妍. 小麦抗纹枯病新位点Qse.hnau-5AS的定位及其候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2240-2250.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!