欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (9): 1597-1605.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.01597

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

利用cDNA-AFLP技术分析小麦应答低磷胁迫的特异表达基因

谷俊涛2,鲍金香1,王效颖1,郭程瑾1,李小娟2,路文静2,肖凯1,*   

  1. 1河北农业大学农学院，河北保定071001；2河北农业大学生命科学学院，河北保定071001
  • 收稿日期:2009-01-07 修回日期:2009-03-15 出版日期:2009-09-12 网络出版日期:2009-07-03
  • 通讯作者: 肖凯, E-mail: xiaokai@hebau.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家重点基础研究发展计划（973计划）前期项目(2007CB116209)，河北省重点基础研究项目(08965525D)，河北省自然科学基金(C2007000476)资助。

Investigation Based on cdna-aflp Approach for Differential Expressed Genesis Responding to Deficient-Pi in Wheat

GU Jun-Tao2,BAO Jin-Xiang1,WANG Xiao-Ying1,GUO Cheng-Jin1,LI Xiao-Juan2,LU Wen-Jing2,XIAO Kai1*   

  1. 1 College of Agronomy, Agricultural University of Hebei, Baoding 071001, China, 2College of Life Science; Agricultural University of Hebei, Baoding 071001, China
  • Received:2009-01-07 Revised:2009-03-15 Published:2009-09-12 Published online:2009-07-03
  • Contact: XIAO Kai, E-mail: xiaokai@hebau.edu.cn

PDF

4545

被引次数

35

摘要：

以磷高效小麦品种石新828为材料，采用cDNA-AFLP技术，鉴定了短期(1~6 h)、中期(12~48 h)和长期(72~144 h)低磷胁迫根系特异上、下调表达基因的表达序列标签(EST)。共有非重复的上调ESTs 142个，下调ESTs 94个。胁迫下的前者分别含短、中和长期23、53和66个；后者分别含短、中和长期17、39和38个。对其功能比对发现，上调ESTs在功能上归属于信号转导、转录调控、代谢、逆境响应、发育、物质运输、脂类代谢和功能未知等类别，下调EST除上述类别外，还含有蛋白质合成和降解等类别。部分转录因子基因(如水稻OsPTF1和拟南芥ZAT10高度同源的转录因子基因)、促分裂原激酶基因MAPK1a、钙依赖蛋白激酶基因CPK1A和蛋白激酶基因(如serine/threonine kinase)、高亲和磷转运蛋白基因(PHT3和PT2)、过氧化物酶基因(如peroxidase 73)和谷胱甘肽-S-转移酶基因(glutathione S-transferase)，受到低磷胁迫的特异增强诱导，在改善小麦植株对低磷胁迫的适应能力中可能具有重要作用。研究表明，小麦对低磷胁迫的响应，在分子水平上存在着植株感受低磷胁迫信号和信号转导、进一步在生理生化方面对胁迫信号产生应答等复杂的过程。

关键词: 小麦, 低磷胁迫, cDNA-AFLP, 特异表达基因, 基因功能类别

Abstract:

To date, differential expression genes in response to deficient-Pi stress have been identified and well studied in Arabidopsis thaliana, and totally 612 up-regulated and 254 down-regulated genes with various functions were reported. However, there is no similar report in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). In this study, seedlings of wheat cultivar Shixin 828 with high phosphorus use efficiency were treated with 20 µmol L-1 Pi for 1 to 144 h, and the differential expressed sequence tags (ESTs) with up-regulated and down-regulated patterns were investigated based on cDNA-AFLP approach after deficient-Pi treatment for short term (1–6 h), medium term (12–48 h), and long term (72–144 h). A total of 142 nonredundant ESTs with up-regulated pattern were identified, in which 23, 53, and 66 ESTs expressed in treatments of short, medium, and long term, respectively. Simultaneously, 94 nonredundant ESTs with down-regulated pattern were detected in treatments of short (17), medium (39), and long term (38). These ESTs were classified into several functional groups with BLAST in GenBank. Except for 44 function-unknown ESTs with the up-regulated pattern, the remained up-regulated ESTs conferred functions of signal transduction, transcription regulation, metabolism, stress response, development, transport, and lipid metabolism. Besides the above functions, protein synthesis and protein degradation were also observed in the down-regulated ESTs. Some genes of transcription factors (such as the transcription factor genes with high homologous to rice OsPTF1 and Arabidospsis ZAT10), mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK1a), calcium-dependent protein kinase (CPK1A), and protein kinase (such as serine/threonine kinase), high-affinity phosphate transporter (PHT3 and PT2), peroxidase (such as peroxidase 73) and glutathione (glutathione S-transferase) were specifically up-regulated under deficient-Pi condition. This suggested that they might play important roles in promoting adaptation to deficient-Pi environment.

Key words: Wheat(Triticum aestivum L.), Low-Pi stress, cDNA-AFLP approach, Expressed sequence tags(ESTs), Functional classification of genes

[1] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[2] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[3] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[4] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[5] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[6] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[7] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[12] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[13] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[14] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
[15] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2