欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (05): 863-870.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.00863

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

水分胁迫下外源ABA提高甘蔗抗旱性的作用机制

李长宁1,2,Manoj Kumar SRIVASTAVA2,农倩1,李杨瑞2,*   

  1. 1 广西大学农学院，广西南宁530004；2广西作物遗传改良生物技术重点开放实验室，广西南宁530007
  • 收稿日期:2009-10-20 修回日期:2010-02-05 出版日期:2010-05-12 网络出版日期:2010-03-15
  • 通讯作者: 李杨瑞，E-mail: lyr@gxaas.net
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由广西农业科学院博士后研究专项（博后74602），广西科技攻关项目（桂科攻0782004-3），国家科技支撑计划项目（2007BAD30B03）和现代农业产业技术体系专项资金资助。

Mechanism of Tolerance to Drought in Sugarcane Plant Enhanced by Foliage Dressing of Abscisic Acid under Water Stress

LI Chang-Ning1,2,Manoj Kumar SRIVASTAVA2,NONG Qian1,LI Yang-Rui2,*   

  1. 1College of Agriculture,Guangxi University,Nanning 530004,China;2Guangxi Crop Genetic Improvement and Biotechnology Laboratory,Nanning 530007,China
  • Received:2009-10-20 Revised:2010-02-05 Published:2010-05-12 Published online:2010-03-15
  • Contact: LI Yang-Rui，E-mail:lyr@gxaas.net

PDF

2818

被引次数

131

摘要：

以抗旱甘蔗品种ROC22为材料，调查水分胁迫及胁迫加喷施脱落酸(ABA)对甘蔗内源ABA合成及相关生理生化作用的影响。结果表明，干旱及干旱加外施ABA的条件下，甘蔗内源ABA合成水平上升，但干旱加ABA处理增幅更显著，甘蔗叶内的脯氨酸(Pro)、H2O2、丙二醛(MDA)含量增加，而ABA处理能缓解MDA的积累，使其含量处于低水平，ABA处理能防止叶绿素降解并对干旱引起的最大光能转化效率(Fv/Fm)、PSII实际量子效率(ΦPSII)下降有明显的缓解作用。干旱条件下，H2O2的积累伴随着抗氧化作用的酶CAT、GPX、GR和APX的活性提高，而ABA处理能进一步提高这些相关酶的活性而逐渐降低H2O2的含量，表明干旱条件下，外施ABA能增强甘蔗的抗氧化防护系统，提高抗旱性。

关键词: ABA, 甘蔗, 抗旱性, H2O2, 抗氧化酶, 叶绿素荧光

Abstract:

Drought is a major limiting factor for sugarcane growth. Abscisic acid (ABA) regulates much important plant physiological and biochemical processes, and induces tolerance to different stresses including drought. Understanding the mechanism of tolerance to drought in sugarcane plant with foliage dressing of ABA under water stress would facilitate breeding and field management for improving drought resistance. Thus, an experiment was set up to investigate the interrelationship between drought induced ABA biosynthesis and antioxidative defense system, and to confer the farther role of foliar application of ABA in imparting drought tolerance to the sugarcane plant. The treatments were: T1 (drought), T2 (drought + foliar application of 15 µmol L–1 ABA) and C (control, normal irrigation) using a drought tolerant cultivar ROC22. The results showed that drought treatment (T1) enhanced the ABA concentration in leaf that was significantly higher in combined treatment (T2), suggesting the ABA biosynthesis was triggered in leaf by the ABA application. Both T1 and T2 resulted in an increase in proline, H2O2 and MDA contents while the exogenous ABA alleviated the increase in MDA content. ABA application decreased the degradation of chlorophyll, and counteracted, at least in part, the decrease in maximal PSII efficiency (Fv/Fm) and quantum efficiency of PSII (ΦPSII). Overproduction of H2O2 in T1 was followed by increasing activities of CAT, GPX, GR, and APX, which was further improved by the ABA treatment (T2). A decrease in H2O2 level with increasing stress in T2 showed that ABA highly induced antioxidative defense system which was found to be vanished progressively in T1. The results clearly suggest that the tolerant cultivar showed an enhanced protective system against drought conditions, and the foliar application of ABA further improved its tolerance by triggering the over expression of antioxidative defense system.

Key words: ABA, Sugarcane, Drought tolerance, Antioxidative enzyme, H2O2, Chlorophyll fluorescence


[1] Duan B L, Yang Y Q, Lu Y W, Helena K, Frank B, Li C Y. Interactions between water deficits, ABA, and provenances in Picea asperata. J Exp Bot, 2007, 58: 3025-3036

[2] Jiang M Y, Zhang J H. Abscisic acid and antioxidant defense in plant Cells. Acta Bot Sin, 2004, 46: 1-9

[3] Ikegami K, Okamoto M, Seo M, Koshiba T. Activation of abscisic acid biosynthesis in the leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana in response to water deficit. J Plant Res, 2009, 122: 235-243

[4] Zhang J H, Jia W S, Yang J C, Ismail A M. Role of ABA in integrating plant responses to drought and salt stresses. Field Crops Res, 2006, 97: 111-119

[5] Jiang M Y, Zhang J H. Role of abscisic acid in water stress induced antioxidant defence in leaves of maize seedlings. Free Radical Res, 2002, 36: 1001-1015

[6] Jiang M Y, Zhang J H. Water stress induced abscisic acid accumulation triggers the increased generation of reactive oxygen species and up regulates the activities of antioxidant enzymes in maize leaves. J Exp Bot, 2002, 53: 2401-2410

[7] Jiang M Y, Zhang J H. Effect of abscisic acid on active oxygen species, antioxidative defence system and oxidative damage in leaves of maize seedlings. Plant Cell Physiol, 2001, 42: 1265-1273

[8] Murata Y, Pei Z M, Mori I C, Schroeder J L. Abscisic acid activation of plasma membrane Ca2+ channels in guard cells requires cytosolic NAD(P)H and is differentially disrupted upstream and downstream of reactive oxygen species production in abi1-1 and abi2-1 protein phosphatase 2C mutants. Plant Cell, 2001, 13: 2513-2523

[9] Zhang X, Zhang L, Dong F C, Gao J F, Galbraith D W, Song C P. Hydrogen peroxide is involved in abscisic acid induced stomatal closure in Vicia faba. Plant Physiol, 2001, 126: 1438-1448

[10] Anderson M D, Prasad T K, Martin B A, Stewart C R. Differential gene expression in chilling acclimated maize seedlings and evidence for the involvement of abscisic acid in chilling tolerance. Plant Physiol, 1994, 105: 331-339

[11] Guan L Q, Scandalios J G. Two structurally similar maize cytosolic superoxide dismutase genes, Sod 4 and Sod4A, respond differentially to abscisic acid and high osmoticum. Plant Physiol, 1998, 117: 217-224

[12] Kamminaka H, Morita S, Tokumoto M, Masumura T, Tanaka K. Differential gene expression of rice superoxide dismutase isoforms to oxidative and environmental stresses. Free Radical Res, 1999, 31: 219-225

[13] Shao H B, Liang Z S, Shao M A, Wang B C. Changes of anti-oxidative enzymes and membrane peroxidation for soil water deficits among 10 wheat genotypes at seedling stage. Colloids Surfaces, 2005, 42: 107-113

[14] Wang W(王玮), Zhang F(张枫), Li D-Q(李德全). The effects of exogenous ABA on osmotic adjustment in maize roots under osmotic stress. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2002, 28(1): 121-126 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[15] Agarwal S, Sairam R K, Srivastava G C, Meena R C. Changes in antioxidant enzymes activity and oxidative stress by abscisic acid and salicylic acid in wheat genotypes. Biol Plant, 2005, 49: 541-550

[16] Li C Y, Yin C Y, Liu S R. Different responses of two contrasting Populus davidiana populations to exogenous abscisic acid application. Environ Exp Bot, 2004, 51: 237-246

[17] Gong M, Li Y J, Chen S Z. Abscisic acid-induced thermotolerance in maize seedlings is mediated by calcium and associated with antioxidant systems. J Plant Physiol, 1998, 153: 488-496

[18] Hu XCalcium-calmodulin is required for abscisic acid-induced antioxidant defense and functions both upstream and downstream of H2O2 production in leaves of maize (Zea mays) plants. New Phytol, 2007, 173: 27-38, Jiang M, Zhang J, Zhang A, Lin F, Tan M.

[19] Health R L, Packer L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Archives Biochem Biophysics, 1968, 125: 189-198

[20] Bates L S, Waldren R P, Teare I D. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant Soil, 1973, 39: 205-207

[21] Brennan T, Frenkel C. Involvement of hydrogen peroxide in the regulation of senescence in pear. Plant Physiol, 1977, 59: 411-416

[22] Aebi H. Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol, 1984, 105: 121-126

[23] Schaedle M, Bassham J A. Chloroplast glutathione reductase. Plant Physiol, 1977, 59: 1011-1012.

[24] Nakano Y, Asada K. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol, 1981, 22: 867-880

[25] Zheng X, Van Huystee R B. Peroxidase regulated elongation of segments from peanut hypocotyls. Plant Sci, 1992, 81: 47-56

[26] Liu J, Jiang M Y, Zhou Y F, Liu Y L. Production of polyamines is enhanced by endogenous abscisic acid in maize seedlings subjected to salt stress. J Integr Plant Biol, 2005, 47: 1326-1334

[27] Gomez C A, Arbona V, Jacas J, Primo M E, Talon M. Abscisic acid reduces leaf abscission and increases salt tolerance in citrus plants. J Plant Growth Regul, 2003, 21: 234-240

[28] Iqbal M, Ashraf M, Rehman S, Rha E S. Does polyamine seed pretreatment modulate growth and levels of some plant growth regulators in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants under salt stress? Bot Studies, 2006, 47: 239-250

[29] Smirnoff N, Cumbes Q J. Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of compatible solutes. Phytochemistry, 1989, 28: 1057-1060

[30] Bassi R, Rigoni F, Giacometti G M. Chlorophyll binding proteins with antenna function in higher plants and green algae. Photochem Photobiol, 1990, 52: 1187-1206

[31] Kause G H, Weis E. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: The basis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 1991, 42: 313-349

[32] Jiang M Y, Zhang J H. Involvement of plasma membrane NADPH oxidase in abscisic acid and water stress-induced antioxidant defense in leaves of maize seedling. Planta, 2002, 215: 1022-1030

[33] Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi S K. Gene expression and signal transduction in water stress response. Plant Physiol, 1997, 115: 327-334
[1] 崔致远, 秦晨展, 刘星雨, 张海, 曾康, 黄国强, 徐景升. 甘蔗类四跨膜蛋白ScTSPAN18与6K2互作应答SCMV侵染研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1618-1630.
[2] 金昱何, 王雪菲, 徐张一娃, 缪怡宁, 蒋云杰, 伊莹, 缪德麟, 朱静仪, 钟一帆, 陈铭亨, 方芳, 刘鹏. 外源激素对低温胁迫下大豆叶片叶绿素荧光参数及抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1817-1829.
[3] 田春艳, 陆鑫, 吴才文, 徐超华, 刘家勇, 边芯, 桃联安. 基于荧光SSR的甘蔗创新种质遗传多样性分析及育种潜力评估[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1057-1072.
[4] 杨宗桃, 杨婷, 王禹童, 艾静, 李燕烨, 刘家勇, 邓军, 赵勇, 张跃彬. 甘蔗CLC基因家族鉴定与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 722-734.
[5] 孔娜, 刘涛, 刘文婷, 陈刚, 文利超, 邓智超, 郭梅, 李伟, 郭永峰. 烟草NtCEP7基因克隆及其编码小肽在苗期抗旱中的作用分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 249-261.
[6] 刘海波, 张蕾, 王立琦, 石晓丽, 周文莹, 崔国贤, 佘玮. 苎麻BnGCL1基因响应干旱胁迫的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 14-27.
[7] 张清怡, 肖义涛, 李秋霞, 张钰石, 张明才, 李召虎. 渗透胁迫下不同玉米品种幼苗ABA合成及生理生化响应差异[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 221-232.
[8] 万慧兰, 吴华英, 曾丹, 钱禛锋, 赵昌祖, 廖然超, 何丽莲, 李富生. 蔗茅耐寒相关基因EfWRKY51克隆分析及功能验证[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2048-2059.
[9] 张建鹏, 王国瑞, 别海, 叶飞宇, 马晨晨, 梁小菡, 鲁晓民, 尚霄丽, 曹丽茹. 转录因子ZmMYB153通过ABA信号调节气孔运动增强玉米苗期抗旱性[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1827-1837.
[10] 尹雨萌, 王雁楠, 康志河, 乔守晨, 卞倩倩, 李亚蔚, 曹郭郑, 赵国瑞, 徐丹丹, 杨育峰. 甘薯谷胱甘肽S-转移酶基因IbGSTU7的克隆及功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1736-1746.
[11] 李培华, 李杰, 孟祥宇, 孙玉晨, 冯永佳, 李云丽, 刁邓超, 赵雯, 吴玮, 韩德俊, 张嵩午, 郑炜君. 高温胁迫下冷型小麦的抗逆性评估及其生理响应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1118-1130.
[12] 金欣欣, 宋亚辉, 苏俏, 杨永庆, 李玉荣, 王瑾. 冀花系列高油酸花生抗旱性鉴定与综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 797-811.
[13] 阳新月, 肖人滈, 张林茜, 唐铭均, 孙光燕, 杜康, 吕长文, 唐道彬, 王季春. 不同生育期涝渍对甘薯抗逆生理特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 744-754.
[14] 王语新, 陈天羽, 翟红, 张欢, 高少培, 何绍贞, 赵宁, 刘庆昌. 甘薯激酶基因IbHT1的克隆及抗旱性功能鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 301-311.
[15] 何梅, 张佳蕾, 范士凯, 孟静静, 王建国, 郭峰, 李新国, 万书波, 杨莎. 花生抗旱基因AhCPK8及其互作蛋白GAPDH的克隆及分子鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2713-2726.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2