欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (04): 579-586.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.00579

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

利用酵母双杂交法检测甘蓝SCR与SRK之间的相互作用

罗兵1,3,薛丽琰1,**,朱利泉1,*,张贺翠1,彭一波1,陈松1,杨红1,杨昆1,李成琼2,王小佳2,*   

  1. 1 西南大学植物生理生物化学实验室, 重庆400716; 2 西南大学重庆市蔬菜学重点实验室, 重庆400716；3常熟理工学院生物与食品工程学院，常熟 215500
  • 收稿日期:2010-09-17 修回日期:2011-01-06 出版日期:2011-04-12 网络出版日期:2011-02-24
  • 通讯作者: 朱利泉, E-mail: zhuliquan@swu.edu.cn, Tel: 023-68250794, Fax:023-68251914; 王小佳, E-mail: wxj@swu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(30971849)资助。

Detection of Interactions between SCR and SRK in Brassica oleracea L. by Yeast Two-Hybrid System

LUO Bing1,3,XUE Li-Yan1,**,ZHU Li-Quan1,*,ZHANG He-Cui1,PENG Yi-Bo1,CHEN Song1,YANG Hong1,YANG Kun1,LI Cheng-Qiong2,WANG Xiao-Jia2,*   

  1. 1 Plant Physiology and Biochemistry Laboratory of Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China; 2 Key Laboratory in Olericulture of Chongqing, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China; 3 College of Biology and Food Engineering, Changshu Institute of Technology, Changshu 215500, China
  • Received:2010-09-17 Revised:2011-01-06 Published:2011-04-12 Published online:2011-02-24
  • Contact: 朱利泉, E-mail: zhuliquan@swu.edu.cn, Tel: 023-68250794, Fax:023-68251914; 王小佳, E-mail: wxj@swu.edu.cn

PDF

2427

被引次数

10

摘要： 为深入研究甘蓝S位点受体激酶(SRK)和S位点富含半胱氨酸蛋白(SCR)间相互识别的分子机理，以具有典型自交不亲和性的甘蓝D3为材料，利用巢式PCR分别扩增SRK胞外域(eSRK)和SCR，通过酵母双杂交检测二者之间的相互作用。并利用同源重组技术将eSRK与GAL4报告基因DNA活化域融合(pGADT7eSRK)以及SCR与GAL4报告基因DNA结合域融合(pGBKT7SCR)。两种重组质粒分别转化酵母Y187和Y2HGold后未出现自激活现象。融合的二倍体酵母(pGADT7eSRK× pGBKT7SCR)能在选择性固体培养基(SD/–Ade/–His/–Leu/–Trp/X-a-Gal/AbA)上生长，并且菌落呈蓝色。结果表明, eSRK与SCR蛋白能够相互结合, 为深入研究二者作用位点成功建立了一个技术平台。

关键词: 甘蓝, S位点受体激酶(SRK), S位点富含半胱氨酸蛋白(SCR), 酵母双杂交

Abstract: For further study on mechanism of the mutual recognition between S-locus receptor kinase (SRK) and S-locus Cysteine-rich protein (SCR) in Brassica, the extracellular domains of SRK (named as eSRK) and SCR were amplified by nested PCR using Brassica oleracea L. ‘D3’ with the trait of typical self-incompatibility (SI), and the interactions between eSRK and SCR was detected by the yeast two-hybrid system. Then the full-length eSRK and the SCR were fused to the Gal4 DNA activation domain (designated pGADT7eSRK) and the Gal4 DNA binding domain (designated pGBKT7SCR) by the gene homologous recombination technique respectively. Then the pGADT7eSRK plasmid and the pGBKT7SCR were transformed into the Y187 yeast strain and the Y2HGold yeast strain respectively. The two transformed yeast strains did not exhibit autoactivation. The diploids, which were fused by the transformed Y2HGold yeast strain and the transformed Y187 yeast strain, grew on selective agar plates (SD/–Ade/–His/– Leu/–Trp/X-a-Gal/AbA), and the resulting colonies were blue, which strongly indicated that eSRK and SCR could combine with each other.

Key words: Brassica oleracea L., Self-incompatibility, S-locus receptor kinase (SRK), S-locus cysteine-rich protein (SCR), Yeast two-hybrid system

[1]Bateman A J. Self-incompatibility systems in angiosperms: III. Cruciferae Hered, 1955, 9: 53–68
[2]Wheeler M J, Graaf B H J, Hadjiosif N, Perry R M, Poulter N S, Osman K. Identification of the pollen self-incompatibility determinant in Papaver rhoeas. Nature, 2009, 459: 992–995
[3]Stein J C, Howlett B, Boyes D C, Nasrallah M E, Nasrallah J B. Molecular cloning of a putative receptor protein kinase gene encoded at the self-incomaptibility locus of Brassica oleracea. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1991, 88: 8816–8820
[4]Takayama S, Shimosato H, Shiba H, Funato M, Che F S, Watanabe M, Iwano M, Isogai A. Direct ligand–receptor complex interaction controls Brassica self-incompatibility. Nature, 2001, 413: 534–538
[5]Schopfer C R, Nasrallah M E, Nasrallah J B. The male determinant of self-incompatibility in Brassica. Science, 1999, 286: 1697–1700
[6]Suzuki G, Kai N, Hirose T, Nishio T, Takayama S, Isogai A, Watanabe M, Hinata K. Genomic organization of the S locus: identification and characterization of genes in SLG/SRK region of S9 haplotype of Brassica campestris (syn. rapa). Genetics, 1999, 153: 391–400
[7]Nasrallah J B, Yu S M, Nasrallah M E. Self-incompatibility genes of Brassica oleracea: expression, isolation and structure. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA, 1988, 85: 5551–5555
[8]Shiba H, Takayama S, Iwano M, Shimosato H, Funato M, Nakagawa T, Che F S, Suzuki G, Watanabe M, Hinata K, Isogai A. A pollen coat protein, SP11/SCR, determines the pollen S-specificity in the self-incompatibility of Brassica species. Plant Physiol, 2001, 125: 2095–2103
[9]Rong X-Y(荣小营), Zhu Li-Q(朱利泉), Wang Y(王永), Gao Q-G(高启国), Chen X-D(陈晓丹), Yang Y(杨洋), Wang X-J(王小佳). Localization of MLPK and SSP genes for self-incompatibility of Brassica oleracea by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2009, 35(5): 802–808 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]Takasaki T, Hatakeyama K, Suzuki G, Watanabe M, Isogai A, Hinata K. The S receptor kinase determines self-incompatibility in Brassica stigma. Nature, 2000, 403: 913–916
[11]Gao Q-G(高启国), Song M(宋明), Niu Y(牛义), Yang K(杨昆), Zhu L-Q(朱利泉), Wang X-J(王小佳). Test of interaction between THL1 and SRK from Brassica oleracea L. in self-incompatibility signaling process. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2008, 34(6): 1–10 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]Nasrallah J B, Nasrallah M E. Pollen-stigma signaling in the sporophytic self-incompatibility response. Plant Cell, 1993, 5: 1325–1335
[13]Kachroo A, Schopfer C R, Nasrallah M E, Nasrallah J B. Allele-specific receptor-ligand interactions in Brassica self-incompatibility. Science, 2001, 293: 1824–1826
[14]Shimosato H, Yokota N, Shiba H, Iwano M, Entani T, Che F S, Watanabe M, Isogai A, Takayama S. Characterization of the SP11/SCR high-affinity binding site involved in self/nonself recognition in Brassica self-incompatibility. Plant Cell, 2007, 19: 107–117
[15]Higashiyama T. Peptide Signaling in Pollen–Pistil Interactions. Plant Cell Physiol, 2010, 51: 177–189
[16]Oender K, Niedermayr P, Hintner H, Richter K, Koller L, Trost A, Bauer J W, Hundsberger H. Relative quantitation of protein–protein interaction strength within the yeast two-hybrid system via fluorescence β-galactosidase activity detection in a high-throughput and low-cost manner. ASSAY Drug Dev Technol, 2006, 4: 709–719
[17]Bower M S, Matias D D, Fernandes C E, Mazzurco M, Gu T, Rothstein S, Goring D R. Two members of the thioredoxin-h family interact with the kinase domain of a Brassica S locus receptor kinase. Plant Cell, 1996, 8: 1641–1650
[18]Gu T, Mazzurco M, Matias D D, Sulaman W, Goring D R. Binding of a novel arm repeat protein to the kinase domain of the S locus receptor kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1998, 95: 382–387
[19]Mazzurco M, Sulaman W, Helen E, Cock J M, Goring D R. Further analysis of the interactions between the Brassica S receptor kinase and three interacting proteins (ARC1, THL1 and THL2) in the yeast two-hybrid system. Plant Mol Biol, 2001, 45: 365–376
[20]Naithani S, Chookajorn T, Ripoll D R, Nasrallah J B. Structural modules for receptor dimerization in the S-locus receptor kinase extracellular domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2007, 104: 12211–12216
[21]Nishio T, Kusaba M, Sakamoto K, Ockendon D J. Polymorphism of the kinase domain of the S-locus receptor kinase gene (SRK) in Brassica oleracea L. Theor Appl Genet, 1997, 95: 335–342
[22]Watanabe M, Ito A, Takada Y, Ninomiya C, Kakizaki T, Takahata Y, Hatakeyam K, Hinata K, Suzuki G, Takasaki T, SattaY, Shiba H, Takayama S, Isogai A. Highly divergent sequences of the pollen self-incompatibility (S) gene in class-I S haplotypes of Brassica campestris (syn. rapa) L. FEBS Lett, 2000, 473: 139–144
[23]Nasrallah M E, Liu P, Broyles S S, Boggs N A, Nasrallah J B. Natural variation in expression of self-incompatibility in Arabidopsis thaliana: Implications for the evolution of selfing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2004, 101: 16070–16074
[24]Kemp B P, Doughty J. S cysteine-rich (SCR) binding domain analysis of the Brassica self-incompatibility S-locus receptor kinase. New Phytol, 2007, 175: 619–629
[25]Fujimoto R, Sugimura T, Nishio T. Gene conversion from SLG to SRK resulting in self-compatibility in Brassica rapa. FEBS Lett, 2006, 580: 425–430
[1] 左同鸿, 张贺翠, 曾静, 朱利泉. 甘蓝自交不亲和相关基因BoPUB3L的克隆与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1698-1710.
[2] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
[3] 王楚锐, 李开祥, 赵志, 肖麓, 唐国永, 赵志刚, 徐亮, 杜德志, 柳海东. 甘蓝型春油菜早花基因BnCRY2功能位点KASP标记的开发及应用[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 708-721.
[4] 马毅娜, 吴晓明玉, 李藕琪, 王圆, 陈丽, 张盈川, 赵伦, 文静, 傅廷栋, 沈金雄. Bna-miR1040-EIF3A模块调控油菜开花时间的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 349-362.
[5] 王彬, 蒙姜宇, 邱浩良, 贺亚军, 钱伟. 甘蓝型油菜BnaDUF579基因家族的鉴定与表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2100-2110.
[6] 夏琦, 郭滢, 王坤美, 王思忆, 巨建业, 彭雅雯, 刘忠松, 夏石头. 甘蓝型油菜种子和种皮中水杨酸含量与原花色素积累的关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1189-1197.
[7] 王晓琳, 刘忠松, 康雷, 杨柳. 甘蓝型油菜角果长度和每角粒数基因定位以及角果皮转录组动态分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 888-899.
[8] 张琴, 戴成, 马朝芝. 生长素响应报告基因转化甘蓝型油菜及各组织GUS动态信号分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 667-675.
[9] 孙程明, 周晓婴, 陈锋, 张维, 王晓东, 彭琦, 郭月, 高建芹, 胡茂龙, 付三雄, 张洁夫. 长链非编码RNA (lncRNA)在甘蓝型油菜分枝角度调控中的功能分析与预测[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 559-567.
[10] 黄绒, 周渠晨, 陈楚铭, 罗倩, 易东, 杜常欢, 黄祥宇, 盛锋, 杜雪竹. 过表达BnNRT2.3-like对油菜氮素吸收利用及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3184-3197.
[11] 巨建业, 杨柳, 陈浩, 康雷, 夏石头, 刘忠松. 单细胞核转录组分析揭示油菜种皮分化过程和种子颜色差异原因[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2860-2874.
[12] 张雯, 李玉, 王创, 石磊, 丁广大. 甘蓝型油菜磷转运蛋白BnaPT48的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2983-2995.
[13] 胡志康, 舒雨, 王会, 杨莹莹, 廖俊宇, 刘佳, 成洪涛, 郭晨, 张园园, 刘胜毅, 胡琼, 梅德圣, 李超. 甘蓝型油菜苗期耐碱性种质综合鉴定与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2681-2692.
[14] 王晨, 贺丹, 姚敏, 邱萍, 何昕, 熊兴华, 康雷, 刘忠松, 钱论文. 基于转录组分析鉴定甘蓝型油菜开花候选基因以及BnaCOR27功能验证[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2693-2704.
[15] 徐林珊, 郜耿东, 王宇, 王家星, 杨吉招, 武亚瑞, 张宵寒, 常影, 李真, 谢雄泽, 龚德平, 王晶, 葛贤宏. 甘蓝型油菜漆酶基因家族成员表达模式及与茎秆抗折力的关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 134-148.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2