欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (04): 583-590.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2016.00583

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

气象因子对广西新植蔗和宿根蔗茎伸长的影响

陈燕丽1,2,3，冯利平1,*，丁美花2,3,*，莫伟华2,3，匡昭敏2,3   

  1. 1 中国农业大学资源与环境学院, 北京 100193; 2 广西气象减灾研究所 / 国家卫星气象中心遥感应用试验基地, 广西南宁 530022; 3 气象GIS应用联合实验室, 广西南宁 530022
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-07 修回日期:2016-01-11 出版日期:2016-04-12 网络出版日期:2016-01-25
  • 通讯作者: 冯利平, E-mail: fenglp@cau.edu.cn; 丁美花, E-mail: E-mail:dding1030@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2013CB430200), 国家公益性行业(气象)专项重点项目(GYHY201406030)和广西自然科学基金项目(2013GXNSFAA019282)资助。

Effects of Meteorological Factors on Stalk Elongation in New-planting and Ratooning Sugarcane

CHEN Yan-Li1,2,3,FENG Li-Ping1,*,DING Mei-Hua2,3,KUANG Zhao-Min2,3   

  1. 1 College of Resources and Environment, China Agriculture University, Beijing 100094, China; 2 Guangxi Meteorological Disaster Mitigation Institute / Remote Sensing Application and Validation Base of NSMC, Nanning 530022, China; 3 Joint Laboratory for GIS Application, Nanning 530022, China
  • Received:2015-04-07 Revised:2016-01-11 Published:2016-04-12 Published online:2016-01-25
  • Contact: 冯利平, E-mail: fenglp@cau.edu.cn; 丁美花, E-mail: E-mail:dding1030@163.co
  • Supported by:

    This study was supported by the National Key Basic Research Program of China (2013CB430200), the Special Fund for Meteorological Research in the Public Interest (GYHY201406030) and the National Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi (2013GXNSFAA019282).

RichHTML

PDF

899

被引次数

3

摘要：

利用2000－2011年广西4个农业气象试验站的甘蔗旬茎伸长量和气象资料, 分析宿根蔗和新植蔗在气象因子影响下茎伸长的差异。结果表明, 新植蔗和宿根蔗茎生长具有明显差异, 新植蔗茎伸长期茎高明显大于宿根蔗, 进入茎生长期时的茎高本底值较小, 茎总伸长量较大但其伸长期较短。多数气象因子与新植蔗、宿根蔗旬茎伸长量极显著相关(P<0.05), 且对新植蔗的影响大于宿根蔗。对新植蔗、宿根蔗茎伸长起直接正作用的主要因子均为最低气温、相对湿度、最高气温, 起直接负作用的主要因子为平均气温、气压, 积温、降雨量则通过其他气象因子起明显的间接作用。旬茎伸长量对降雨量存在较明显的滞后性, 新植蔗滞后期多为2旬, 宿根蔗多为1旬, 新植蔗对日照时数的响应也存在滞后现象, 两者对温度类气象因子及相对湿度均无滞后。

关键词: 甘蔗, 茎伸长量, 气象因子, 新植蔗, 宿根蔗

Abstract:

Sugarcane stalk elongation is the most important factor for the development evaluation and yield estimation, on which meteorological factors have significant effects. Differences between new planting sugarcane and ratooning sugarcane in development and response to meteorological factors need to be analyzed for promoting agricultural production. In this paper, taking new-planting sugarcane and ratooning sugarcane of Guangxi as the research materials, observedsugarcane agronomic data and meteorological information at four agro-meteorological experimental stations from 2000 to 2011 were used to analyze the relationship between stalk elongation and meteorological factors that were precipitation, relative humidity, maximum temperature, minimum temperature, mean temperature, air pressure, and sunshine hours at different stages. The results show that there was an obvious difference between new-planting sugarcane and ratooning sugarcane in stalk height. During the sugarcane stem elongation, compared with ratooning sugarcane, new-planting sugarcane had a higher stalk height with a lower background in most of years, besides, its total stem elongation amount was much more but elongation duration was short. There was a significant correlation between stalk elongation and most meteorological factors in both new-planting sugarcane and ratooning sugarcane. The effect of most meteorological variables was larger in new-planting sugarcane than in ratooning sugarcane. The correlation between new-planting sugarcane and meteorological factors are obviously higher than that of ratoon sugarcane. Minimum temperature, relative humidity and maximum temperature played a direct positive role on stalk elongation in both new-planting sugarcane and ratooning sugarcane, and average temperature and air pressure played a direct negative role, meanwhile, accumulated temperature and rainfall play a significant indirect effect through other meteorological factors. There was a significant lag in the response of stem elongation to rainfall for both new-planting sugarcane and ratooning sugarcane. Compared with ratooning sugarcane, lag of new-planting sugarcane was longer. The total lag time was about 20 days for new-planting sugarcane and 10 days for ratooning sugarcane. There was also a lag in response to sunshine hours for new-planting sugarcane, but no lag to temperature for both sugarcanes.

Key words: Sugarcane, stalk elongation, Meteorological factors, New-planting sugarcane, atoon sugarcane

[1]钟楚, 周臣, 李金惠, 陈邵华, 鲁正刚. 气候变化对云南耿马甘蔗生长发育的影响. 中国糖料, 2011, (3): 38–42

Zhong C, Zhou C, Li H, Chen S H, Lu Z G. Effects of climate change on growth and development of sugarcane in Gengma, Yunnan province . Sugar Crops China, 2011, (3): 38–42 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[2]陈志彪, 朱鹤健. 漳州甘蔗生长的主要影响因素分析及改善措施. 中国农业气象, 2002, 23(2): 40–43

Chen Z B, Zhu H. Analysis of main factors affecting sugarcane growth and the measures of increasing yield in Zhangzhou. Chin J Agrometeorol, 2002, 23(2): 40–43 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[3]苏永秀, 李政, 孙涵. 基于GIS的广西甘蔗种植气候区划. 中国农业气象, 2006, 27: 252–255

Su Y X, Li Z, Sun H. Climate division of sugarcane planting based on GIS in Guangxi. Chin J Agrometeorol, 2006, 27: 252–255 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[4]罗武. 罗城县甘蔗产量与气象条件分析. 现代农业科技, 2011, (3): 304–305

Luo W. Analysis of sugarcane yield and meteorological condition in Luocheng county. Modern Agric Sci Technol, 2011, (3): 304–305 (in Chinese)

[5]刘建波, 彭懿, 陈秋波. 海南甘蔗种植的气候适宜性分析及区划. 中国农业气象, 2009, 30(增刊2): 254–256

Liu J B, Peng Y, Chen Q B. Cliamte suitability and regionalization of sugarcane cultivation in Hainan. Chin J Agrometeorol, 2009, 30(suppl-2): 254–256 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[6]谭宗琨, 欧钊荣, 何燕. 全球蔗糖主产国甘蔗产量与气象条件关系的初步研究. 中国农业气象, 2007, 28: 71–75

Tan Z K, Ou Z R, He Y. A preliminary study on relationship between sugarcane yields and meteorological conditions in main sucrose production countries worldwide. Chin J Agrometeorol, 2007, 28: 71–75 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[7]欧钊荣, 谭宗琨, 何燕, 匡昭敏, 陈汇林, 莫小华, 黄中艳. 影响我国甘蔗主产区甘蔗产量的关键气象因子及其丰欠指标. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 36: 10407–10410

Ou Z R, Tan Z K, He Y, Kuang Z M, Chen H L, Mo X H, Huang Z Y. The key meteorological factors affecting the sugarcane yield in major production areas in China and their high low yield indices. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2008, 36: 10407–10410 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[8]古丽, 黄智刚, 李文宝, 刘永贤. 1980—2007年南宁蔗区甘蔗气象产量变化及影响因子分析. 南方农业学报, 2011, 42: 492－495

Gu L, Huang Z G, Li W B, Liu Y X. Analysis on climate factors affecting sugarcane meteorological yield in Nanning area during 1980－2007. J Southern Agric, 2011, 42: 492–495 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[9]谢平, 张羽, 陈圣南. 影响湛江甘蔗产量与糖分的气候因子变化特征. 中国农业气象, 2007, 28(2): 136–139

Xie P, Zhang Y, Chen S N. Change characteristics of climate factors affecting sugarcane yield and sugar content in Zhanjiang city. Chin J Agrometeorol, 2007, 28(2): 136–139 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[10]关志明. 甘蔗产量与大伸长期气象要素的统计分析. 甘蔗糖业, 1984, (9): 49–52

Guan Z M. Statistical analysis of sugarcane yield and meteorological elements for stalk elongation. Sugarcane Canesugar, 1984, (9): 49–52 (in Chinese)

[11]吴炫柯, 刘永裕, 刘梅. 气象因子对甘蔗茎伸长的影响. 气象, 2008, 34(6): 116–118

Wu X K, Liu Y Y, Liu M. Effects of meteorological factors on sugarcane stalk elongation. Meteorol Monthly, 2008, 34(6): 116–118 (in Chinese)

[12]吴炫柯, 李家文, 刘永裕. 主要气象因子对甘蔗茎伸长的通径分析. 中国糖料, 2008, (3): 25–26

Wu X K, Li J W, Liu Y Y. Path analysis of main climatic factors on sugarcane height growth. Sugar Crops China, 2008, (3): 25–26 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[13]吴炫柯, 段毅强, 陈利东. 甘蔗茎伸长量与气象水分参数的相关性分析. 气象科技, 2011, 39(1): 110–113

Wu X K, Duan Y Q, Chen L D. Correlation analysis of sugarcane stem elongation and meteorological moisture parameters. Meteorol Sci Technol, 2011, 39(1): 110–113 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[14]蒋菊生, 谢贵水, 林位夫. 气象因子与甘蔗生长的关系及其预测模型的建立. 甘蔗, 1999, 6(1): 1–5

Jiang J S, Xie G S, Lin D F. Relationship between meteorological factors and the height growth of sugarcane and predict model establishment. Sugarcane, 1999, 6(1): 1–5 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[15]谢贵水, 蒋菊生, 蔡明道. 影响甘蔗株高生长的气象因子通径分析. 甘蔗, 2003, 10(1): 7–11

Xie G S, Jiang J S, Cai M D. Path analysis of climatic factors on sugarcane height growth. Sugarcane, 2003, 10(1): 7–11 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[16]钟楚, 金莉莉, 周臣, 鲁正刚, 李金惠, 陈绍华. 云南耿马甘蔗茎伸长量与气象因子的关系及其模拟预测. 中国农业气象, 2011, 32: 582–586

Zhong C, Jin L L, Zhou C, Lu Z G, Li J H, Chen S H. Relationship between sugarcane stem elongation and meteorological factors and elongation prediction in Gengma, Yunnan. Chin J Agrometeorol, 2011, 32: 582–586 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[17]国家气象局. 农业气象观测规范(上册). 北京: 气象出版社, 1993. pp 20–21

China Meteorological Administration. Agricultural meteorological observation specification(top volume) . Beijing: China Meteorological Press, 1993. 20–21 (in Chinese)

[18]吴炫柯, 韦剑锋, 陈利东. 甘蔗茎伸长量与土壤水分含量的相关性. 中国糖料, 2013, (4): 60–61

Wu X K, Wei J F, Chen L D. Correlation between sugarcane stem elongation and soil moisture. Sugar Crops China, 2013, (4): 60–61 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[19]王建林, 齐华, 房全孝,于贵瑞. 水稻、大豆、玉米光合速率的日变化及其对光强响应的滞后效应. 华北农学报, 2007, 22(2): 119–124

Wang J L, Qi H, Fang X Q, Yu G R. Diurnal changes of photosynthesis and its hysteresis to light in rice, soybean and maize. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 2007, 22(2): 119–124

[20]陈燕丽, 莫伟华, 罗永明, 莫建飞, 黄永璘, 丁美花. 基于气候信息的喀斯特地区植被EVI模拟. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(9): 187–194

Chen Y L, Mo W H, Luo Y M, Mo J F, Huang Y L, Ding M H. EVI simulation of vegetation in Karst rocky area using climatic factors, 2015, 31(9): 187–194
[1] 肖健, 陈思宇, 孙妍, 杨尚东, 谭宏伟. 不同施肥水平下甘蔗植株根系内生细菌群落结构特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1222-1234.
[2] 周慧文, 丘立杭, 黄杏, 李强, 陈荣发, 范业赓, 罗含敏, 闫海锋, 翁梦苓, 周忠凤, 吴建明. 甘蔗赤霉素氧化酶基因ScGA20ox1的克隆及功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1017-1026.
[3] 孔垂豹, 庞孜钦, 张才芳, 刘强, 胡朝华, 肖以杰, 袁照年. 不同施肥水平下丛枝菌根真菌对甘蔗生长及养分相关基因共表达网络的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 860-872.
[4] 杨宗桃, 刘淑娴, 程光远, 张海, 周营栓, 商贺阳, 黄国强, 徐景升. 甘蔗类泛素蛋白UBL5应答SCMV侵染及其与SCMV-6K2的互作[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 332-341.
[5] 张海, 程光远, 杨宗桃, 刘淑娴, 商贺阳, 黄国强, 徐景升. 甘蔗PsbR亚基应答SCMV侵染及其与SCMV-6K2的互作[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1522-1530.
[6] 傅华英, 张婷, 彭文静, 段瑶瑶, 许哲昕, 林艺华, 高三基. 甘蔗新品种(系)苗期白条病人工接种抗性鉴定与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1531-1539.
[7] 苏亚春, 李聪娜, 苏炜华, 尤垂淮, 岑光莉, 张畅, 任永娟, 阙友雄. 甘蔗割手密种类甜蛋白家族鉴定及栽培种同源基因功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(7): 1275-1296.
[8] 黄宁, 惠乾龙, 方振名, 李姗姗, 凌辉, 阙友雄, 袁照年. 甘蔗β-胡萝卜素异构酶基因家族的鉴定、定位和表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(5): 882-893.
[9] 王恒波, 陈姝琦, 郭晋隆, 阙友雄. 甘蔗抗黄锈病G1标记的分子检测及候选抗病基因WAK的分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 577-586.
[10] 杨帆, 钟晓媛, 李秋萍, 李书先, 李武, 周涛, 李博, 袁玉洁, 邓飞, 陈勇, 任万军. 再生稻次适宜区迟播栽对不同杂交籼稻淀粉RVA谱的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 701-713.
[11] 张荣跃, 王晓燕, 杨昆, 单红丽, 仓晓燕, 李婕, 王长秘, 尹炯, 罗志明, 李文凤, 黄应昆. 甘蔗新品种及主栽品种对褐锈病抗性与Bru1基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(2): 376-382.
[12] 仓晓燕, 夏红明, 李文凤, 王晓燕, 单红丽, 王长秘, 李婕, 张荣跃, 黄应昆. 甘蔗优良品种(系)对黑穗病的抗性评价[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(11): 2290-2296.
[13] 张海, 程光远, 杨宗桃, 王彤, 刘淑娴, 商贺阳, 赵贺, 徐景升. 甘蔗ScCRT1基因克隆及其应答SCMV侵染分子机制的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(1): 94-103.
[14] 郑清雷,余陈静,姚坤存,黄宁,阙友雄,凌辉,许莉萍. 甘蔗Rieske Fe/S蛋白前体基因ScPetC的克隆及表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(6): 844-857.
[15] 罗俊,林兆里,李诗燕,阙友雄,张才芳,杨仔奇,姚坤存,冯景芳,陈建峰,张华. 不同土壤改良措施对机械压实酸化蔗地土壤理化性质及微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(4): 596-613.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2