欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (5): 1248-1261.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.02065

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于无人机和地面图像的田间水稻冠层参数估测与评价

王泽1(), 周钦阳1(), 刘聪1, 穆悦1, 郭威2, 丁艳锋1,*(), 二宫正士1,2,*()   

  1. 1南京农业大学作物表型组学交叉研究中心 / 南京农业大学前沿交叉研究院 / 江苏省现代作物生产协同创新中心 / 现代作物生产省部共建协同创新中心, 中国江苏南京 210095
    2东京大学农学生命科学研究院生态调和农学机构 / 国际田间作物表型研究实验室, 日本东京 188-0002
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-09 接受日期:2021-09-09 出版日期:2022-05-12 网络出版日期:2021-10-19
  • 通讯作者: 丁艳锋,二宫正士
  • 作者简介:王泽, E-mail: 2019101170@njau.edu.cn;
    周钦阳, E-mail: 2019201022@njau.edu.cn第一联系人：**同等贡献
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省科技厅创新能力建设计划项目——作物表型组学研究科学中心项目(BM2018001);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目资助(KYRC202002)

Estimation and evaluation of paddy rice canopy characteristics based on images from UAV and ground camera

WANG Ze1(), ZHOU Qin-Yang1(), LIU Cong1, MU Yue1, GUO Wei2, DING Yan-Feng1,*(), NINOMIYA Seishi1,2,*()   

  1. 1Plant Phenomics Research Center, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production co-sponsored by Province and Ministry, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, China
    2International Field Phenomics Research Laboratory, Institute for Sustainable Agro-ecosystem Services, University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Midori-cho, Nishi-Tokyo, Tokyo 188-0002, Japan
  • Received:2020-10-09 Accepted:2021-09-09 Published:2022-05-12 Published online:2021-10-19
  • Contact: DING Yan-Feng,NINOMIYA Seishi
  • About author:First author contact:**Contributed equally to this work
  • Supported by:
    Plant Phenomics Research Program of Science and Technology Department of Jiangsu Province(BM2018001);Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(KYRC202002)

RichHTML

22

PDF

524

摘要：

田间水稻表型监测可用于分析水稻产量相关性状, 对指导水稻栽培管理以及产量预测具有重要意义。本研究以3种氮肥处理下6个不同栽培品种的水稻为研究对象, 估测并评价了水稻冠层的主要表型参数, 以探讨利用图像分析方法评价多品种及栽培环境下田间水稻长势的适用性。基于无人机和田间固定相机图像, 本研究通过图像处理、三维建模和机器学习自动测算出田间水稻冠层覆盖度、株高、穗数, 并结合实际测量结果进行了精度评价。结果表明: (1) 基于无人机图像使用决策树分类模型提取的水稻冠层图像与人工勾绘结果一致性较好(Qseg均值为0.75, 方差为0.08), 由此计算的冠层覆盖度与人工勾绘计算的冠层覆盖度相关性较高(R2= 0.83, RMSE = 5.36%); (2) 使用冠层高度模型估测的各小区水稻株高均值与田间实测高度均值相关性较高(R2= 0.81, RMSE = 9.81 cm), 但整体呈现低估; (3) 基于地面图像使用决策树分类和形态参数过滤得到的穗数计数结果与实测穗数相关性较高(R2= 0.83, RMSE = 10.99)。总体而言, 结合图像分析算法, 应用低空无人机遥感技术高通量自动化估测水稻冠层覆盖度、株高的精度较高, 而应用地面平台进行稻穗精确识别的潜力很大, 可用于分析氮肥施用量对水稻长势指标的影响及不同品种对氮肥的响应情况, 对田间水稻表型信息的深入挖掘及实际产量预测具有重要意义。

关键词: 水稻表型, 表型平台, 长势参数, 株高, 冠层覆盖度, 穗数计数

Abstract:

Phenotypic monitoring of rice in the field can be used to analyze traits related to rice yield, which is of great significance to guide rice cultivation management and yield prediction. In this study, to explore the applicability of image analysis methods to evaluate rice growth in different fields under multiple cultivars and cultivation environments, we estimated and evaluated the main phenotypic parameters of rice canopy in paddy fields with six different cultivars under three nitrogen treatments. Based on UAV and field fixed camera images, this study used image processing, three-dimensional modeling and machine learning to automatically estimate rice canopy coverage, plant height, and panicle number in the field, and evaluated the accuracy combining with the actual measurement results. The results showed that the rice canopy segmentation based on the decision tree classification model using UAV images were consistent with the manually segmented results (mean value and variance of Qseg was 0.75 and 0.08), and the rice canopy coverage calculated by this method had a relatively high correlation with that calculated by manually segmentation (R2= 0.83, RMSE = 5.36%). The average rice plant height estimated by the canopy height model in each plot had a high correlation with the mean plant height measured in the field (R2= 0.81, RMSE = 9.81 cm), but it was underestimated as a whole. Based on the ground image, the panicle count results obtained by decision tree classification and morphological parameter filter had a relatively high correlation with the measured panicle number (R2= 0.83, RMSE = 10.99). Overall, combined with image analysis algorithm, using low-altitude UAV remote sensing technology to high-throughput and automatically estimate rice canopy coverage and plant height can achieve relatively high accuracy; using image from ground camera to accurately count the rice panicle number is of significant potentiality. The proposed pipeline in this research could be used to analyze nitrogen effect on rice growth status and evaluate nitrogen response of different rice cultivars, and it is of great significance for mining rice field phenotypic information and yield prediction.

Key words: rice phenotype, phenotyping platform, growth parameters, plant height, canopy coverage, panicle counting

图1

试验地点及示意图 A: 试验地点; B: 小区布局。中国地图来源: 标准地图服务系统(GS(2020)3183号)。"

图2

2019年试验小区品种及氮肥处理分布 A1: 中浙优8号; A2: Y两优900; A3: 兆优5431; B1: 南粳9108; B2: 宁粳8号; B3: 武运粳23。灰色区域: N0; 浅绿色: N150; 深绿: N300。"

附图1

2020年试验小区品种及氮肥处理分布 a1：黄华占;a2：Y两优900;a3：中浙优1;a4：甬优1540;b1：宁粳8号;b2：南粳46;b3：9优418;b4：甬优538; 绿色区域：30 kg hm-2 (N1);紫色：10%减氮 270 kg hm-2 (N2);综色：20%减氮 240 kg hm-2 (N3);红色：使用缓释肥的20%减氮 240 kg hm-2 (N4);浅绿色：30%减氮 210 kg hm-2 (N5)。"

图3

基于太阳能的田间作物图像自动采集传输装置"

图4

基于地面固定相机平台和低空无人机平台水稻冠层表型参数估测的总体研究方法路线"

图5

2019年各小区RGB正射影像(A)和冠层表面高度(B)"

图6

稻穗分割及去噪 A: 决策树分类模型输出图像; B: 特征筛选后输出图像。"

图7

2019年基于决策树模型的无人机图像分类结果 A: 正射图; B: 模型分类二值图。"

图8

水稻冠层覆盖度计算值与实测值相关分析及线性回归"

附图2

2020年基于决策树模型的无人机图像分类结果 (A：正射图;B：模型分类二值图)"

图9

水稻株高计算值与实测值相关分析及线性回归"

表1

2019年水稻冠层表型参数数值统计"

品种
Rice variety		 栽培品种
Cultivar		 施氮量
Nitrogen application (kg hm-2)		 估算冠层覆盖度
Estimated canopy coverage (%)		 校正后株高
Calibrated height (cm)
籼稻
Japonica		 中浙优8
Zhongzheyou 8		 0 61.76 ± 4.72 b 67.91 ± 3.44 c
150 87.30 ± 3.22 a 91.34 ± 5.37 b
300 84.86 ± 3.58 a 101.73 ± 0.45 a
Y两优900
Y Liangyou 900		 0 61.49 ± 1.29 b 58.47 ± 7.81 b
150 90.96 ± 3.61 a 78.54 ± 3.48 a
300 84.69 ± 5.47 a 87.82 ± 3.83 a
兆优5431
Zhaoyou 5431		 0 84.72 ± 5.99 b 67.41 ± 5.29 b
150 97.65 ± 0.77 a 93.08 ± 1.94 a
300 90.45 ± 2.62 ab 100.56 ± 2.95 a
粳稻
Indica		 南粳9108
Nanjing 9108		 0 54.05 ± 4.40 b 48.67 ± 2.99 b
150 90.95 ± 3.43 a 66.56 ± 2.13 a
300 90.16 ± 3.21 a 71.10 ± 1.53 a
宁粳8号
Ningjing 8		 0 39.53 ± 2.12 b 45.29 ± 8.51 b
150 70.79 ± 2.46 a 60.42 ± 1.19 a
300 68.82 ± 5.66 a 66.79 ± 1.45 a
武运粳23
Wuyunjing 23		 0 60.65 ± 7.28 b 46.79 ± 4.58 b
150 90.35 ± 3.70 a 64.13 ± 0.42 a
300 89.66 ± 3.02 a 67.89 ± 1.91 a

图10

人工标记与算法识别稻穗计数结果对比"

图11

自动识别稻穗结果 A: 原图; B: 人工标记; C: 算法识别; D: 人工标记与算法识别差别。粉色代表由算法识别后的穗, 蓝色代表人工标记的穗。"

[1] 段凌凤, 杨万能. 水稻表型组学研究概况和展望. 生命科学, 2016, 10:1129-1137.
Duan L F, Yang W N. Research advances and future scenarios of rice phenomics. Chin Bull Life Sci, 2016, 10:1129-1137 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[2] 朱德峰, 程式华, 张玉屏, 林贤青, 陈惠哲. 全球水稻生产现状与制约因素分析. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43:474-479.
Zhu D F, Cheng S H, Zhang Y P, Lin X Q, Chen H Z. Analysis of status and constraints of rice production in the world. Sci Agric Sin, 2010, 43:474-479 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3] 彭永彬, 谢先芝. 表型组学在水稻研究中的应用. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34:300-306.
Peng Y B, Xie X Z. Application of phenomics in rice research. Chin J Rice Sci, 2020, 34:300-304 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] 章曼. 基于高光谱遥感的水稻生长监测研究. 西北农林科技大学硕士学位论文, 陕西杨凌, 2015.
Zhang M. Based on Hyperspectral Remote Sensing of the Rice Growth Monitoring Research. MS Thesis of Northwest Agriculture and Forest University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China, 2015 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[5] Han L, Yang G J, Dai H Y, Xu B, Yang H, Feng H K, Li Z H, Yang X D. Modeling maize above-ground biomass based on machine learning approaches using UAV remote-sensing data. BioMed Central, 2019, 15:10.
[6] Busemeyer L, Mentrup D, Möller K, Wunder E, Alheit K, Hahn V, Maurer H, Reif J, Würschum T, Müller J, Rahe F, Ruckelshausen A. BreedVision—a multi-sensor platform for non-destructive field-based phenotyping in plant breeding. Sensors, 2013, 13:2830-2847.
doi: 10.3390/s130302830 pmid: 23447014
[7] Walter A, Liebisch F, Hund A. Plant phenotyping: from bean weighing to image analysis. Plant Methods, 2015, 11:14.
doi: 10.1186/s13007-015-0056-8 pmid: 25767559
[8] Jin X L, Liu S Y, Baret F, Hemerlé M, Comar A. Estimates of plant density of wheat crops at emergence from very low altitude UAV imagery. Remote Sens Environ, 2017, 198:105-114.
doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.007
[9] 张玉盛, 肖欢, 吴勇俊, 杨小粉, 汪泽钱, 伍湘, 向焱赟, 张小毅, 敖和军. 粒肥施用时期对水稻镉积累的影响初探. 华北农学报, 2020, 35(2):144-151.
Zhang Y S, Xiao H, Wu Y J, Yang X F, Wang Z Q, Wu X, Xiang Y B, Zhang X Y, Ao H J. Effect of application period of granular fertilizer on cadmium accumulation in rice. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 2020, 35(2):144-151 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[10] 韩焕豪, 崔远来, 时元智, 余双, 陈劲丰. SunScan冠层分析仪在水稻叶面积指数测量中的应用. 灌溉排水学报, 2015, 34(8):44-48.
Han H H, Cui Y L, Shi Y Z, Yu S, Chen J F. Application of SunScan canopy analysis system to measure leaf area index of rice. J Irrig Drain, 2015, 34(8):44-48 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[11] Toshihiro S, Cao V P, Aikihiko K, Khang D N, Masayuki Y. Analysis of rapid expansion of inland aquaculture and triple rice-cropping areas in a coastal area of the Vietnamese Mekong Delta using MODIS time-series imagery. Landscape Urban Plan, 2009, 92:34-46.
doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.02.002
[12] Xiao X M, Boles S, Frolking S, Li C S, Jagadeesh Y.B, Salas W, Moore B. Mapping paddy rice agriculture in South and Southeast Asia using multi-temporal MODIS images. Remote Sens Environ, 2005, 100:95-113.
doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2005.10.004
[13] Yang G J, Liu J G, Zhao C J, Li Z H, Huang Y B, Yu H Y, Xu B, Yang X D, Zhu D M, Zhang X Y, Zhang R Y, Feng H K, Zhao X Q, Li Z H, Li H L, Yang H. Unmanned aerial vehicle remote sensing for field-based crop phenotyping: current status and perspectives. Front Plant Sci, 2017, 8:1111.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01111
[14] 陈仲新, 郝鹏宇, 刘佳, 安萌, 韩波. 农业遥感卫星发展现状及我国监测需求分析. 智慧农业, 2019, 1(1):32-42.
Chen Z X, Hao P Y, Liu J, An M, Han B. Technical demands for agricultural remote sensing satellites in China. Smart Agric, 2019, 1(1):32-42 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15] 汪沛, 罗锡文, 周志艳, 臧英, 胡炼. 罗基于微小型无人机的遥感信息获取关键技术综述. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(18):1-12.
Wang P, Luo X W, Zhou Z Y, Zang Y, Hu L. Key technology for remote sensing information acquisition based on micro UAV. Trans CSAE, 2014, 30(18):1-12 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[16] Desai S V, Balasubramanian V N, Fukatsu T, Ninomiya S, Guo W. Automatic estimation of heading date of paddy rice using deep learning. Plant Methods, 2019, 15:1-11.
doi: 10.1186/s13007-018-0385-5
[17] 丁国辉, 许昊, 温明星, 陈佳玮, 王秀娥. 基于经济型低空无人机对小麦重要产量表型性状的多生育时期获取和自动化分析. 农业大数据学报, 2019, 1(2):19-31.
Ding G H, Xu H, Wen M X, Chen J W, Wang X E. Developing cost-effective and low-altitude UAV aerial phenotyping and automated phenotypic analysis to measure key yield-related traits for bread wheat. J Agric Big Data, 2019, 1(2):19-31 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[18] Guo W, Rage U K, Ninomiya S. Illumination invariant segmentation of vegetation for time series wheat images based on decision tree model. Comput Electron Agric, 2013, 96:58-66.
doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2013.04.010
[19] Duan T, Zheng B Y, Guo W, Ninomiya S, Guo Y, Chapman S C. Comparison of ground cover estimates from experiment plots in cotton, sorghum and sugarcane based on images and ortho-mosaics captured by UAV. Funct Plant Biol, 2017, 44:169.
doi: 10.1071/FP16123
[20] 赵锋, 王克俭, 苑迎春. 基于颜色特征的AdaBoost算法的麦穗识别的研究. 作物杂志, 2014, (1):141-144.
Zhao F, Wang K J, Yuan Y C. Study on wheat spike identification based on color features and AdaBoost Algorithm. Crops, 2014, (1):141-144 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21] Cointault F, Guerin D, Guillemin J-P, Chopinet B. In-field Triticum aestivum ear counting using colour-texture image analysis. New Zeal J Crop Hortic, 2008, 36:117-130.
[22] Zhou C Q, Liang D, Yang X D, Yang H, Yue J B, Yang G J. Wheat ears counting in field conditions based on multi-feature optimization and TWSVM. Front Plant Sci, 2018, 9:1024.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01024
[23] Fernandez-Gallego J A, Kefauver S C, Gutiérrez N A, Nieto- Taladriz M T, Araus J L. Wheat ear counting in-field conditions: high throughput and low-cost approach using RGB images. Plant Methods, 2018, 14:22.
doi: 10.1186/s13007-018-0289-4 pmid: 29568319
[24] Xiong X, Duan L F, Liu L B, Tu H F, Yang P, Wu D, Chen G X, Xiong L Z, Yang W N, Liu Q. Panicle-SEG: a robust image segmentation method for rice panicles in the field based on deep learning and superpixel optimization. Plant Methods, 2017, 13:104.
doi: 10.1186/s13007-017-0254-7 pmid: 29209408
[25] Olsen P A, Ramamurthy K N, Ribera J, Chen Y H, Thompson A M, Luss R, Tuinstra M, Abe N. Detecting and counting panicles in sorghum images. The 5th IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics, Turin, Italy, 2018.
[26] 段凌凤, 熊雄, 刘谦, 杨万能, 黄成龙. 基于深度全卷积神经网络的大田稻穗分割. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(12):202-209.
Duan L F, Xiong X, Liu Q, Yang W N, Huang C L. Field rice panicles segmentation based on deep full convolutional neural network. Trans CSAE, 2018, 34(12):202-209 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27] 黄国祥. RGB颜色空间及其应用研究. 中南大学博士学位论文, 湖南长沙, 2002.
Huang G X. RGB Color Space and It’s Application. PhD Dissertation of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China, 2002 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28] 秦绪佳, 王慧玲, 杜轶诚, 郑红波, 梁震华. Hsv色彩空间的retinex结构光图像增强算法. 计算机辅助设计与图形学学报, 2013, 25:488-493.
Qin X J, Wang H L, Du Y C, Zheng H B, Liang Z H. Structured light image enhancement algorithm based on Retinex in HSV color space. J Comp-Aied Desig Comp Grap, 2013, 25:488-493.
[29] 张宏建. Lab色彩模式在图像处理中的应用. 福建电脑, 2011, 27(1):146-147.
Zhang H J. Application of Lab color mode in image processing. J Fujian Comput, 2011, 27(1):146-147 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[30] Guo W, Zheng B Y, Duan T, Fukatsu T, Chapman S C, Ninomiya S. EasyPCC: benchmark datasets and tools for high-throughput measurement of the plant canopy coverage ratio under field conditions. Sensors, 2017, 17:798.
doi: 10.3390/s17040798
[31] Guo W, Zheng B Y, Potgieter A B, Diot J, Watanabe K, Noshita K, Jordan D R, Wang X M, Watson J, Ninomiya S, Chapman S C. Aerial imagery analysis-quantifying appearance and number of sorghum heads for applications in breeding and agronomy. Front Plant Sci, 2018, 9:1544.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01544
[32] 段凌凤. 水稻植株穗部性状在体测量研究. 华中科技大学博士学位论文, 湖北武汉, 2013.
Duan L F. Panicle Traits Measurement of Rice Plant in vivo. PhD Dissertation of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China, 2013 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[33] 王秀娟, 康孟珍, 华净, de Reffye P. 从群体到个体尺度—基于数据的DSSAT和GreenLab作物模型连接探索. 智慧农业, 2021, 3(2):77-87.
Wang X J, Kang M Z, Hua J, de Reffye P. From stand to organ level: a trial of connecting DSSAT and GreenLab crop model through data. Smart Agric, 2021, 3(2):77-87 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34] Bouman B, Keulen H V, Laar H, Rabbinge R. The ‘School of de Wit’ crop growth simulation models: a pedigree and historical overview. Agric Syst, 1996, 52:171-198.
doi: 10.1016/0308-521X(96)00011-X
[35] Woebbecke D M, Meyer G E, Bargen K V, Mortensen D A. Color indices for weed identification under various soil, residue, and lighting conditions. Trans ASAE, 1995, 38:259-269.
doi: 10.13031/2013.27838
[36] Meyer G E, Neto J C. Verification of color vegetation indices for automated crop imaging applications. Comput Electron Agric, 2008, 63:282-293.
doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2008.03.009
[37] Burgos-Artizzu X P, Ribeiro A, Guijarro M, Pajares G. Real-time image processing for crop/weed discrimination in maize fields. Comput Electron Agric, 2011, 75:337-346.
doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2010.12.011
[38] Pérez A J, López F, Benlloch J V, Christensen S. Colour and shape analysis techniques for weed detection in cereal fields. Comput Elect Agric, 2000, 25:197-212.
doi: 10.1016/S0168-1699(99)00068-X
[39] 李存军. 基于数字照片特征的小麦覆盖度自动提取研究. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2004, 30(6):64-70.
Li C J. Study on automatic extraction of wheat coverage based on digital photo features. J Zhejiang Univ(Agric Life Sci Edn), 2004, 30(6):64-70 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[40] Lukina E V, Stone M L, Raun W R. Estimating vegetation coverage in wheat using digital images. J Plant Nutr, 1999, 22:341-350.
doi: 10.1080/01904169909365631
[41] 计野. 无人机遥感图像内部畸变校正算法及应用研究. 电子科技大学博士学位论文, 四川成都, 2010.
Ji Y. Research on Internal Distortion Correction Algorithm and Application of UAV Remote Sensing Image. PhD Dissertation of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 2010 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[42] Weng J, Cohen P. Camera calibration with distortion models and accuracy evaluation. Patt Anal Mach Intell IEEE Trans, 1992, 14:965-980.
doi: 10.1109/34.159901
[43] 牛庆林, 冯海宽, 杨贵军, 李长春, 杨浩, 徐波. 基于无人机数码影像的玉米育种材料株高和LAI监测. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(5):73-82.
Niu Q L, Feng H K, Yang G J, Li C C, Yang H, Xu B. Monitoring plant height and leaf area index of maize breeding material based on UAV digital images. Trans CSAE, 2018, 34(5):73-82 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[44] 胡鹏程. 基于无人机近感的高通量田间作物几何表型研究. 中国农业大学博士学位论文, 北京, 2018.
Hu P C. High-throughput Field Morphological Phenotyping using UAV-based Proximal Sensing. PhD Dissertation of China Agricultural University, Beijing, China, 2018 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[45] 姜海燕, 徐灿, 陈尧, 成永康. 基于田间图像的局部遮挡小尺寸稻穗检测和计数方法. 农业机械学报, 2020, 51(9):152-162.
Jiang H Y, Xu C, Chen Y, Cheng Y K. A detecting and counting method for small-sized and occluded rice panicles based on in-field images. Trans CSAM, 2020, 51(9):152-162 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[46] Madec S, Jin X, Lu H, Solan B D, Liu S, Duyme F. Ear density estimation from high resolution RGB imagery using deep learning technique. Agric For Meteorol, 2019, 264:225-234.
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.10.013
[47] Xiong H, Cao Z, Lu H, Madec S, Shen C. TasselNetv2: in-field counting of wheat spikes with context-augmented local regression networks. Plant Methods, 2019, 15:150.
doi: 10.1186/s13007-019-0537-2
[1] 胡文静, 李东升, 裔新, 张春梅, 张勇. 小麦穗部性状和株高的QTL定位及育种标记开发和验证[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1346-1356.
[2] 于春淼, 张勇, 王好让, 杨兴勇, 董全中, 薛红, 张明明, 李微微, 王磊, 胡凯凤, 谷勇哲, 邱丽娟. 栽培大豆×半野生大豆高密度遗传图谱构建及株高QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1091-1102.
[3] 付美玉, 熊宏春, 周春云, 郭会君, 谢永盾, 赵林姝, 古佳玉, 赵世荣, 丁玉萍, 徐延浩, 刘录祥. 小麦矮秆突变体je0098的遗传分析与其矮秆基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 580-589.
[4] 韩玉洲, 张勇, 杨阳, 顾正中, 吴科, 谢全, 孔忠新, 贾海燕, 马正强. 小麦株高QTL Qph.nau-5B的效应评价[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(6): 1188-1196.
[5] 沈文强, 赵冰冰, 于国玲, 李凤菲, 朱小燕, 马福盈, 李云峰, 何光华, 赵芳明. 优良水稻染色体片段代换系Z746的鉴定及重要农艺性状QTL定位及其验证[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(3): 451-461.
[6] 付虹雨, 崔国贤, 李绪孟, 佘玮, 崔丹丹, 赵亮, 苏小惠, 王继龙, 曹晓兰, 刘婕仪, 刘皖慧, 王昕惠. 基于无人机遥感图像的苎麻产量估测研究[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(9): 1448-1455.
[7] 姜朋,何漪,张旭,吴磊,张平平,马鸿翔. 宁麦9号与扬麦158株高及其构成因素的遗传解析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(6): 858-868.
[8] 马娟, 曹言勇, 王利锋, 李晶晶, 王浩, 范艳萍, 李会勇. 利用WGCNA鉴定玉米株高和穗位高基因共表达模块[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(3): 385-394.
[9] 霍强,杨鸿,陈志友,荐红举,曲存民,卢坤,李加纳. 基于QTL定位和全基因组关联分析筛选甘蓝型油菜株高和一次有效分枝高度的候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(02): 214-227.
[10] 崔月,陆建农,施玉珍,殷学贵,张启好. 蓖麻株高性状主基因+多基因遗传分析[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(7): 1111-1118.
[11] 王瑞,凌亮,詹鹏杰,于纪珍,楚建强,平俊爱,张福耀. 控制高粱分蘖与主茎株高一致性的基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(6): 829-838.
[12] 黄聪,李晓方,李定国,林忠旭. 利用陆地棉MAGIC群体定位产量、生育期和株高性状的QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(9): 1320-1333.
[13] 刘忠祥,杨梅,殷鹏程,周玉乾,何海军,邱法展. 玉米株高主效QTL qPH3.2精细定位及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(9): 1357-1366.
[14] 陈伟刚,郭建斌,徐志军,喻博伦,邱西克,黄莉,宋延滨,陈玉宁,周小静,罗怀勇,刘念,任小平,姜慧芳. 花生出仁率和株高的QTL定位分析[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(8): 1142-1151.
[15] 李英双,胡丹,聂蛟,黄科慧,张玉珂,张园莉,佘恒志,方小梅,阮仁武,易泽林. 甜荞株高和茎粗的遗传分析[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(8): 1185-1195.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2