欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (9): 2390-2399.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.11070

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

高度特异性小麦ATG8抗体的研制及其在细胞自噬检测中的应用

李永波1(), 崔德周1, 黄琛1, 隋新霞1, 樊庆琦1,*(), 楚秀生1,2,*   

  1. 1.山东省农业科学院作物研究所 / 黄淮北部小麦生物学与遗传育种重点实验室 / 小麦玉米国家工程实验室, 山东济南 250100
    2.山东师范大学生命科学学院, 山东济南 250014
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-06 接受日期:2021-11-30 出版日期:2022-09-12 网络出版日期:2022-07-15
  • 通讯作者: 樊庆琦,楚秀生
  • 作者简介:E-mail: lyb920327@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东省农业良种工程项目(2019LZGC01702);国家自然科学基金青年项目(32001542);山东省自然科学基金青年项目(ZR2020QC114);山东省农科院创新工程: “主要农作物育种关键技术”项目(CXGC2021A09)

Preparation of highly specific wheat ATG8 antibody and its application in the detection of autophagy

LI Yong-Bo1(), CUI De-Zhou1, HUANG Chen1, SUI Xin-Xia1, FAN Qing-Qi1,*(), CHU Xiu-Sheng1,2,*   

  1. 1. Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic improvement in North Huang-Huai River Valley, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs / National Engineering Laboratory for Wheat and Maize, Jinan 250100, Shandong, China
    2. School of Life Science, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250000, Shandong, China
  • Received:2021-08-06 Accepted:2021-11-30 Published:2022-09-12 Published online:2022-07-15
  • Contact: FAN Qing-Qi,CHU Xiu-Sheng
  • Supported by:
    Agricultural Variety Improvement Project of Shandong Province(2019LZGC01702);National Natural Science Foundation of China (Youth Project)(32001542);Shandong Natural Science Foundation (Youth Project)(ZR2020QC114);“Key Crop Breeding Technology”(CXGC2021A09)

摘要:

细胞自噬是一种进化上高度保守的溶酶体/液泡降解途径, 对机体适应各种生物或非生物胁迫, 以及维持自身正常生长发育具有重要的意义。自噬相关蛋白8 (autophagy-related protein 8, ATG8)是检测自噬的金标准。目前由于缺乏特异性好的小麦ATG8抗体, 导致小麦细胞自噬研究进展缓慢。本研究通过人工合成小麦ATG8蛋白序列上的一段18个氨基酸的多肽作为抗原去免疫兔子, 成功获得了高度特异性的小麦ATG8多克隆抗体。该抗体不仅能够识别小麦根、叶及种子中的ATG8蛋白条带, 而且可以在根、叶中检测到细胞自噬结构, 并首次在小麦籽粒中实现了细胞自噬结构的检测。本研究研制的小麦ATG8抗体, 除了能够检测到小麦中常见的ATG8a-h等8种典型类型外, 还能检测到一种非典型的新的ATG8蛋白, 为深入开展植物细胞自噬调控机制研究以及优异新基因挖掘提供了最佳方法学基础。

关键词: 小麦, 自噬, 多克隆抗体, ATG8蛋白

Abstract:

Autophagy is an evolutionarily highly conserved lysosomal/vacuolar degradation pathway, which is of great significance for the body to adapt to various biotic or abiotic stresses and maintain its normal growth and development. Autophagy-related protein 8 (ATG8) is the gold standard for detecting autophagy. At present, the lack of specific wheat ATG8 antibody has led to slow progress in the research of wheat autophagy. In this study, an 18-amino acid polypeptide of wheat ATG8 protein sequence was artificially synthesized as an antigen to immunize rabbits, and a highly specific wheat ATG8 polyclonal antibody was successfully obtained. The antibody can not only recognize the ATG8 protein bands in roots, leaves, and seeds of wheat, but also can detect autophagy structures in roots and leaves, and autophagy structures in wheat grains were detected for the first time. Besides eight typical types of ATG8a-h antibody found in wheat, a typical new ATG8 protein was detected by wheat ATG8 antibody developed in this study, These results provide the best methodological basis for further study on the regulation mechanism of plant autophagy and excavation of excellent genes.

Key words: wheat, autophagy, polyclonal antibody, autophagy-related protein 8

图1

ATG8抗血清效价分析"

图2

ATG8抗体特异性检测 SDS胶浓度为12.5%。"

表1

质谱鉴定ATG8蛋白"

起始
Start
序列
Sequence
结束
End
蛋白鉴定
Protein ID
名称
Name
4 SSFKLEHPLER 14 U3Q019 Autophagy-related protein 8
4 TCFKTEHPLER 14 Q7XY24 Autophagy-related protein 8
24 EKYSDRIPVIVEK 36 U3Q019 Autophagy-related protein 8
24 EKYADRIPVIVEK 36 Q7XY24 Autophagy-related protein 8
37 ADKSDVPEIDKKK 49 Q7XY24 Autophagy-related protein 8
37 AGKSDIPDIDK 47 U3Q019 Autophagy-related protein 8
49 KYLVPADLTVGQFVYVVR 66 U3Q019 Autophagy-related protein 8
69 IKLSAEKAIFIFVK 82 U3Q019 Autophagy-related protein 8
83 NTLPPTAALMSAIYEENKDEDGFLYMTYSGENTFG 117 U3Q019 Autophagy-related protein 8

图3

Western blot检测ATG8蛋白 α-Tubulin用作内参, SDS胶浓度为15%; 3-MA: 3-MA+PEG-8000; 浓度为10 mmol L-1; 处理时间为48 h; 总蛋白上样量均为1 mg; 误差是3次实验数据平均值±SD。不同的字母代表显著性差异。."

图4

小麦根部细胞自噬结构检测 白色箭头指示的是自噬结构, 标尺为500 μm。选取不同处理根部的相同部位, 置于10×10倍显微镜下, 并通过ANOVA软件对每个视野中的自噬结构数量进行统计学分析。不同的字母代表显著性差异。误差是3次实验数据平均值±SD。"

图5

小麦根部细胞自噬结构统计分析 选取不同处理根部的相同部位, 置于10×10倍显微镜下, 并通过ANOVA软件对每个视野中的自噬结构数量进行统计学分析。不同的字母代表显著性差异。误差是3次实验数据平均值±SD。"

图6

小麦叶部细胞自噬结构检测 白色箭头指示自噬结构, 标尺: 50 μm。选取不同处理叶部的相同部位, 置于10×20倍显微镜下, 并通过ANOVA软件对每个视野中的自噬结构数量进行统计学分析, 不同的字母代表显著性差异。误差是3次实验数据平均值±SD。"

图7

小麦叶部细胞自噬结构统计分析 选取不同处理叶部的相同部位, 置于10×20倍显微镜下, 并通过ANOVA软件对每个视野中的自噬结构数量进行统计学分析, 不同的字母代表显著性差异。误差是3次实验数据平均值±SD。"

图8

小麦籽粒自噬结构检测 白色短箭头指示胚乳中的自噬结构, 黄色短箭头指示果皮中的自噬结构, 长箭头指示籽粒的不同结构; 标尺为200 μm。Al (Aleurone layer): 糊粉层; En (Endosperm): 胚乳; Pe (Pericarp): 果皮。"

图9

不同类型的小麦ATG8蛋白表达、纯化及抗体识别 SDS胶浓度为15%。"

图10

同源系统进化树分析 红色矩形区域为ATG8新型蛋白, ATG8j; ATG8a (AGW81789.1), ATG8b (AGW81790.1), ATG8c (AGW81791.1), ATG8d (AGW81792.1), ATG8e (AGW81793.1), ATG8f (AGW81794.1), ATG8g (AGW81795.1), ATG8h (AGW81796.1), ATG8j (A0A3B6PL31)。"

[1] Ghosh A, Jana M, Modi K, Gonzalez F J, Sims K B, Berry-Kravis E, Pahan K. Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha induces lysosomal biogenesis in brain cells: implications for lysosomal storage disorders. J Biol Chem, 2015, 290: 10309-10324.
[2] Feng Y, He D, Yao Z, Klionsky D J. The machinery of macroautophagy. Cell Res, 2014, 24: 24-41.
doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.168
[3] Yin Z, Pascual C, Klionsky D J. Autophagy: machinery and regulation. Microb Cell, 2016, 3: 588-596.
doi: 10.15698/mic2016.12.546
[4] Nakatogawa H, Ichimura Y, Ohsumi Y. Atg8, a ubiquitin-like protein required for autophagosome formation, mediates membrane tethering and hemifusion. Cell, 2007, 130: 165-178.
pmid: 17632063
[5] Ichimura Y, Kirisako T, Takao T, Satomi Y, Shimonishi Y, Ishihara N, Mizushima N, Tanida I, Kominami E, Ohsumi M, Noda T, Ohsumi Y. A ubiquitin-like system mediates protein lipidation. Nature, 2000, 408: 488-492.
doi: 10.1038/35044114
[6] Yoshimoto K, Hanaoka H, Sato S, Kato T, Tabata S, Noda T, Ohsumi Y. Processing of ATG8s, ubiquitin-like proteins, and their deconjugation by ATG4s are essential for plant autophagy. Plant Cell, 2004, 16: 2967-2983.
pmid: 15494556
[7] Bassham D C. Methods for analysis of autophagy in plants. Methods, 2015, 75: 181-188.
doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.09.003 pmid: 25239736
[8] Thompson A R, Doelling J H, Suttangkakul A, Vierstra R D. Autophagic nutrient recycling in Arabidopsis directed by the ATG8 and ATG12 conjugation pathways. Plant Physiol, 2005, 138: 2097-2110.
pmid: 16040659
[9] Chung T, Phillips A R, Vierstra R D. ATG8 lipidation and ATG8-mediated autophagy in Arabidopsis require ATG12 expressed from the differentially controlled ATG12A AND ATG12B loci. Plant J, 2010, 62: 483-493.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04166.x
[10] Kuzuoglu-Ozturk D, Cebeci Yalcinkaya O, Akpinar B A, Mitou G, Korkmaz G, Gozuacik D, Budak H. Autophagy-related gene, TdAtg8, in wild emmer wheat plays a role in drought and osmotic stress response. Planta, 2012, 236: 1081-1092.
doi: 10.1007/s00425-012-1657-3 pmid: 22569921
[11] Merkulova E A, Guiboileau A, Naya L, Masclaux-Daubresse C, Yoshimoto K. Assessment and optimization of autophagy monitoring methods in Arabidopsis roots indicate direct fusion of autophagosomes with vacuoles. Plant Cell Physiol, 2014, 55: 715-726.
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcu041
[12] Lin W, Zhuang X. Using microscopy tools to visualize autophagosomal structures in plant cells. Methods Mol Biol, 2017, 1662: 257-266.
[13] Pu Y, Bassham D C. Detection of autophagy in plants by fluorescence microscopy. Methods Mol Biol, 2016, 1450: 161-172.
[14] Fan T, Yang W, Zeng X, Xu X, Xu Y, Fan X, Luo M, Tian C, Xia K, Zhang M. A rice autophagy gene OsATG8b is involved in nitrogen remobilization and control of grain quality. Front Plant Sci, 2020, 11: 588.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00588 pmid: 32582228
[15] 吴洪波, 刘刚, 张路路, 王冬梅. 小麦ATG8的原核表达及其抗血清制备. 华北农学报, 2013, 28(1): 101-105.
Wu H B, Liu G, Zhang L L, Wang D M. Cloning and prokaryotic expression of ATG8 (a molecular marker of autophagy) gene from wheat and preparation of antiserum. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 2013, 28(1): 101-105. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16] Rappsilber J, Mann M, Ishihama Y. Protocol for micro- purification, enrichment, pre-fractionation and storage of peptides for proteomics using StageTips. Nat Protoc, 2007, 2: 1896-1906.
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.261 pmid: 17703201
[17] Li Y B, Cui D Z, Sui X X, Huang C, Huang C Y, Fan Q Q, Chu X S. Autophagic survival precedes programmed cell death in wheat seedlings exposed to drought stress. Int J Mol Sci, 2019, 20: 5777.
doi: 10.3390/ijms20225777
[18] Martinet W, Roth L, De Meyer G R Y. Standard Immunohistochemical assays to assess autophagy in mammalian tissue. Cells, 2017, 6: 17.
doi: 10.3390/cells6030017
[19] Ktistakis N T. Monitoring the localization of MAP1LC3B by indirect immunofluorescence. Cold Spring Harb Protoc, 2015, 2015: 751-755.
doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot086264 pmid: 26240409
[20] Zhang Q, Wang D, Zhang H, Wang M, Li P, Fang X, Cai X. Detection of autophagy processes during the development of nonarticulated laticifers in Euphorbia kansui Liou. Planta, 2018, 247: 845-861.
doi: 10.1007/s00425-017-2835-0 pmid: 29260395
[21] Bao Y, Mugume Y, Bassham D C. Biochemical methods to monitor autophagic responses in plants. Methods Enzymol, 2017, 588: 497-513.
[22] 林静. 腐败梭菌毒素单抗、多抗的制备及DAS_ELISA方法的初步建立. 山东农业大学硕士毕业论文, 山东泰安, 2019.
Lin J. Preparation of Monoclonal Antibody and Multiple Antibody against Clostridium septicums Alpha Toxin and Preliminary Establishment of DAS-ELISA. MS Thesis of Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an, Shandong, China, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23] 王传武, 赵德明. 用实验动物制备多克隆抗体: I. 免疫方案的优化. 实验动物科学与管理, 2002, 19(4): 40-44.
Wang C W, Zhao D M. Preparation of polyclonal antibody from experimental animals: I. Optimization of immololunization scheme. Lab Anim Sci Administr, 2002, 19(4): 40-44. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24] 刘希, 李齐, 郁飞. 拟南芥自噬蛋白ATG8e的原核表达及多克隆抗体制备. 江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(18): 47-51.
Liu X, Li Q, Yu F. Prokaryotic expression and polyclonal antibody preparation of Arabidopsis autophagy protein ATG8e. Jiangsu Agric Sci, 2018, 46(18): 47-51. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25] Hernandez-Garcia M S, Miranda-Ozuna J F T, Salazar-Villatoro L, Vazquez-Calzada C, Avila-Gonzalez L, Gonzalez-Robles A, Ortega-Lopez J, Arroyo R. Biogenesis of autophagosome in trichomonas vaginalis during macroautophagy induced by rapamycin-treatment and iron or glucose starvation conditions. J Eukaryot Microbiol, 2019, 66: 654-669.
doi: 10.1111/jeu.12712
[26] Bu F, Yang M, Guo X, Huang W, Chen L. Multiple functions of atg8 family proteins in plant autophagy. Front Cell Dev Biol, 2020, 8: 466.
doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00466
[27] 胡蕊洁, 杨向云, 贾磊, 李玉如, 项月, 岳洁瑜, 王华忠. 病毒介导的GFP-ATG8在小麦上的表达和在自噬活性监测上的应用. 作物学报, 2021, 47: 2371-2378.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.01094
Hu X J, Yang X Y, Jia L, Li Y R, Xiang Y, Yue J Y, Wang H J. Virus-mediated expression of GFP-ATG8 for autophagy monitoring in wheat. Acta Agron Sin, 2021, 47: 2371-2378. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28] Pottier M, Dumont J, Masclaux-Daubresse C, Thomine S. Autophagy is essential for optimal translocation of iron to seeds in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot, 2019, 70: 859-869.
[29] Zhen X, Li X, Yu J, Xu F. OsATG8c-mediated increased autophagy regulates the yield and nitrogen use efficiency in rice. Int J Mol Sci, 2019, 20: 4956.
doi: 10.3390/ijms20194956
[30] Sera Y, Hanamata S, Sakamoto S, Ono S, Kaneko K, Mitsui Y, Koyano T, Fujita N, Sasou A, Masumura T, Saji H, Nonomura K I, Mitsuda N, Mitsui T, Kurusu T, Kuchitsu K. Essential roles of autophagy in metabolic regulation in endosperm development during rice seed maturation. Sci Rep, 2019, 9: 18544.
[31] Hanaoka H, Noda T, Shirano Y, Kato T, Hayashi H, Shibata D, Tabata S, Ohsumi Y. Leaf senescence and starvation-induced chlorosis are accelerated by the disruption of an Arabidopsis autophagy gene. Plant Physiol, 2002, 129: 1181-1193.
pmid: 12114572
[32] Chung T, Suttangkakul A, Vierstra R D. The ATG autophagic conjugation system in maize: ATG transcripts and abundance of the ATG8-lipid adduct are regulated by development and nutrient availability. Plant Physiol, 2009, 149: 220-234.
doi: 10.1104/pp.108.126714
[33] Maqbool A, Hughes R K, Dagdas Y F, Tregidgo N, Zess E, Belhaj K, Round A, Bozkurt T O, Kamoun S, Banfield M J. Structural basis of host autophagy-related protein 8 (ATG8) binding by the Irish potato famine pathogen effector protein PexRD54. J Biol Chem, 2016, 291: 20270-20282.
[34] Xia K, Liu T, Ou Y J, Wang R, Fan T, Zhang M. Genome-wide identification, classification, and expression analysis of autophagy-associated gene homologues in rice (Oryza sativa L.). DNA Res, 2011, 18: 363-377.
doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsr024
[35] Zess E K, Jensen C, Cruz-Mireles N, De la Concepcion J C, Sklenar J, Stephani M, Imre R, Roitinger E, Hughes R, Belhaj K, Mechtler K, Menke F L H, Bozkurt T, Banfield M J, Kamoun S, Maqbool A, Dagdas Y F. N-terminal beta-strand underpins biochemical specialization of an ATG8 isoform. PLoS Biol, 2019, 17: e3000373.
[36] Pei D, Zhang W, Sun H, Wei X, Yue J, Wang H. Identification of autophagy-related genes ATG4 and ATG8 from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and profiling of their expression patterns responding to biotic and abiotic stresses. Plant Cell Rep, 2014, 33: 1697-1710.
doi: 10.1007/s00299-014-1648-x
[37] Seo E, Woo J, Park E, Bertolani S J, Siegel J B, Choi D, Dinesh-Kumar S P. Comparative analyses of ubiquitin-like ATG8 and cysteine protease ATG4 autophagy genes in the plant lineage and cross-kingdom processing of ATG8 by ATG4. Autophagy, 2016, 12: 2054-2068.
doi: 10.1080/15548627.2016.1217373
[1] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[2] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[3] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[4] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[5] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[6] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[7] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[12] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[13] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[14] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
[15] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!