欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (03): 461-468.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

以湖南和湖北大豆[Glycine max（L.）Merr.]为例分析影响遗传多样性评价的因素

关媛1;鄂文弟1,3;王丽侠1;关荣霞1;刘章雄1;常汝镇1;曲延英2;邱丽娟1,*   

  1. 1中国农业科学院作物科学研究所，国家农作物基因资源与遗传改良重大科学工程/农业部作物种质资源与生物技术重点开放实验室，北京 100081；2新疆农业大学，新疆乌鲁木齐 830052；3东北农业大学，教育部大豆生物学重点实验室，黑龙江哈尔滨 150030
  • 收稿日期:2006-01-26 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-03-12 网络出版日期:2007-03-12
  • 通讯作者: 邱丽娟

Analysis of Factors Influencing the Genetic Diversity Evaluation Using Two Soybean[Glycine max（L.）Merr.] Collections from Hunan and Hubei

GUAN Yuan 1;E Wen-Di 1,3; WANG Li-Xia1;GUAN Rong-Xia1;LIU Zhang-Xiong 1;CHANG Ru-Zhen 1;QU Yan-Ying 2;QIU Li-Juan 1,*   

  1. 1 National Key Facility of Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement / Key Laboratory of Crop Germplasm & Biotechnology, Ministry of Agriculture / Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081; 2 Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumchi 830052, Xinjiang; 3 Northeast Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Soybean biology. Ministry of Education, Harbin 150030, Heilongjiang, China
  • Received:2006-01-26 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-03-12 Published online:2007-03-12
  • Contact: QIU Li-Juan

PDF

1003

被引次数

22

摘要：

以不同来源大豆种质为材料进行基因组SSR分析，探讨大豆遗传多样性研究方法，旨在为科学评价大豆种质资源提供参考。当取样比例相同时，湖北大豆的遗传丰富度显著高于湖南大豆，但两省大豆遗传多样性指数之间没有显著差异。当取样量相同时，利用随机取样法比较，湖南大豆的遗传多样性显著高于湖北，而利用聚类取样比较，两省大豆的遗传多样性没有显著差异。在遗传多样性指数相同情况下，湖北大豆的遗传丰富度显著高于湖南大豆。取样数与三个遗传多样性评价参数（等位变异数、Shannon指数、He）之间均达到显著和极显著相关。以湖南大豆为例，估算出在大豆SSR遗传多样性分析中，至少需要50~60个样本，即占总体9.0%~10.8%的取样比例，才能代表总体的遗传变异。提出在评价大豆遗传多样性时，应用大豆样本数对其遗传多样性指数计算公式进行修正，建议将Shannon指数计算公式改为H＝－lnN ∑Pi lnPi (N为样本数)。根据修正公式分析，结果表明，湖北大豆的遗传多样性高于湖南大豆。

关键词: 大豆, 遗传多样性, SSR标记, Shannon指数, 期望杂合度, 等位变异数, 取样量

Abstract:

Accessions from Hunan and Hubei provinces in the Chinese soybean pre-core collection were analyzed with SSR markers to determine an optimal strategy in genetic diversity evaluation. The results showed that when analyzed with the same sampling ratio, the number of alleles in accessions from Hubei province was higher than those from Hunan province, however the difference was not up to significant level in genetic diversity index. When analyzed with same sample size by random sampling, accessions from Hunan province were higher both in number of alleles and diversity index than those from Hubei, while there was no significant difference between them as sampled based on cluster. Accessions from Hubei were larger in number of alleles than those from Hunan when sampled by the same genetic diversity index. Genetic diversity index was influenced by sample size as we concluded, and we deduced that in genetic diversity analysis, a minimum of 50–60 accessions (9.0%–10.8% percent of total accessions) was required to represent most of genetic variation, so that it could explain the total genetic variation. An adjustment of the formula for Shannon index was also proposed after a set of analyses based on accessions from Hunan and Hubei. And with it, accessions from Hubei showed higher genetic diversity than those from Hunan province.

Key words: Soybean, Genetic diversity, SSR Markers, Shannon index, He, Number of alleles, Sample size

[1] 肖颖妮, 于永涛, 谢利华, 祁喜涛, 李春艳, 文天祥, 李高科, 胡建广. 基于SNP标记揭示中国鲜食玉米品种的遗传多样性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1301-1311.
[2] 陈玲玲, 李战, 刘亭萱, 谷勇哲, 宋健, 王俊, 邱丽娟. 基于783份大豆种质资源的叶柄夹角全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1333-1345.
[3] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[4] 王炫栋, 杨孙玉悦, 高润杰, 余俊杰, 郑丹沛, 倪峰, 蒋冬花. 拮抗大豆斑疹病菌放线菌菌株的筛选和促生作用及防效研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1546-1557.
[5] 于春淼, 张勇, 王好让, 杨兴勇, 董全中, 薛红, 张明明, 李微微, 王磊, 胡凯凤, 谷勇哲, 邱丽娟. 栽培大豆×半野生大豆高密度遗传图谱构建及株高QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1091-1102.
[6] 李阿立, 冯雅楠, 李萍, 张东升, 宗毓铮, 林文, 郝兴宇. 大豆叶片响应CO2浓度升高、干旱及其交互作用的转录组分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1103-1118.
[7] 彭西红, 陈平, 杜青, 杨雪丽, 任俊波, 郑本川, 罗凯, 谢琛, 雷鹿, 雍太文, 杨文钰. 减量施氮对带状套作大豆土壤通气环境及结瘤固氮的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1199-1209.
[8] 王好让, 张勇, 于春淼, 董全中, 李微微, 胡凯凤, 张明明, 薛红, 杨梦平, 宋继玲, 王磊, 杨兴勇, 邱丽娟. 大豆突变体ygl2黄绿叶基因的精细定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 791-800.
[9] 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[10] 杜浩, 程玉汉, 李泰, 侯智红, 黎永力, 南海洋, 董利东, 刘宝辉, 程群. 利用Ln位点进行分子设计提高大豆单荚粒数[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 565-571.
[11] 周悦, 赵志华, 张宏宁, 孔佑宾. 大豆紫色酸性磷酸酶基因GmPAP14启动子克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 590-596.
[12] 王娟, 张彦威, 焦铸锦, 刘盼盼, 常玮. 利用PyBSASeq算法挖掘大豆百粒重相关位点与候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 635-643.
[13] 董衍坤, 黄定全, 高震, 陈栩. 大豆PIN-Like (PILS)基因家族的鉴定、表达分析及在根瘤共生固氮过程中的功能[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 353-366.
[14] 张国伟, 李凯, 李思嘉, 王晓婧, 杨长琴, 刘瑞显. 减库对大豆叶片碳代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 529-537.
[15] 禹桃兵, 石琪晗, 年海, 连腾祥. 涝害对不同大豆品种根际微生物群落结构特征的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1690-1702.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2