欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (02): 311-316.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于近地高光谱棉花生物量遥感估算模型

柏军华1;李少昆1,2,*;王克如1,2;隋学艳1;陈兵1   

  1. 1 新疆兵团绿洲生态农业重点开放实验室,新疆石河子832003;2 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所/国家农作物基因资源与基因改良重大科学工程,北京100081
  • 收稿日期:2005-11-09 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-02-12 网络出版日期:2007-02-12
  • 通讯作者: 李少昆

Estimation Models of Cotton Aboveground Fresh Biomass Based on Field Hyperspectral Remote Sensing

BAI Jun-Hua1,LI Shao-Kun12*,WANG Ke-Ru12,SHUI Xue-Yan1,CHEN Bing1   

  1. 1 Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology Agriculture of Xinjiang Construction Crops, Shihezi 832003, Xinjiang; 2 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences / The National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2005-11-09 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-02-12 Published online:2007-02-12
  • Contact: LI Shao-Kun

摘要:

分析棉花地上鲜生物量冠层高光谱反射率变异系数,反射率光谱、一阶微分光谱与地上鲜生物量相关关系得结果表明:在可见光近红外波段棉花冠层反射率光谱变异系数在672 nm波段处最大;棉花地上鲜生物量与反射率光谱相关系数最大值在可见光波段出现在589~700 nm,在近红外波段出现在865~919 nm波段,且前者大于后者。地上鲜生物量与一阶微分光谱相关系数在可见光波段出现524~528 nm、552~588 nm、710~755 nm 3个高值区。基于以上研究,选择19个高光谱特征参数建立了棉花地上鲜生物量高光谱遥感监测模型,经检验,单波段中以F629估算水平最高,估算模型为Y = 9.7914 exp(-20.738 F629),准确度为83.9%、RMSE为0.64 kg m-2、预测值与实测值相关系数为0.940**;组合参数以[629, 901]指数形式估算模型估算水平最高,模型为Y = 0.0986 exp(4.3696[629, 901]),准确度达84.0%,RMSE为0.55 kg m-2,预测值与实测值相关系数为0.960**,上述两个模型为参选模型中估算棉花地上鲜生物量最佳高光谱估算模型。

关键词: 棉花, 地上鲜生物量, 高光谱遥感, 监测模型

Abstract:

Aboveground fresh biomass is an important colony qualitative index of cotton, and so it is significant for production management and yield estimation in cotton to establish the monitoring model based on hyperspectral parameter. The wavelength variation coefficient of cotton canopy hyperspectrum on aboveground fresh biomass and the correlation between the aboveground fresh biomass and reflective spectrum, the first derivative spectrum showed that the biggest value of hyperspectral variation coefficient of cotton canopy reflectance in the visible light region was in 672 nm. The biggest value of correlation coefficient between the aboveground fresh biomass and reflectance spectrum at the visible light region was in 589–700 nm and at the near infrared red region in 865-919 nm, and the former was larger than latter. The correlation coefficient between the aboveground fresh biomass and the first derivative value in the visible light had three high-value areas including 524–528 nm, 552–588 nm and 710–755 nm. According to the analysis above, the nineteen hyperspectral characteristic parameters were used to establish the hyperspectral remote sensing estimation models of the aboveground fresh biomass in cotton. The tested result of models expressed the parameters veracity of estimating the aboveground fresh biomass in cotton, including reflectance of 682 nm and 629 nm and the combination forms, was up 80%. Among them, F629[Y = 9.7914 exp(-20.738 F629)]in single band reflectance parameters was better, its veracity reached to 83.9%, RMSE was 0.64 kg m-2, and the correlation coefficient between the estimated value and measured value was 0.94**; The monitoring model of [629, 901] [Y = 0.0986 exp(4.3696 [629, 901])] was best, and its veracity reached to 84.0%, RMSE was 0.55 kg m-2, and the correlation coefficient between the estimated value and measured value was 0.96**, the two models above were the best among the elected models estimating cotton aboveground fresh biomass.

Key words: Cotton, Aboveround fresh biomass, Hyperspectral remote sensing, Estimation models

[1] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[2] 张曦, 王广恩, 李邵琦, 刘祎, 李俊兰, 钱玉源. 基于转录组测序解析陆海杂交姊妹系马克隆值差异的形成机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1442-1458.
[3] 周琦翔, 朱艳, 汪楚博, 朱柏林, 李俊博, 宋利兵. 基于DSSAT模型模拟气候变化对新疆棉花物候期及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 590-602.
[4] 郭栋财, 吕涛, 蔡永生, 买吾鲁达·艾合买提, 全家, 曲延英, 郑凯. 棉花纤维品质相关性状QTL元分析及候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1445-1466.
[5] 王亚雯, 戚正阳, 尤佳琦, 聂新辉, 曹娟, 杨细燕, 涂礼莉, 张献龙, 王茂军. 棉花60K功能位点基因芯片的制备及应用[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1178-1188.
[6] 王清华, 朱格格, 方雯, 刘诗诗, 鲁剑巍. 基于高光谱遥感的油菜叶片氮磷养分含量诊断[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1326-1337.
[7] 丁俊沣, 许映飞, 张祥, 陈媛, 陈德华. 生长调节剂吲哚丁酸对移栽棉苗成活及生长发育的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3331-3341.
[8] 哈丽哈什·依巴提, 张炎, 李青军, 徐新朋, 何萍. 基于产量反应和农学效率的棉花智能化推荐施肥方法研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 3052-3064.
[9] 李亚玮, 徐盈盈, 左春阳, 刘若男, 梁亚军, 孔杰, 张献龙, 闵玲. 棉花减数分裂进程鉴定体系构建及其对高温胁迫的响应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2570-2580.
[10] 陈佳伟, 林艳, 张明星, 周诗晶, 饶力群, 周池, 李鑫. 贝莱斯芽孢杆菌YCH92对棉花根际土壤微生物群落及棉花产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2821-2835.
[11] 谢章书, 谢学方, 屠小菊, 刘爱玉, 董合忠, 周仲华. 植物激素对棉花蕾铃脱落的调控研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 1-29.
[12] 辛明华, 秘雅迪, 王国平, 李小飞, 李亚兵, 董合林, 韩迎春, 冯璐. 行距配置和种植密度对棉花干物质生产及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 221-232.
[13] 李超, 付小琼. 基于GYT双标图综合评价黄河流域中熟杂交棉花区域试验品种[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 30-43.
[14] 艾莎, 李莎, 方治伟, 李论, 李甜甜, 高利芬, 陈利红, 肖华锋, 万人静, 闫多子, 武星廷, 彭海, 韩瑞玺, 周俊飞. 棉花MNP标记位点开发及其在DNA指纹图谱构建中的应用[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2267-2278.
[15] 李航, 刘丽, 黄乾, 刘文豪, 司爱君, 孔宪辉, 王旭文, 赵福相, 梅拥军, 余渝. 棉花种质资源萌发期耐盐性鉴定及筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(5): 1147-1157.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!