欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (01): 50-56.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

水、旱栽培条件下稻谷粒型和粒重的相关分析及其QTL定位

郭咏梅1,2;穆平2;刘家富3;李自超2,*;卢义宣1,*   

  1. 1 云南省农业科学院粮食作物研究所,云南昆明650205;2 中国农业大学农业部作物基因组学与遗传改良重点实验室,北京市作物遗传改良实验室,北京100094;3云南省农业科学院农业部农产品质量检验测试中心,云南昆明650201
  • 收稿日期:2006-01-09 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-01-12 网络出版日期:2007-01-12
  • 通讯作者: 卢义宣

Correlation Analysis and QTL Mapping of Grain Shape and Grain Weight in Rice under Upland and Lowland Environments

GUO Yong-Mei12,MU Ping2,LIU Jia-Fu3,LI Zi-Chao2*,LU Yi-Xuan1*   

  1. 1 Institute of Food Crop Research, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650205,Yunnan; 2 College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094; 3 Farmer Produce Quality and Test Center of Ministry of Agriculture, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, China
  • Received:2006-01-09 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-01-12 Published online:2007-01-12
  • Contact: LU Yi-Xuan

摘要:

为了解水、旱栽培条件下水稻粒形和粒重的表型及QTL变化,以陆稻品种IRAT109和水稻品种越富构建的双单倍体群体为材料,系统分析了稻谷粒长、粒宽、粒重及长宽比在水、旱栽培条件下的相关性,并进行了数量性状基因位点的比较定位。结果表明,水、旱条件下,粒长与长宽比和粒重均呈极显著正相关;粒宽与长宽比呈极显著负相关,与粒重极显著正相关,4个性状在水、旱条件间相关性都达极显著正相关。其中粒长的相关系数最高,达0.817,粒宽的相关系数最低,为0.457。表明粒长受水分影响最小而粒宽受水分影响较大。粒重、长宽比介于二者之间。两种条件下共检测到14个QTLs,分布于水稻1、5、6、7、10和12染色体上,其中控制粒长的5个,LOD值为1.93~5.11,贡献率为5.97%~28.85%;控制粒宽的1个,LOD值为2.39,贡献率为12.76%;控制长宽比的3个,LOD值为2.08~4.6,贡献率为7.78%~21.89%;控制粒重的5个,LOD值为2.68~9.45,贡献率为4.1%~14.8%。其中控制粒长的qGL-5及控制粒重的qGWt-1a和qGWt-1b在水、旱条件下均能检测到,在抗旱育种中可用于分子标记辅助选择籽粒性状。QTL分析的结果进一步验证了表型分析结果,粒宽相对易受土壤水分影响,粒长、粒重和长宽比,受水分胁迫影响较小,遗传比较稳定。

关键词: 水稻, 粒型, 粒重, 加倍单倍体群体(DH系), 数量性状基因座位(QTL), 水、旱栽培

Abstract:

Grain length (GL), grain width (GW), length width ratio (LWR) and grain weight(GWt) are most important apparent quality traits in rice, which are positively correlated with the commercial value of rice especially in international market. Moreover, grain shape is also a vital factor related to rice yield and milling quality. Companed with GL, GW and LWR, grain weight is one of the most important components related to rice yield. Several studies reported that GL, GW, LWR and GWt were controlled by some QTLs were detected under lowland condition. There have been no reports about QTLs for grain shape and grain weight under both upland and lowland conditions. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the correlation and inheritance of grain shape and grain weight between under upland and under lowland conditions, especially to find QTLs under upland condition.
A doubled haploid (DH) population consisting of 116 DH lines developed through anther culture of the F1 hybrid between an upland rice cultivar ‘IRAT109’ and a lowland rice cultivar ‘Yuefu’ was used in this study. The parents and the 116 DH lines were planted under water- and dry-cultivation conditions, on the experiment farm of China Agricultural University in 2002. Seeds of parents and 116 DH lines were harvested at maturity, and used to measure grain length, grain width, length width ratio and grain weight. QTLs analysis was conducted with QTL Mapper version 1.0 and the constructed molecular linkage map consisting of 165 molecular markers, which covered 1 535 cM in length with an average distance of 9.3 cM between adjacent markers. A threshold probability of P<0.005 was used to declare the existence of additive QTLs. Correlation analysis between grain shape and grain weight was conducted using the software of SPSS.
Positively significant correlations between GL and LWR and between GL and GWt in both upland and lowland environments were observed. Negatively significant correlations between GW and LWR and positively significant correlations between GW and GWt under the two environments were also detected. This result indicated that GL, GW, LWR and GWt had closely genetic background. All the four traits in upland environment were significantly correlated with those in lowland environment respectively, with the biggest correlation coefficient of 0.817 for GL and the smallest coefficient of 0.457 for GW. Therefore, compared to GW, GL was less affected by water stress (upland condition).
A total of 14 QTLs were detected for GL, GW, LWR and GWt, which located on chromosome 1, 5, 6, 7,10 and 12. Ten QTLs had high general contribution with explained variance of over 10%. For GL, one QTLs under upland condition and four QTLs under lowland condition were detected respectively. These QTLs explained 5.97%–28.85% of phenotypic variance. The LOD score was 1.93–5.11. For GW, only one QTLs was detected under upland condition. The LOD score and general contribution was 2.39 and 12.76% respectively. For LWR, one QTLs under upland condition and two QTLs under lowland condition was detected respectively. These QTLs explained 7.78%–21.89% of phenotypic variance. The LOD score was 2.08–4.60. For GWt, there were two additive QTLs under upland condition and three additive QTLs under lowland condition respectively. They explained 4.1%–14.8% of phenotypic variance. The LOD score was 2.68–9.45. Three QTLs qGL-5, qGWt-1a and qGWt-1b were both detected under upland and lowland environments (common QTL). Two co-localized QTLs (qGL-1a and qGWt-1a, and qGL-1b and qGWt-1b) controlling GL and GW were detected. These QTLs would be helpful in MAS of grain shape breeding.

Key words: Rice, Grain shape, Grain weight, Doubled haploid population, Quantitative trait loci

[1] 田甜, 陈丽娟, 何华勤. 基于Meta-QTL和RNA-seq的整合分析挖掘水稻抗稻瘟病候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1372-1388.
[2] 郑崇珂, 周冠华, 牛淑琳, 和亚男, 孙伟, 谢先芝. 水稻早衰突变体esl-H5的表型鉴定与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1389-1400.
[3] 周文期, 强晓霞, 王森, 江静雯, 卫万荣. 水稻OsLPL2/PIR基因抗旱耐盐机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1401-1415.
[4] 郑小龙, 周菁清, 白杨, 邵雅芳, 章林平, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻不同穗部籽粒的淀粉与垩白品质差异及分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[5] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[6] 杨建昌, 李超卿, 江贻. 稻米氨基酸含量和组分及其调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1037-1050.
[7] 杨德卫, 王勋, 郑星星, 项信权, 崔海涛, 李生平, 唐定中. OsSAMS1在水稻稻瘟病抗性中的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1119-1128.
[8] 朱峥, 王田幸子, 陈悦, 刘玉晴, 燕高伟, 徐珊, 马金姣, 窦世娟, 李莉云, 刘国振. 水稻转录因子WRKY68在Xa21介导的抗白叶枯病反应中发挥正调控作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1129-1140.
[9] 王小雷, 李炜星, 欧阳林娟, 徐杰, 陈小荣, 边建民, 胡丽芳, 彭小松, 贺晓鹏, 傅军如, 周大虎, 贺浩华, 孙晓棠, 朱昌兰. 基于染色体片段置换系群体检测水稻株型性状QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1141-1151.
[10] 王泽, 周钦阳, 刘聪, 穆悦, 郭威, 丁艳锋, 二宫正士. 基于无人机和地面图像的田间水稻冠层参数估测与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1248-1261.
[11] 陈悦, 孙明哲, 贾博为, 冷月, 孙晓丽. 水稻AP2/ERF转录因子参与逆境胁迫应答的分子机制研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 781-790.
[12] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[13] 巫燕飞, 胡琴, 周棋, 杜雪竹, 盛锋. 水稻延伸因子复合体家族基因鉴定及非生物胁迫诱导表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 644-655.
[14] 王娟, 张彦威, 焦铸锦, 刘盼盼, 常玮. 利用PyBSASeq算法挖掘大豆百粒重相关位点与候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 635-643.
[15] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!