欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (01): 50-56.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

水、旱栽培条件下稻谷粒型和粒重的相关分析及其QTL定位

郭咏梅1,2;穆平2;刘家富3;李自超2,*;卢义宣1,*   

  1. 1 云南省农业科学院粮食作物研究所,云南昆明650205;2 中国农业大学农业部作物基因组学与遗传改良重点实验室,北京市作物遗传改良实验室,北京100094;3云南省农业科学院农业部农产品质量检验测试中心,云南昆明650201
  • 收稿日期:2006-01-09 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-01-12 网络出版日期:2007-01-12
  • 通讯作者: 卢义宣

Correlation Analysis and QTL Mapping of Grain Shape and Grain Weight in Rice under Upland and Lowland Environments

GUO Yong-Mei12,MU Ping2,LIU Jia-Fu3,LI Zi-Chao2*,LU Yi-Xuan1*   

  1. 1 Institute of Food Crop Research, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650205,Yunnan; 2 College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094; 3 Farmer Produce Quality and Test Center of Ministry of Agriculture, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, China
  • Received:2006-01-09 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-01-12 Published online:2007-01-12
  • Contact: LU Yi-Xuan

摘要:

为了解水、旱栽培条件下水稻粒形和粒重的表型及QTL变化,以陆稻品种IRAT109和水稻品种越富构建的双单倍体群体为材料,系统分析了稻谷粒长、粒宽、粒重及长宽比在水、旱栽培条件下的相关性,并进行了数量性状基因位点的比较定位。结果表明,水、旱条件下,粒长与长宽比和粒重均呈极显著正相关;粒宽与长宽比呈极显著负相关,与粒重极显著正相关,4个性状在水、旱条件间相关性都达极显著正相关。其中粒长的相关系数最高,达0.817,粒宽的相关系数最低,为0.457。表明粒长受水分影响最小而粒宽受水分影响较大。粒重、长宽比介于二者之间。两种条件下共检测到14个QTLs,分布于水稻1、5、6、7、10和12染色体上,其中控制粒长的5个,LOD值为1.93~5.11,贡献率为5.97%~28.85%;控制粒宽的1个,LOD值为2.39,贡献率为12.76%;控制长宽比的3个,LOD值为2.08~4.6,贡献率为7.78%~21.89%;控制粒重的5个,LOD值为2.68~9.45,贡献率为4.1%~14.8%。其中控制粒长的qGL-5及控制粒重的qGWt-1a和qGWt-1b在水、旱条件下均能检测到,在抗旱育种中可用于分子标记辅助选择籽粒性状。QTL分析的结果进一步验证了表型分析结果,粒宽相对易受土壤水分影响,粒长、粒重和长宽比,受水分胁迫影响较小,遗传比较稳定。

关键词: 水稻, 粒型, 粒重, 加倍单倍体群体(DH系), 数量性状基因座位(QTL), 水、旱栽培

Abstract:

Grain length (GL), grain width (GW), length width ratio (LWR) and grain weight(GWt) are most important apparent quality traits in rice, which are positively correlated with the commercial value of rice especially in international market. Moreover, grain shape is also a vital factor related to rice yield and milling quality. Companed with GL, GW and LWR, grain weight is one of the most important components related to rice yield. Several studies reported that GL, GW, LWR and GWt were controlled by some QTLs were detected under lowland condition. There have been no reports about QTLs for grain shape and grain weight under both upland and lowland conditions. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the correlation and inheritance of grain shape and grain weight between under upland and under lowland conditions, especially to find QTLs under upland condition.
A doubled haploid (DH) population consisting of 116 DH lines developed through anther culture of the F1 hybrid between an upland rice cultivar ‘IRAT109’ and a lowland rice cultivar ‘Yuefu’ was used in this study. The parents and the 116 DH lines were planted under water- and dry-cultivation conditions, on the experiment farm of China Agricultural University in 2002. Seeds of parents and 116 DH lines were harvested at maturity, and used to measure grain length, grain width, length width ratio and grain weight. QTLs analysis was conducted with QTL Mapper version 1.0 and the constructed molecular linkage map consisting of 165 molecular markers, which covered 1 535 cM in length with an average distance of 9.3 cM between adjacent markers. A threshold probability of P<0.005 was used to declare the existence of additive QTLs. Correlation analysis between grain shape and grain weight was conducted using the software of SPSS.
Positively significant correlations between GL and LWR and between GL and GWt in both upland and lowland environments were observed. Negatively significant correlations between GW and LWR and positively significant correlations between GW and GWt under the two environments were also detected. This result indicated that GL, GW, LWR and GWt had closely genetic background. All the four traits in upland environment were significantly correlated with those in lowland environment respectively, with the biggest correlation coefficient of 0.817 for GL and the smallest coefficient of 0.457 for GW. Therefore, compared to GW, GL was less affected by water stress (upland condition).
A total of 14 QTLs were detected for GL, GW, LWR and GWt, which located on chromosome 1, 5, 6, 7,10 and 12. Ten QTLs had high general contribution with explained variance of over 10%. For GL, one QTLs under upland condition and four QTLs under lowland condition were detected respectively. These QTLs explained 5.97%–28.85% of phenotypic variance. The LOD score was 1.93–5.11. For GW, only one QTLs was detected under upland condition. The LOD score and general contribution was 2.39 and 12.76% respectively. For LWR, one QTLs under upland condition and two QTLs under lowland condition was detected respectively. These QTLs explained 7.78%–21.89% of phenotypic variance. The LOD score was 2.08–4.60. For GWt, there were two additive QTLs under upland condition and three additive QTLs under lowland condition respectively. They explained 4.1%–14.8% of phenotypic variance. The LOD score was 2.68–9.45. Three QTLs qGL-5, qGWt-1a and qGWt-1b were both detected under upland and lowland environments (common QTL). Two co-localized QTLs (qGL-1a and qGWt-1a, and qGL-1b and qGWt-1b) controlling GL and GW were detected. These QTLs would be helpful in MAS of grain shape breeding.

Key words: Rice, Grain shape, Grain weight, Doubled haploid population, Quantitative trait loci

[1] 胡赵, 钱润, 谢丰璞, 应素平. 水稻SPX基因家族鉴定及响应磷处理的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1902-1912.
[2] 邹仪妹, 徐敏, 汪海洋, 姚辉, 王加峰, 刘浩, 任代胜. 两系不育系水稻幼苗根系响应盐胁迫的转录因子调控网络鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742.
[3] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[4] 陈伟, 卫万娟, 赵其兵, 常东伟, 余凌波, 翟鹏飞, 冯志明, 陈宗祥, 任仰涛, 杨鹏, 刘海浪, 李珍富, 杨永乐, 金彦刚, 左示敏. 利用CRISPR/Cas9编辑Hd6基因创制优质早熟水稻新种质[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1046-1056.
[5] 石少阶, 刘凯, 陈姿夷, 王卉颖, 李三和, 周雷, 游艾青. 水稻矮化多分蘖基因DMT1的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1022-1034.
[6] 覃奕琰, 付瑶, 苏畅, 李娜, 徐静茹, 程笑然, 张琪, 赵明辉. OsST41调控水稻苗期耐盐性的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 802-812.
[7] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
[8] 叶凡, 李帅, 李思宇, 陈云, 窦超银, 刘立军. 不同节水灌溉方式对东北稻区水稻产量和群体质量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 895-907.
[9] 王婵, 吴莹莹, 李文奇, 李霞, 王芳权, 周彤, 杨杰. 基于HRM技术开发水稻抗条纹叶枯病基因STV11功能标记[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2547-2556.
[10] 陈惠莹, 何嘉欣, 朱斌, 黄士轩, 周星佑, 伍君权, 杨美艳. 水稻黄单胞菌噬菌体vB_XaS_HDB2的全基因组分析和生物学特性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2087-2099.
[11] 杨海洋, 吴林宣, 李博纹, 石翰峰, 袁禧龙, 刘金朝, 蔡海荣, 陈诗怡, 郭涛, 王慧. 基于QTL定位发现的OsWRI3调控水稻种子的落粒性[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1712-1724.
[12] 雷松翰, 范骏扬, 车艳奕, 代永东, 郑雨萌, 田维江, 桑贤春, 王晓雯. 水稻内卷叶突变体acl3的鉴定及调控基因的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1467-1479.
[13] 李福媛, 杨奕, 马继琼, 许明辉, 林良斌, 孙一丁. 水稻OsPUB4基因克隆、激素诱导表达分析与互作蛋白筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1690-1700.
[14] 吴美娟, 张寅辉, 李元昊, 刘海霞, 黄以琳, 李甜, 刘红霞, 张学勇, 郝晨阳, 郭杰, 侯健. 小麦蔗糖合酶基因TaSUS2调控籽粒淀粉合成及品质的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1514-1525.
[15] 王梦宁, 谢可冉, 高逖, 王飞, 任孝俭, 熊栋梁, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 崔克辉. 水稻幼穗分化期至抽穗期高温对籽粒形态和充实的影响及其与粒重的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1347-1362.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!