欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (07): 1063-1070.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

播期对小麦品种藁城8901籽粒淀粉合成相关酶活性及淀粉组分积累的影响

刘霞1,2;尹燕枰1;贺明荣1;王振林1,*   

  1. 1山东农业大学农学院/农业部小麦栽培生理与遗传改良重点开放实验室/山东省作物生物学重点实验室,山东泰安 271018;2山东省农业科学院玉米研究所,山东济南250100
  • 收稿日期:2005-06-20 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-07-12 网络出版日期:2006-07-12
  • 通讯作者: 王振林

Effects of Sowing Date on Activities of Enzymes Involved in Grain Starch Synthesis and Starch Component Accumulation in Wheat Cultivar Gaocheng 8901

LIU Xia1 2,YIN Yan-Ping1,HE Ming-Rong1,WANG Zhen-Lin1   

  1. 1Agronomy College, Shandong Agricultural University / Key Laboratory of Wheat Cultivation Physiology and Genetic Improvement, Ministry of Agriculture / Shandong Provincial Laboratory of Crop Biology, Tai’an 271018, Shandong; 2Institute of Maize, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, Shandong, China
  • Received:2005-06-20 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-07-12 Published online:2006-07-12
  • Contact: WANG Zhen-Lin

摘要:

通过测定旗叶和籽粒中磷酸蔗糖合成酶(SPS)、蔗糖合成酶(SS)、AGP焦磷酸化酶(AGPase)、UGP焦磷酸化酶(UPGase)、可溶性淀粉合成酶(SSS)和束缚态淀粉合成酶(GBSS)的活性,以及蔗糖含量,研究了播种期对藁城8901蔗糖代谢和淀粉合成相关酶活性变化及淀粉组分积累的影响。结果表明,早播和晚播均可降低籽粒直链淀粉积累量,但其支链淀粉积累量随播期的推迟逐渐升高;直链淀粉和支链淀粉积累的最适平均日照时数分别为9.06和11.07 h;支链淀粉积累的最佳日均气温为22.75℃,而直链淀粉积累对温度的适应范围较宽,日均气温在17~25℃之间时,直链淀粉含量与日均气温呈正相关关系。推迟播期使旗叶SPS和SS活性升高,而旗叶蔗糖积累量、籽粒SS、SPS活性和蔗糖积累量均显著降低;籽粒AGPase、SSS活性和支链淀粉积累量明显升高;而UGPase、花后14 d的GBSS活性和直链淀粉积累量显著降低。表明在小麦植株体内存在淀粉积累对蔗糖代谢的反馈调节作用,它主要是通过降低籽粒SPS活性而不是SS活性来实现的。由SS催化的蔗糖降解不是提供小麦籽粒淀粉积累所需底物的惟一途径。在小麦籽粒淀粉合成过程中,AGPase、SSS、UGPase和GBSS均起着重要的调节作用。植株本身可通过反馈抑制籽粒UGPase和某一时期的GBSS活性来调节籽粒中蔗糖向淀粉的转化以及淀粉组分的积累,以维持体内合理的直/支比例。

关键词: 蔗糖, 淀粉, 淀粉合成酶, 播种期, 小麦

Abstract:

Grain starch is synthesized from sucrose of leaves, and regulated by a series of enzymes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Previous researches have revealed that sowing date affects wheat quality by changing protein content, wet gluten content, sedimentation value, dough development time and stability time. Grain quality also relates to starch content, especially the component of starch. In order to understand the regulation mechanism of sowing date to the accumulation and component of grain starch, a wheat coultivar, Gaocheng 8901, was employed with different sowing dates. The starch (amylose and amylopectin) content in grain, and the activities of sucrose-phosphate synthase (SPS), sucrose synthase (SS), adenosine diphosphorate glucose pyrophrylase (AGPase), uridine diphosphorate glucose pyrophrylase (UGPase), soluble starch synthase (SSS) and granule-bound starch synthase (GBSS), as well as sucrose content in flag leaf and grain were determined during grain filling. The results showed that the accumulation of amylose was decreased under both early and late sowing treatments, but that of amylopectin increased significantly (P<0.01) (Fig.1). The optimum daily sunlight hour (ASH) for amylose and amylopectin accumulation were 9.06 and 11.07 hours, respectively (Table 1). The amylopectin content was maximal when the average daily air temperature (ATD) was 22.75℃, while amylose content showed a positive correlation with ATD from 17℃ to 25℃. Under late sowing treatment, the activities of SS and SPS increased in flag leaf, but decreased in grain significantly (P<0.05) 14 days after anthesis, while the sucrose accumulation in flag leaf and grain both reduced (Fig.3–6). Late sowing also resulted in the increase of AGPase activity, SSS activity and amylopectin accumulation, but the decrease of UGPase and GBSS activities in grain at mid to late period of grain filling (Fig.7, 8). The above results suggest a feedback system of sucrose metabolism by starch accumulation in wheat, which takes function through reducing the activity of SPS instead of SS in grain. The approach of sucrose decomposition catalyzed by SS is not the unique one for starch synthesis in grain. AGPase, SSS, UGPase and GBSS all play important roles in starch synthesis, of which UGPase and GBSS activities are restrained at certain stages to regulate the transformation of sucrose to starch and the accumulation of starch component, so that a reasonable ratio of amylose to amylopectin can be kept.

Key words: Sucrose, Starch, Starch synthase, Sowing date, Wheat

中图分类号: 

  • S512
[1] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[2] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[3] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[4] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[5] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[6] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[7] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[12] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[13] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[14] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
[15] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!