欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (07): 1063-1070.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

播期对小麦品种藁城8901籽粒淀粉合成相关酶活性及淀粉组分积累的影响

刘霞1,2;尹燕枰1;贺明荣1;王振林1,*   

  1. 1山东农业大学农学院/农业部小麦栽培生理与遗传改良重点开放实验室/山东省作物生物学重点实验室,山东泰安 271018;2山东省农业科学院玉米研究所,山东济南250100
  • 收稿日期:2005-06-20 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-07-12 网络出版日期:2006-07-12
  • 通讯作者: 王振林

Effects of Sowing Date on Activities of Enzymes Involved in Grain Starch Synthesis and Starch Component Accumulation in Wheat Cultivar Gaocheng 8901

LIU Xia1 2,YIN Yan-Ping1,HE Ming-Rong1,WANG Zhen-Lin1   

  1. 1Agronomy College, Shandong Agricultural University / Key Laboratory of Wheat Cultivation Physiology and Genetic Improvement, Ministry of Agriculture / Shandong Provincial Laboratory of Crop Biology, Tai’an 271018, Shandong; 2Institute of Maize, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, Shandong, China
  • Received:2005-06-20 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-07-12 Published online:2006-07-12
  • Contact: WANG Zhen-Lin

摘要:

通过测定旗叶和籽粒中磷酸蔗糖合成酶(SPS)、蔗糖合成酶(SS)、AGP焦磷酸化酶(AGPase)、UGP焦磷酸化酶(UPGase)、可溶性淀粉合成酶(SSS)和束缚态淀粉合成酶(GBSS)的活性,以及蔗糖含量,研究了播种期对藁城8901蔗糖代谢和淀粉合成相关酶活性变化及淀粉组分积累的影响。结果表明,早播和晚播均可降低籽粒直链淀粉积累量,但其支链淀粉积累量随播期的推迟逐渐升高;直链淀粉和支链淀粉积累的最适平均日照时数分别为9.06和11.07 h;支链淀粉积累的最佳日均气温为22.75℃,而直链淀粉积累对温度的适应范围较宽,日均气温在17~25℃之间时,直链淀粉含量与日均气温呈正相关关系。推迟播期使旗叶SPS和SS活性升高,而旗叶蔗糖积累量、籽粒SS、SPS活性和蔗糖积累量均显著降低;籽粒AGPase、SSS活性和支链淀粉积累量明显升高;而UGPase、花后14 d的GBSS活性和直链淀粉积累量显著降低。表明在小麦植株体内存在淀粉积累对蔗糖代谢的反馈调节作用,它主要是通过降低籽粒SPS活性而不是SS活性来实现的。由SS催化的蔗糖降解不是提供小麦籽粒淀粉积累所需底物的惟一途径。在小麦籽粒淀粉合成过程中,AGPase、SSS、UGPase和GBSS均起着重要的调节作用。植株本身可通过反馈抑制籽粒UGPase和某一时期的GBSS活性来调节籽粒中蔗糖向淀粉的转化以及淀粉组分的积累,以维持体内合理的直/支比例。

关键词: 蔗糖, 淀粉, 淀粉合成酶, 播种期, 小麦

Abstract:

Grain starch is synthesized from sucrose of leaves, and regulated by a series of enzymes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Previous researches have revealed that sowing date affects wheat quality by changing protein content, wet gluten content, sedimentation value, dough development time and stability time. Grain quality also relates to starch content, especially the component of starch. In order to understand the regulation mechanism of sowing date to the accumulation and component of grain starch, a wheat coultivar, Gaocheng 8901, was employed with different sowing dates. The starch (amylose and amylopectin) content in grain, and the activities of sucrose-phosphate synthase (SPS), sucrose synthase (SS), adenosine diphosphorate glucose pyrophrylase (AGPase), uridine diphosphorate glucose pyrophrylase (UGPase), soluble starch synthase (SSS) and granule-bound starch synthase (GBSS), as well as sucrose content in flag leaf and grain were determined during grain filling. The results showed that the accumulation of amylose was decreased under both early and late sowing treatments, but that of amylopectin increased significantly (P<0.01) (Fig.1). The optimum daily sunlight hour (ASH) for amylose and amylopectin accumulation were 9.06 and 11.07 hours, respectively (Table 1). The amylopectin content was maximal when the average daily air temperature (ATD) was 22.75℃, while amylose content showed a positive correlation with ATD from 17℃ to 25℃. Under late sowing treatment, the activities of SS and SPS increased in flag leaf, but decreased in grain significantly (P<0.05) 14 days after anthesis, while the sucrose accumulation in flag leaf and grain both reduced (Fig.3–6). Late sowing also resulted in the increase of AGPase activity, SSS activity and amylopectin accumulation, but the decrease of UGPase and GBSS activities in grain at mid to late period of grain filling (Fig.7, 8). The above results suggest a feedback system of sucrose metabolism by starch accumulation in wheat, which takes function through reducing the activity of SPS instead of SS in grain. The approach of sucrose decomposition catalyzed by SS is not the unique one for starch synthesis in grain. AGPase, SSS, UGPase and GBSS all play important roles in starch synthesis, of which UGPase and GBSS activities are restrained at certain stages to regulate the transformation of sucrose to starch and the accumulation of starch component, so that a reasonable ratio of amylose to amylopectin can be kept.

Key words: Sucrose, Starch, Starch synthase, Sowing date, Wheat

中图分类号: 

  • S512
[1] 胡文静, 李东升, 裔新, 张春梅, 张勇. 小麦穗部性状和株高的QTL定位及育种标记开发和验证[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1346-1356.
[2] 郑小龙, 周菁清, 白杨, 邵雅芳, 章林平, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻不同穗部籽粒的淀粉与垩白品质差异及分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[3] 郭星宇, 刘朋召, 王瑞, 王小利, 李军. 旱地冬小麦产量、氮肥利用率及土壤氮素平衡对降水年型与施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1262-1272.
[4] 付美玉, 熊宏春, 周春云, 郭会君, 谢永盾, 赵林姝, 古佳玉, 赵世荣, 丁玉萍, 徐延浩, 刘录祥. 小麦矮秆突变体je0098的遗传分析与其矮秆基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 580-589.
[5] 冯健超, 许倍铭, 江薛丽, 胡海洲, 马英, 王晨阳, 王永华, 马冬云. 小麦籽粒不同层次酚类物质与抗氧化活性差异及氮肥调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 704-715.
[6] 刘运景, 郑飞娜, 张秀, 初金鹏, 于海涛, 代兴龙, 贺明荣. 宽幅播种对强筋小麦籽粒产量、品质和氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 716-725.
[7] 马红勃, 刘东涛, 冯国华, 王静, 朱雪成, 张会云, 刘静, 刘立伟, 易媛. 黄淮麦区Fhb1基因的育种应用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 747-758.
[8] 王洋洋, 贺利, 任德超, 段剑钊, 胡新, 刘万代, 郭天财, 王永华, 冯伟. 基于主成分-聚类分析的不同水分冬小麦晚霜冻害评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 448-462.
[9] 陈新宜, 宋宇航, 张孟寒, 李小艳, 李华, 汪月霞, 齐学礼. 干旱对不同品种小麦幼苗的生理生化胁迫以及外源5-氨基乙酰丙酸的缓解作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 478-487.
[10] 徐龙龙, 殷文, 胡发龙, 范虹, 樊志龙, 赵财, 于爱忠, 柴强. 水氮减量对地膜玉米免耕轮作小麦主要光合生理参数的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 437-447.
[11] 马博闻, 李庆, 蔡剑, 周琴, 黄梅, 戴廷波, 王笑, 姜东. 花前渍水锻炼调控花后小麦耐渍性的生理机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 151-164.
[12] 孟颖, 邢蕾蕾, 曹晓红, 郭光艳, 柴建芳, 秘彩莉. 小麦Ta4CL1基因的克隆及其在促进转基因拟南芥生长和木质素沉积中的功能[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 63-75.
[13] 韦一昊, 于美琴, 张晓娇, 王露露, 张志勇, 马新明, 李会强, 王小纯. 小麦谷氨酰胺合成酶基因可变剪接分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 40-47.
[14] 李玲红, 张哲, 陈永明, 尤明山, 倪中福, 邢界文. 普通小麦颖壳蜡质缺失突变体glossy1的转录组分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 48-62.
[15] 罗江陶, 郑建敏, 蒲宗君, 范超兰, 刘登才, 郝明. 四倍体小麦与六倍体小麦杂种的染色体遗传特性[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1427-1436.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!