欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (07): 1057-1062.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

亚精胺预处理对渗透胁迫下小麦幼苗抗氧化能力的影响

段辉国1,2;袁澍2;黄作喜1;孙歆2;卿东红1;董凌2;林宏辉2,*   

  1. 1 内江师范学院化学与生命科学系,四川内江641112;2 四川大学生命科学学院,生物资源与生态环境教育部重点实验室,四川成都610064
  • 收稿日期:2005-06-08 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-07-12 网络出版日期:2006-07-12
  • 通讯作者: 卿东红

The Effects of Spermidine Pretreatment on Antioxidative Capacity in Wheat Seedlings under Osmotic Stress

DUAN Hui-Guo1 2,YUAN Shu2,HUANG Zuo-Xi1,SUN Xin2,QING Dong-Hong1,DONG Ling2,LIN Hong-Hui2 *   

  1. 1 Depatment of Chemistry and Life Science, Neijiang Teachers College, Neijiang 641112, Sichuan; 2 Key Laboratory of Bio-resources and Eco-environment (Ministry of Education), College of Life Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, Sichuan, China
  • Received:2005-06-08 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-07-12 Published online:2006-07-12
  • Contact: LIN Hong-Hui

摘要: 以小麦绵农4号幼苗叶片为试材,以-0.6 MPa聚乙二醇-6000(PEG-6000)处理造成渗透胁迫,研究了外源亚精胺(Spd)预处理对小麦相对含水量(RWC)、H2O2含量、丙二醛(MDA)含量、电解质渗漏以及超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、过氧化物酶(POD)、过氧化氢酶(CAT)和抗坏血酸过氧化物酶(APX)活性的影响。在渗透胁迫处理

关键词: 渗透胁迫, 亚精胺, 抗氧化能力

Abstract:

The effects of spermidine (Spd) pretreatment on relative water content (RWC), H2O2 content, malonyldialdehyde (MDA) level, electrolyte leakage and activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT) and ascorbate peroxidese (APX) in wheat seedlings (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Miannong 4) were investigated under osmotic dehydration by -0.6 MPa polyethylene glycol 6000 (PEG-6000). Half of eight-day-old seedlings (control) were daily sprayed with distilled water + 0.02% (V/V) Tween-80 and irrigated with half-strength Hoagland’s nutrient solution, and the other half seedlings (Spd pretreatment) were daily sprayed with 0.2 mmol/L Spd + 0.02 % (V/V) Tween-80 and irrigated with 0.2 mmol/L Spd + half-strength Hoagland’s nutrient solution for 2 days before osmotic stress. The results showed that the RWC decreased, lipid peroxidated, as well as H2O2 content and electrolyte leakage increased in seedling leaves of control under osmotic stress, while these changes deferred in Spd pretreatment. Under osmotic stress, the activities of SOD, POD and APX increased, but CAT activity decreased in control. Spd pretreatment increased the activities of SOD and POD. Moreover, the activities of POD, CAT and APX, especially SOD in seedling leaves of Spd pretreated were higher than those of control during the throughout osmotic stress period. It suggested that Spd could induce and maintain the higher level of antioxidant enzyme activities, and decrease the concentration of H2O2, therefore alleviate oxidative damages by osmotic stress, and promote antioxidant capacity of wheat seedlings under osmotic stress.

Key words: Osmotic Stress, Spermidine (Spd), Antioxidant capacity

中图分类号: 

  • Q945
[1] 马博闻, 李庆, 蔡剑, 周琴, 黄梅, 戴廷波, 王笑, 姜东. 花前渍水锻炼调控花后小麦耐渍性的生理机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 151-164.
[2] 杨梦婷, 张春, 王作平, 邹华文, 吴忠义. 玉米ZmbHLH161基因的克隆及功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(12): 2008-2016.
[3] 李敏,于太飞,徐兆师,张双喜,闵东红,陈明,马有志,柴守诚,郑炜君. 大豆转录因子基因GmNF-YCa可提高转基因拟南芥渗透胁迫的耐性[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(08): 1161-1169.
[4] 葛淑娟,孙爱清,刘鹏,张杰道,董树亭. 玉米响应渗透胁迫的数字基因表达谱分析[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(07): 1164-1173.
[5] 僧珊珊,王群,张永恩,李潮海,刘天学,赵龙飞,刘怀攀. 外源亚精胺对淹水胁迫玉米的生理调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(06): 1042-1050.
[6] 丁在松, 王春艳, 关东明, 赵凤悟, 赵明. 旱稻×稗草杂交后代YF2-1光合作用气体交换、叶绿素荧光和抗氧化酶系统对渗透胁迫的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(05): 876-881.
[7] 万小荣,莫爱琼,郭小建,杨妙贤,余土元,曹锦萍. 含异位表达花生AhNCED1基因的拟南芥提高耐渗透胁迫能力[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(09): 1440-1449.
[8] 汪耀富;杨天旭;刘国顺;赵春华;王佩;陈新建. 渗透胁迫下烟草叶片基因的差异表达研究[J]. 作物学报, 2007, 33(06): 914-920.
[9] 刘怀攀;纪秀娥;史留功;李潮海. 渗透胁迫对玉米幼苗叶片不同形态多胺含量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2006, 32(10): 1430-1436.
[10] 孙立平;何宝坤;吴学友;刘丽霞;李德全. 渗透胁迫下ABA及Ca2+/CaM信使系统对玉米幼苗根系63.5 kD热稳定蛋白的调控作用[J]. 作物学报, 2005, 31(01): 83-87.
[11] 杨建昌;张亚洁;张建华;王志琴;朱庆森. 水分胁迫下水稻剑叶中多胺含量的变化及其与抗旱性的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2004, 30(11): 1069-1075.
[12] 刘春玲;陈慧萍;刘娥娥;彭新湘;卢少云;郭振飞. 水稻品种对几种逆境的多重耐性及与ABA的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2003, 29(05): 725-729.
[13] 王玮, 张枫, 李德全. 外源ABA对渗透胁迫下玉米幼苗根系渗透调节的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2002, 28(01): 121-126.
[14] 梁宗锁;康绍忠;高俊风;张建华. 分根交替渗透胁迫与脱落酸对玉米根系生长和蒸腾效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2000, 26(02): 250-256.
[15] 陈京. 抗旱性不同的甘薯品种对渗透胁迫的生理响应[J]. 作物学报, 1999, 25(02): 232-236.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!