欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (03): 339-344.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

磷对小麦旗叶氮代谢有关酶活性和籽粒蛋白质含量的影响

王旭东;于振文;石玉;王小燕   

  1. 山东农业大学农业部小麦栽培生理与遗传改良重点开放实验室,山东泰安271018
  • 收稿日期:2005-01-06 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-03-12 网络出版日期:2006-03-12
  • 通讯作者: 于振文

Effects of Phosphorus on Activities of Enzymes Related to Nitrogen Metabolism in Flag Leaves and Protein Contents in Grains of Wheat

WANG Xu-Dong;Yu Zhen-Wen;SHI Yu;WANG Xiao-Yan   

  1. Key Laboratory of Wheat Cultivation Physiology & Genetic Improvement, Ministry of Agriculture, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, Shandong
  • Received:2005-01-06 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-03-12 Published online:2006-03-12
  • Contact: Yu Zhen-Wen

摘要:

选用中筋品种鲁麦22和强筋品种济南17在大田条件下研究了不同磷素水平(P0,不施磷;P1,每公顷施P2O5 105 kg;P2,每公顷施P2O5 210 kg)对小麦旗叶氮代谢有关酶活性、籽粒蛋白质积累和蛋白质组分含量的影响。结果表明,磷提高了灌浆前期和中期小麦旗叶硝酸还原酶(NR)和谷氨酰胺合成酶(GS)的活性,以及灌浆中期旗叶内肽酶(EP)的活性,其中对济南17的促进作用大于鲁麦22,而同一品种的P1和P2之间无显著差异;施磷亦提高了开花后14 d之前旗叶可溶性蛋白质含量和7 d之前游离氨基酸含量,与P0相比,P1有利于旗叶灌浆前期游离氨基酸的积累以及灌浆期间向籽粒的再分配,而过高的磷素水平(P2)对于灌浆后期旗叶游离氨基酸向籽粒再分配的影响较小;磷对籽粒蛋白质合成积累的促进作用在灌浆前期较大,后期较小,表现为前期施磷处理籽粒蛋白质含量显著高于P0,随着灌浆进程,差异逐渐缩小,最终2个品种P1处理成熟籽粒中蛋白质含量最高;不同磷素水平对2个小麦品种蛋白质组分的影响不一,对于2个小麦品种籽粒中清蛋白和球蛋白含量之和P1与P0无显著差异,而P1水平下籽粒谷蛋白和醇溶蛋白含量显著在鲁麦22中提高,在济南17中提高幅度较小,说明P1水平对改善小麦的营养品质意义不大,但能够改善其加工品质;P2水平下,济南17的加工品质有变劣的趋势。磷对小麦籽粒蛋白质各组分含量影响的复杂性要求在生产中,应针对不同品质类型小麦品种制定不同的优化栽培措施。

关键词: 磷素, 小麦, 酶活性, 蛋白质含量, 蛋白质组分

Abstract:

Nitrogen metabolism in leaves has important function on protein accumulation in wheat grains, involving three key enzymes, i.e. nitrate reductase (NR), glutamine synthetase (GS) and endopeptidase (EP). It has been well documented the changes of related enzymes in nitrogen metabolism under different rates of nitrogen and potassium fertilizer. However, little research has been done about the effect of phosphorus (P) on the contents of protein components in wheat. The objectives of the present research were to investigate the effect of P on the activities of three enzymes concerned with nitrogen metabolism in flag leaves and protein accumulation as well as its component contents in wheat grains. The study was carried out from 2001 to 2002 with two wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Lumai 22 and cv. Jinan 17) in field. Three P rates (P0, P1 and P2) were set in the experiment, and the amounts of P application were 0 kg, 105 kg and 210 kg P2O5 per ha, respectively. The results showed that the activities of NR, GS and EP in flag leaves were increased with the increase of P application during the early and middle grain filling stages (Fig.1-3), and the effect of P application for Jinan 17 was greater than that for Lumai 22, but there was no significant difference between P1 and P2 treatment. The contents of soluble protein and free amino acid in flag leaves were increased by P application before 14 d and 7 d after anthesis respectively(Fig.4 and Fig.5). And P1 treatment was of benefit to the accumulation of free amino acid during early grain filling stage and the redistribution to grains during the whole grain filling stage, whereas P2 treatment was less effect on the redistribution. It indicated that the synthesis and accumulation of protein in grains were increased by P application during grain filling stage, especially in the early stage. The protein content in P1 and P2 was significantly higher than that in P0 during the early grain filling. When maturing, P1 treatment had the highest total protein content in both cultivars (Fig.6). In P1 treatment there were little effect on the contents of albumin and globulin, and significant increase for the contents of gliadin and gluten in the two cultivars, which was greater for Lumai 22 than for Jinan 17 (Table 1). These results suggested that P1 treatment had little effect on wheat nutritional quality, but could improve its processing quality. However, excessive P application could deteriorate the processing quality as for Jinan 17. Therefore, different cultivation management should be adopted according to the different quality demans of different wheat types.

Key words: Phosphorus, Wheat, Enzyme activity, Protein content, Protein component

中图分类号: 

  • S512
[1] 胡文静, 李东升, 裔新, 张春梅, 张勇. 小麦穗部性状和株高的QTL定位及育种标记开发和验证[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1346-1356.
[2] 郭星宇, 刘朋召, 王瑞, 王小利, 李军. 旱地冬小麦产量、氮肥利用率及土壤氮素平衡对降水年型与施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1262-1272.
[3] 付美玉, 熊宏春, 周春云, 郭会君, 谢永盾, 赵林姝, 古佳玉, 赵世荣, 丁玉萍, 徐延浩, 刘录祥. 小麦矮秆突变体je0098的遗传分析与其矮秆基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 580-589.
[4] 冯健超, 许倍铭, 江薛丽, 胡海洲, 马英, 王晨阳, 王永华, 马冬云. 小麦籽粒不同层次酚类物质与抗氧化活性差异及氮肥调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 704-715.
[5] 刘运景, 郑飞娜, 张秀, 初金鹏, 于海涛, 代兴龙, 贺明荣. 宽幅播种对强筋小麦籽粒产量、品质和氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 716-725.
[6] 马红勃, 刘东涛, 冯国华, 王静, 朱雪成, 张会云, 刘静, 刘立伟, 易媛. 黄淮麦区Fhb1基因的育种应用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 747-758.
[7] 徐龙龙, 殷文, 胡发龙, 范虹, 樊志龙, 赵财, 于爱忠, 柴强. 水氮减量对地膜玉米免耕轮作小麦主要光合生理参数的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 437-447.
[8] 王洋洋, 贺利, 任德超, 段剑钊, 胡新, 刘万代, 郭天财, 王永华, 冯伟. 基于主成分-聚类分析的不同水分冬小麦晚霜冻害评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 448-462.
[9] 陈新宜, 宋宇航, 张孟寒, 李小艳, 李华, 汪月霞, 齐学礼. 干旱对不同品种小麦幼苗的生理生化胁迫以及外源5-氨基乙酰丙酸的缓解作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 478-487.
[10] 马博闻, 李庆, 蔡剑, 周琴, 黄梅, 戴廷波, 王笑, 姜东. 花前渍水锻炼调控花后小麦耐渍性的生理机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 151-164.
[11] 孟颖, 邢蕾蕾, 曹晓红, 郭光艳, 柴建芳, 秘彩莉. 小麦Ta4CL1基因的克隆及其在促进转基因拟南芥生长和木质素沉积中的功能[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 63-75.
[12] 韦一昊, 于美琴, 张晓娇, 王露露, 张志勇, 马新明, 李会强, 王小纯. 小麦谷氨酰胺合成酶基因可变剪接分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 40-47.
[13] 李玲红, 张哲, 陈永明, 尤明山, 倪中福, 邢界文. 普通小麦颖壳蜡质缺失突变体glossy1的转录组分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 48-62.
[14] 罗江陶, 郑建敏, 蒲宗君, 范超兰, 刘登才, 郝明. 四倍体小麦与六倍体小麦杂种的染色体遗传特性[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1427-1436.
[15] 王艳朋, 凌磊, 张文睿, 王丹, 郭长虹. 小麦B-box基因家族全基因组鉴定与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1437-1449.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!