欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (03): 330-338.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

结实期水分亏缺对反义Wx基因转化系水稻籽粒淀粉合成关键酶活性及淀粉累积的影响

蔡一霞;王维;张祖建;朱庆森;杨建昌   

  1. 华南农业大学农学院,广东广州510642
  • 收稿日期:2005-03-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-03-12 网络出版日期:2006-03-12
  • 通讯作者: 朱庆森

Effects of Water Deficiency on the Activities of Key Enzymes Involved in the Starch Synthesis and the Accumulation of Starch for the Transgenic Rice Plants Carrying Antisense Wx gene during Grain Filling

CAI Yi-Xia;WANG Wei;ZHANG Zu-Jian;ZHU Qing-Sen;YANG Jian-Chang   

  1. College of Agronomy, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong
  • Received:2005-03-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-03-12 Published online:2006-03-12
  • Contact: ZHU Qing-Sen

摘要:

以反义Wx基因转化系水稻及其受体亲本武运粳7号(9522)为材料,研究了结实期水层灌溉和水分亏缺条件下籽粒淀粉合成关键酶活性、淀粉及直支链淀粉含量的变化。结果表明,以水层灌溉为对照,结实初期(花后5~10 d)的水分亏缺利于籽粒中腺苷二磷酸葡萄糖焦磷酸化酶(ADPGPase)和颗粒淀粉合成酶(GBSS)活性的提高,但随着水分亏缺时间的延长,到灌浆后期两种酶活性降低的速度要快于对照。水分亏缺显著降低了可溶性淀粉合成酶(SSS)的峰值。Q酶活性于水分胁迫下显著受到抑制,花后20 d到成熟期酶活性降低的幅度较大。而两类去分支酶(异淀粉酶和普鲁兰酶)于水分亏缺下活性显著升高,在灌浆后期花后25~30 d普鲁兰酶仍保持着较高的活性。与水层灌溉相比,水分亏缺下籽粒中总淀粉的积累和支链淀粉含量明显降低。GBSS最大活性与直链淀粉含量关系最为密切,呈极显著正相关(r=0.981**),SSS、Q酶和DBE最大酶活性分别与淀粉和支链淀粉含量不显著相关性。由此推测土壤水分对支链淀粉合成和积累的影响并不是由某一种酶调节的,而是由SSS、Q酶和DBE以及其他一些酶共同催化完成的。

关键词: 水稻, 水分亏缺, Q酶, 去分支酶(DBE), 直链淀粉含量, 结实期

Abstract:

Soil drought is one of the most important factors limiting rice production in china. Recently, more attention for the inferior quality of rice caused by water stress has been paid in agricultural production. The previous study showed that the indices of quality, such as chalkiness, gel consistency and RVA profile were changed by soil drought. It is considered that rice quality is related to the process of starch accumulation. Therefore, all changes of rice quality under water deficit conditions are responsible for physiological metabolism of starch accumulation during grain filling. In present study, the pot experiments were conducted at Yangzhou University. Three transgenic rice plants CA1, CA2, CA3 carrying antisense Wx gene and a wild type (cv. Wuyunjing7) were grown under water deficiency at flowering stage. In order to assess the implication of physiological metabolism of starch accumulation to water deficiency, as the indictors of rice quality, the contents of soluble sugar, starch, amylose and amylopectin were measured. The starch accumulation capacity was determined by measuring adenosine diphosphoglucose pyrophosphorylase (ADPGPase), soluble starch synthase (SSS), granule-bounding starch synthase (GBSS), starch branching enzyme (Q-enzyme) and two debranching enzymes (Isoamylase and Pullulanase) in rice grain during filling period. The results showed that the activities of ADPGPase and GBSS were significantly enhanced at initial filling stage (5~10 d), and then declined rapidly from 20 days after anthesis (DAA) to ripening (Fig.1) by drought stress. The maximum activity of SSS was significantly decreased, but less affected by water deficiency at the later stage of starch accumulation. Q enzyme catalyzed the formation of α-1, 6 indican bond involved in the synthesis of amylopectin was most sensitive to water in that it responded earlier, and to a greater extent, than the other enzymes. The significant decrease in activity of Q enzyme was observed under water-deficit conditions, especially in later grain-filling stage (Fig.2). However, under such drought conditions, leading to decrease of starch accumulation, the decline in Q enzyme activity was more than that in ADPGPase and SSS. The activities of two debranching enzymes (DBE, Isoamylase and Pullulanase) were elevated significantly, and the high activity of Pullulanase was substantially observed at 20-30DAA under water deficiency (Fig.3). The total accumulation of starch and the content of amylopectin were reduced under water deficiency compared to well-watered treatments (Fig.4, Fig.5). A positive correlation between the maximal activity of GBSS and the content of amylose was observed (r=0.981**). However, there were no clear correlations between the maximal activities of SSS, Q enzyme, DBE and starch content or amylopectin content. The results suggested that the influences of soil water potential on starch accumulation and the synthesis of the amylopectin were attributed to changes of activities in SSS, Q-enzyme, DBE and other enzymes, and not regulated by only one of them.

Key words: Rice, Water deficiency, Q enzyme, Debranching enzyme, Amylose content, Grain-filling period

中图分类号: 

  • S511
[1] 田甜, 陈丽娟, 何华勤. 基于Meta-QTL和RNA-seq的整合分析挖掘水稻抗稻瘟病候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1372-1388.
[2] 郑崇珂, 周冠华, 牛淑琳, 和亚男, 孙伟, 谢先芝. 水稻早衰突变体esl-H5的表型鉴定与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1389-1400.
[3] 周文期, 强晓霞, 王森, 江静雯, 卫万荣. 水稻OsLPL2/PIR基因抗旱耐盐机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1401-1415.
[4] 郑小龙, 周菁清, 白杨, 邵雅芳, 章林平, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻不同穗部籽粒的淀粉与垩白品质差异及分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[5] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[6] 杨建昌, 李超卿, 江贻. 稻米氨基酸含量和组分及其调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1037-1050.
[7] 杨德卫, 王勋, 郑星星, 项信权, 崔海涛, 李生平, 唐定中. OsSAMS1在水稻稻瘟病抗性中的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1119-1128.
[8] 朱峥, 王田幸子, 陈悦, 刘玉晴, 燕高伟, 徐珊, 马金姣, 窦世娟, 李莉云, 刘国振. 水稻转录因子WRKY68在Xa21介导的抗白叶枯病反应中发挥正调控作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1129-1140.
[9] 王小雷, 李炜星, 欧阳林娟, 徐杰, 陈小荣, 边建民, 胡丽芳, 彭小松, 贺晓鹏, 傅军如, 周大虎, 贺浩华, 孙晓棠, 朱昌兰. 基于染色体片段置换系群体检测水稻株型性状QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1141-1151.
[10] 王泽, 周钦阳, 刘聪, 穆悦, 郭威, 丁艳锋, 二宫正士. 基于无人机和地面图像的田间水稻冠层参数估测与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1248-1261.
[11] 陈悦, 孙明哲, 贾博为, 冷月, 孙晓丽. 水稻AP2/ERF转录因子参与逆境胁迫应答的分子机制研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 781-790.
[12] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[13] 巫燕飞, 胡琴, 周棋, 杜雪竹, 盛锋. 水稻延伸因子复合体家族基因鉴定及非生物胁迫诱导表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 644-655.
[14] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
[15] 王琰, 陈志雄, 姜大刚, 张灿奎, 查满荣. 增强叶片氮素输出对水稻分蘖和碳代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 739-746.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!