欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (03): 339-344.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

磷对小麦旗叶氮代谢有关酶活性和籽粒蛋白质含量的影响

王旭东;于振文;石玉;王小燕   

  1. 山东农业大学农业部小麦栽培生理与遗传改良重点开放实验室,山东泰安271018
  • 收稿日期:2005-01-06 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-03-12 网络出版日期:2006-03-12
  • 通讯作者: 于振文

Effects of Phosphorus on Activities of Enzymes Related to Nitrogen Metabolism in Flag Leaves and Protein Contents in Grains of Wheat

WANG Xu-Dong;Yu Zhen-Wen;SHI Yu;WANG Xiao-Yan   

  1. Key Laboratory of Wheat Cultivation Physiology & Genetic Improvement, Ministry of Agriculture, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, Shandong
  • Received:2005-01-06 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-03-12 Published online:2006-03-12
  • Contact: Yu Zhen-Wen

摘要:

选用中筋品种鲁麦22和强筋品种济南17在大田条件下研究了不同磷素水平(P0,不施磷;P1,每公顷施P2O5 105 kg;P2,每公顷施P2O5 210 kg)对小麦旗叶氮代谢有关酶活性、籽粒蛋白质积累和蛋白质组分含量的影响。结果表明,磷提高了灌浆前期和中期小麦旗叶硝酸还原酶(NR)和谷氨酰胺合成酶(GS)的活性,以及灌浆中期旗叶内肽酶(EP)的活性,其中对济南17的促进作用大于鲁麦22,而同一品种的P1和P2之间无显著差异;施磷亦提高了开花后14 d之前旗叶可溶性蛋白质含量和7 d之前游离氨基酸含量,与P0相比,P1有利于旗叶灌浆前期游离氨基酸的积累以及灌浆期间向籽粒的再分配,而过高的磷素水平(P2)对于灌浆后期旗叶游离氨基酸向籽粒再分配的影响较小;磷对籽粒蛋白质合成积累的促进作用在灌浆前期较大,后期较小,表现为前期施磷处理籽粒蛋白质含量显著高于P0,随着灌浆进程,差异逐渐缩小,最终2个品种P1处理成熟籽粒中蛋白质含量最高;不同磷素水平对2个小麦品种蛋白质组分的影响不一,对于2个小麦品种籽粒中清蛋白和球蛋白含量之和P1与P0无显著差异,而P1水平下籽粒谷蛋白和醇溶蛋白含量显著在鲁麦22中提高,在济南17中提高幅度较小,说明P1水平对改善小麦的营养品质意义不大,但能够改善其加工品质;P2水平下,济南17的加工品质有变劣的趋势。磷对小麦籽粒蛋白质各组分含量影响的复杂性要求在生产中,应针对不同品质类型小麦品种制定不同的优化栽培措施。

关键词: 磷素, 小麦, 酶活性, 蛋白质含量, 蛋白质组分

Abstract:

Nitrogen metabolism in leaves has important function on protein accumulation in wheat grains, involving three key enzymes, i.e. nitrate reductase (NR), glutamine synthetase (GS) and endopeptidase (EP). It has been well documented the changes of related enzymes in nitrogen metabolism under different rates of nitrogen and potassium fertilizer. However, little research has been done about the effect of phosphorus (P) on the contents of protein components in wheat. The objectives of the present research were to investigate the effect of P on the activities of three enzymes concerned with nitrogen metabolism in flag leaves and protein accumulation as well as its component contents in wheat grains. The study was carried out from 2001 to 2002 with two wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Lumai 22 and cv. Jinan 17) in field. Three P rates (P0, P1 and P2) were set in the experiment, and the amounts of P application were 0 kg, 105 kg and 210 kg P2O5 per ha, respectively. The results showed that the activities of NR, GS and EP in flag leaves were increased with the increase of P application during the early and middle grain filling stages (Fig.1-3), and the effect of P application for Jinan 17 was greater than that for Lumai 22, but there was no significant difference between P1 and P2 treatment. The contents of soluble protein and free amino acid in flag leaves were increased by P application before 14 d and 7 d after anthesis respectively(Fig.4 and Fig.5). And P1 treatment was of benefit to the accumulation of free amino acid during early grain filling stage and the redistribution to grains during the whole grain filling stage, whereas P2 treatment was less effect on the redistribution. It indicated that the synthesis and accumulation of protein in grains were increased by P application during grain filling stage, especially in the early stage. The protein content in P1 and P2 was significantly higher than that in P0 during the early grain filling. When maturing, P1 treatment had the highest total protein content in both cultivars (Fig.6). In P1 treatment there were little effect on the contents of albumin and globulin, and significant increase for the contents of gliadin and gluten in the two cultivars, which was greater for Lumai 22 than for Jinan 17 (Table 1). These results suggested that P1 treatment had little effect on wheat nutritional quality, but could improve its processing quality. However, excessive P application could deteriorate the processing quality as for Jinan 17. Therefore, different cultivation management should be adopted according to the different quality demans of different wheat types.

Key words: Phosphorus, Wheat, Enzyme activity, Protein content, Protein component

中图分类号: 

  • S512
[1] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[2] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[3] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[4] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[5] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[6] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[7] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[8] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[9] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[10] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[11] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[12] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[13] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[14] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[15] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!