欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2005, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (10): 1333-1339.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

冬小麦不同株型品种光谱响应及株型识别方法研究

卢艳丽;李少昆;王纪华;谢瑞芝;黄文江;高世菊;刘良云   

  1. 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所,北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2004-09-27 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2005-10-12 网络出版日期:2005-10-12
  • 通讯作者: 李少昆

Spectral and Recongnized Method for Different Plant Type Wheat Cultivars

LU Yan-Li;LI Shao-Kun;WANG Ji-Hua;XIE Rui-Zhi;HUANG Wen-Jiang;GAO Shi-Ju;Liu Liangyun;Wang Zhijie   

  1. Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081
  • Received:2004-09-27 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2005-10-12 Published online:2005-10-12
  • Contact: Li Shaokun

摘要:

以直立和平展2种株型的冬小麦品种为材料,研究了它们的光谱响应以及田间植被覆盖度的差异,探讨了利用冠层光谱反射率、光谱特征参量NDVI及植被覆盖度识别小麦株型的方法。结果表明,(1)小麦不同株型品种在近红外波段(700~1300 nm)光谱反射率有明显差异,生育前期平展型品种高于直立型品种,并以拔节期的差异为最显著,随着生育进程差异逐渐变小。拔节期是进行株型识别的最佳时期,并且此期冠层的敏感波段680 nm和760~900 nm的反射率在2种株型品种之间差异明显。(2)小麦冠层叶面积指数(LAI)与归一化差异植被指数NDVI(680,890)呈正相关,并且不同生育阶段其相关程度有差异,这是利用NDVI和植被覆盖度(COV)识别不同株型的基础。(3)相同COV条件下,直立型品种的NDVI高于平展型品种的NDVI,并且随着COV的增加,差异逐渐变小,二者的变化关系体现了直立型品种株型紧凑和平展型品种株型披散的特点,利用NDVI和COV的关系可以对株型进行识别,以小麦拔节期为最佳识别阶段,此期2种株型品种的NDVI具有显著差异(P<0.05)。

关键词: 小麦, 株型, 冠层光谱, 覆盖度, 植被指数, 叶面积指数

Abstract:

With the application of remote sensing in estimating crop biochemical composition, the estimation precision has became a research focus. Plant-type is the main influential factor to canopy spectral due to its influence on canopy structure. It is very important to identify plant type of wheat cultivars for improving estimation accuracy. 10 winter wheat cultivars with two plant types were used to discuss their canopy spectral reflectance and the method to identify plant type using spectral characteristics and vegetation coverage (COV). The results were as follows: (1) Their canopy spectral reflectance had obvious difference in near infrared bands at earlier stages, especially at jointing stage (Fig.1). It was proved that Jointing was the best stage to identify plant-type, and in this stage there was a big differences for canopy spectral reflectance between 2 plant types in wavebands of 680 nm and 760-900 nm (Table 2). These bands lied in the position of red edge and near infrared, which were the plant canopy sensitive bands. So it was very useful to improve the measurement accuracy of leaf biochemical composition. (2) Leaf area index (LAI) was positively correlated with normal difference vegetable index [NDVI(680, 890)]. The correlation coefficient was different at different stage(Fig.3,4). The correlation between LAI and NDVI was the foundation to identify plant type by using NDVI and COV(vegetable coverage). (3)With COV increasing, NDVI was increased, but the difference between two plant types became diminishing. It reflected their plant-type characteristics, that is to say, leaves are erect and upwards in erect cultivars but horizontal and downwards in horizontal cultivars. So COV of horizontal cultivars was higher than that of erect ones under the same NDVI. On the other hand, when COV of the two cultivars was equal, NDVI of the erect leaf type varieties was higher than that of horizontal leaf type cultivars (Fig.5). As for wheat, jointing stage with low and different COV in two pant-type cultivars is the best stage to identify plant-type. There was significant difference in NDVI of erect and horizontal cultivars (P<0.05) at jointing stage. It is feasible to know plant type information using COV and NDVI. This method is fast and non-destructive. It provides the foundation to assess plant biochemical composition quantitatively by remote sensing.

Key words: Wheat, Plant type, Spectral, Coverage density, NDVI, LAI

中图分类号: 

  • S512,S123
[1] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[2] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[3] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[4] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[5] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[6] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[7] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[12] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[13] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[14] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
[15] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!