欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (10): 1530-1536.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

油菜生长发育模拟模型研究

曹宏鑫1;张春雷2;李光明2;张保军3;赵锁劳3;汪宝卿3;金之庆1;高亮之1
  

  1. 1江苏省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所,江苏南京210014; 2中国农业科学院油料作物研究所,湖北武汉430062;3西北农林科技大学,陕西杨凌712100
  • 收稿日期:2005-08-11 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-10-12 网络出版日期:2006-10-12
  • 通讯作者: 曹宏鑫

Researches of Simulation Models of Rape(Brassica napus L.) Growth and Development

CAO Hong-Xin1,ZHANG Chun-Lei2,LI Guang-Ming2,ZHANG Bao-Jun3,ZHAO Suo-Lao3,WANG Bao-Qing3,JIN Zhi-Qing1,GAO Liang-Zhi1   

  1. 1 Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment Research, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, Jiangsu; 2 Institute of Oil Crops Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430062, Hubei; 3 Northwest Sci-Tech University of Agriculture and Forestry, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
  • Received:2005-08-11 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-10-12 Published online:2006-10-12
  • Contact: CAO Hong-Xin

摘要:

以2002—2005年中国长江中游地区田间试验为基础,结合相关文献资料,借鉴R/WCSODS思路,建立油菜生长发育模拟模型,包括油菜发育期、叶龄、干物质、叶面积及分枝数动态模型,并确定参数、检验与验证。例如,中双9号与中油杂2号在武汉和芜湖生育期观察值与模拟值平均绝对误差-0.9~-0.3 d,相关系数0.9996~0.9997,差值标准误2.2~2.3 d,最大绝对误差4 d。干物质与叶面积指数实测值与模拟值平均绝对误差分别为7.3 g·m-2和-0.1043,差值标准误分别为59.13 g·m-2和0.1506,相关系数分别为0.9916和0.9583,最大绝对误差分别为98.8 g·m-2和-0.27。油菜发育期和叶龄模型以温、光为主要驱动因子,油菜生长发育全过程划分为播种至出苗、出苗至抽薹、抽薹至初花以及初花至成熟4个生育阶段,精度较高,适用性好,通用性强,更符合管理要求且易掌握;春化模型同时考虑冬性、半冬性及春性品种,更为全面;油菜群体动态模拟模型初步考虑了绿色茎与角果光合;讨论了油菜模拟优化决策系统的结构与功能。

关键词: 油菜, 生长发育, 模拟模型

Abstract:

Agricultural model is one of core technology for digital agriculture, and crop simulation model is an important content in agriculture model. The aim of simulation model of rape growth and development (SMRGD) was to develop Rape Cultivation Simulation-Optimization-Decision Making System(Rape-CSODS) , to design its planting , to regulate and control its growth and development, and to fulfill its high yield, good quality, high benefits and standard production eventually. The SMRGD were developed based on field experiments with 2 cultivars, 6 sowing dates and 3 sites from 2002 to 2005 in middle valley of Yangtze river in China and relative data from references of rape researches, employed ideas of R/WCSODS (Rice/Wheat Cultivation Simulation-Optimization-Decision Making System), which included phenology, leaf age, biomass, leaf area index (LAI), and shoot and ramification number dynamics models, in the same time, the SMRGD and its parameters were also assessed, calibrated and tested. The average absolute deviation(de), correlation coefficients(r) and the standard errors of their absolute deviation(Sde) of the observed and simulated values for growth period duration of two cultivars in Wuhan and Wuhu were -0.9 to -0.3 d, with the correlation coefficient from 0.9996 to 0.9997 and 2.2 to 2.3 d, respectively, the most absolute deviation was 4 d. The de, Sde, r and the most absolute deviation of dry matter weight and LAI for “Zhongshuang 9” in Wuhan between the observed and simulated values were 7.3 g·m-2 and -0.1043, 59.13 g·m-2 and 0.1506, with the correlation coefficients 0.9916 and 0.9863, and 98.8 g·m-2 and -0.27, respectively, 1:1 line of them was in Fig.2 to 4. Temperature and light were main driving factors in the models of phenology and leaf age for rape, a life cycle of rape was divided into 4 development phases including from sowing to emergence, from emergence to enlongation, from enlongation to early anthesis, and from early anthesis to maturity, which made the model higher precision, good adaptability, wide usability, easy to master and suitable to use in management of rape production. The vernalization models for rape could be use in winter, semi-winter and spring rape varieties. The photosynthesis of green stem and pods were taken account simply in the population dynamic models for rape. The structure and functions of Rape-CSODS also were discussed in this study.

Key words: Rape, Growth and development, Simulation models

[1] 任依涵, 赵曼利, 代晶, 李银水, 顾炽明, 杨璐, 杜雪竹, 胡文诗, 秦璐. 油菜叶片功能氮动态变化对光合速率及光合氮利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1459-1471.
[2] 蒯婕, 娄洪祥, 谭晓强, 郜耿东, 邵东李, 肖胜男, 赵杰, 徐正华, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生. 直播油菜单产提升的生理基础及实践途径[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 982-992.
[3] 张全军, 吴东丽, 刘聪, 朱永超, 杨大生, 孔祥胜. 1981—2024年长江中下游油菜发育期时空格局演变特征[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1140-1152.
[4] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.
[5] 谭文清, 惠荣奎, 张凡丽, 覃磊, 毛舒香, 邓力超, 郭一鸣, 曲亮, 严明理. 油菜耐渍性快速鉴定及耐渍种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1035-1045.
[6] 王楚锐, 李开祥, 赵志, 肖麓, 唐国永, 赵志刚, 徐亮, 杜德志, 柳海东. 甘蓝型春油菜早花基因BnCRY2功能位点KASP标记的开发及应用[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 708-721.
[7] 娄洪祥, 幸仁鹏, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 蒯婕, 周广生. 播种期对长江中游甘蓝型油菜光温资源利用效率和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 539-551.
[8] 李瑞, 余意雯, 王敦亮, 田婷, 孙灵湘, 陶玥玥, 孙华. 长江中下游油菜薹油兼用模式菜籽产量特征比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 620-630.
[9] 马毅娜, 吴晓明玉, 李藕琪, 王圆, 陈丽, 张盈川, 赵伦, 文静, 傅廷栋, 沈金雄. Bna-miR1040-EIF3A模块调控油菜开花时间的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 349-362.
[10] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 基于北纬30°分界的长江中游油菜增产策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 99-117.
[11] 朱家宝, 王先领, 樊友众, 王宗铠, 蒯婕, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 周广生. 秸秆还田耦合氮肥运筹对稻茬油菜茎秆质量和抗倒伏性能的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 233-248.
[12] 王彬, 蒙姜宇, 邱浩良, 贺亚军, 钱伟. 甘蓝型油菜BnaDUF579基因家族的鉴定与表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2100-2110.
[13] 樊友众, 王先领, 王宗铠, 王春云, 王天尧, 谢捷, 蒯婕, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 周广生. 秸秆还田耦合氮肥运筹对稻茬油菜光合性能及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2139-2151.
[14] 李炳霖, 叶晓磊, 肖红, 肖国滨, 吕伟生, 刘君权, 任涛, 陆志峰, 鲁剑巍. 镁肥用量对油菜产量和镁吸收量及因冻害减产程度的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1850-1860.
[15] 李世鹏, 陈才武, 张晶, 吕恬, 傅廷栋, 易斌. 基于改进U-Net++模型的油菜pol TCMS温敏两系育性等级鉴定及温度育性关系的量化研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1423-1434.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!