欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (04): 662-668.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00662

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

苗期水分胁迫对玉米根系生长杂种优势的影响

李博;田晓莉*;王刚卫;潘飞;李召虎   

  1. 中国农业大学作物化学控制研究中心 / 农业部作物栽培与耕作学重点开放实验室/植物生理学与生物化学国家重点实验室, 北京 100094
  • 收稿日期:2007-09-03 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-04-12 网络出版日期:2008-04-12
  • 通讯作者: 田晓莉

Heterosis of Root Growth in Maize (Zea mays L.) Seedling under Water Stress

LI Bo,TIAN Xiao-Li*,WANG Gang-Wei,PAN Fei,LI Zhao-Hu   

  1. Center of Crop Chemical Control / Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Farming System / State Key Laboratory of National Plant Physiology and
    Biochemical, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China
  • Received:2007-09-03 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-04-12 Published online:2008-04-12
  • Contact: TIAN Xiao-Li

摘要: 以玉米杂交种高油115及其亲本(母本220、父本1145) 为材料, 研究了玉米苗期根系生长的杂种优势及水分胁迫的影响。试验设水分充足、轻度干旱和严重干旱3个处理, 田间持水量分别为75%、55%和35%。结果表明, 在水分充足条件下, 根长(RL)、根表面积(SA)和根干重(RDW)均表现出不同程度的中亲优势和超亲优势, 轻度干旱显著降低了各指标的杂种优势, 而严重干旱则完全抑制了根系生长的杂种优势。根系各性状中, RL的杂种优势最强。在水分充足条件下, 与中等根(根直径0.25~0.45 mm)和粗根(根直径>0.45 mm)相比, 细根(根直径0.05~0.20 mm)的RL、SA及其占总根系比例的杂种优势最高。轻度干旱胁迫虽然降低了根系的杂种优势, 但RL、SA仍表现出显著的超亲优势和中亲优势(粗根的超亲优势除外)。此外, 只有细根RL和SA占总根系的比例在轻度干旱胁迫下具有显著的中亲优势, 说明杂交种可以通过生成较亲本更高比例的细根来抵抗轻度干旱胁迫。

关键词: 玉米, 幼苗, 杂种优势, 根系生长, 水分胁迫

Abstract: Maize (Zea mays L.), the earliest crop for heterosis application, is highly sensitive to water stress. The root system is one of the important organs contributing to drought tolerance. However, few reports have provided quantitative data on the hybrid vigor in root development of maize, especially on that under water stress. The objective of this study was to investigate the hete- rosis of maize root growth at seedling stage and the effects of water availability on it. Hybrid maize Gaoyou 115 (220 × 1145) and its parents were subjected to three water treatments: 75%, 55%, and 35% of field water-holding capacity, considered as well watered (WW), moderate water stress (MWS), and severe water stress (SWS) respectively. The desired soil water regimes were well prepared at the beginning of the experiment, and kept by weighing. Under WW treatment, substantial midparent heterosis (MPH) and overparent hereosis (OPH) were observed for root dry weight (RDW), root length (RL), and root surface area (SA). MPH for these traits was in the range between 100% and 203%, and OPH between 99% and 189%. MWS clearly reduced the degree of heterosis compared with WW; MPH was in the range between 73% and 108%, and OPH between 55% and 59%. However, SWS arrested hybrid vigor in root growth almost completely. These results indicate that heterosis of root growth in maize seedlings varies with water availability. The maximum heterosis for root growth was obtained in RL with average 155.5% MPH and aver-age 124.2% OPH over WW and MWS. Compared with middle (0.25 mm < root diameter (DA)≤0.45 mm) and coarse (0.45 mm < DA) roots, fine (0.05 mm < DA≤0.20 mm) roots displayed the highest degree of MPH and OPH in absolute RL and SA under WW, MPH for its RL and SA was 265% and 246%, respectively, and OPH 218% and 208%, respectively. For the ratios of RL and SA to the total RL and SA respectively, they only displayed significant and slight MPH, but compared with middle and coarse roots, fine roots (with 21% and 44% of MPH for RL% and SA%, respectively) still had the highest degree of heterosis. Although we still detected significant MPH and OPH for absolute RL and SA regardless of root diameter classes (except for OPH for coarse roots) and significant MPH for the ratios of RL and SA concerning fine roots under MWS, it was obvious that MWS reduced het-erosis of RL and SA, especially for fine roots. MPH values for absolute RL and SA showed about one-fold decreases, and OPH showed more than two-fold decreases. Additionally, absolute RL and SA for fine roots do not reveal heterosis under SWS, but the ratios of RL and SA for them significantly displayed 9% and 16% of MPH, respectively. This suggests that the seedlings of hybrid maize develop more and greater proportion of fine roots than its parents (especially under water stress), which enable them to resist moderate drought better.

Key words: Maize (Zea mays L.), Seedlings, Heterosis, Root growth, Water availability

[1] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[3] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[6] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[7] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[8] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[9] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[10] 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
[11] 杨亚莉, 徐明睿, 马越飞, 海艺蕊, 刘凯栋, 刘万茂, 孙颖. 玉米根尖及整根响应缺铁的转录组比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1006-1021.
[12] 马亮, 马璐, 张舒钰, 章慧敏, 王仁明, 宋旭东, 张振良, 冒宇翔, 陆虎华, 陈国清, 郝德荣, 周广飞. 玉米苞叶数目转录组分析及候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 790-801.
[13] 孟成, 王哲. 玉米ZmPFK基因家族全基因组鉴定及响应胁迫表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 764-779.
[14] 李新浩, 邢梦柯, 周梓惠, 李思烨, 任昊, 王洪章, 赖华江. 外源褪黑素通过协调光反应与暗反应增强玉米苗期的耐热性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 839-856.
[15] 张超, 郭欢, 李忠玲, 岳淑宁, 赵娜. 基于BSA-seq技术定位玉米籽粒花青素关联基因[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 780-789.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!