欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 1115-1121.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.01115

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

玉米水分利用效率、碳稳定同位素判别值和叶面积之间的关系

张丛志12，张佳宝1*，赵炳梓1，张辉12，黄平12，李晓鹏12，朱强根1   

  1. 1中国科学院南京土壤与农业可持续发展高家重点实验室封丘农业生态系统高家实验站，江苏南京210008；2中国科学院研究生院，北京100049
  • 收稿日期:2008-08-20 修回日期:2008-12-13 出版日期:2009-06-12 网络出版日期:2009-04-16
  • 通讯作者: 张佳宝，E-mail:jbzhang@issas.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家重点基础研究发展计划（973计划）项目（2005CB121103），中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目（KZCX2-YW-406），中国科学院知识创新工程重大项目（KSCX1-YW-09-05）资助。

Relationships among Water Use Efficiency,Carbon Isotope Discrimination,and Specific Leaf Area in Maize

ZHANG Cong-Zhi12,ZHANG Jia-Bao1,ZHAO Bing-Zi1,ZHANG Hui12,HUANG Ping12,LI Xiao-Peng12,ZHU Qiang-Gen1   

  1. 1State Experimental Station of Agro-Ecosystem in Fengqiu,State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture,Institute of Soil Science,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Nanjing 210008,China;2Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China
  • Received:2008-08-20 Revised:2008-12-13 Published:2009-06-12 Published online:2009-04-16
  • Contact: ZHANG Jia-Bao，E-mail:jbzhang@issas.ac.cn

PDF

2446

被引次数

8

摘要：

通过盆栽试验，研究了水分胁迫对玉米各生育期叶面积(LA)、比叶面积(SLA)、水分利用效率(WUE)和碳稳定同位素判别值(Δ13C)的影响以及不同水分条件下WUE、茎叶Δ13C和SLA之间的关系。试验设4个水分处理, 分别为田间持水量的75%~100%(W1)、50%~75%(W2)、30%~50%(W3)和0~30%(W4)。W2和W3处理对生物量干重的影响在玉米拔节期明显，而W4处理导致各生育期生物量干重的极大降低。在W2和W3处理下，玉米各生育期的WUE随着水分胁迫程度的增加而增加；而W4处理下，WUE在孕穗期后则显著降低。SLA在孕穗期达到最大。玉米各生育期叶片Δ13C在W1、W2和W3处理中呈随水分胁迫的增加而降低的趋势，而W4处理下的叶片Δ13C则高于W2和W3处理。玉米叶片光合同化物质往茎秆转移时没有发生碳同位素的分馏作用。在玉米的各生育期，叶片Δ13C、茎秆Δ13C和玉米WUE呈一致性的负相关；各生育期的SLA与Δ13C呈正相关关系，而与WUE呈显著的负相关。

关键词: 水分胁迫, 玉米, 生育期, 水分利用效率, 碳同位素判别值, 比叶面积

Abstract:

Plant fractionates heavy carbon isotopes during photosynthesis, which usually occurs when CO2 diffuses to the carboxylation site, and during carboxylation reaction. On account of CO2 fixation process is coupled with water transpiration during the photosynthesis, it is possible to apply stable carbon isotope to study crop water use efficiency (WUE). At present, stable carbon isotope techniques have been widely studied and applied in C3 plants, however, the relative studies are less reported in C4 plants. In this way, a pot experiment was conducted from June 9 to September 25 in 2007 to study the variation of leaf area (LA), specific leaf area (SLA), water use efficiency (WUE), and carbon isotope discrimination (Δ13C) in maize (Zea mays L.) under different water deficit conditions. The objective was to understand the relationship among WUE, Δ13C and SLA. Maize were subjected to four water treatments, that is: 75–100% (W1), 50%–75% (W2), 30%–50% (W3), and 0–30% (W4) of field water-holding capacity of the soil. The WUE, SLA, and Δ13C values were measured at seedling, jointing, booting, tasseling, filling, and mature stages. The dry matter accumulation at jointing was obviously affected by W2 and W3 treatments, and decreased significantly in W4 treatment after booting. WUE increased with water stress during all growth stages in W2 and W3 treatments, but decreased significantly in W4 treatment after booting. SLA reached maximal value at booting. Leaf Δ13C decreased in W1, W2, and W3 treatments from jointing to mature, whereas leaf Δ13C value was greater in W4 treatment than in W2 and W3 treatments. Stem Δ13C significantly and positively correlated and presented no significant difference with leaf Δ13C, which indicated that carbon isotope was not fractionated during photosynthate transport from leaves to stems. Maize Δ13C was negatively correlated with WUE; SLA and Δ13C presented positive correlation and both negatively correlated with WUE.

Key words: Water stress, Maize,Growth stage, Water use efficiency, Carbon isotope discrimination, Specific leaf area

[1] Yepez E A, Williams D G, Scott R L, Lin G. Partitioning overstory and understory evapotranspiration in a semiarid savanna woodland from the isotope composition of water vapor. Agric For Meteorol, 2003, 119: 53-68
[2] Williams D G, Cable W, Hultine K, Hoedjes J C B, Yepez E A, Simonneaux V, Er-Raki S, Boulet G, de Bruin H A R, Chehbouni A, Hartogensis O K, Timouk F. Evapotranspiration components determined by stable isotope, sap flow and eddy covariance techniques. Agrci For Meteorol, 2004, 125: 241-258
[3] Nier A O, Gulbransen E A. Variations in the relative abundance of the carbon isotopes. J Am Chem Soc, 1939, 61: 697-698
[4] O’leary M H. Carbon isotope fractionation in plants. Phytochemistry, 1981, 20:553-567
[5] Farquhar G D. On the nature of carbon isotope discrimination in C4 species. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1983, 10: 205-226
[6] Wright G C, Hubick K T, Farquhar G D. Discrimination in carbon isotopes of leaves correlates with water use efficiency of field grown peanut cultivars. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1988, 15: 815-825
[7] Wright G C, Nageswara R C, Farquhar G D. Water-use efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination in peanut under water deficit conditions. Crop Sci, 1994, 34: 92-97
[8] Hubick K T, Shorter R, Farquhar G D. Heritability and genotype × environment interactions of carbon isotope discrimination and transpiration efficiency in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L). Aust J Plant Physiol, 1988, 15: 799-813
[9] Ehleringer J R, Klassen S, Clayton C, Sherrili D, Fuller H M, Qing N F, Cooper T A. Carbon isotope discrimination and transpiration efficiency in common bean. Crop Sci, 1991, 31: 1161-1615
[10] Ehdaie B, Waines J G. Variation in water-use efficiency and its components in wheat: I. Well-watered pot experiment. Crop Sci, 1993, 33: 294-299
[11] Knight J D, Livingston N J, van Kessel C. Carbon isotope discrimination and water-use efficiency of six crops under wet and dryland conditions. Plant, Cell Environ, 1994, 17: 173-179
[12] Condon A G, Richards R A, Farquhar G D. Relationship between carbon isotope discrimination, water use efficiency and transpiration efficiency for dryland wheat. Aust J Agric Res, 1993, 44: 1693-1671
[13] Wall F L, Matus A, Lafond G P, van Kessel C. Water-use efficiency and carbon isotopic composition in reduced tillage system. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 1999, 63: 356-361

[14] Farquhar G D, Ehleringer J R, Hubick K T. Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Ann Rev Plant Physiol, 1989, 40: 503-537
[15] Voltas J, Serrano L, Hernández M, Pemán J. Carbon isotope discrimination, gas exchange and stem growth of four Euramerican hybrid poplars under different watering regimes.New For, 2006, 31: 435-451
[16] Chaves M M, Pereira J S, Maroco J, Rodriques M L, Ricardo C P, Osório M L, Carvalho I, Faria T, Pinheiro C. How plants cope with water stress in the field. Photosynthesis and growth. Ann Bot, 2002, 89: 907-916
[17] Sun Z J, Livingston N J, Guy R D, Ethier G J. Stable carbon isotopes as indicators of increased water use efficiency and productivity in white spruce
[Picea glauca (Moench) Voss] seedlings. Plant Cell Environ, 1996, 19: 887-894
[18] Saranga Y, Flash I, Paterson A H, Yakir D. Carbon isotope ratio in cotton varies with growth stage and plant organ. Plant Sci, 1999, 142: 47-56
[19] Chen Y-H(陈英华), Hu J(胡俊), Li Y-H(李裕红), Xue B(薛博), Yan C-L(严重玲). Application of stable carbon isotope techniques to research into water stress. Acta Ecol Sin(生态学报), 2004, 24 (5): 1027-1033 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20] Ebukanson G J. Retardation of chloroplast ATPase activity in maize seedlings by drought stress. J Plant Physiol, 1987, 129: 187-189
[21] Gimenez C, Mitchell V G, Lawlor D W. Regulation of photosynthetic rate of two sunflower hybrids under water stress. Plant Physio1, 1992, 98: 516-524
[22] Zhao B Z, Kondo M, Maeda M, Ozaki Y, Zhang J. Water-use efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination in two cultivars of upland rice during different developmental stages under three water regimes. Plant Soil, 2004, 261: 61-75
[23] FarquharG D, Richards R A. Isotopic composition of plant carbon correlates with water-use efficiency of wheat genotypes. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1984, 11: 539-552
[24] Hubick K T, Farquhar G D. Carbon isotope discrimination and the ratio of carbon gained to water lost in barley cultivars. Plant, Cell Environ, 1989, 12: 795-804
[25] Hall A E, Richards R A, Condon A G, Wright G C, Farquhar G D. Carbon isotope discrimination and plant breeding. Plant Breed Rev, 1994, 12: 81-113
[26] Meinzer F C, Rundel P W, Goldstein G, Sharifi M R. Carbon isotope composition in relation to leaf gas exchange and environmental conditions in Hawaiian Metrosideros polymorpha populations. Oecologia, 1992, 91: 305-311
[27] Bagnall D J, King R W, FarquharG D. Temperature dependent feedback inhibition of photosynthesis in peanut. Planta, 1988, 175: 348-354
[1] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[3] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[6] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[7] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[8] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[9] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[10] 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
[11] 杨亚莉, 徐明睿, 马越飞, 海艺蕊, 刘凯栋, 刘万茂, 孙颖. 玉米根尖及整根响应缺铁的转录组比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1006-1021.
[12] 张超, 郭欢, 李忠玲, 岳淑宁, 赵娜. 基于BSA-seq技术定位玉米籽粒花青素关联基因[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 780-789.
[13] 叶凡, 李帅, 李思宇, 陈云, 窦超银, 刘立军. 不同节水灌溉方式对东北稻区水稻产量和群体质量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 895-907.
[14] 郭向阳, 涂亮, 王栋, 刘鹏飞, 王安贵, 易强, 任洪, 李刚, 祝云芳, 吴迅, 蒋喻林, 田丰, 陈泽辉. 热带Suwan种质在我国玉米种质改良中的创新与利用[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 655-664.
[15] 马亮, 马璐, 张舒钰, 章慧敏, 王仁明, 宋旭东, 张振良, 冒宇翔, 陆虎华, 陈国清, 郝德荣, 周广飞. 玉米苞叶数目转录组分析及候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 790-801.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2