欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 1552-1557.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.01552

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

两种灌溉方式下保水剂用量对裸燕麦产量和品质的影响

吴娜1，赵宝平1,**，曾昭海1，任长忠2，郭来春2，陈昌龙1，赵国军2，胡跃高1,*   

  1. 1中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院，北京100193；2白城市农业科学院，吉林白城137000
  • 收稿日期:2009-01-05 修回日期:2009-03-15 出版日期:2009-08-12 网络出版日期:2009-06-11
  • 通讯作者: 胡跃高, E-mail: huyuegao@cau.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家“十一五”科技支撑计划项目（2006BAD15B02）和农业部公益性行业（农业）科研专项“优质燕麦生产与加工技术研究”（nyhyzx07-099-2）资助。

Effects of Super Absorbent Polymer Application Rate on Yield and Quality of Naked Oat(Avenue nuda L.) in Two Irrigation Systems

WU Na1,ZHAO Bao-Ping1,**,ZENG Zhao-Hai1,REN Chang-Zhong2,GUO Lai-Chun2,CHEN Chang-Long,ZHAO Guo-Jun2,HU Yue-Gao1,*   

  1. 1 College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; 2 Baicheng Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Baicheng 137000, China
  • Received:2009-01-05 Revised:2009-03-15 Published:2009-08-12 Published online:2009-06-11
  • Contact: HU Yue-Gao, E-mail: huyuegao@cau.edu.cn

PDF

1929

被引次数

61

摘要：

保水剂和滴灌是两种节水措施，在小麦、玉米和番茄上广泛应用。燕麦是一种对水分敏感的作物，籽粒产量和品质受水分影响较大，目前这方面研究较少。本文在大田条件下，采用裂区设计，研究了传统灌溉和滴灌两种灌溉方式下4个保水剂用量(0、30、60和90 kg hm-2)对裸燕麦白燕8号籽粒产量、籽粒品质、籽粒矿质元素含量和饲草品质的影响。结果表明，传统灌溉处理的籽粒产量比滴灌处理高14.78 %，粗蛋白、粗脂肪和β-葡聚糖含量比滴灌处理分别降低1.22%、2.73%和3.36%，差异显著(P < 0.05)。滴灌处理下籽粒中钙、镁、钾、锌、铁含量均显著高于传统灌溉，锰含量差异不显著。滴灌处理的相对饲用价值为122.38%~135.67%，显著高于传统灌溉(118.75%~134.44%)。保水剂用量对裸燕麦籽粒产量有显著影响，滴灌条件下施用保水剂比不施保水剂增产2.95%~12.14%，传统灌溉条件下施用保水剂比不施保水剂增产1.1%~5.0%。60 kg hm-2保水剂有利于裸燕麦大多数品质性状的提高，以及矿质元素的吸收利用。

关键词: 保水剂, 滴灌, 传统灌溉, 裸燕麦, 产量, 品质

Abstract:

Super absorbent polymer (SAP) and drip irrigation technique are water-saving measurements in several crops, such as wheat, maize, and tomato. Oat is a water-sensitive crop that requires a large amount of water during the growth period. Grain yield and quality of oat are affected by water condition. However, studies in this area are rare. In this study, the variation of grain yield, grain quality, mineral element contents and forage quality of naked oat were investigated under two irrigation systems (traditional irrigation and drip irrigation) and four levels of super absorbent polymer (0, 30, 60 and 90 kg ha-1). Compared with drip irrigation, grain yield under traditional irrigation was 14.78% higher, but crude protein, crude fat, and β-glucan content of grain decreased by 1.22%, 2.73%, and 3.36%, respectively. The difference between two irrigation systems was significant (P < 0.05). Calcium, magnesium, potassium, zinc and iron contents in grains were significantly higher in drip irrigation system than in traditional irrigation system, except for the manganese content. Relative feeding value, which varied from 122.38% to 135.67% in drip irrigation system, was significantly higher than that in traditional irrigation system (118.75%–134.44%). SAP had positive effect on grain yield of naked oat. In drip irrigation system, the grain yield increased by 2.95% to 12.14% when SAP was applied; it in traditional irrigation system increased by 1.1% to 5.00%. The SAP application of 60 kg ha-1improved most quality traits of naked oat including the contents of mineral elements in grains.

Key words: Super absorbent polymer, Drip irrigation, Traditional irrigation, Naked oat, Yield, Quality

[1] Liu R-F(刘瑞风), Zhang J-P(张俊平), Wang A-Q(王爱勤). Water absorbency and its influence factor of PAM-atta superabsorbent composite. Trans CSAE (农业工程学报), 2005, 21(9): 47-50 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] Lentz R D, Shainberg I, Sojka R E, Carter D L. Preventing irrigationfurrow erosion with small application of polymers. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 1992, 56: 1926-1932
[3] Sojka R E,Lentz R D, Westerman D T. Water and erosion management with multiple application of polyacrylamide in furrow irrigation. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 1998, 62: 1672-1680

[4] Sui H(隋华), Dong J-H(董家行), Li X-G(李小刚), Liu Q(刘强), Sun X-H(孙秀华), Zheng S-Q(郑淑清), Xing P-Z(邢佩芝). Effects of drought-control and water-retention agent on wheat growth. J Tianjin Agric Univ (天津农学院学报), 2008, 15(2): 11-13 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[5] Liu X-S(刘学生), Gao F-W(高凤文), Zhao F-M(赵凤民), Luo S-G (罗盛国). Effects of super absorbent polymer on corn yield and yield constituent factors. J Northeast Agric Univ (东北农业大学学报), 2006, 37(2): 151-154 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[6] Oktem A, Simsek M, Oktem A G. Deficit irrigation effects on sweet corn (Zea mays saccharata Sturt) with drip irrigation system in a semi-arid region: I. Water-yield relationship. Agric Water Manage, 2003, 61: 63-74

[7] Ngouajio M, Wang G, Goldy R. Withholding of drip irrigation between transplanting and flowering increases the yield of field-grown tomato under plastic mulch. Agric Water Manage, 2007, 87: 285-291

[8] Enciso J, Jifon J, Wiedenfeld B. Subsurface drip irrigation of onions: Effects of drip tape emitter spacing on yield and quality. Agric Water Manage, 2007, 92: 126-130

[9] Li G-R(李桂荣), Zhao B-P(赵宝平), Hu Y-G(胡跃高), Cheng F-M(程方民), Zeng Z-H(曾昭海), Zhao N-C(赵宁春). Effects of irrigation regimes on phytic acid, protein, and mineral element contents in two oat cultivars. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(5): 866-870 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] Oraby H F, Ransom C B, Kravchenko A N, Sticklen M B. Barley HVA1 gene confers salt tolerance in R3 transgenic oats. Crop Sci, 2005, 45: 2218-2227

[11] Wight C P, O’Donoughue L S, Chong J, Tinker N A, Molnar S J.Discovery, localization, and sequence characterization of molecular markers for the crown rust resistance genes Pc38, Pc39, and Pc48 in cultivated oat (Avena sativa L.).Mol Breed, 2004, 14: 349-361
[12] Long J, Holland J B, Munkvold G P, Jannink J L. Responses to selection for partial resistance to crown rust in oat. Crop Sci, 2006, 46: 1260-1265
[13] Nicholson I A. The effect of stage of maturity on the yield and chemical composition of oats for haymaking. J Agric Sci, 1957, 49: 129-139

[14] Eagles H A, Lewis T D, Holland R. Quality and quantity of forage from winter oats in the manawatu. New Zealand J Exp Agric, 1979, 7: 337-341

[15] Bao G-S(鲍根生), Zhou Q-P(周青平), Han Z-L(韩志林). Effects of nitrogen and potassium fertilizer on yield and quality of oat. Pratacult Sci (草业科学), 2008, 25(10): 48-53(in Chinese with English abstract)
[16] Zheng D-S(郑殿升), Lü Y-C(吕耀昌), Tian C-Y(田长叶), Zhao W(赵伟). Analysis on beta-glucan content of naked oat(Avena nuda L.) in China. J Plant Genet Resour (植物遗传资源学报), 2006, 7(1): 54-58 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[17] Zhao N-C(赵宁春), Zhang Q-F(张其芳), Cheng F-M(程方民), Zhou W-J(周伟军). Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and zinc supply levels on grain phytic acid content and its correlation with several mineral nutrients in rice grains. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2007, 21(2): 185-190 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18] Feng J-H(冯继华). Comparison of the van soest method and conventional method for measuring lignin and cellulose content. J Southwest Natl Coll (Nat Sci Edn) (西南民族学院学报·自然科学版), 1994, 20(1): 55-56(in Chinese with English abstract)
[19] SAS Institute SAS/STAT User’s Guide. Version 8.2. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, 2001
[20] Antony E, Singandhupe R B. Impact of drip and surface irrigation on growth, yield and WUE of capsicum. Agric Water Manage, 2004, 65: 121-132
[21] Najafi P. Effects of using subsurface drip irrigation and treated municipal waste water in irrigation of tomato. Pakistan J Biol Sci, 2006, 9: 2672-2676

[22] Liu Z H, Cheng F M, Zhang G P. Grain phytic acid content in japonica rice as affected by cultivar and environment and its relation to protein content. Food Chem, 2005, 89: 49-52
[23] Xie Z J, Jiang D, Cao W X. Effects of post-anthesis soil water status on the activities of key regulatory enzymes of starch and protein accumulation in wheat grains. J Plant Physiol Mol Biol, 2003, 29: 309-316
[24] Ma X-M(马新明), Xiong S-P(熊淑萍), Li L(李琳), Zhang J-J(张娟娟), He J-G(何建国). Effects of soil moisture on photosynthetic characteristics of different specialized end-uses winter wheat at their later growth stages and on their yield. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报) , 2005, 16(1): 83-87 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25] Wang L-Q(王立秋), Jin Z-Z(靳占忠), Cao J-S(曹敬山), Wang Z-Y(王占宇). Effect of water and fertilizer factors on grain quality and bread baking quality of wheat. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1997, 30(3): 67-73 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26] Zhang G, Chen J, Wang J, Ding S. Cultivar and environmental effects on (1-3,1-4)-β-D-glucan and protein content in malting barley. J Cereal Sci, 2001, 34: 295-301
[27] Bassiri A, Nahapetian A. Differences in concentrations and interrelationships of phytate, phosphorus, magnesium, calcium, zinc, and iron in wheat varieties grown under dryland and irrigated conditions. J Agric Food Chem, 1977, 25: 1118-1122
[28] Luo M-Z(罗明珠), Liu Z-F(刘子凡), Liang J-N(梁计南), Luo C-J(罗朝觉). Effects of water-holding agent on the yield and quality of sugarcane. Sugarcane (甘蔗), 2003, 10(3): 13-16 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[3] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[4] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[7] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[8] 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[9] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[10] 刘嘉欣, 兰玉, 徐倩玉, 李红叶, 周新宇, 赵璇, 甘毅, 刘宏波, 郑月萍, 詹仪花, 张刚, 郑志富. 耐三唑并嘧啶类除草剂花生种质创制与鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1027-1034.
[11] 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[12] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[13] 杜浩, 程玉汉, 李泰, 侯智红, 黎永力, 南海洋, 董利东, 刘宝辉, 程群. 利用Ln位点进行分子设计提高大豆单荚粒数[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 565-571.
[14] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
[15] 袁嘉琦, 刘艳阳, 许轲, 李国辉, 陈天晔, 周虎毅, 郭保卫, 霍中洋, 戴其根, 张洪程. 氮密处理提高迟播栽粳稻资源利用和产量[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 667-681.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2