欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (9): 1744-1748.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.01744

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

超级早、晚稻品种的源库协调性

袁小乐1，潘晓华1,*，石庆华1，吴建富1，漆映雪2   

  1. 1江西农业大学/农业部双季稻生理生态与栽培重点实验室/作物生理生态与遗传育种教育部重点实验室，江西南昌330045‘2江西省土壤肥料技术推广站，江西南昌330046
  • 收稿日期:2009-02-22 修回日期:2009-05-02 出版日期:2009-09-12 网络出版日期:2009-07-04
  • 通讯作者: 潘晓华, E-mail:xhuapan@163.com; Tel: 0791-3813490
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家“十一五”科技支撑计划项目（2006BAD02A04）和江西省科技厅重点攻关项目（20051B020010）资助。

Coordination between Source and Sink in Super Early and  Late Rice

YUAN Xiao-Yue1,PAN Xiao-Hua1,*,SHI Qing-Hua1,WU Jian-Fu1,QI Ying-Xue2   

  1. 1 Key Laboratory of Physiology, Ecology and Cultivation of Double Cropping Rice, Ministry of Agriculture / Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Education / Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China; 2 Jiangxi Soil and Fertilizer Extension Station, Nanchang 330046, China
  • Received:2009-02-22 Revised:2009-05-02 Published:2009-09-12 Published online:2009-07-04
  • Contact: PAN Xiao-Hua, E-mail:xhuapan@163.com; Tel: 0791-3813490

PDF

3147

被引次数

26

摘要：

为了探讨超级早、晚稻品种的高产机理，对其源库特性进行了研究。与非超级稻品种(对照)相比，超级早、晚稻品种的总库容量、粒叶比、粒束比均较大，且与产量显著正相关；在整个灌浆结实期的源库增量比略大，但早稻在灌浆中后期(抽穗后10~25 d)和晚稻在灌浆前期(抽穗后0~10 d)均明显大；起始灌浆速率和平均灌浆速率均大，结实率与起始灌浆速率显著正相关，产量与平均灌浆速率极显著(早稻)或显著(晚稻)正相关；生育后期的根系活力衰退值较小，而剑叶的气-叶温差除早稻的株两优819和晚稻的淦鑫688外，其它均大。根系活力衰退值与产量显著负相关，剑叶的气叶温差与产量显著正相关。研究表明，较大的库容量且源库协调性较好是超级早、晚稻品种超高产的重要机理。

关键词: 超级稻, 早稻, 晚稻, 产量, 源库特性

Abstract:

In order to clarify the super higher yield mechanism of super early and late rice, we studied the source and sink characteristics under field conditions. Compared with non-super rice cultivars (control cultivar), the total sink capacity, ratio of grain-leaf area and ratio of grain-vascular bundle of super rice were higher, and positively and significantly correlated with grain yield. During filling stage, the ratio of source increase to sink of super early and late rice was slightly higher than that of control cultivars, but in the mid-late filling stage (10–25 d after heading) of early rice and the early filling stage (0–10 d after heading) of late rice, the ratio was significantly larger than that of control cultivars. The initialgrain-filling rate and mean grain-filling rate of super early and late rice were higher than those of controlcultivars, and positively and significantly correlated with filled grain rate and yield respectively. The degradation rates of root activity of super early and late rice after heading were lower than those of control cultivars, while the temperature depression (difference between air temperature and leaf temperature) was higher than that of controlcultivarsexcept early rice Zhuliangyou 819 and late rice Ganxin 688. The degradation rate of root activity and the temperature depression were negatively and positively, correlated with grain yield, respectively. The results suggested that larger total sink capacity and better coordination between source and sink should be the important mechanism for super higher yield in super early and late rice cultivars.

Key words: Super Rice（O. sativa L.）, Early rice, Late rice, Yield, Source and sink Characteristics

[1] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[3] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[4] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[7] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[8] 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[9] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[10] 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[11] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[12] 杜浩, 程玉汉, 李泰, 侯智红, 黎永力, 南海洋, 董利东, 刘宝辉, 程群. 利用Ln位点进行分子设计提高大豆单荚粒数[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 565-571.
[13] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
[14] 袁嘉琦, 刘艳阳, 许轲, 李国辉, 陈天晔, 周虎毅, 郭保卫, 霍中洋, 戴其根, 张洪程. 氮密处理提高迟播栽粳稻资源利用和产量[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 667-681.
[15] 丁红, 徐扬, 张冠初, 秦斐斐, 戴良香, 张智猛. 不同生育期干旱与氮肥施用对花生氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 695-703.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2