欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (11): 2045-2054.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.02045

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

冬小麦节水栽培三种灌溉模式的水氮利用与产量形成

张胜全1,方保停1,2,张英华1,周顺利1,王志敏1,*   

  1. 1中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院,北京100193;2河南省农业科学院小麦研究中心,河南郑州450002
  • 收稿日期:2009-02-24 修回日期:2009-05-31 出版日期:2009-11-12 网络出版日期:2009-09-10
  • 通讯作者: 王志敏, E-mail: zhimin206@263.net; Tel: 010-62734011
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国际科技支撑计划项目(2007BAD69B05)和北京市自然科学基金项目(6072018)资助。

Utilization of Water and Nitrogen and Yield Formation Under Three ALimited Irrigation Schedules in Winter Wheat

ZHANG Sheng-Quan1,FANG Bao-Ting1,2,ZHANG Ying-Hua1,ZHOU Shun-Li1,WANG Zhi-Min1*   

  1. 1College of Agronomy and Biotechnology,China Agricultural University,Beijing 100193,China;2Wheat Research Center,Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Zhengzhou 450002,China
  • Received:2009-02-24 Revised:2009-05-31 Published:2009-11-12 Published online:2009-09-10
  • Contact: WANG Zhi-Min,E-mail:zhimin206@263.net;Tel:010-62734011

摘要:

为探讨华北平原冬小麦节水栽培适宜灌溉模式及其产量形成与资源利用规律,2004—2008连续4年在同一地块比较春不灌水(I0)、春灌1水(I1)和春灌2水(I2) 3种灌溉模式对冬小麦水氮利用特性与产量形成的影响。在均实行晚播和一次性底施氮量157.5 kg hm-2条件下,各模式年际间籽粒产量稳定,I0、I1和I2模式的4年平均产量分别为6 134、7 515和8 134 kg hm-2,平均总耗水量分别为3 334、3 829和4 270 m3 hm-2,平均总吸氮量分别为162.5、197.9和212.2 kg hm-2。在耗水构成中,土壤贮水消耗占总耗水量的比例分别为66.7%、49.2%和37.8%。3种灌溉模式的水分利用效率达1.9~2.0 kg m-3,灌溉模式间无显著差异;氮素利用效率在3个灌溉模式间也无显著差异,平均为38.0 kg kg-1 N。3种灌溉模式主茎穗占成穗数比例平均为81%,开花期上三叶叶面积指数2.6~3.8,旗叶节以上非叶绿色器官面积指数2.7~3.6。综合以上结果,冬小麦3种灌溉模式及其配套技术形成的群体结构可在不同产量水平上实现水、氮资源高效利用。

关键词: 冬小麦, 节水栽培, 氮素利用效率, 高产, 灌溉模式

Abstract:

Water shortage is a great challenge in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production worldwide. Studies on wheat physiology and ecology have been carried out aiming at yielding more grains with less consumptions of water and nitrogen fertilizer. Cultivation techniques based on limited irrigation and nitrogen application are highly emphasized in North China Plain, where water stress is the most major problem in regular years. In Wuqiao area, Hebei province, China, a series cultivation systems have been established with distinct effects of high yield and small water consumption. The principle measure in the technique system was controlling the irrigation frequency and water amount. The purpose of this study was to disclose the mechanism of high-yielding and high resource use efficiency in the cultivation system established in Wuqiao. In the consecutive growing seasons from 2004 to 2008, field experiments were conducted at the Wuqiao Experimental Station of China Agriculture University under three limited irrigation schedules, i.e., no irrigation in spring (I0), 750 m3 ha-1 of water at jointing (I1) and each 750 m3ha-1 of water at jointing and anthesis (I2). Fertilizers were only applied before sowing, including urea 225 kg ha-1, (NH4)2HPO4 300 kg ha-1 (thus, the total nitrogen was 157.5 kg ha-1),K2SO4225 kg ha-1, and ZnSO422.5 kg ha-1. The characteristics of water and nitrogen use and the formation of grain yield were investigated at jointing, booting, anthesis, and maturity stages. The results showed that the average yield was 6134 kg ha-1 for I0, 7 515 kg ha-1 for I1, and 8 134 for I2 treatment, and the average total evapotranspiration was in the order of 3 334, 3 829, and
4 270
m3 ha-1. The ratio of soil water consumption to total evapotranspiration was 67%, 49%, and 38% in I0, I1, and I2 treatments, respectively. The water use efficiency ranged from 1.9 to 2.0 kg m-3 with no significant differences among treatments. This indicated that approximately 52.6 m3 of water was required for yielding 100 kg of grains. Under the nitrogen application level of 157.5 kg ha-1, the average total nitrogen accumulation was 163, 198, and 212 kg ha-1 in I0, I1, and I2 treatments, respectively. Consistent results with slight variations were observed in the total nitrogen accumulation across years. The average nitrogen use efficacy of the three irrigation treatments was 38 kg kg-1and there were no significant differences among treatments. In terms of the characteristics of plant population, the leaf area index (LAI) at booting and anthesis, as well as the LAI for the top three leaves were not significantly different between I1 and I2 treatments, but they were significantly higher than those in I0 treatment. The LAI for the top three leaves and non-leaf organs green area index (NAI) above flag leaf ranged from 2.6 to 3.8 and from 2.7 to 3.6, respectively. The ratios of non-leaf organs green area above flag leaf to the uppermost three leaf area and total leaf area were more than 1.0 and 0.7, respectively. Three limited irrigation schedulesshowed steady grain yield and high resource use efficiency for consecutive four years.

Key words: Winter wheat, Water-saving cultivation, Nitrogen use efficiency, High yield, Irrigation schedule

[1] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[2] 蒯婕, 娄洪祥, 谭晓强, 郜耿东, 邵东李, 肖胜男, 赵杰, 徐正华, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生. 直播油菜单产提升的生理基础及实践途径[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 982-992.
[3] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[4] 林子晴, 钟醒宇, 刘樊, 任子澳, 马瑞, 邓秀峰, 王东伟, 刘少鹏, 陈康, 张明才, 李召虎, 周于毅, 段留生. 山东北部沿海平原区小麦-玉米周年两吨粮超高产技术创建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 631-643.
[5] 郭保卫, 王旺, 王开, 王岩, 曾鑫, 景秀, 王晶, 倪新华, 许轲, 张洪程. 长江中下游两类型糯稻高产群体动态特征及超高产形成规律[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2433-2453.
[6] 李宜谦, 徐守振, 刘萍, 马麒, 谢斌, 陈红. 基于40K SNP芯片的陆地棉产量构成因素全基因组关联分析及单铃重位点挖掘[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2128-2138.
[7] 闫喆林, 任强, 樊志龙, 殷文, 孙亚丽, 范虹, 何蔚, 胡发龙, 闫丽娟, 柴强. 氮肥后移优化绿洲灌区小麦间作玉米种间关系提高氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2190-2203.
[8] 万书波, 张佳蕾, 高华鑫, 王才斌. 中国花生高产栽培研究进展与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1703-1711.
[9] 吴柳格, 陈坚, 张鑫, 邓艾兴, 宋振伟, 郑成岩, 张卫建. 近二十年国审冬小麦品种的产量与品质性状变化趋势研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1814-1826.
[10] 陈如雪, 孙丽芳, 张芯源, 牟海萌, 张永新, 袁丽雪, 彭仕乐, 王壮壮, 王永华. 秸秆还田与微生物菌剂配施对冬小麦旗叶碳氮代谢及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1901-1913.
[11] 赵刚, 张建军, 党翼, 樊廷录, 王磊, 周刚, 王淑英, 李兴茂, 倪胜利, 米文博, 周旭姣, 程万莉, 李尚中. 黄土旱塬区秸秆覆盖量对不同降雨年型土壤水温效应和冬小麦产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1643-1653.
[12] 孟祥宇, 刁邓超, 刘雅睿, 李云丽, 孙玉晨, 吴玮, 赵雯, 汪妤, 吴建辉, 李春莲, 曾庆东, 韩德俊, 郑炜君. 小麦新品种西农877高产稳产的遗传特性解析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1261-1276.
[13] 王东, 王森, 尚丽, 冯浩伟, 张永巧, 崔佳鸣, 李爽, 章佳聪, 车欢. 补灌对黄土高原半湿润区冬小麦产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1312-1325.
[14] 王娇, 白海霞, 韩语燕, 梁惠, 冯雅楠, 张东升, 李萍, 宗毓铮, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇. CO2浓度升高、升温及其交互作用对良星99冬小麦叶片碳氮代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1061-1076.
[15] 王哲, 胡燕灵, 龚方仪, 易睿, 赵书宏, 刘睿琴, 刘雨杭, 张甜, 张亚洲, 郑有良, 刘登才, 黄林, 伍碧华. 基于16K芯片的野生二粒小麦渗入系BAd7-209籽粒蛋白含量QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3238-3250.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!