利用SPAD和Dualex快速、无损诊断玉米氮素营养状况

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.00840

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了探讨玉米生长过程中适宜的施氮量，以加拿大玉米品种Pioneer 38B84为试验材料，在底施氮为45 kg hm^-2和基本苗7.9万株 hm^-2条件下，研究追氮量0、34、68、101、135、169和203 kg hm^-2以及氮饱和参考小区等8个处理对吐丝后玉米穗位叶SPAD值、Dualex值、地上部生物量及产量的影响。结果表明，SPAD值、地上部生物量以及产量均随追氮量增加而增加，Dualex值随追氮量增加而降低。追氮101、135、169和203 kg hm^-2处理的SPAD-氮饱和指数(SPAD-NSI)在各测定日期均大于0.95。追氮101 kg hm^-2处理的Dualex-NSI在吐丝后18~46 d大于0.95；追氮135、169和203 kg hm^-2各处理的Dualex-NSI在各测定日期均大于0.95。SPAD 值、Dualex 值、SPAD-NSI和Dulaex-NSI均与追氮量显著相关。在拔节期追氮101 kg hm^-2 或135 kg hm^-2即可满足玉米生长对氮素的需求，获得最大的经济产量。当超过最大产量施肥量时，氮肥用量的增加对SPAD值、Dualex值、地上部生物量以及产量均无显著影响。追肥不仅可达到与氮饱和参考小区同样的产量效果，而且还可减少氮肥的施用量，减少种植者的经济投入。在本试验条件下，基施氮45 kg hm^-2，在拔节期适宜的追氮量为101 kg hm^-2或135 kg hm^-2。SPAD叶绿素仪与Dualex仪均可用来诊断玉米的氮素营养状况。

关键词: 追施氮肥量, 玉米, SPAD值, Dualex值, 产量

Abstract:

Nitrogen (N) is one of the most important nutrients influencing both yield and grain quality, and N supply is one of the few production factors that can be controlled and which is known to effectively influence crop performance. Both SPAD reading and Dualex reading are shown to be highly correlated with leaf N concentration, and crop N status can be assessed through the SPAD reading and Dualex reading. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the suitable N rate at topdressing time. In order to evaluate the N application rates on SPAD reading and Dualex reading of corn after silking, corn field experiment was conducted with application of 45 kg N ha^-1 at sowing and planting density of 79 000 plants ha^-1 in 2008 on the L’Acadie experimental farm (Quebec, Canada). Topdressing N was performed with 0, 34, 68, 101, 135, 169 and 203 kg N ha^-1 at jointing stage. N-saturated reference plots with topdressing of 180 kg N ha^-1 at 10 days after sowing, besides 45 kg N ha^-1 at sowing, was established. With increasing topdressing N rates, SPAD reading, aboveground dry biomass and corn grain yield increased, and Dualex reading decreased. The SPAD-NSI of topdressing N treatments with 101, 135, 169 and 203 kg N ha^-1was always higher than 0.95 at all samplings dates. The Dualex-NSI of topdressing N treatments with 101 kg N ha^-1 was higher than 0.95 from 18 d to 46 d; the Dualex-NSI of topdressing N treatments with 135, 169 and 203 kg N ha^-1 was also higher than 0.95 at all samplings dates. SPAD reading, Dualex reading, SPAD-NSI and Dualex-NSI were strongly correlated with topdressing N rates. The maximum yield was reached when topdressing N was 101 or 135 kg N ha^-1at jointing stage. When maximum yield was reached, any additional N was no significant effect on SPAD reading, Dualex reading, aboveground dry biomass and corn grain yield. Topdressing N rate of 101 or 135 kg N ha^-1 was enough for corn growth after silking and getting maximum grain yield. There was no significant difference between splitting the N into two applications and N-saturated application on grain yield; however, splitting the N into two applications significantly decreased the total N application rate and growers’ inputs. In the present study, the suitable topdressing N rate was 101 or 135 kg N ha^-1with 45 kg N ha^-1at sowing. SPAD and Dualex could be integrated to evaluate in-season N status of corn.

Key words: Topdressing N application rates, Corn, SPAD reading, Dualex reading, Corn grain yield

鱼欢,邬华松,王之杰. 利用SPAD和Dualex快速、无损诊断玉米氮素营养状况[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(05): 840-847.

YU Huan,WU Hua-Song,WANG Zhi-Jie. Evaluation of SPAD and Dualex for In-Season Corn Nitrogen Status Estimation[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2010, 36(05): 840-847.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.00840

https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/Y2010/V36/I05/840

参考文献

[1] Elia A, Santamaria P, Serio F. Nitrogen nutrition, yield and quality of spinach. J Sci Food Agric, 1988,76: 341–346

[2] Samonte S O P B, Wilson L T, Medley J C, Pinson S R M, McClung A M, Lales J S. Nitrogen utilization efficiency: Relationships with grain yield, grain protein, and yield-related traits in rice. Agron J,2006, 98: 168–176

[3] Ferguson R B, Hergert G W, Schepers J S, Gotway C A, Cahoon J E, Peterson T A. Site-specific nitrogen management of irrigated maize: Yield and soil residual nitrate effects. Soil Sci Soc Am J,2002, 66: 544–553

[4] Arora Y, Juo A S R. Leaching of fertilizer ions in a Kaolinitic Ultisol in the high rainfall tropics: Leaching of nitrate in field plots under cropping and bare fallow. ,1982, 46: 1212–1218Soil Sci Soc Am J

[5] Randall G W, Vetsch J A, Huffman J R. Corn production on a subsurface-drained mollisol as affected by time of nitrogen application and nitrapyrin. Agron J, 2003, 95: 1213–1219

[6] Fox R H, Kern J M, Piekielek W P. Nitrogen fertilizer source, and method and time of application effects on no-till corn yields and nitrogen uptake. Agron J, 1986, 78: 741–746

[7] Russelle M P, Deibert E J, Hauck R D, Stevanovic M, Olson R A. Effects of water and nitrogen management on yield and ¹⁵N-depleted fertilizer use efficiency of irrigated corn. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 1981, 45: 553–558

[8] Welch L F, Mulvaney D L, Oldham M G, Boone L V, Pendleton J W. Corn yields with fall, spring, and sidedress nitrogen. Agron J, 1971, 63: 119–123

[9] Wood C W, Reeves D W, Duffield R R, Edmisten K L. Field chlorophyll measurements for evaluation of corn nitrogen status. J Plant Nutr,1992, 15: 487–500

[10] Arregui L M, Lasa B, Lafarga A, Iranneta I, Baroja E, Quemada M. Evaluation of chlorophyll meters as tools for N fertilization in winter wheat under humid Mediterranean conditions. Eur J Agron,2006, 24: 140–148

[11] Turner F T, Jund M F. Chlorophyll meter to predict nitrogen topdress requirement for semidwarf rice. Agron J, 1991, 83: 926–928

[12] Varvel G E, Schepers J S, Francis D D. Ability for in-season correction of nitrogen deficiency in corn using chlorophyll meters. Soil Sci Soc Am J,1997, 6: 1233–1239

[13] Schepers J S, Francis D D, Vigil M, Below F E. Comparison of corn leaf nitrogen concentration and chlorophyll meter readings. Commun Soil Sci Plan,1992,23: 2173–2187

[14] Hussain F, Bronson K F, Yadvinder S, Bijay S, Peng S. Use of chlorophyll meter sufficiency indices for nitrogen management of irrigated rice in Asia. Agron J, 2000, 92: 875–879

[15] Blackmer T M, Schepers J S. Use of a chlorophyll meter to monitor nitrogen status and schedule fertigation for corn. J Prod Agric,1995, 8: 56–60

[16] Tremblay N, Bélec C. Adapting nitrogen fertilization to unpredictable seasonal conditions with the least impact on-the environment. Horttechnology,2006, 16: 408–412

[17] Shapiro C A. Using a chlorophyll meter to manage nitrogen applications to corn with high nitrate irrigation water. Commun Soil Sci Plan, 1999, 30: 1037–1049

[18] Caldwell M M, Gold W G, Harris G, Ashurst C W. A modulated lamp system for solar UV-B (280–320 nm) supplementation studies in the field. Photochem Photobiol,1983, 37: 479–485

[19] Cerovic Z G, Ounis A, Cartelat A, Latouche G, Goulas Y, Meyer S, Moya I. The use of chlorophyll fluorescence excitation spectra for the non-destructive in situassessment of UV-absorbing compounds in leaves. Plant Cell Environ, 2002, 25: 1663–1676

[20] Cartelat A, Cerovic Z G, Goulas Y, Meyer S, Lelarge C, Prioul J L, Barbottin A, Jeuffroy M H, Gata P, Agati G, Moya I. Optically assessed contents of leaf polyphenolics and chlorophyll as indicators of nitrogen deficiency in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Field Crops Res,2005, 91: 35–49

[21] Goulas Y, Cerovic Z G, Cartelat A, Moya I. Dualex: a new instrument for field measurements of epidermal UV-absorbance by chlorophyll fluorescence. Appl Optics, 2004, 43: 4488–4496

[22] Tremblay N, Wang Z J, Bélec C. Evaluation of the Dualex for the assessment of corn nitrogen status. J Plant Nutr, 2007, 30: 1355–1369

[23] Delgado J A, Ristau R J, Dillon M A, Duke H R, Stuebe A, Follett R F, Shaffer M J, Riggenbach R R, Sparks R T, Thompson A, Kawanabe L M, Kunugi A, Thompson K. Use of innovative tools to increase nitrogen use efficiency and protect environmental quality in crop rotations. Commun Soil Sci Plan, 2001, 32: 1321–1354

[24] Ma B L, Dwyer L M, Gregorich E G. Soil N amendment, effects on seasonal N mineralization and N cycling in maize production. Agron J, 1999, 91: 1003–1009

Jia L-L(贾良良), Chen X-P(陈新平), Zhang F-S(张福锁). Non-destructive measurement of crop nitrogen nutrition diagnosis. World Agric (世界农业), 2001, (6): 36–37 (in Chinese with English abstract)

相关文章 15

[1]	刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2]	胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[3]	梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[4]	马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[5]	孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[6]	张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[7]	张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[8]	王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[9]	赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[10]	杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[11]	郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[12]	张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[13]	杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[14]	韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[15]	张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed