欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (08): 1401-1408.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.01401

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

沼液与尿素配施对冬小麦光合特性及产量的影响

冯伟,管涛,王永华,郭天财*,王晨阳,朱云集   

  1. 河南农业大学国家小麦工程技术研究中心,河南郑州 450002
  • 收稿日期:2010-01-26 修回日期:2010-04-21 出版日期:2010-08-12 网络出版日期:2010-06-11
  • 通讯作者: 郭天财, E-mail: tcguo888@sina.com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由现代农业(小麦)产业技术体系(MATS)建设专项资金和国家自然科学基金(30900867)资助。

Effects of Biogas Slurry Combinated with Urea on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Winter Wheat

FENG Wei,GUAN Tao,WANG Yong-Hua,GUO Tian-Cai*,WANG Chen-Yang,ZHU Yun-Ji   

  1. National Engineering Research Center for Wheat, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China
  • Received:2010-01-26 Revised:2010-04-21 Published:2010-08-12 Published online:2010-06-11
  • Contact: GUO Tian-Cai,E-mail:tcguo888@sina.com

摘要: 2007—2009年度,在总施氮量相同的条件下,比较了沼液与尿素氮肥不同基追比对冬小麦品种温麦28光合特性及产量的影响。在基施沼液的基础上追施尿素,提高叶片PSII潜在活性(Fv/Fo)、PSII光化学最大效率(Fv/Fm)和荧光光化学猝灭系数(qP),降低荧光非光化学猝灭系数(qN),其PSII量子效率(ΦPSII)和电子传递速率(ETR)优势明显,具有较高的光合速率,尤其是基施25%沼液氮+追施75%尿素氮处理,光合功能强,籽粒产量最高,2007—2008年度达8 277.90 kg hm-2,2008—2009年度为7 318.07 kg hm-2。整个生育期单施沼液处理使小麦营养生长过旺,荧光参数变劣,光合速率下降,产量显著降低。单施尿素氮肥处理Fv/FoFv/Fm在开花期前具有明显优势,但在开花期后不再延续前期优势,ΦPSII和ETR参数年度间存在差异,qP值持续低于基施沼液追施尿素的配施处理,而qN值表现相反,荧光参数间不够协调,产量较基施沼液追施尿素处理降低,而较单施沼液处理显著提高。

关键词: 小麦, 沼液, 尿素, 光合特性, 产量

Abstract: A two-year field experiment was carried out to study the physiological basis of photosynthesis when biogas slurry was jointly applied with urea in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and to suggest the proper method for applying biogas slurry. Under the control of total input of nitrogen, the treatments with basal biogas slurry and topdressed urea showed relative high values of PSII potential activity (Fv/Fo), the maximal quantum efficiency of PSII photochemistry (Fv/Fm), photochemical quenching coefficient (qP), electron transport rate (ETR), overall photochemical quantum yield of PSII (ΦPSII), and Pn and low values of non-photochemical quenching coefficient (qN) of flag leaf from heading to maturity of wheat. The best performance of Pn and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters was observed in the treatment of basal biogas slurry (25%) + topdressed urea (75%), which also showed the highest yield of 8 277.90 kg ha-1 and 7 318.07 kg ha-1 in 2007–2008 and 2008–2009. The only application of biogas slurry resulted in poor chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and low Pn because of plant malnutrition, and ultimately a significant lower yield than other treatments. Although the highest Fv/Fo and Fv/Fm were observed in the treatment with urea applied only at heading stage, there were obvious unbalanced chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, such as a continuously low level of qP, a continuously high level of qN, and the unstable ETR and ΦPSII across years. The results suggest that the proper application of biogas slurry in combination with chemical fertilizers may promote grain yield of wheat through optimizing photosynthetic functions, and biogas slurry applied before sowing is better than topdressed at jointing stage.

Key words: Winter wheat, Biogas slurry, Urea, Photosynthetic characteristics, Grain yield

   [1]    Li Z-B(李泽碧), Wang Z-Y(王正银), Li Q-R(李清荣), Xu W-H(徐卫红), Li C-Q(李成琼), Liu C-G(刘朝贵), Wu G-Q(吴国强). Effects of combined application of biogas digestate and chemical fertilizer on yield and quality of lettuce. China Biogas (中国沼气), 2006, 24(1): 27-30 (in Chinese with English abstract)   
[2]    Li J-M(李菊梅), Xu M-G(徐明岗), Qin D-Z(秦道珠), Li D-C(李冬初), Hosen Y, Yagi K. Effects of chemical fertilizers application combined with manure on ammonia volatilization and rice yield in red paddy soil. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2005, 11(1): 51-56 (in Chinese with English abstract)   
[3]    Ni L(倪亮), Sun G-H(孙广辉), Luo G-E(罗光恩), Shi W-Y(石伟勇), Lu H(陆宏), Ye W-Z(叶伟宗). Effect of marsh gas sewage irrigation on soil quality. Soils (土壤), 2008, 40(4): 608-611 (in Chinese with English abstract)   
[4]    Li Y(李轶), Zhang Y-L(张玉笼), Yu N(虞娜), Tong L(佟玲), Zhang Z(张镇). Effects of biogas fertilizers application on nitrate and salt accumulation in soil of protected fields. Chin J Soil Sci (土壤通报), 2007, 38(2): 409-411 (in Chinese with English abstract)   
[5]    Duan M-S(段茂盛), Wang G-H(王革华). Greenhouse gas mitigation benefits of biogas project in livestock farms. Acta Energiae Solaris Sin (太阳能学报), 2003, 24(3): 386-389 (in Chinese with English abstract)   
[6]    Dahiya A K, Vasudevan P. Biogas plant slurry as an alternative to chemical fertilizers. Biomass, 1986, 9: 67-74   
[7]    Xu W-H(徐卫红), Wang Z-Y(王正银), Wang Q(王旗), Ou-Yang J(欧阳柬), Chen C-F(陈彩范). A review on studies of biogas fermentation residue effect on vegetable yield and quality. China Biogas (中国沼气), 2005, 23(2): 27-29 (in Chinese with English abstract)   
[8]    Liu X-G(刘小刚), Li B-Z(李丙智), Zhang L-S(张林森), Jin H-C(金会翠 Sin (西北农业学报), 2007, 16(3): 105-108 (in Chinese with English abstract)), Feng C-L(冯存良). Effect of biogas slurry on fruit quality and leaf physiological activity index of Fuji apple. Acta Agric Boreali-Occident   
[9]    Zhu L-S(朱列书), Dai L-J(戴林建), Su X-Y(苏祥云), Fu S-F(付松发). The impacts on yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco when fertilize with different ponded organic fertilizers. Crop Res (作物研究), 2004, 18(2): 96-99 (in Chinese)
[10]    Evens S D, Goodrich P R. Effects of solid and liquid beef and liquid hogmanure on soil characteristics and on growth, yield, and composition of corn. J Environ Qual, 1997, 6: 361-368
[11]    Qiu L(邱凌), Yang B-P(杨保平), Zhang Z-M(张正茂), Li X-Y(李相运), Zou Y-J(邹养军). Effects of soaking of wheat seed by biogas slurry on wheat growth in dryland. China Biogas (中国沼气), 1999, 17(1): 42-44 (in Chinese)
[12]    Yang J-F(杨军芳), Zhou X-F(周晓芬). The effects of dressing biogas waste fertilizer in wheat fields. J Hebei Agric Sci(河北农业科学), 2005, 9(3): 58-60 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]    Matis T, Lithourgidis A S, Gagianas A A. Effects of injected liquid cattle manure on growth and yield of winter wheat and soil characteristics. Agron J, 2003, 95: 592-596
[14]    Garg R N, Pathak H, Das D K, Tomar R K. Use of flyash and biogas slurry for improving wheat yield and physical properties of soil. Environ Monitoring Assessment, 2005, 107: 1-9
[15]    Kong D-J(孔德杰), Yang G-H(杨改河), Ren G-X(任广鑫), Feng Y-Z(冯永忠), Ke Y(柯英). Effects of different amount of applied biogas fermentation residues on photosynthesis characteristic and grain yield of winter wheat. Acta Agric Boreali-Occident Sin (西北农业学报), 2008, 17(2): 64-69 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]    Guo T-C(郭天财), Feng W(冯伟), Zhao H-J(赵会杰), Xue G-D(薛国典), Wang H-C(王化岑), Wang Y-H(王永华), Yao Z-J(姚战军). Study on photosynthetic characteristics of flag leaves in two spike-type cultivars of winter wheat and effects of nitrogen on photosynthetic characteristics. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2004, 30(2): 115-121 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]    Zhang W-F(张旺锋), Gou L(勾玲), Wang Z-L(王振林), Li S-K(李少昆), Yu S-L(余松烈), Cao L-P(曹连莆). Effect of nitrogen on chlorophyll fluorescence of leaves of high-yielding cotton in Xinjiang. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2003, 36(8): 893-898 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]    Tian J-C(田纪春), Chen J-S(陈建省), Wang Y-X(王延训), Zhang Y-X(张永祥中国农业科学), 2001, 34(1): 1). Effects of delayed-nitrogen application on grain yield and photosynthetic characteristics in flag leaves of wheat cultivars. Sci Agric Sin (-4 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]    Ju Z-C(鞠正春)应用生态学报), 2006, 17(3): 395, Yu Z-W(于振文). Effects of nitrogen topdressing at different growth stage on chlorophyll fluorescence of winter wheat flag leaves. Chin J Appl Ecol (-398 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]    Kurt M, Walter S. Effects of different manuring systems with and without biogas digestion on soil mineral nitrogen content and on gaseous nitrogen losses (ammonia, nitrous oxides). Eur J Agron, 2009, 30: 1-16
[21]    Terhoeven-Urselmans T, Scheller E, Raubuch M, Ludwig B, Joergensen R G. CO2 evolution and N mineralization after biogas slurry application in the field and its yield effects on spring barley. Appl Soil Ecol, 2009, 42: 297-302
[22]    Matsunaka T, Sawamoto T, Ishimura H, Takakura K, Takekawa A. Efficient use of digested cattle slurry from biogas plant with respect to nitrogen recycling in grassland. Intl Congress Ser, 2006, 1293: 242-252
[23]    Yang C(杨闯), Xu W-X(徐文修), Li Q-Q(李钦钦), Yang X(杨旭), Zhu Y(朱永), Chen M(陈明). Effect of biogas slurry soaking seed on growth and yield of upland cotton. Xinjiang Agric Sci (新疆农业科学), 2009, 46(1): 138-141 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]    Xu M-G(徐明岗), Li D-C(李冬初), Li J-M(李菊梅), Qin D-Z(秦道珠), Yagi K, Hosen Y. Effects of organic manure application with chemical fertilizers on nutrient absorption and yield of rice in Hunan of southern China. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2008, 41(10): 3133-3139 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]    Zhang J-J(张建军), Fan T-L(樊廷录), Wang Y(王勇), Tang X-M(唐小明), Dang Y(党翼). Winter wheat yield and soil nutriments affected by organic fertilizer in loess plateau east of Gansu. Acta Bot Boreal-Occident Sin (西北植物学报). 2009, 29(8): 1656-1662 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 胡文静, 李东升, 裔新, 张春梅, 张勇. 小麦穗部性状和株高的QTL定位及育种标记开发和验证[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1346-1356.
[2] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[3] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[4] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[5] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[6] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[7] 徐田军, 张勇, 赵久然, 王荣焕, 吕天放, 刘月娥, 蔡万涛, 刘宏伟, 陈传永, 王元东. 宜机收籽粒玉米品种冠层结构、光合及灌浆脱水特性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1526-1536.
[8] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[9] 郭星宇, 刘朋召, 王瑞, 王小利, 李军. 旱地冬小麦产量、氮肥利用率及土壤氮素平衡对降水年型与施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1262-1272.
[10] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[11] 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[12] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[13] 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[14] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[15] 杜浩, 程玉汉, 李泰, 侯智红, 黎永力, 南海洋, 董利东, 刘宝辉, 程群. 利用Ln位点进行分子设计提高大豆单荚粒数[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 565-571.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!