欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (04): 635-640.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.00635

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

亚麻种质资源遗传多样性与亲缘关系的AFLP分析

李明   

  1. 东北农业大学农学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150030
  • 收稿日期:2010-07-21 修回日期:2010-11-26 出版日期:2011-04-12 网络出版日期:2011-01-17
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由黑龙江省博士后留省工作启动基金LBH-Q05035资助。

Genetic Diversity and Relationship of Flax Germplasm as Revealed by AFLP Analysis

 LI  Ming   

  1. Flax Laboratory of Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
  • Received:2010-07-21 Revised:2010-11-26 Published:2011-04-12 Published online:2011-01-17

摘要: 选取18个中国品种和67份来自世界各地的亚麻材料(包括油用亚麻,农家种和野生种),采用7对引物通过扩增片段长度多态性(AFLP)分子标记分析, 获得168个位点具有多态性,平均每对引物可扩增出24条带。利用NTSYS 2.1采用非加权配对算术平均法(UPGMA)方法聚类分析,计算遗传距离和构建遗传系统进化树。结果显示85份材料在遗传相似系数0.53处分为4类,可以将栽培种和3个野生种区分开来;在遗传相似系数0.67处可以将纤维亚麻划为1类,而绝大多数油用亚麻分成4类,油用亚麻的遗传多样性远高于纤维亚麻;国产纤维亚麻中黑字号品种相似度极高,遗传背景狭窄,而双字号品种多样性稍好。还证明Linum bienne与亚麻栽培种(Linum usitatissimum L.)关系密切,并支持纤维亚麻来自油用亚麻的假说。

关键词: 亚麻种质资源, 遗传多样性, 亲缘关系, AFLP

Abstract: Flax (linum usitatissimum) is one of the major fibre and oil yielding crops. AFLP is very useful molecular marker for a number of plant species. To reveal the genetic diversity and find ways to broaden the genetic background of Chinese fibre flax varieties, we analyzed 18 Chinese fibre flax cultivars and other 67 accessions (including linseed, landrace and wild species) from different countries in the world by using AFLP marker. In total, 168 polymorphic alleles were detected with seven pairs of AFLP primer. For each pair of primer, 24 alleles on the average was detected in all accessions. Unweighted pair-group method with arithmetical averages (UPGMA) cluster analysis was used to estimate the genetic distances and to construct a dendrogram by NTSYS 2.1. The results showed that all 85 accessions were classified into four groups at 0.53 of similarity coefficient, which distinguish the varieties of flax (Linum usitatissimum) from three wild flax species. All varieties of flax were classified into five sub-groups (all fibre flax accessions were in one sub-group and the most of linseed accessions divided into other four sub-groups) at 0.67, indicating linseed possessed genetic basis broader than the fibre flax. In Chinese fibre flax varieties, Heiya cultivars had high genetic similarity, and its genetic basis was narrower than that of Shuangya variety. The results also showed that there were close relationship between Linum bienne and Linum usitatissinum, and sustained the hypothesis that fibre flax has evolved from linseed.

Key words: Flax germplasm, Genetic diversity, Relationship, AFLP marker

[1] 肖颖妮, 于永涛, 谢利华, 祁喜涛, 李春艳, 文天祥, 李高科, 胡建广. 基于SNP标记揭示中国鲜食玉米品种的遗传多样性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1301-1311.
[2] 王琰琰, 王俊, 刘国祥, 钟秋, 张华述, 骆铮珍, 陈志华, 戴培刚, 佟英, 李媛, 蒋勋, 张兴伟, 杨爱国. 基于SSR标记的雪茄烟种质资源指纹图谱库的构建及遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(7): 1259-1274.
[3] 刘少荣, 杨扬, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 康定明, 范亚明, 任洁, 江彬, 葛建镕, 成广雷, 王凤格. 基于农艺及品质性状与SSR标记的青贮玉米品种遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2362-2370.
[4] 孙倩, 邹枚伶, 张辰笈, 江思容, Eder Jorge de Oliveira, 张圣奎, 夏志强, 王文泉, 李有志. 基于SNP和InDel标记的巴西木薯遗传多样性与群体遗传结构分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(1): 42-49.
[5] 赵孟良,王丽慧,任延靖,孙雪梅,侯志强,杨世鹏,李莉,钟启文. 257份菊芋种质资源表型性状的遗传多样性[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(5): 712-724.
[6] 张红岩,杨涛,刘荣,晋芳,张力科,于海天,胡锦国,杨峰,王栋,何玉华,宗绪晓. 利用EST-SSR标记评价羽扇豆属(Lupinus L.)遗传多样性[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(3): 330-340.
[7] 刘易科,朱展望,陈泠,邹娟,佟汉文,朱光,何伟杰,张宇庆,高春保. 基于SNP标记揭示我国小麦品种(系)的遗传多样性[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(02): 307-314.
[8] 叶卫军,陈圣男,杨勇,张丽亚,田东丰,张磊,周斌. 绿豆SSR标记的开发及遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(8): 1176-1188.
[9] 吴迷,汪念,沈超,黄聪,温天旺,林忠旭. 基于重测序的陆地棉InDel标记开发与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(2): 196-203.
[10] 卢媛,艾为大,韩晴,王义发,李宏杨,瞿玉玑,施标,沈雪芳. 糯玉米自交系SSR标记遗传多样性及群体遗传结构分析[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(2): 214-224.
[11] 薛延桃,陆平,史梦莎,孙昊月,刘敏轩,王瑞云. 新疆、甘肃黍稷资源的遗传多样性与群体遗传结构研究[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(10): 1511-1521.
[12] 刘洪,徐振江,饶得花,鲁清,李少雄,刘海燕,陈小平,梁炫强,洪彦彬. 基于形态学性状和SSR标记的花生品种遗传多样性分析和特异性鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(1): 26-36.
[13] 白冬梅,薛云云,赵姣姣,黄莉,田跃霞,权宝全,姜慧芳. 山西花生地方品种芽期耐寒性鉴定及SSR遗传多样性[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(10): 1459-1467.
[14] 魏中艳, 李慧慧, 李骏, YasirA.Gamar, 马岩松, 邱丽娟. 应用SNP精准鉴定大豆种质及构建可扫描身份证[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(03): 315-323.
[15] 余斌,杨宏羽,王丽,刘玉汇,白江平,王蒂,张俊莲. 引进马铃薯种质资源在干旱半干旱区的表型性状遗传多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(01): 63-74.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!