欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (04): 609-616.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.00609

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

大豆粒形性状QTL的精细定位

牛远,谢芳腾,布素红,谢尚潜,韩世凤,耿青春,刘兵,章元明*   

  1. 南京农业大学作物遗传与种质创新国家重点实验室, 江苏南京 210095
  • 收稿日期:2012-09-10 修回日期:2012-12-11 出版日期:2013-04-12 网络出版日期:2013-01-28
  • 通讯作者: 章元明, E-mail: soyzhang@njau.edu.cn, soyzhang@hotmail.com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目(NECT-05-0489), 江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK2008335)和中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金创新团队项目(KYT201002)资助。

Fine Mapping of Quantitative Traits Loci for Seed Shape Traits in Soybean

NIU Yuan,XIE Fang-Teng,BU Shu-Hong,XIE Shang-Qian,HAN Shi-Feng,GENG Qing-Chun,LIU Bing,ZHANG Yuan-Ming*   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
  • Received:2012-09-10 Revised:2012-12-11 Published:2013-04-12 Published online:2013-01-28
  • Contact: 章元明, E-mail: soyzhang@njau.edu.cn, soyzhang@hotmail.com

摘要:

在溧水中子黄豆×南农493-1衍生的504F2:6家系中选择Satt331~Satt592目标区间7个杂合单株和168个重组单株,衍生成356RHL-F2个体(群体I)168个重组体家系(群体II)。群体II来自142F2:6家系,若每个F2:6家系只保留1个重组家系则构成群体III。采用lasso和复合区间作图(CIM)法检测3个群体粒形性状2种指标的QTL。结果表明, lasso法检测到的粒长关联标记是O19S21/Satt331,而CIM检测到的QTL区间是S21~S22O23~O19lasso法检测到的粒宽关联标记是O19/O21,而CIM检测到的QTL区间是O23~O19/O19~O21;长宽比与S21~S22关联是由于粒长QTL引起的,与O23~O19 /O19~O21关联是由于粒长和粒宽QTL引起的。将原Satt331~Satt592目标区间的粒长QTL剖分为与标记S21~S22O23~O19/O19~O21关联的2个多效性QTL。根据大豆基因注释数据库,Glyma10g35240Glyma10g34980可能是控制粒形性状发育的候选基因。

关键词: 大豆, 粒形, 数量性状基因座, 精细定位, 候选基因

Abstract:

Based on the target interval region of SSR markers Satt331–Satt592, we constructed 356 RHL-F2 individuals (population I) and 168 recombinant families (population II) derived from 504 F2:6 families of the direct and reciprocal crosses of Lishuizhongzihuang with Nannong 493-1 to fine map quantitative traits loci (QTLs) for seed length (SL), width (SW) and length-to-width (SLW) ratio in soybean using composite interval mapping (CIM) and lasso approaches. Among 168 recombinant families, only one recombinant individual was selected from a same F2:6 family so that 142 recombinant families were constructed as population III. Response variable for QTL analysis was as original observation, and the value corrected by the associated marker information. As a result, markers associated with SL were O19 and S21/Satt331 from lasso method and S21–S22 and O23–O19 from CIM method; marker associated with SW was O19/O21 from lasso method and O23–O19/O19–O21 from CIM method; and the QTL associated with markers S21–S22 for SLW was derived from QTL for SL, and the QTL with markers O23–O19/O19–O21 for SLW was derived from QTLs for SL and SW. This indicates that QTL associated with markers Satt331–Satt592 in our study was further partitioned into two pleiotropic QTLs, which were associated with markers S21–S22 and markers O23–O19/O19–O21. According to the annotation project database, Glyma10g35240 and Glyma10g34980 might be candidate genes for seed shape traits.

Key words: Soybean, Seed shape trait, Quantitative trait locus, Fine mapping, Candidate gene

[1]Wilson D O. Storage of orthodox seeds. In: Basra A S ed. Seed Quality: Basic Mechanisms, Agricultural Implications. New York: Food Products Press, 1995. pp 173–2081



[2]Yano M. Genetic and molecular dissection of naturally occurring variation. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2001, 4: 130–135



[3]Frary A, Nesbitt T C, Grandillo S, Knaap E, Cong B, Liu J, Meller J, Elber R, Alpert K B, Tanksley S D. fw2.2: A quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit. Science, 2000, 289: 85–88



[4]Liu J, Van Eck J, Cong B, Tanksley S D. A new class of regulatory genes underlying the cause of pear-shaped tomato fruit. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2002, 99: 13302–13306



[5]Van der Knaap E, Tanksley S D. Identi?cation and characterization of a novel locus controlling early fruit development in tomato. Theor Appl Genet, 2001, 103: 353–358



[6]Fan C C, Xing Y Z, Mao H L, Lu T T, Han B, Xu C G, Li X H, Zhang Q F. GS3, a major QTL for grain length and weight and minor QTL for grain width and thickness in rice, encodes a putative transmembrane protein. Theor Appl Genet, 2006, 112: 1164–1171



[7]Takano-Kai N, Jiang H, Kubo T, Sweeney M, Matsumoto T, Kanamori H, Padhukasahasram B, Bustamante C, Yoshimura A, Doi K, McCouch S. Evolutionary history of GS3, a gene conferring grain length in rice. Genetics, 2009, 182: 1323–1334



[8]Mao H L, Sun S Y, Yao J L, Wang C, Yu S, Xu C G, Li X H, Zhang Q F. Linking differential domain functions of the GS3 protein to natural variation of grain size in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2010, 107: 19579–19584



[9]Song X J, Huang W, Shi M, Zhu M Z, Lin H X. A QTL for rice grain width and weight encodes a previously unknown RING-type E3 ubiquitin ligase. Nat Genet, 2007, 39: 623–630



[10]Shomura A, Izawa T, Ebana K, Ebitani T, Kanegae H, Konishi S, Yano M. Deletion in a gene associated with grain size increased yields during rice domestication. Nat Genet, 2008, 40: 1023–1028



[11]Wan X Y, Weng J F, Zhai H Q, Wang J, Lei C, Liu X, Guo T, Jiang L, Su N, Wan J. Quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis for rice grain width and fine mapping of an identified QTL allele gw-5 in a recombination hot spot region on chromosome 5. Genetics, 2008, 179: 2239–2252



[12]Martin A, Lee J, Kichey T, Gerentes D, Zivy M, Tatout C, Dubois F, Thierry B, Valot B, Davanture M, Tercé-Laforgue T, Quilleré I, Coque M, Gallais A, Gonzalez-Moro M, Bethencourt L, Habash D Z, Lea P J, Charcosset A, Perez P, Murigneux A, Sakakibara H, Edwards K J, Hirel B. Two cytosolic glutamine synthetase isoforms of maize are specifically involved in the control of grain production. Plant Cell, 2006, 18: 3252–3274



[13]Monna L, Lin H X, Kojima S. Genetic dissection of a genomic region for a quantitative trait locus, Hd3, into two loci, Hd3a and Hd3b controlling heading date in rice. Theor Appl Genet, 2002, 104: 772–778



[14]Thomson M J, Edwards J D, Septiningsih E M, Harrington S, McCouch S R. Substitution mapping of dth1.1, a flowering-time quantitative trait locus (QTL) associated with transgressive variation in rice, reveals multiple sub-QTL. Genetics, 2006, 172: 2501–2514



[15]Xue W Y, Xing Y Z, Weng X Y, Zhao Y, Tang W J, Wang L, Zhou H J, Yu S B, Xu C G, Li X H, Zhang Q F. Natural variation in Ghd7 is an important regulator of heading date and yield potential in rice. Nat Genet, 2008, 40: 761–767



[16]Xu Y, Li H N, Li G J, Wang X, Cheng L G, Zhang Y M. Mapping quantitative trait loci for seed size traits in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.). Theor Appl Genet, 2011, 122: 581–594



[17]Salas P, Oyarzo-Llaipen J C, Wang D, Chase K, Mansur L. Genetic mapping of seed shape in three populations of recombinant inbred lines of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.). Theor Appl Genet, 2006, 113: 1459–1466



[18]Li C-D(李灿东), Jiang H-W(蒋洪蔚), Zhang W-B(张闻博), Qiu P-C(邱鹏程), Liu C-Y(刘春燕), Li W-F(李文福), Gao Y-L(高运来), Chen Q-S(陈庆山), Hu G-H(胡国华). QTL analysis of seed and pod traits in soybean. Mol Plant Breed (分子植物育种), 2008, 6(6): 1091–1100 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[19]Liang H-Z(梁慧珍), Wang S-F(王树峰), Yu Y-L(余永亮), Wang T-F(王庭峰), Gong P-T(巩鹏涛), Fang X-J(方宣钧), Liu X-Y(刘学义), Zhao S-J(赵双进), Zhang M-C(张孟臣), Li W-D(李卫东). Mapping quantitative trait loci for six seed shape traits in soybean. Henan Agric Sci (河南农业科学), 2008, 45: 54–60 (in Chinese)



[20]Cheng L-G(程利国), Li G-J(李广军), Liu Y-Q(刘玉芹), Li H-N(李河南), Zhang Y-M(章元明). Genetic analysis of resistance of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) to soybean mosaic virus strain Sa. J Nanjing Agric Univ (南京农业大学学报), 2009, 32(4): 13–17 (in Chinese with English abstract )



[21]Wei S-P(魏世平), Liu X-F(刘晓芬), Yang S-X(杨胜先), Lü H-Y(吕海燕), Niu Y(牛远), Zhang Y-M(章元明). Comparison of various clustering methods for population structure in Chinese cultivated soybean (Glycine max(L.) Merr. ) J Nanjing Agric Univ (南京农业大学学报), 2011, 34(2): 13–17 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[22]Xu S. An expectation-maximization algorithm for the lasso estimation of quantitative trait locus effects. Heredity, 2010, 105: 483–494



[23]Andaya V C, Tai T H. Fine mapping of the qCTS12 locus, a major QTL for seedling cold tolerance in rice. Theor Appl Genet, 2006, 113: 467–475



[24]Yamanaka N, Watanabe S, Toda K, Hayashi M, Huchigami H, Takahashi R, Harada K. Fine mapping of the FT1 locus for soybean flowering time using a residual heterozygous line derived from a recombinant inbred line. Theor Appl Genet, 2005, 110: 634–639



[25]Tuinstra M R. Heterogeneous inbred family (HIF) analysis: a method for developing near-isogenic lines that differ at quantitative trait loci. Theor Appl Genet, 1997, 95: 1005–1011



[26]He R(何冉), Guan R-X(关荣霞), Liu Z-X(刘章雄), Zhu X-L(朱晓丽), Chang R-Z(常汝镇), Qiu L-J(邱丽娟). Mapping the qBN-c1-1 locus to LG C1 for soybean branching using residual heterozygous lines derived from a segregation population. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2009, 42(4): 1152–1157 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[27]Wu J-R(吴季荣). Fine mapping and candidate gene analysis of a QTL controlling hull silicon content in rice. PhD Dissertation of Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences, 2009 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[28]Fan Y-Y(樊叶杨). Fine mapping and genetic dissection of QTL for yield traits on the short arm of rice chromosome 6. Ph D Dissertation of Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences, 2010 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[29]Wen J, Lease K A, Walker J C. DVL, a novel class of small polypeptides: over expression alters Arabidopsis development. Plant J, 2004, 37: 668–677



[30]Orsi C H, Tanksley S D. Natural variation in an ABC transporter gene associated with seed size evolution in tomato species. PLoS Genet, 2009, 5(l): e1000347



[31]Koike M, Takezawa D, Arakawa K, Yoshida S. Accumulation of 19-kDa plasma membrane polypeptide during induction of freezing tolerance in wheat suspension-cultured cells by abscisic acid. Plant Cell Physiol, 1997, 38: 707–716

[1] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[2] 金昱何, 王雪菲, 徐张一娃, 缪怡宁, 蒋云杰, 伊莹, 缪德麟, 朱静仪, 钟一帆, 陈铭亨, 方芳, 刘鹏. 外源激素对低温胁迫下大豆叶片叶绿素荧光参数及抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1817-1829.
[3] 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[4] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[5] 姚术, 郭凯悦, 翟慧慧, 姚佳慧, 邓文琪, 闫玲, 黄驰, 高阳, 俞嫣然, 赵振邦, 李英慧, 王晓波, 李佳佳. 大豆苗期耐低铁综合评价及优异种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1373-1387.
[6] 马亮, 马璐, 张舒钰, 章慧敏, 王仁明, 宋旭东, 张振良, 冒宇翔, 陆虎华, 陈国清, 郝德荣, 周广飞. 玉米苞叶数目转录组分析及候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 790-801.
[7] 张晴, 杨昱, 郭茜, 岳霈尧, 殷丛丛, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 大豆GmARA6a的克隆及响应盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 480-493.
[8] 鲁雅妮, 丁超杰, 张煜, 杜习军, 齐学礼, 胡琳, 许为钢. 河南省200份小麦品种苗期茎基腐病抗性鉴定与全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 363-375.
[9] 王雅致, 杨飚, 季香林, 石瑛, 张丽莉. 二倍体马铃薯抗旱资源鉴定及抗旱基因初步筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 72-84.
[10] 董丽华, 董成艳, 李正楠, 余静, 叶靓, 刘芳, 谭静. 玉米禾谷镰孢穗腐病抗性候选基因的筛选与鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 131-147.
[11] 李璐琪, 程宇坤, 白斌, 雷斌, 耿洪伟. 小麦叶片气孔相关性状全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2266-2284.
[12] 王克晶, 李向华. 我国珍稀的大豆属多年生烟豆和短绒野大豆物种遗传资源濒危性评估分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2009-2019.
[13] 孟然, 李赵嘉, 冯薇, 陈悦, 刘路平, 杨春燕, 鲁雪林, 王秀萍. 大豆不同生育时期耐盐性综合评价及耐盐种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 1991-2008.
[14] 贺红利, 张雨涵, 杨静, 程云清, 赵杨, 李星诺, 司洪亮, 张兴政, 杨向东. 大豆e1-as基因突变体的创制及生理分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2228-2239.
[15] 蔡金珊, 李超男, 王景一, 李宁, 柳玉平, 景蕊莲, 李龙, 孙黛珍. 小麦幼苗根系性状全基因组关联分析及TaSRL-3B优异等位基因发掘[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2020-2032.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!