欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (09): 1674-1678.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.01674

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同环境及栽培条件下啤用大麦阿拉伯木聚糖含量的变化

张晓勤1,2,薛大伟2,张国平1,*   

  1. 1浙江大学农业与生物技术学院 浙江杭州 310058; 2杭州师范大学生命与环境科学学院 浙江杭州310036
  • 收稿日期:2013-02-14 修回日期:2013-04-22 出版日期:2013-09-12 网络出版日期:2013-07-09
  • 通讯作者: 张国平, E-mail: zhanggp@zju.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由浙江省自然科学基金项目(Y3100074, Z3110054)和杭州市科技发展计划项目(20100933B08)资助。

Changes of Arabinoxylan Content in Malting Barley under Different Environments and Cultivation Conditions

ZHANG Xiao-Qin1,2,XUE Da-Wei2,ZHANG Guo-Ping1,*   

  1. 1 College of Agriculture & Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China;2 College of Life & Environmental Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 310036, China
  • Received:2013-02-14 Revised:2013-04-22 Published:2013-09-12 Published online:2013-07-09
  • Contact: 张国平, E-mail: zhanggp@zju.edu.cn

RichHTML

PDF

1058

被引次数

2

摘要：

阿拉伯木聚糖(AX)含量是影响啤用大麦品质的主要因素之一。利用3个二棱大麦品种，研究了籽粒灌浆期AX含量和内切木聚糖酶活性(EA)的变化动态，以及施氮量、施肥期、种植密度及种植地点对AX含量的影响。结果表明，其3个品种的AX含量和EA在灌浆期变化趋势基本相同，表现为阿拉伯木聚糖总含量(TAX)、非水溶性阿拉伯木聚糖含量(WUAX)和EA在整个灌浆期呈下降趋势，水溶性阿拉伯木聚糖含量(WEAX)比例较低，且呈先增后降的趋势。与其他两品种比较，浙大9号在籽粒灌浆期TAX含量始终较高、EA始终较低。浙大9号籽粒TAX含量在杭州点显著高于在桐乡点，而WEAX含量在桐乡点显著高于在杭州点。播种量、氮肥用量及运筹对桐乡点籽粒TAX和WEAX含量均无显著影响，但在杭州点这3种农艺因子均显著影响WEAX含量。

关键词: 大麦, 灌浆期, 环境, 阿拉伯木聚糖, 内切木聚糖酶

Abstract:

Arabinoxylan (AX) content in barley grains is a principal chemical component affecting malt quality. The changes of arabinoxylan content and endoxylanase activity (EA) in grains during grain filling and their responses to agronomic factors, such as nitrogen rate and application timing, plant density, and growing site, were investigated using two-rowed barley cultivars, Hua 30, Zheda 9, and Zhexiu 12. All that three barley cultivars had the same changing trend in AX content and EA during grain-filling period. Contents of total arabinoxylan (TAX) and water unextractablearabinoxylan (WUAX), and EA declined constantly during grain filling stage, and content of water extractablearabinoxylan (WEAX), a small proportion of TAX, increased at early stage and declined at late stage. When Zheda 9 was planted in Hangzhou and Tongxiang of Zhejiang Province, TAX content in grains was significantly higher in Hangzhou than in Tongxiang, and the opposite was true for WEAX content. The effects of plant density and nitrogen application rate and timing were not significant on both TAX and WEAX contents in Tongxiang, while the effect was significant of these factors on WEAX contents in Hangzhou.

Key words: Barley, Grain filling stage, Environment, Arabinoxylan, Endoxylanase

[1]Zhang G P, Li C D. Genetics and Improvement of Barley Malt Quality. Zhejiang University Press & Springer, 2009. pp 1–8



[2]Gamlath J, Aldreda G P, Panozzo J F. Barley (1-3;1-4)-β-glucan and arabinoxylan content are related to kernel hardness and water uptake. J Cereal Sci, 2008, 47: 365–371



[3]Li Y, Lu J, Gu G X, Shi Z P, Mao Z G. Studies on water-extractable arabinoxylans during malting and brewing. Food Chem, 2005, 93: 33–38



[4]Fincher G. Morphology and chemical composition of barley endosperm cell walls. J Inst Brewing, 1975, 81: 116–122



[5]Bacic A, Stone B A. Chemistry and organization of aleurone cell wall components from wheat and barley. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1981, 8: 475–495



[6]Feng B(冯波), Shu S-G(舒守贵), Zhang A-M(张爱民), Wang T(王涛). Research progress on pentosan in triticeae crops. Chin Bull Bot (植物学通报), 2006, 23(2): 215–223 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[7]Philippe S, Saulnier L, Guillon F. Arabinoxylan and (1-3),(1-4)-β-glucan deposition in cell walls during wheat endosperm development. Planta, 2006, 224: 449–461



[8]Zhou S-M(周素梅), Wang Q(王强), Zhang X-N(张晓娜). Research advances in functional polysaccharide-wheat arabinoxylan. J Nucl Agric Sci (核农学报), 2009, 23(2): 297–301 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[9]Han J. Structural characteristics of arabinoxylan in barley, malt, and beer. Food Chem, 2000, 70: 131–138



[10]Simpson D J, Fincher G B, Huang A H C, Cameron-Mills V. Structure and function of cereal and related higher plant (1-4)-β-xylan endohydrolases. J Cereal Sci, 2003, 37: 111–127



[11]Li N(李宁). Gene Cloning and Characterization of the Xylanolytic Enzymes from Streotomyxes spp. PhD Dissertation of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2009. pp 1–11 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[12]Li Y(李胤). Mechanism of Solubilization, Degradation of Arabinoxylans and Cloning as well as Expression of Acidic Xylanase Gene. PhD Dissertation of Jiangnan University, 2006. pp 1–15 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[13]Chen J-X(陈锦新), Zhang G-P(张国平), Wang J-M(汪军妹), Chen Z-H(陈仲华), Zhou T-Y(周体耀). The effect of timing of N application on barley β-glucanase activity and malt quality. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2004, 30(1): 47–51 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[14]Qi J C, Zhang G P, Zhou M X. Protein and hordein content in barley seeds as affected by nitrogen level and their relationship to beta-amylase activity. J Cereal Sci, 2006, 43: 102–107



[15]Wang J M, Chen J X, Dai F, Wu F B, Yang J M, Zhang G P. Protein fractions in barley grains as affected by some agronomic factors and their relationships to malt quality. Cereal Res Commun, 2007, 35: 129–140



[16]Dornez E, Gebruers K, Joye I J, De Ketelaere B, Lenartz J, Massaux C, Bodson B, Delcour J A, Courtin C M. Effects of genotype, harvest year and genotype-by-harvest year interactions on arabinoxylan, endoxylanase activity and endoxylanase inhibitor levels in wheat kernels. J Cereal Sci, 2008, 47: 180–189



[17]Dornez E, Gebruers K, Joye I J, De Ketelaere B, Lenartz J, Massaux C, Bodson B, Delcour J A, Courtin C M. Effects of fungicide treatment, N-fertilisation and harvest date on arabinoxylan, endoxylanase activity and endoxylanase inhibitor levels in wheat kernels. J Cereal Sci, 2008, 47: 190–200



[18]Zhang X Q, Xue D W, Wu F B, Zhang G P. Genotypic and environmental variation of arabinoxylan content and endoxylanase activity in barley grains. J Integr Agric, 2013 (in press)



[19]Douglas S G. A rapid method for the determination of pentosans in wheat flour. Food Chem, 1981, 7: 139–145



[20]Rouau X, Surget A. A rapid semi-automated method for the determination of total and water-extractable pentosans in wheat flours. Carbohydr Polym, 1994, 24: 123–132



[21]Miller G L. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Analyt Biochem, 1959, 31: 426–428



[22]Sungurtas J, Swanston J S, Davies H V, McDougall G J. Xylan-degrading enzymes and arabinoxylan solubilisation in barley culivars of differing malting quality. J Cereal Sci, 2004, 39: 273–281



[23]Ni J(倪静), Xu Z-B(徐智斌), Wang T(王涛). Dynamic changes of grain sugar, starch, protein contents during grain filling stage in waxy wheat. J Triticeae Crops (麦类作物学报)，2010, 30(3): 509–514 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[24]Li C-X(李春喜), Liu L(刘玲), Jiang L-N(姜丽娜), Li D-D(李丹丹), Zhang B-B(张蓓蓓), Zhang D-J(张黛静). Dynamic changes of wheat grain pentosan monosaccharide components during the filling stage. Acta Agric Boreali-Occident Sin (西北农业学报), 2008, 17(1): 124–128 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 贺军与, 钟伟, 陈云琼, 王卫斌, 熊静蕾, 蒋亚丽, 施辉蒙, 陈升位. 大麦籽粒发育进程中7种黄酮类化合物的积累特性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1624-1630.
[2] 耿腊, 黄业昌, 李梦迪, 谢尚耿, 叶玲珍, 张国平. 大麦籽粒β-葡聚糖含量的全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(7): 1205-1214.
[3] 张帆, 杨茜. 大麦-双季稻轮作体系有机物料与化肥配施对大麦资源利用效率及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2522-2531.
[4] 徐婷婷, 汪巧玲, 邹淑琼, 狄佳春, 杨欣, 朱银, 赵涵, 颜伟. 基于高通量测序的大麦InDel标记开发及应用[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(9): 1340-1350.
[5] 徐银萍, 潘永东, 刘强德, 姚元虎, 贾延春, 任诚, 火克仓, 陈文庆, 赵锋, 包奇军, 张华瑜. 大麦种质资源成株期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(3): 448-461.
[6] 杨晓梦, 李霞, 普晓英, 杜娟, Muhammad Kazim Ali, 杨加珍, 曾亚文, 杨涛. 大麦重组自交系群体籽粒总花色苷含量和千粒重QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(01): 52-61.
[7] 时丽洁,蒋枞璁,王方梅,杨平,冯宗云. 大麦蛋白质二硫键异构酶基因家族的鉴定与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(9): 1365-1374.
[8] 赵小强,任斌,彭云玲,徐明霞,方鹏,庄泽龙,张金文,曾文静,高巧红,丁永福,陈奋奇. 8种水旱环境下2个玉米群体穗部性状QTL间的上位性及环境互作效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(6): 856-871.
[9] 金欣欣,姚艳荣,贾秀领,姚海坡,申海平,崔永增,李谦. 基因型和环境对小麦产量、品质和氮素效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(4): 635-644.
[10] 胡德益,蔡露,陈光登,张锡洲,刘春吉. 不同磷水平下大麦分蘖期磷效率相关性状QTL定位分析[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(12): 1746-1759.
[11] 李玉,陈璐,严凯,孙影,殷毅凡,丁秀文,戴其根,张洪程. 1,2,4-三氯苯对2个不同耐性水稻品种光合特性与产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(02): 255-264.
[12] 雷雅坤,刘兵强,邸锐,闫龙，杨春燕，郝东旭，张孟臣. 大豆不同环境下脂肪酸组分含量的QTL分析[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(02): 303-310.
[13] 唐朝臣,罗峰,李欣禹,裴忠有,高建明,孙守钧*. 甜高粱产量及品质相关性状对环境因子反应度分析[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(10): 1612-1618.
[14] 张利莎,董国清,扎桑,卓嘎,王德良,谷方红,袁兴淼,张京,郭刚刚. 基于EST-SSR和SNP标记的大麦麦芽纯度检测[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(08): 1147-1154.
[15] 司二静,张宇,汪军成,孟亚雄,李葆春,马小乐,尚勋武,王化俊. 大麦农艺性状与SSR标记的关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(07): 1064-1072.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2