欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (04): 613-622.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.00613

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江中下游小麦品种根系改良特征及其与产量的关系

田中伟,樊永惠,殷美,王方瑞,蔡剑,姜东,戴廷波*   

  1. 南京农业大学农学院 / 农业部作物生理生态与生产管理重点实验室,江苏南京 210095
  • 收稿日期:2014-09-09 修回日期:2015-02-06 出版日期:2015-04-12 网络出版日期:2015-03-02
  • 通讯作者: 戴廷波, E-mail: tingbod@njau.edu.cn, Tel: 025-84395033
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家科技支撑计划项目(2013BAD07B00), 国家自然科学基金项目(31471443), 江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK20140705)和南京农业大学青年科技创新基金项目(KJ2013004)资助。

Genetic Improvement of Root Growth and Its Relationship with Grain Yield of Wheat Cultivars in the Middle-Lower Yangtze River

TIAN Zhong-Wei,FAN Yong-Hui,YIN Mei,WANG Fang-Rui,CAI Jian,JIANG Dong,DAI Ting-Bo*   

  1. Agronomy College of Nanjing Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology Ecology and Production Management of Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing 210095, China
  • Received:2014-09-09 Revised:2015-02-06 Published:2015-04-12 Published online:2015-03-02
  • Contact: 戴廷波, E-mail: tingbod@njau.edu.cn, Tel: 025-84395033

摘要:

为探明小麦品种更替过程中根系改良特征对氮肥的响应及其与产量形成的关系,从而为高产品种选育及根冠构型建成提供理论依据。本研究以长江中下游不同年代大面积推广的代表性小麦品种南大2419、扬麦1号、扬麦158和扬麦16为材料,采用大田和盆栽试验,研究了3个施氮水平(纯氮0、225和300 kg hm-2)下小麦根系形态与生理特性的差异及其与产量的关系。结果表明,小麦籽粒产量随品种育成年代推进逐步增加,现代品种对施氮的响应较早期品种大。现代小麦品种拔节至开花阶段根系干物质积累量和生长速率显著高于早期品种,而播种至拔节期早期品种的根系生长在无氮条件下具有较强的生长优势。小麦根系总根长、表面积、根体积、0~60cm土层根重密度、根系活力和SOD活性随品种育成年代逐步提高,而MDA含量显著降低。增施氮肥促进了不同年代品种根系生长,但现代品种增幅较早期品种大,说明品种改良提高了小麦根系对氮肥的响应。籽粒产量与开花期根系总根长、表面积、根系生物量和0~60cm根重密度呈显著正相关。因此,增加根系与土壤接触面积和高氮适应性、提高根系生理活性、延缓根系衰老是长江中下游小麦品种演变的重要特征也是高产高效栽培调控的重要目标。

关键词: 小麦, 品种改良, 根系形态, 籽粒产量, 氮肥响应

Abstract:

Exploring the characteristics of root growth, root physiology and their relationships to grain yield in wheat cultivars released in different decades will facilitate the development of new wheat cultivars, with stable and high yields and low nitrogen fertilizer input. Four wheat cultivars Nanda 2419, Yangmai 1, Yangmai 158, and Yangmai 16, which were bred or widely planted in the Middle-Lower Yangtze River Basin after 1950, were used in field and pot experiments in 2010–2011 with three nitrogen rates (pure N 0, 225, and 300 kg ha-1). The results showed that, grain yield was improved with the genetic improvement in wheat breeding and the sensitivity of modern cultivars to N was greater as compared with early released cultivars. The root dry matter accumulation (DMA) and growth rate from jointing to anthesis of modern cultivars were higher than these of early released cultivars. The root length, root surface area, root volume and density of root weight in 0–60 cm soil layer were enhanced with the genetic improvement in wheat breeding, while no change was found in proportion of root distribution. The root activity, MDA concentration and SOD activity in modern cultivars were improved significantly. Higher N application increased root growth and physiological performance, with larger effects in modern cultivars, indicating that the response to N and high-N tolerance were promoted with genetic improvement in wheat breeding. In addition, these were significantly positive relations of grain yield with total root length, root surface area, root biomass and density of root weight in 0–60 cm soil layer. Therefore, higher contact area of the roots with soil and high-N adaptability, enhanced root physiological activity and N assimilation capacity, and delayed senescence of root system should be the important characteristics in cultivar evolution in the Middle-Lower Yangtze River,which are the main purpose getting in high-yield and high efficiency cultivation in this region.

Key words: Wheat, Genetic improvement, Root morphology, Grain yield, Nitrogen response

[1]Tian Z W, Jing Q, Dai T B, Jiang D, Cao W X. Effects of genetic improvements on grain yield and agronomic traits of winter wheat in the Yangtze River Basin of China. Field Crops Res, 2011, 124: 417–425



[2]Zheng T C, Zhang X K, Yin G H, Wang L N, Han Y L, Chen L, Huang F, Tang J W, Xia X C, He Z H. Genetic gains in grain yield, net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance achieved in Henan Province of China between 1981 and 2008. Field Crops Res, 2011, 122: 225–233



[3]Wu W, Li C J, Ma B L, Shah Farooq, Liu Y, Liao Y C. Genetic progress in wheat yield and associated traits in China since 1945 and future prospects. Euphytica, 2014, 196: 155-168.



[4]田中伟, 王方瑞, 戴廷波, 蔡剑, 姜东, 曹卫星. 小麦品种改良过程中物质积累转运特性与产量的关系. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45: 801–808



Tian Z W, Wang F R, Dai T B, Cai J, Jiang D, Cao W X. Characterization of dry matter accumulation and translocation during wheat genetic improvement in relation to grain yield. Sci Agric Sin, 2012, 45: 801–808 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[5]Chochois V, Vogel J P, Watt M. Application of Brachypodium to the genetic improvement of wheat roots. J Exp Bot, 2012, 63: 3467–3474



[6]杨建昌. 水稻根系形态生理与产量, 品质形成及养分吸收利用的关系. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44: 36–46



Yang J C. Relationships of rice root morphology and physiology with the formation of grain yield and quality and the nutrient absorption and utilization. SciAgric Sin, 2011, 44: 36-46 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[7]冯福学, 黄高宝, 柴强, 于爱忠, 乔海军, 黄涛. 不同耕作措施对冬小麦根系时空分布和产量的影响. 生态学报, 2009, 29: 2499–2506



Feng F X, Huang G B, Chai Q, Yu A Z, Qian H J, Huang T. Efects of diferent tillage on spatiotemporal distribution of winter wheat root and yield. Acta Ecol Sin, 2009, 29: 2499–2506 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[8]汪晓丽, 陶玥玥, 盛海君, 封克. 硝态氮供应对小麦根系形态发育和氮吸收动力学的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2010, 30: 129–134



Wang X L, Tao Y Y, Sheng H J, Feng K. Effects of nitrate supply on morphology development and nitrate uptake kinetics of wheat roots. J Triticeae Crops, 2010, 30: 129–134 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[9]李絮花, 杨守祥, 于振文, 余松烈. 有机肥对小麦根系生长及根系衰老进程的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2005, 11: 467–472



Li X H, Yang S X, Yu Z W, Yu S L. Efects of organic manure application on growth and senescence of root in winter wheat. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2005, 11: 467–472 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[10]高志红, 陈晓远, 罗远培. 不同土壤水分条件下冬小麦根、冠平衡与生长稳定性研究. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40: 540–548



Gao Z H, Chen X Y, Luo Y P. Winter wheat root and shoot: Equilibrium and growth stability under different soil and water conditions. Sci Agric Sin, 2007, 40: 540–548 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[11]魏道智, 宁书菊, 林文雄. 小麦根系活力变化与叶片衰老的研究. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15: 1565–1569



Wei D Z, Ning S J, Lin W X. Relationship between wheat root activity and leaf senescence. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2004, 15: 1565–1569 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[12]孙敏, 郭文善, 朱新开, 封超年, 郭凯泉, 彭永欣. 不同氮效率小麦品种苗期根系的NO3-, NH4+吸收动力学特征. 麦类作物学报, 2006, 26(5): 84–87



Sun M, Guo W S, Zhu X K, Feng C N, Guo K Q, Peng Y X. Kinetics of nitrate and ammonium uptake by different wheat genotypes at seedling stage. JTriticeae Crops, 2006, 26(5): 84–87 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[13]雍太文, 陈小容, 杨文钰, 向达兵, 樊高琼. 小麦/玉米/大豆三熟套作体系中小麦根系分泌特性及氮素吸收研究. 作物学报, 2010, 36: 477–485



Yong T W, Chen X R, Yang W Y, Xiang D B, Fan G Q. Root exudates and nitrogen uptake of wheat in wheat/maize/soybean relay cropping system. Acta Agron Sin, 2010, 36: 477–485 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[14]Malik A H, Andersson A, Kuktaite R, Mujahid M Y, Khan B K, Johansson E. Genotypic variation in dry weight and nitrogen concentration of wheat plant parts:relations to grain yield and grain protein concentration. J Agric Sci, 2012, 4: 11–15



[15]Kong L, Wang F, Feng B, Li S, Si J, Zhang B. A root-zone soil regime of wheat: physiological and growth responses to furrow irrigation in raised bed planting in Northern China. AgronJ, 2010, 102: 154-–162



[16]Tan W N, Liu J P, Dai T B, Jing Q, Cao W X, Jiang D. Alterations in photosynthesis and antioxidant enzyme activity in winter wheat subjected to post-anthesis water-logging. Photosynthetica, 2008, 46: 21–27



[17]翟荣荣, 冯跃, 王会民, 陈艳丽, 吴伟明, 占小登, 沈希宏, 戴高兴, 杨占烈, 曹立勇. 不同水分条件下水稻苗期根系性状的QTL分析. 核农学报, 2012, 26: 975–982



Zhai R R, Feng Y, Wang H M, Chen Y L, Wu W M, Zhan X D, Shen X H, Dai G X, Yang Z L, Cao L Y. QTL mapping for root traits in rice seedlings under different water supply conditions. Acta Agric Nucl Sin, 2012, 26: 975–982(in Chinese with English abstract)



[18]Xue Y F, Zhang W, Liu D Y, Yue S C, Cui Z L, Chen X P, Zou C Q. Effects of nitrogen management on root morphology and zinc translocation from root to shoot of winter wheat in the field. Field Crops Res, 2014, 161: 38–45



[19]苗果园, 高志强, 张云亭, 尹钧, 张爱良. 水肥对小麦根系整体影响及其与地上部相关的研究. 作物学报, 2002, 28: 445–450



Miao G Y , Gao Z Q, Zhang Y T, Yin J , Zhang A L. Effect of water and fertilizer to root system and its correlation with tops in wheat. Acta Agron Sin, 2002, 28: 445–450 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[20]Wang C Y, Liu W X, Li Q X, Ma D Y, Lu H F, Feng W, Xie Y X, Zhu Y J, Guo T C. Effects of different irrigation and nitrogen regimes on root growth and its correlation with above-ground plant parts in high-yielding wheat under field conditions. Field Crops Res, 2014, 165: 138–149



[21]褚光, 刘洁, 张耗, 杨建昌. 超级稻根系形态生理特征及其与产量形成的关系. 作物学报, 2014, 40: 850–858



Chu G, Liu J, Zhang H, Yang J C. Morphology and physiology of roots and their relationships with yield for mation in super rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40: 850–858(in Chinese with English abstract)



[22]Wasson A P, Richards R A, Chatrath R, Misra S C, Prasad S V Sai, Rebetzke G J, Kirkegaard J A, Christopher J, Watt M. Traits and selection strategies to improve root systems and water uptake in water-limited wheat crops. J Exp Bot, 2012, 63: 3485–3498



[23]Pang J Y, Palta J A, Rebetzke G J, Milroy S P. Wheat genotypes with high early vigour accumulate more nitrogen and have higher photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency during early growth. Funct Plant Biol, 2014, 41: 215–222



[24]Erenoglu E B, Kutman U B, Ceylan Y, Yildiz B, Cakmak I. Improved nitrogen nutrition enhances root uptake, root -to - shoot translocation and remobilization of zinc (65Zn) in wheat. New Phytol, 2011, 189: 438–448



[25]程建峰, 戴廷波, 荆奇, 姜东, 潘晓云, 曹卫星. 不同水稻基因型的根系形态生理特性与高效氮素吸收. 土壤学报, 2007, 44: 266–272



Cheng J F, Dai T B, Jing Q, Jiang D, Pan X Y, Cao W X. Root morphological and physiological characteristics in relation to nitrogen absorption efficiency in different rice genotypes. Acta Pedol Sin, 2007, 44: 266–272 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[26]张荣, 张大勇. 半干旱区春小麦不同年代品种根系生长冗余的比较实验研究. 植物生态学报, 2000, 24: 298–303



Zhang R, Zhang D Y. A comparative study on root redundancy in spring wheat varieties released in different years in semi-arid area. Acta PhytoecolSin, 2000, 24: 298–303 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[27]魏海燕, 张洪程, 张胜飞, 杭杰, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 马群, 张庆, 刘艳阳. 不同氮利用效率水稻基因型的根系形态与生理指标的研究. 作物学报, 2008, 34: 429–436



Wei H Y, Zhang H C, Zhang S F, Hang J, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Ma Q, Zhang Q, Liu Y Y. Root morphological and physiological characteristics in rice genotypes with diferent N use eficiencies. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34: 429–436 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[28]张洋, 张继, 强晓敏, 翟丙年, 王朝辉. 不同氮效率基因型冬小麦生理特征的比较研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16: 1319–1324



Zhang Y, Zhang J, Qiang X M, Zhai B N, Wang Z H. Comparative study on physiological characteristics in winter wheat with different nitrogen use efficiency. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2010, 16: 1319–1324 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[29]Sgherri C, Quartacci M F, Navari-Izzo F. Early production of activated oxygen species in root apoplast of wheat following copper excess. J Plant Physiol, 2007, 164: 1152–1160



[30]Fageria N K, Moreira A. The role of mineral nutrition on root growth of crop plants. Adv Agron, 2011, 110: 251–331



[31]Herrera J M, Noulas C, Feil B, Stamp P, Liedgens M. Nitrogen and genotype effects on root growth and root survivorship of spring wheat. J Plant NutrSoil Sci, 2013, 176: 561–571



[32]Gan Y, Campbell C A, Janzen H H, Lemke R L, Basnyat P, McDonald C L. Nitrogen accumulation in plant tissues and roots and N mineralization under oilseeds, pulses, and spring wheat. PlantSoil, 2010, 332: 451–461



[33]Passioura J B. Roots and drought resistance. AgricWaterManag, 1983, 7: 265–280



[34]Xiong Y C, Li F M, Zhang T. Performance of wheat crops with different chromosome ploidy: root-sourced signals, drought tolerance, and yield performance. Planta, 2006, 224: 710–718

[1] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[2] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[3] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[4] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[5] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[6] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[7] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[12] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[13] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[14] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[15] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!