欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10): 1548-1556.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.01548

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

秸秆还田替代化学钾肥对棉麦轮作中棉仁油分累积的效应

宋光雷,睢宁,余超然,张凡,孟亚利,陈兵林,赵文青,王友华*   

  1. 南京农业大学农学院 / 农业部南方作物生理生态重点开放实验室, 江苏南京 210095
  • 收稿日期:2015-03-16 修回日期:2015-06-01 出版日期:2015-10-12 网络出版日期:2015-06-29
  • 通讯作者: 王友华, E-mail: w_youhua126@126.com, Tel: 025-84396129
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(31371583)资助。

Effects of Straw-Returning Instead of Chemical Potassium Application on Oil Accumulation in Cottonseed Embryo in Wheat-Cotton Rotation System

SONG Guang-Lei,SUI Ning,YU Chao-Ran,ZHANG Fan,MENG Ya-Li,CHEN Bing-Lin,ZHAO Wen-Qing,WANG You-Hua*   

  1. Nanjing Agricultural University / Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology & Ecology in Southern China, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing 210095, China
  • Received:2015-03-16 Revised:2015-06-01 Published:2015-10-12 Published online:2015-06-29
  • Contact: 王友华, E-mail: w_youhua126@126.com, Tel: 025-84396129

RichHTML

PDF

1444

被引次数

23

摘要：

为研究棉田化学钾肥的秸秆替代施入对棉仁含油量的影响及其生理生化基础，2012—2013年于江苏省农业科学院试验站进行麦棉两熟周年秸秆还田定位试验，在棉花季设置小麦秸秆不还田(0, W0)、半量还田(4500 kg hm–2, W1)和全量还田(9000 kg hm–2, W2)，在小麦季设置棉花秸秆不还田(0, C0)、半量还田(3750 kg hm–2, C1)和全量还田(7500 kg hm–2, C2)，两种作物秸秆不同还田量组合后共9个秸秆还田处理，另根据秸秆折合钾肥量，于2012年棉花季开始增设2个钾肥用量处理，即150和300 kg K2O hm–2 (K1和K2)。研究显示，在适宜氮肥(300 kg N hm–2)、磷肥(150 kg P2O5 hm–2)水平下，随着逐年秸秆还田与施钾，土壤速效氮、有效磷年际间差异均不显著，但土壤速效钾含量年际间存在显著差异；花后17 d、24 d是不同处理条件下棉仁含油量差异形成的关键时期；相较于6-磷酸葡萄糖脱氢酶(G6PDH)、磷酸烯醇式丙酮酸羧化酶(PEPC)，花后17 d、24 d的磷脂酸磷酸酯酶(PPase)的活性对棉仁油分的通径系数更大。结果表明，短期秸秆还田与单施化学钾肥均主要影响棉田土壤速效钾含量；从棉仁油分累积角度来看，秸秆还田可在很大程度上替代化学钾的施入；花后17 d、24 d棉仁钾含量是影响棉仁含油量的关键因子；秸秆还田替代化学钾肥条件下，PPase较G6PDH、PEPC对棉仁油分的影响更为关键。

关键词: 棉仁, 油分, 秸秆还田, 钾肥

Abstract:

A field experiment was carried out to study the influence of straw returning to field (taking the place of chemical potassium fertilization) on cottonseed lipid content and its physiological mechanism in 2012—2013 in the research station of Jiangsu Agricultural Academy in Nanjing. Application rates of wheat straw were designed as 0, 4500, and 9000 kg ha-1 (W0, W1, and W2) in cotton season. Similarly, application rates of cotton straw were designed as 0, 3750, and 7500 kg ha-1 (C0, C1, and C2) in wheat reason. There were nine straw-returning treatments with combinations of two kinds of crop straw at returning different amounts. Additionally, according to the straw potassium content, K fertilizer rates were newly designed as 150 and 300 kg K2O ha-1 (K1 and K2) in cotton season in 2012. The results showed that under the condition of optimized nitrogen (300 kg N ha–1) and phosphate (150 kg P2O5 ha–1) fertilization levels, with straw returning and the chemical potassium fertilizer application year by year, the differences of soil available nitrogen and phosphorus between years were not significant, while those of soil K content were significantly different. The 17th day and 24th day after anthesis (DAA) were the key period for the difference of cottonseed oil formation. Under the chemical potassium fertilization and the straw returning condition, the phosphatidic acid phosphatase (PPase) contributed more to cottonseed oil accumulation than glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) in response to soil potassium nutrition. The result indicated that, the soil available K content was the major nutrition factor that was significantly affected by the two-years straw returning and the chemical potassium fertilizer application. Straw returning to field can take the place of chemical potassium application to a high extent. The amount of straw returning will affect potassium content of the soil. Low potassium stress will accelerate the aging of cotton plant, and might be a straight reason that caused the difference of oil content. The potassium content in the cottonseed at 17th day, 24th day after anthesis is a key nutrition factor that may lead to the difference of cottonseed oil content. The phosphatidic acid phosphatase (PPase) plays a more important role than glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH), phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) in cottonseed oil accumulation in response to soil potassium nutrition.

Key words: Cottonseed embryo, Oil content, Returning straw, Potassium fertilizer

[1]Marschner H, Rimmington G M. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Plant Cell Environ, 1988, 11: 147–148



[2]Zörb C, Senbayram M, Peiter E. Potassium in agriculture–status and perspectives. J Plant Physiol, 2014, 171: 656–669



[3]董合忠, 唐薇, 李振怀, 张冬梅, 李维江. 棉花缺钾引起的形态和生理异常. 西北植物学报, 2005, 25: 615–624



Dong H Z, Tang W, Li Z H, Zhang D M, Li W J. Morphological and physiological disorders of cotton resulting from potassium deficiency. Acta Bot Borea-Occident Sin, 2005, 25: 615–624 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[4]Zhang Z Y, Tian X L, Duan L S, Wang B M, He Z P, Li Z H. Differential responses of conventional and Bt-transgenic cotton to potassium deficiency. J Plant Nutr, 2007, 30: 659–670



[5]白由路. 高价格下我国钾肥的应变策略. 中国土壤与肥料, 2009, (3): 1–4



Bai Y L. Response strategy of potassium fertilizer under high price in China. Soil Fert Sci China, 2009, (3): 1–4 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[6]王亚静, 毕于运, 高春雨. 中国秸秆资源可收集利用量及其适宜性评价. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43: 1852–1859



Wang Y J, Bi Y Y, Gao C Y. Collectable amount sand suitability evaluation of straw resource in China. Sci Agric Sin, 2010, 43: 1852–1859 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[7]李继福, 鲁剑巍, 任涛, 丛日环, 李小坤, 周鹂, 杨文兵, 戴志刚. 稻田不同供钾能力条件下秸秆还田替代钾肥效果. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47: 292–302



Li J F, Lu J W, Ren T, Cong R H, Li X H, Zhou L, Yang W B, Dai Z G. Effect of Straw incorporation substitute for K-fertilizer under different paddy soil K supply capacities. Sci Agric Sin, 2014, 47: 292–302 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[8]Karaosmanoglu F, Tuter M, Gollu E, Yanmaz S, Altintig E. Fuel properties of cottonseed oil. Energy Sourc, 1999, 21: 821–828.



[9]Meneghetti S M P, Meneghetti M R, Serra T M, Barbosa D C, Wolf C R. Biodiesel production from vegetable oil mixtures: cottonseed, soybean, and castor oils. Energy Fuels, 2007, 21: 3746–3747



[10]Gipson J R, Joham H E. Influence of night temperature on growth and development of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.): IV. Seed Quality. Agron J, 1969, 61: 365–367



[11]Anderson O E, Worthington R E. Boron and manganese effects on protein, oil content, and fatty acid composition of cottonseed. Agron J, 1971, 63: 566–569



[12]Leffler H R, Elmore C D, Hesketh J D. Seasonal and fertility-related changes in cottonseed protein quantity and quality. Crop Sci 1977, 17: 953–956



[13]Elmore C D, Spurgeon W I, Thom W Q. Nitrogen fertilization increases N and alters amino acid concentration of cottonseed. Agron J, 1979, 71: 713–716



[14]Sawan Z M, Hafez S A, Basyony A E, Alkassas A E E R. Cottonseed, protein, oil yields and oil properties as influenced by potassium fertilization and foliar application of zinc and phosphorus. World J Agric Sci, 2006, 2: 66–74



[15]Sawan Z M, Hafezb S A, Basyony A E, Alkassas A E E R. Cottonseed: protein, oil yields, and oil properties as influenced by potassium fertilization and foliar application of zinc and phosphorus. Grasas Y Aceites, 2007, 58: 40–48



[16]Leigh R A, Wyn-Jones R G.. Cellular compartmentation in plant nutrition: the selective cytoplasm and the promiscuous vacuole. Adv Plant Nutr USA, 1986, 2: 249–279



[17]Suelter C H. Role of potassium in enzyme catalysis. Potass Agric, 1985, 337–350



[18]鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1999. p 147



Lu R K. Method for agro-chemical analyses of soil. Beijing: Agricultural, Science and Technology Press of China, 1999. p 147



[19]Fan M, Jiang R, Liu X, Zhang F, Lu S, Zeng X, Christie P. Interactions between non-flooded mulching cultivation and varying nitrogen inputs in rice-wheat rotations. Field Crops Res, 2005, 91: 307–318



[20]Feil B, Moser S B, Jampatong S, Stamp P. Mineral composition of the grains of tropical maize varieties as affected by pre-anthesis drought and rate of nitrogen fertilization. Crop Sci, 2005, 45: 516–523



[21]陈玉萍, 刘后利. 甘蓝型油菜子油分的积累与某些生理变化关系的研究. 武汉植物学研究, 1995, 13: 240–246



Chen Y P, Liu H L. Studies on the relationship between oil content and the change of biological metabolism in Brassica napus L. seed. J Wuhan Bot Res, 1995, 13: 240–246



[22]Tian W N, Braunstein L D, Pang J, Stuhlmeier K M, Xi Q C, Tian X, Stanton R C. Importance of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity for cell growth. J Biol Chem, 1998, 273: 10609–10617



[23]西北农林科技大学. 基础生物化学实验指导. 陕西: 陕西科学技术出版社, 1986. pp 104–107



Northwest A&F University. Guide of Basic Biochemistry Experiment. Shanxi: Shaanxi Sci &Tech Press, 1986. pp 104–107 (in Chinese)



[24]Sebei K, Ouerghi Z, Kallel H, Boukhchina S. Evolution of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase activity and lipid content during seed maturation of two spring rapeseed cultivars (Brassica napus L.). Comptes Rendus Biol, 2006, 329, 719–725



[25]Edmeades D C. The long-term effects of manures and fertilisers on soil productivity and quality: a review. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst, 2003, 66: 165–180



[26]Steiner C, Teixeira W G, Lehmann J, Nehls T, de Macêdo J L V, Blum W E H, Zech W. Long term effects of manure, charcoal and mineral fertilization on crop production and fertility on a highly weathered Central Amazonian upland soil. Plant Soil, 2007, 291: 275–290



[27]Zhao Y, Wang P, Li J, Chen Y, Liu S. The effects of two organic manures on soil properties and crop yields on a temperate calcareous soil under a wheat–maize cropping system. Eur J Agron, 2009, 31: 36–42



[28]Zhu H, Wu J, Huang D, Zhu Q, Liu S, Su Y, Wei W. Improving fertility and productivity of a highly-weathered upland soil in subtropical China by incorporating rice straw. Plant Soil, 2010, 331: 427–437



[29]Sui N, Zhou Z G, Yu C R, Liu R X, Yang C Q, Zhang F, Song G L, Meng Y. Yield and potassium use efficiency of cotton with wheat straw incorporation and potassium fertilization on soils with various conditions in the wheat–cotton rotation system. Field Crops Res, 2015, 172: 132–144.



[30]董合忠, 李维江, 唐薇, 张冬梅. 棉花生理性早衰研究进展. 棉花学报, 2005, 17: 56–60



Dong H Z, Li J W, Tang W, Zhang D M. research progress in physiological premature senescence in cotton. Cotton Sci, 2005, 17: 56–60



[31]杨铁钢, 黄树梅, 靳永胜, 孟菊茹, 刘凤玲. 棉株载铃量对其主要生育性状的影响. 华北农学报, 1999, 14(3): 65–70



Yang T G, Huang S M, Jin Y S, Meng J R, Liu F L. Effects of boll load in a cotton plant on major developmental traits. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 1999, 14(03): 65–70



[32]Wakao S, Benning C. Genome-wide analysis of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenases in Arabidopsis. Plant J, 2005, 41: 243–256



[33]Schwender J, Ohlrogge J B, Shachar-Hill Y. A flux model of glycolysis and the oxidative pentosephosphate pathway in developing Brassica napus embryos. J Biol Chem, 2003, 278: 29442–29453



[34]陈锦清, 郎春秀, 胡张华, 刘智宏, 黄锐之. 反义PEP基因调控油菜籽粒蛋白质/油脂含量比率的研究. 农业生物技术学报, 1999, 7: 316–320



Chen J Q, Lang C X, Hu Z H, Liu Z H, Huang R Z. Antisense PEP gene regulates to ratio of protein and lipid content in Brassica napus seeds. J Agric Biotechnol, 1999, 7: 316–320



[35]印南日, 李培武, 周海燕, 白艺珍, 丁小霞. 我国食用棉籽油质量安全. 中国农业科技导报, 2013, (4): 20–24



Yin N R, Li P W, Zhou H Y, Bai X Z, Ding X X. Quality and safety of edible Cottonseed oil in China. J Agric Sci Technol, 2013, (4): 20–24



[36]董合忠, 李维江, 张晓洁. 棉花种子学. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004. pp 53–54



Dong H Z, Li W J, Zhang X J. Science and technology of cottonseed. Beijing: Science Press, 2004. pp 53–54
[1] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[2] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[3] 朱家宝, 王先领, 樊友众, 王宗铠, 蒯婕, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 周广生. 秸秆还田耦合氮肥运筹对稻茬油菜茎秆质量和抗倒伏性能的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 233-248.
[4] 金欣欣, 宋亚辉, 苏俏, 杨永庆, 王瑾. 高产高油高油酸花生品种的生长发育及干物质生产特征[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 191-201.
[5] 杨颖聪, 张俊豪, 唐一哲, 乔唱唱, 王鹏博, 黄明, 徐国伟, 王贺正. 秸秆还田和施磷量对旱地小麦籽粒淀粉及其合成相关酶活性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2467-2484.
[6] 樊友众, 王先领, 王宗铠, 王春云, 王天尧, 谢捷, 蒯婕, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 周广生. 秸秆还田耦合氮肥运筹对稻茬油菜光合性能及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2139-2151.
[7] 赵佳雯, 李子洪, 欧星雨, 王伊朗, 丁小飞, 梁乐瑶, 丁文金, 张海鹏, 马尚宇, 樊永惠, 黄正来, 张文静. 氮肥与钾肥运筹对弱筋小麦籽粒产量、品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1914-1933.
[8] 陈如雪, 孙丽芳, 张芯源, 牟海萌, 张永新, 袁丽雪, 彭仕乐, 王壮壮, 王永华. 秸秆还田与微生物菌剂配施对冬小麦旗叶碳氮代谢及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1901-1913.
[9] 崔鑫, 谷贺贺, 宋毅, 张哲, 刘诗诗, 陆志峰, 任涛, 鲁剑巍. 钾肥用量对油菜产量和钾素积累及因冻害减产程度的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1629-1642.
[10] 孟孜贞, 刘陈, 盛倩男, 熊志豪, 方娅婷, 赵剑, 余秋华, 王昆昆, 李小坤, 任涛, 鲁剑巍. 氮磷钾肥施用对冬油菜增产效果及因冻害减产程度的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1037-1049.
[11] 李翔宇, 季欣杰, 王雪莲, 龙安燃, 王峥宇, 杨子慧, 宫香伟, 姜英, 齐华. 秸秆还田配施氮肥对春玉米产量和籽粒品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 696-712.
[12] 王鹏博, 张冬霞, 乔唱唱, 黄明, 王贺正. 秸秆还田和施磷量对豫西旱地小麦土壤酶活性和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 534-547.
[13] 朱荣昱, 赵蒙杰, 姚云凤, 李艳红, 李向东, 刘兆新. 秸秆还田方式与播种深度对夏直播花生土壤物理性状与出苗特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(8): 2106-2121.
[14] 杨春菊, 唐道彬, 张凯, 杜康, 黄红, 乔欢欢, 王季春, 吕长文. 氮钾减量配施对甘薯产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(5): 1341-1350.
[15] 胡明明, 丁峰, 彭志芸, 向开宏, 李郁, 张宇杰, 杨志远, 孙永健, 马均. 多元化种植模式下秸秆还田配合水氮管理对水稻产量形成与氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(5): 1236-1252.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2