欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (09): 1353-1360.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.01353

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

油菜乙酰乳酸合酶突变体S638N的酶学特性及其对ALS类除草剂的抗性

胡茂龙, 浦惠明*, 龙卫华, 高建芹, 戚存扣, 张洁夫, 陈松   

  1. 江苏省农业科学院经济作物研究所 / 农业部长江下游棉花与油菜重点实验室 / 国家油料作物改良中心南京分中心, 江苏南京210014
  • 收稿日期:2015-01-05 出版日期:2015-09-12 网络出版日期:2015-09-12
  • 通讯作者: 浦惠明, E-mail:puhuiming@126.com, Tel: 025-84390370
  • 作者简介:第一作者联系方式: E-mail:humolon@163.com, Tel: 025-84390375
  • 基金资助:
    本研究由国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)项目(2011AA10A10403), 国家自然科学基金项目(31101174)和江苏省农业科学院基本科研业务专项[ZX(15)1004]资助

Enzymatic Characteristics of Acetolactate Synthase Mutant S638N in Brassica napus and Its Resistance to ALS Inhibitor Herbicides

HU Mao-Long, PU Hui-Ming*, LONG Wei-Hua, GAO Jian-Qin, QI Cun-Kou, ZHANG Jie-Fu, CHEN Song   

  1. Institute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of Cotton and Rapeseed (Nanjing), Ministry of Agriculture / Nanjing Sub-center of National Center of Oil Crops Improvement, Nanjing 210014, China
  • Received:2015-01-05 Published:2015-09-12 Published online:2015-09-12

摘要: 在对油菜抗咪唑啉酮类除草剂基因BnALS1R克隆与功能验证基础上, 为比较抗性基因编码的乙酰乳酸合酶突变体S638N酶学特性及其对ALS类除草剂抗性与野生型的差异, 构建基因原核表达载体, 在大肠杆菌中表达S638N和野生型的重组融合蛋白。SDS-PAGE和Western blot分析表明, S638N和野生型均能表达出约74 kD的特异性重组蛋白。纯化目的蛋白, 在不同温度和pH条件下, 测定S638N和野生型的酶活性。结果显示, 温度和pH对突变酶活性的影响与野生型相同, 表现为先升后降, 在37℃、pH 7.0条件下催化活性均最高。同时, 该突变酶的酶学动力学参数Km和Vmax与野生型没有显著差异, 其对3个辅助因子的响应曲线也与野生型类似, 缺少其中任何一个辅助因子均使突变酶S638N基本都没有活性。然而, 突变酶S638N对IMI类除草剂抗性显著高于野生型, 而对Su类除草剂敏感性和野生型相同。因此, 突变酶S638N具有对IMI类除草剂的专一抗性, 但未改变酶学反应特征。

关键词: 油菜, 咪唑啉酮类除草剂, 乙酰乳酸合酶, S638N, 除草剂抗性

Abstract: Acetolactate synthase (ALS) catalyses the first step in the synthesis of the branched-chain amino acids and is the target of several classes of herbicides. A BnALS1R gene from herbicide-resistant mutant line M9 in B. napus, was previously isolated and demonstrated to be resistant to the imidazolinone (IMI) herbicides. This research was to reveal the differences of enzymatic characteristics and its resistance to ALS inhibitor herbicides between the mutant S638N and the wild-type enzyme. The BnALS1R gene was constructed and expressed in Escherichia coli along with the wild-type. The target recombinant proteins with the predicted molecular weight (74 kD) were successively expressed in Escherichia coli and purified by SDS-PAGE. The enzymatic activity of the purified S638N and wild-type was then measured in enzyme reaction systems under different temperatures and pH values. Results showed that the S638N resembled the wild-type in their enzymatic activity, showing maximum activity at 37°C and pH 7.0, and no significant difference in the Km and Vmax between the S638N and wild-type. The activation of the S638N by cofactors (FAD, Mg2+ and thiamine diphosphate) was examined and generated similar results to that of the wild-type. The mutant enzyme was inactive when one of three cofactors was omitted. However, the S638N was more resistant to IMI herbicides than the wild-type in contrast to Su herbicides that inhibited the S638N as well as the wild-type. Therefore, the S638N has resistance specific to IMI herbicides with unalteration of the enzymatic reaction characteristics.

Key words: Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.), Imidazolinone herbicides, Acetolactate synthase, S638N, Herbicide-resistance

[1] McCourt J A, Duggleby R G. Acetohydroxyacid synthase and its role in the biosynthetic pathway for branched-chain amino acids. Amino Acids , 2006, 31: 173-210
[2] Tan S, Evans R R, Dahmer M L, Bijay K S, Dale L S. Imidazolinone-tolerant crops: history, current status and future. Pest Manag Sci , 2005, 61: 246-257
[3] McCourt J A, Pang S S, King-Scott J, Guddat L W, Duggleby R G. Herbicide-binding sites revealed in the structure of plant acetohydroxyacid synthase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA , 2006, 103: 569-573
[4] Chipman D M, Duggleby R G, Tittmann K. Mechanisms of acetohydroxyacid synthases. Curr Opin Chem Biol , 2005, 9: 475-481
[5] Chipman D, Barak Z, Schloss J V. Biosynthesis of 2-aceto-2- hydroxy acids: acetolactate synthases and acetohydroxyacid synthases. Biochim Biophys Acta , 1998, 1385: 401-419
[6] Duggleby R G. Domain relationships in thiamine diphosphate- dependent enzymes. Acc Chem Res , 2006, 39: 550-557
[7] Lee H, Sachin R, Neeraj K, Burkea I, Yenisha J P, Gilla K S, Wettsteina D V, Steven E U. Single nucleotide mutation in the barley acetohydroxy acid synthase (AHAS) gene confers resistance to imidazolinone herbicides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA , 2011, 108: 8909-8913
[8] Carlos A S, Mariano B, Mariel E, Sherry R, Ascenzi W R. Molecular and biochemical characterization of an induced mutation conferring imidazolinone resistance in sunflower. Theor Appl Genet , 2008, 118: 105-112
[9] Carlos A S, Mariano B. Inheritance and molecular characterization of broad range tolerance to herbicides targeting acetohydroxyacid synthase in sun?ower. Theor Appl Genet , 2012, 124: 355-364
[10] Carlos A. S, Mariano B, Emiliano A, Brigitte W. Response to imazapyr and dominance relationships of two imidazolinone- tolerant alleles at the Ahasl1 locus of sun?ower. Theor Appl Genet , 2012, 124: 385-396
[11] Hattori J, Brown D, Mourad G, Labbe H, Ouellet T, Sunohara G, Rutledge R, King J, Miki B. An acetohydroxyacid synthase mutant reveals a single site involved in multiple herbicide resistance. Mol Gen Genet , 1995, 246: 419-425
[12] 胡茂龙, 浦惠明, 高建芹, 龙卫华, 戚存扣, 张洁夫, 陈松. 油菜乙酰乳酸合成酶抑制剂类除草剂抗性突变体M9的遗传和基因克隆. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45: 4326-4334 Hu M L, Pu H M, Gao J Q, Long W H, Qi C K, Zhang J F, Chen S. Inheritance and gene cloning of an ALS inhabiting herbicide-resistant mutant line M9 in Brassica napus . Sci Agric Sin , 2012, 45: 4326-4334 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] Walter K L, Strachan S D, Ferry N M, Albert H H, Castle L A, Sebastian S A. Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1 and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean. Pest Manag Sci , 2014, 70: 1831-1839
[14] Ghio C, Ramos M L, Altieri E, Bulos M, Sala C A. Molecular characterization of Als1 , an acetohydroxyacid synthase mutation conferring resistance to sulfonylurea herbicides in soybean. Theor Appl Genet , 2013, 126: 2957-2968
[15] Li H, Li J, Zhao B, Wang J, Yi L, Liu C, Wu J, King G J, Liu K. Generation and characterization of tribenuron-methyl herbicide-resistant rapeseed ( Brassica napus ) for hybrid seed production using chemically induced male sterility. Theor Appl Genet , 2015, 128: 107-118
[16] Thompson C, Tar’an B. Genetic characterization of the acetohydroxyacid synthase (AHAS) gene responsible for resistance to imidazolinone in chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.). Theor Appl Genet , 2014, 127: 1583-1591
[17] Li D, Barclay I, Jose K, Stefanova K, Appels R. A mutation at the Ala122 position of acetohydroxyacid synthase (AHAS) located on chromosome 6D of wheat: improved resistance to imidazolinone and a faster assay for marker assisted selection. Mol Breed , 2008, 22: 217-225
[18] Duggleby R G, McCourt J A, Guddat L W. Structure and mechanism of inhibition of plant acetohydroxyacid synthase. Plant Physiol Biochem , 2008, 46: 309-324
[19] Ott K H, Kwagh J G, Stockton G W, Sidorov V, Kakefuda G. Rational molecular design and genetic engineering of herbicide resistant crops by structure modeling and site-directed mutagenesis of acetohydroxyacid synthase. J Mol Biol , 1996, 263: 359-368
[20] Bernasconi P, Woodworth A R, Rosen B A, Subramanian M V, Siehl D L. A naturally occurring point mutation confers broad range tolerance to herbicides that target acetohydroxyacid synthase. J Biol Chem , 1995, 270: 17381-17385
[21] Subramanian M V, Hung H Y, Dias J M, Miner V W, Butler J H, Jachetta J J. Properties of mutant acetolactate synthases resistant to triazolopyrimidine sulfonanilide. Plant Physiol , 1990, 94: 239-244
[22] Chang A K, Duggleby R G. Herbicide-resistant forms of Arabidopsis thaliana acetohydroxyacid synthase: characterization of the catalytic properties and sensitivity to inhibitors of four defined mutants. Biochem J , 1998, 333: 765-777
[23] Lee Y T, Chang A K, Duggleby R G. Effect of mutagenesis at serine 653 of Arabidopsis thaliana acetohydroxyacid synthase on the sensitivity to imidazolinone and sulfonylurea herbicides. FEBS Lett , 1999, 452: 341-345
[24] Chang A K, Duggleby R G. Expression, purification and characterization of Arabidopsis thaliana acetohydroxyacid synthase. Biochem J , 1997, 327: 161-169
[25] 浦惠明, 高建芹, 龙卫华, 胡茂龙, 张洁夫, 陈松, 陈新军, 陈锋, 顾慧, 付三雄, 戚存扣. 油菜抗咪唑啉酮性状的遗传及其应用. 中国油料作物学报, 2011, 33: 15-19 Pu H M, Gao J Q, Long W H, Hu M L, Zhang J F, Chen S, Chen X J, Chen F, Gu H, Fu S X, Qi C K. Studies on inheritance of imidazolinones resistance in Brassica napus and its utilization. Chin J Oil Crop Sci , 2011, 33: 15-19 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26] 胡茂龙, 孔令娜, 龙卫华, 高建芹, 浦惠明, 戚存扣, 张洁夫, 陈松. 油菜乙酰羟基酸合酶基因 BnAHAS1 的克隆及其重组蛋白质的原核表达. 江苏农业学报, 2014, 30: 986-991 Hu M L, Kong L N, Long W H, Gao J Q, Pu H M, Qi C K, Zhang J F, Chen S. Cloning of the BnAHAS1 gene from Brassica napus and prokaryotic expression of its recombinant protein in Escherichia coli . Jiangsu J Agric Sci , 2014, 30: 986-991 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27] Bradford M M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Ann Biochem , 1976, 72: 248-254
[28] Singh B K, Stidham M A, Shaner D L. Assay of acetohydroxyacid synthase. Ann Biochem , 1988, 171: 173-179
[29] Seefeldt S S, Jensen J E, Fuerst E P. Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose response relationships. Weed Technol , 1995, 9: 218-227
[30] Esposito D, Chatterjee D K. Enhancement of soluble protein expression through the use of fusion tags. Curr Opin Biotech , 2006, 17: 353-358
[31] Waugh D S. Making the most of affinity tags. Trends Biotech , 2005, 23: 316-320
[32] Chong C K, Choi J D. Amino acid residues conferring herbicide tolerance in tobacco acetolactate synthase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun , 2000, 279: 462-467
[33] 高建芹, 浦惠明, 戚存扣, 张洁夫, 龙卫华, 胡茂龙, 陈松, 陈新军, 陈锋, 顾慧. 抗咪唑啉酮油菜种质的发现与鉴定. 植物遗传资源学报, 2010, 11: 369-373 Gao J Q, Pu H M, Qi C K, Zhang J F, Long W H, Hu M L, Chen S, Chen X J, Chen F, Gu H. Identification of imidazolidone- resistant oilseed rape mutant. J Plant Genet Resour , 2010, 11: 369-373 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34] 胡茂龙, 龙卫华, 高建芹, 付三雄, 陈锋, 周晓婴, 彭琦, 张维, 浦惠明, 戚存扣, 张洁夫, 陈松. 油菜抗咪唑啉酮类除草剂基因 BnALS1R 等位基因特异PCR标记的开发与应用. 作物学报, 2013, 39: 1711-1719 Hu M L, Long W H, Gao J Q, Fu S X, Chen F, Zhou X Y, Peng Q, Zhang W, Pu H M, Qi C K, Zhang J F, Chen S. Development and application of allele-specific PCR marker for the imidazolinone-resistant gene BnALS1R in Brassica napus . Acta Agron Sin , 2013, 39: 1711-1719 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 任依涵, 赵曼利, 代晶, 李银水, 顾炽明, 杨璐, 杜雪竹, 胡文诗, 秦璐. 油菜叶片功能氮动态变化对光合速率及光合氮利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1459-1471.
[2] 蒯婕, 娄洪祥, 谭晓强, 郜耿东, 邵东李, 肖胜男, 赵杰, 徐正华, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生. 直播油菜单产提升的生理基础及实践途径[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 982-992.
[3] 张全军, 吴东丽, 刘聪, 朱永超, 杨大生, 孔祥胜. 1981—2024年长江中下游油菜发育期时空格局演变特征[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1140-1152.
[4] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.
[5] 谭文清, 惠荣奎, 张凡丽, 覃磊, 毛舒香, 邓力超, 郭一鸣, 曲亮, 严明理. 油菜耐渍性快速鉴定及耐渍种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1035-1045.
[6] 王楚锐, 李开祥, 赵志, 肖麓, 唐国永, 赵志刚, 徐亮, 杜德志, 柳海东. 甘蓝型春油菜早花基因BnCRY2功能位点KASP标记的开发及应用[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 708-721.
[7] 马毅娜, 吴晓明玉, 李藕琪, 王圆, 陈丽, 张盈川, 赵伦, 文静, 傅廷栋, 沈金雄. Bna-miR1040-EIF3A模块调控油菜开花时间的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 349-362.
[8] 娄洪祥, 幸仁鹏, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 蒯婕, 周广生. 播种期对长江中游甘蓝型油菜光温资源利用效率和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 539-551.
[9] 李瑞, 余意雯, 王敦亮, 田婷, 孙灵湘, 陶玥玥, 孙华. 长江中下游油菜薹油兼用模式菜籽产量特征比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 620-630.
[10] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 基于北纬30°分界的长江中游油菜增产策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 99-117.
[11] 朱家宝, 王先领, 樊友众, 王宗铠, 蒯婕, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 周广生. 秸秆还田耦合氮肥运筹对稻茬油菜茎秆质量和抗倒伏性能的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 233-248.
[12] 王彬, 蒙姜宇, 邱浩良, 贺亚军, 钱伟. 甘蓝型油菜BnaDUF579基因家族的鉴定与表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2100-2110.
[13] 樊友众, 王先领, 王宗铠, 王春云, 王天尧, 谢捷, 蒯婕, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 周广生. 秸秆还田耦合氮肥运筹对稻茬油菜光合性能及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2139-2151.
[14] 李炳霖, 叶晓磊, 肖红, 肖国滨, 吕伟生, 刘君权, 任涛, 陆志峰, 鲁剑巍. 镁肥用量对油菜产量和镁吸收量及因冻害减产程度的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1850-1860.
[15] 李世鹏, 陈才武, 张晶, 吕恬, 傅廷栋, 易斌. 基于改进U-Net++模型的油菜pol TCMS温敏两系育性等级鉴定及温度育性关系的量化研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1423-1434.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!