欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (11): 1700-1707.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2016.01700

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

旗叶蜡质含量不同小麦近等基因系的抗旱性

徐文1,2,申浩1,2,郭军2,余晓丛2,李祥1,杨彦会1,马晓1,赵世杰1,*,宋健民2,*   

  1. 1作物生物学国家重点实验室 / 山东农业大学生命科学学院,山东泰安271018;2山东省农业科学院作物研究所,山东济南 250100
  • 收稿日期:2016-01-14 修回日期:2016-06-20 出版日期:2016-11-12 网络出版日期:2016-08-01
  • 通讯作者: 赵世杰, E-mail: sjzhao@sdau.edu.cn; 宋健民, E-mail: song_jianmin@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(31271635), 国家农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-03-1-8)和山东省自主创新重大关键技术计划项目(2014GJJS0201-1)资助。

Drought Resistance of Wheat NILs with Different Cuticular Wax Contents in Flag Leaf

XU Wen 1,2,SHEN Hao1,2,GUO Jun2,YU Xiao-Cong2,LI Xiang1,YANG Yan-Hui1,MA Xiao1,ZHAO Shi-Jie1,*,SONG Jian-Min2,*   

  1. 1State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology /College of Life Sciences, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China; 2 Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China
  • Received:2016-01-14 Revised:2016-06-20 Published:2016-11-12 Published online:2016-08-01
  • Contact: Zhao Shijie, E-mail: sjzhao@sdau.edu.cn; Song Jianmin, E-mail: song_jianmin@163.com
  • Supported by:

    This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31271635), the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-03-1-8), and the Innovation Project for Key Technologies in Shandong Province (2014GJJS0201-1).

摘要:

于2013—2014和2014—2015年度,以多蜡质和少蜡质的4个小麦近等基因系为材料,采用田间旱棚方式控制土壤水分,研究了蜡质含量与小麦抗旱性的关系。结果表明,干旱处理后,多蜡质小麦品系旗叶的蜡质含量平均为15.15 mg g?1,较少蜡质小麦品系(8.43 mg g?1)高79.8%;多蜡质小麦品系旗叶的水势较高,干旱处理后下降幅度明显小于少蜡质小麦品系,水分散失率也显著低于少蜡质品系(P< 0.05);多蜡质小麦品系旗叶的光合速率平均下降7.5%,而少蜡质小麦品系下降9.8%;多蜡质小麦品系旗叶PSII最大光化学效率(Fv/Fm)平均下降幅度为3.4%,少蜡质小麦品系下降幅度达到5.8%;多蜡质小麦品系的籽粒产量高于少蜡质品系,平均高3.7%;多蜡质小麦品系的抗旱指数和干旱敏感指数均显著低于少蜡质小麦品系(P< 0.05)。以上结果表明,蜡质能够提高小麦的抗旱性,旗叶蜡质含量可以作为抗旱小麦品种的选择指标。

关键词: 小麦, 近等基因系, 蜡质含量, 抗旱性

Abstract:

The relationship of flag leaf cuticular wax content with leaf water potential, excised-leaf water loss, leaf photosynthesis characteristics and wheat yield under drought stress were analyzed in 2013–2014 and 2014–2015 wheat seasons using four wheat nearly isogenetic lines (NILs) differing in cuticular wax content in flag leaf. Under drought stress condition, the average flag leaf cuticular wax content of the high-wax NILs (15.15 mg g?1) was 79.8% higher than that of the low-wax NILs (8.43 mg g?1). Compared with the low-wax NILs, the high-wax NILs showed significantly higher water potential in flag leaf and lower water loss rate (P< 0.05). In response to drought stress, photosynthetic rate (Pn) and Fv/Fm of flag leaf declined in both types of NILs, however, the decrease percentages were lower in the high-wax NILs (7.5% and 3.4%, respectively) than in the low-wax NILs (9.8% and 5.8%, respectively). As a result, the average yield of the high-wax NILs was 3.7% higher than that of the low-wax NILs, and the drought tolerance (TOL) and stress susceptible index (SSI) of the high-wax NILs were significantly less than those of the low-wax NILs (P< 0.05). These results indicate that cuticular wax content in flag leaf is closely related to drought tolerance and can be used as a physiological indicator of drought resistance in wheat selection.

Key words: Common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), Nearly isogenetic lines (NILs), Cuticular wax content, Drought resistance

[1]黄玲, 张正斌, 崔玉亭, 刘孟雨, 柴守玺, 陈兆波. 小麦叶片蜡质含量与水分利用效率和产量的关系. 麦类作物学报, 2003, 23(3): 41–44 Huang L, Zhang Z B, Cui Y T, Liu M Y, Chai S X, Chen Z B. Relationship between cuticular wax content and water use efficiency of leaf and yield in wheat. J Triticeae Crops, 2003, 23(3): 41–44 (in Chinese with English abstract) [2]Johnson D A, Richards R A, Turner N C. Yield, water relations, gas exchange, and surface reflectances of near-isogenic wheat lines differing in glaucousness. Crop Sci, 1983, 23: 318–325 [3]Foulkes M J, Sylvester-Bradley R, Weightman R, Weightman, Snape J W. Identifying physiological traits associated with improved drought resistance in winter wheat. Field Crops Res, 2007, 103: 11–24 [4]FAO. 2013. Drought. http://www.fao.org/docrep/017/aq191e/aq191e.pdf [5]柴凌燕, 董易凡, 李士伟, 史团省. 植物角质膜及其渗透性与抗旱性研究进展. 植物研究, 2010, 30: 763–768 Chai L Y, Dong Y F, Li S W, Shi T X. Research progress in permeability and drought resistance of plant cuticular. Bull Bot Res, 2010, 30: 763–768 (in Chinese with English abstract) [6]李魏强, 张正斌, 李景娟. 植物表皮蜡质与抗旱及其分子生物学.植物生理与分子生物学报, 2006, 32: 505–512 Li W Q, Zhang Z B, Li J J. Plant epicuticular cuticular wax and drought resistance as well as its molecular biology. J Plant Physiol Mol Biol, 2006, 32: 505–512 (in Chinese with English abstract) [7]李婧婧, 黄俊华, 谢树成. 植物蜡质及其与环境的关系. 生态学报, 2011, 31: 565–574 Li J J, Huang J H, Xie S C. Plant cuticular wax and its response to environmental conditions: an overview. Acta Ecol Sin, 2011, 31: 565–574 (in Chinese with English abstract) [8]Pollard M, Beisson F, Li Y H, Ohlrogge J B. Building lipid barriers: biosynthesis of cutin and suberin. Trends Plant Sci, 2008, 13: 236–246 [9]Kunst L, Samuel L. Plant cuticles shine: advances in cuticular wax biosynthesis and export. Plant Biol, 2009, 12: 721–727 [10]Bianchi G, Lupotto E, Borghi B, Corbellini M. Cuticular cuticular wax of wheat. The effects of chromosomal deficiencies on the biosynthesis of cuticular wax components. Planta, 1980, 148: 328–331 [11]Suh M C, Samuels A L, Jetter R, Kunst L, Pollard M, Ohlrogge J, Beisson F. Cuticular lipid composition, surface structure, and gene expression in Arabidopsis stem epidermis. Plant Physiol, 2005, 139: 1649–1665 [12]Premchandra G S, Saneoka H, Fujita K, Ogata S. Leaf water relations osmotic adjustment cell membrane stability epicuticular cuticular wax load and growth as affected by increasing water deficit in Sorghum. J Exp Bot, 1992, 43: 1569–1576 [13]Bames J D, Percy K E, Poul N D. The influence of UV-B radiation on the physicochemical nature of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) leaf surface. J Exp Bot, 1996, 47: 99–109 [14]Eigenbrode S D, Espelie K E. Effects of plant epicuticular lipids on insect herbivores. Annu Rev Entomol, 1995, 40: 171–194 [15]Kosma D K, Jill A, Nemacheck. Changes in properties of wheat leaf cuticle during interactions with Hessian fly. Plant J, 2010, 63: 31–43 [16]王美芳, 陈巨莲, 原国辉, 雷振生, 吴政卿, 赵献林. 植物表面蜡质对植食性昆虫的影响研究进展. 生态环境学报, 2009, 18: 1155–1160 Wang M F, Chen J L, Yuan G H, Lei Z S, Wu Z Q, Zhao X L. Effects of plant epicuticular cuticular waxes on phytophagous insects behaviour. Ecol Environ Sci, 2009, 18: 1155–1160 (in Chinese with English abstract) [17]刘勇, 陈巨莲, 程登发. 不同小麦品种(系)叶片表面蜡质对两种麦蚜取食的影响. 应用生态学报, 2007, 18: 1785-1788 Liu Y, Chen J L, Cheng D F. Effects of wheat leaf surface cuticular waxes on the feeding of two wheat aphid species. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2007, 18: 1785–1788 (in Chinese with English abstract) [18]李希峰, 董娜. 小麦近等基因系的构建及应用进展. 安徽农业科学, 2012, 40: 2577–2579 Li X F, Dong N. Progress in construction and application of near-isogenic line in wheat. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2012, 40: 2577–2579 (in Chinese with English abstract) [19]Zadoks J C, Chang T T, Konzak C F. A decimal code for growth stages of cereals. Weed Res, 1974, 14: 415–421 [20]Adamski N M, Bush M S, Simmonds J, Turner A S, Mugford S G, Jones A, Findlay K, Pedentchouk N, von Wettstein-Knowles P, Uauy C. The Inhibitor of wax 1 locus (Iw1) prevents formation of β-and OH-β-diketones in wheat cuticular waxes and maps to a sub-cM interval on chromosome arm 2BS. Plant J, 2013, 746: 989–1002 [21]Zhang Z, Wang W, Li W. Genetic interactions underlying the biosynthesis and inhibition of β-diketones in wheat and their impact on glaucousness and cuticle permeability. PLoS One, 2013, 8: e54129 [22]李鹏民, 高辉远, Strasser R. 快速叶绿素荧光诱导动力学分析在光合作用研究中的应用. 植物生理与分子生物学学报, 2005, 31: 559–566 Li P M, Gao H Y, Strasser R. Application of the fast chlorophyll fluorescence induction dynamics analysis in photosynthesis study. Acta Photophysiol Sin, 2005, 31: 559–566 (in Chinese with English abstract) [23]Strasser R, Tsimill-Michael M, Srivastava A. Analysis of the chlorophyll a fluorescence transient. In: Papageorgiou G C, Govindjee, eds. Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration. Volume 19: Chlorophyll a Fluorescence: A Signature of Photosynthesis. Berlin: Springer, 2004. pp 321–362 [24]Fischer R A, Maurer R. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars: I. Grain yield responses. Aust J Agric Res, 1978, 29: 897–912 [25]Rosielle A A, Hamblin J. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environment. Crop Sci, 1981, 21: 943–946 [26]Fleury D, Jefferies S, Kuchel H, Langridge P. Genetic and genomic tools to improve drought tolerance in wheat. J Exp Bot, 2010, 61: 3211–3222 [27]Piao S, Ciais P, Huang Y, Huang Y, Shen Z, Peng S, Li J, Zhou L, Liu H, Ma Y, Ding Y, Friedlingstein P, Liu C, Tan K, Yu Y, Zhang T, Fang J. The impacts of climate change on water resources and agriculture in China. Nature, 2010, 467: 43–51 [28]Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Seki M. Regulatory network of gene expression in the drought and cold stress responses. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2003, 6: 410–417 [29]Reddy A R, Chaitanya K V, Vivekanandan M. Drought-induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. J Plant Physiol, 2004, 161: 1189–1202 [30]Yordanov I, Velikova V, Tsonev T. Plant responses to drought, acclimation, and stress tolerance. Photosynthetica, 2000, 38: 171-186 [31]Parent B, Shahinnia F, Maphosa L, Berger B, Rabie H, Chalmers K, Langridge, Fleury D. Combining field performance with controlled environment plant imaging to identify the genetic control of growth and transpiration underlying yield response to water-deficit stress in wheat. J Exp Bot, 2015, 66: 5481–5492 [32]高杨. 小麦叶片表皮蜡质的测定及其对光合和农艺性状的效应分析. 西北农林科技大学硕士论文, 陕西杨凌, 2014. pp 21–34 Gao Y. Determination of Epidermal Wax Content in Wheat Leaves and Analysis on Its Effect on Photosynthetic and Agronomic Traits. MS Thesis of Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China, 2014. pp 21–34 (in Chinese with English abstract) [33]Mir R R, Zaman-Allah M, Sreenivasulu N, Trethowan R, Varshney R K. Integrated genomics, physiology and breeding approaches for improving drought tolerance in crops. Theor Appl Genet, 2012, 125: 625–645 [34] Tuberosa R, Maccaferri M. Genomics approaches to dissect the genetic basis of drought resistance in durum wheat. In: Yasunari Q, Shigeo T, Hirokazu H eds. Advances in Wheat Genetics: from Genome to Field. Springer, Japan, 2015. pp 213–223

[1] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[2] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[3] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[4] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[5] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[6] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1Pod-D1Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[7] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[12] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[13] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[14] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
[15] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!