欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (08): 1190-1195.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2017.01190

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

玉米秸秆收贮高效资源化利用模式分析

马秋颖1,王智2,徐道清3,王秀东1,*,顿宝庆2,*,路明2   

  1. 1中国农业科学院农业经济与发展研究所，北京100081；2中国农业科学院作物科学研究所/农作物基因资源与基因改良国家重大科学工程，北京100081；3北京天地日月生物能源有限公司，北京100070
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-22 修回日期:2017-04-20 出版日期:2017-08-12 网络出版日期:2017-05-11
  • 通讯作者: 王秀东,E-mail: wangxiudong@caas.cn; 顿宝庆, E-mail:dunbaoqing@caas.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201503135-16)“作物秸秆能源化高效清洁利用技术研发集成与示范应用”资助。

Analysis of High Efficiency Resource Utilization Pattern of Corn Straw

MA Qiu-Ying1,WANG Zhi2,XU Dao-Qing3,WANG Xiu-Dong1,*,DUN Bao-Qing2,*,LU Ming2   

  1. 1Institute of Agriculture Economics and Development, Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Beijing 100081, China;2Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences/Crop Genetic Resources and National Major Scientific Project of Genetic Improvement, Beijing 100081,China;3Beijing Tiandiriyue Bio-energy Co., Ltd, Beijing 100070, China
  • Received:2017-01-22 Revised:2017-04-20 Published:2017-08-12 Published online:2017-05-11
  • Contact: 王秀东,E-mail: wangxiudong@caas.cn; 顿宝庆, E-mail:dunbaoqing@caas.cn
  • Supported by:

    The study was supported by the Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest(201503135-16).

RichHTML

PDF

694

摘要：

积极开发玉米秸秆低成本、高质量收贮模式，有效提高资源化利用水平，是推行农作物秸秆以农用为主、多元综合利用的重要途径。本研究在内蒙古自治区以玉米秸秆榨汁存贮模式为研究对象，基于实际收贮利用成本、秸秆产品收益对该模式资源化利用水平进行分析，结果表明目前该模式具有良好的经济效益，成本费用收益率约为6.70%，销售利润率约为6.30%，并且在收贮过程中能够有效降低秸秆中干物质、糖分和水分的流失，是一种高效资源化收贮利用模式。同时，结合该收贮模式在资源化利用方面的优势及我国东北地区玉米秸秆利用现状进行该模式在当地推广可行性探究表明，该模式具有一定程度上的推广前景。

关键词: 玉米秸秆, 榨汁, 模式, 资源化, 推广

Abstract:

Actively developing low-cost high-quality utilization of corn straw, and effectively enhancing corn straw resource utilization rate is very important to promote the use of crop straw in agricultural and comprehensive processing. This study armed at the corn straw juicestorage and utilization pattern in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, and analyzed the cost-benefit of corn strawproducts based on the actual cost of storage and utilization. The processing and utilization model could effectively reduce the dry matter, sugar and water losses in corn straw, with good economic benefits. The ratio of profits to cost was about 6.70% and the sales margin was about 6.30%. Combined with the advantages and disadvantages of the collection and storage mode in the utilization of resources and the status quo of the utilization of corn straw in Northeast China, we suggest that the corn straw resource utilization model is feasible in northeast region.

[1]谢光辉. 论我国非粮生物质原料的非粮属性. 中国农业大学学报, 2013, (6): 1–5
Xie G H. On non-grain properties of non-grain biomass raw materials in China. J China Agric Univ, 2013, (6): 1–5
[2]孟海波. 秸秆能源化利用技术现状与趋势. 农民科技培训, 2014, (9): 45–47
Meng H B. Straw energy utilization technology status and trends. Peasant Sci & Technol Train, 2014, (9): 45–47
[3]Chaoui H, Eckhoff S R. Biomass feedstock storage for quantity and quality preservation. Eng Sci Biomass Feedstock Product Provision. 2014, (6):165–193
[4]Shinners K J, Binversie B N, Muck R E, Weimer P J. Comparison of wet and dry corn stover harvest and storage. Biomass &Bioenergy, 2007, 31: 211–221
[5]Richard T L. Challenges in scaling up biofuels infrastructure. Science, 2010, 329: 793–796
[6]Dunford N T, Edwards J. Nutritional bioactive components of wheat straw as affected by genotype and environment. Bioresour Technol, 2009, 101: 422–425
[7]卞云龙, 杜凯, 王益军, 邓德祥. 玉米茎秆糖含量的分布. 作物学报, 2009, 12: 2252–2257
Bian Y L, Du K, Wang Y J, Deng D X. Distribution of sugar content in maize stem. Acta Agron Sin, 2009, 12: 2252–2257
[8]张纪鹏, 姜慧, 霍炜, 赵红. 农作物乙醇燃料的综合效益分析. 农业工程学报, 2008, (2): 299–303
Zhang J P, Jiang H, Huo W, Zhao H. Comprehensive benefit analysis of ethanol fuel in crops. Trans CSAE, 2008, (2): 299–303
[9]Nilsson D. SHAM—a simulation model for designing traw fuel delivery systems. Part 1: Model description.Biomass & Bioenergy, 1999, 16: 25–38
[10]Wenyuan H. A framework for economic analysis of live stock and crop byproducts utilization.Am J Agric Econom, 1979, 61: 91–96
[11]Rosentrater K A, Richard T L, Bern C J, et al. Economic simulation modeling of reprocessing alternatives for corn mesa byproducts. ResourcConserv Recycl, 2003, 39: 341–367
[12]Anders L. Agriculture-based biomass energy supply-a survey of economic issues. Energy Policy, 1997, 25: 573–582
[13]张燕. 中国秸秆资源“5F”利用方式的效益对比探析. 中国农学通报, 2009, 25: 45–51
Zhang Y. Comparison and analysis of benefit of "5F" utilization mode of straw resources in China. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2009, 25: 45–51
[14]陈冬冬, 高旺盛, 陈源泉. 中国农作物秸秆资源化利用生态效应和技术选择分析. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23, 143–149
Chen DD, Gao WS, Chen Y Q. Ecological effects and technical selection of crop straw utilization in China. Chin Agric Sci Bull,2007, 23: 143–149
[15]毕于运, 高春雨, 王亚静. 中国秸秆资源数量估算.农业工程学报,2009, (12): 211–217
Bi Y Y, Gao C Y, Wang Y J. Estimation of straw resources in China. Trans CSAE, 2009,12: 211–217
[16]胡世洋, 于平, 岳军, 王继艳, 吕继萍, 惠继星, 肖乃仲, 徐友海, 于东, 王丹, 肖天雄. 纤维素燃料乙醇技术瓶颈: 秸秆收储体系建设研究. 环境工程, 2014, 增刊1: 1081–1084
Hu S Y, Yu P, Yue J, WangJ Y, LyuJ P, HuiJ X, Xiao N Z, Xu Y H, Yu D, Wang D, Xiao T X. Study on the bottleneck of cellulose fuel ethanol technology: straw storage and storage system. Engineering, 2014, (suppl-1): 1081–1084
[17]Farrell A E, Plevin R J, Turner B T, Jones A D, O’Hare M, Kammen D M. Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science, 2006, 311: 506–508
[18]毕于运. 秸秆资源评价及利用研究. 中国农业科学院博士学位论文, 北京, 2010
Bi Y Y. Evaluation and Utilization of Straw Resources.PhDDissertation of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China, 2010 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]韩佳慧, 杨扬, 张景来. 利用回归模型比较秸秆利用方式. 安徽科技学院学报,2009, (6): 87–91
HanJ H, Yang Y, Zhang J L. Comparison of straw utilization patterns by regression model. J Anhui Sci Technol Univ, 2009, (6): 87–91
[1] 袁大双, 邓琬玉, 王珍, 彭茜, 张晓莉, 姚梦楠, 缪文杰, 朱冬鸣, 李加纳, 梁颖. 甘蓝型油菜BnMAPK2基因的克隆及功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 840-850.
[2] 黄成, 梁晓梅, 戴成, 文静, 易斌, 涂金星, 沈金雄, 傅廷栋, 马朝芝. 甘蓝型油菜BnAPs基因家族成员全基因组鉴定及分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 597-607.
[3] 闫岩, 张钰石, 刘础荣, 任丹阳, 刘洪润, 刘雪晴, 张明才, 李召虎. 冬小麦-夏玉米轮作“双晚”种植模式下的品种匹配与资源效率[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 423-436.
[4] 余慧芳, 张卫娜, 康益晨, 范艳玲, 杨昕宇, 石铭福, 张茹艳, 张俊莲, 秦舒浩. 马铃薯CrRLK1Ls基因家族的鉴定及响应晚疫病菌信号的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 249-258.
[5] 荐红举, 尚丽娜, 金中辉, 丁艺, 李燕, 王季春, 胡柏耿, Vadim Khassanov, 吕典秋. 马铃薯PIF家族成员鉴定及其对高温胁迫的响应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 86-98.
[6] 李静, 王洪章, 刘鹏, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝. 夏玉米不同栽培模式花后叶片光合性能的差异[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(7): 1351-1359.
[7] 黄兴, 习金根, 陈涛, 覃旭, 谭施北, 陈河龙, 易克贤. 剑麻苯丙氨酸裂解酶基因的鉴定及表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(6): 1082-1089.
[8] 赵杰, 李绍平, 程爽, 田晋钰, 邢志鹏, 陶钰, 周磊, 刘秋员, 胡雅杰, 郭保卫, 高辉, 魏海燕, 张洪程. “独秆”栽培模式下全程氮肥在分蘖中后期施用对旱直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(6): 1162-1174.
[9] 孟钰玉, 魏春茹, 范润侨, 于秀梅, 王逍冬, 赵伟全, 魏新燕, 康振生, 刘大群. 小麦TaPP2-A13基因的表达响应逆境胁迫并与SCF复合体接头蛋白TaSKP1相互作用[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(2): 224-236.
[10] 柳燕兰, 郭贤仕, 张绪成, 马明生, 王宏康. 密度和施肥对旱地马铃薯干物质积累、产量和水肥利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(2): 320-331.
[11] 李昊昱,孟兆良,庞党伟,陈金,侯永坤,崔海兴,金敏,王振林,李勇. 周年秸秆还田对农田土壤固碳及冬小麦-夏玉米产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(6): 893-903.
[12] 周宝元,马玮,孙雪芳,丁在松,李从锋,赵明. 冬小麦-夏玉米高产模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征研究[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(4): 589-600.
[13] 王慧敏,李新国,万书波,张智猛,丁红,李国卫,高文伟,彭振英. 花生膜联蛋白基因家族成员的结构和表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(3): 390-400.
[14] 吕伟生,曾勇军,石庆华,潘晓华,黄山,商庆银,谭雪明,李木英,胡水秀,曾研华. 双季机插稻叶龄模式参数及高产品种特征[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(12): 1844-1857.
[15] 施军琼, 王亚琴, 张天泉, 马玲, 桑贤春, 何光华. 水稻黄绿叶基因Yellow-Green Leaf 6 (YGL6)的表达模式与蛋白定位[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(05): 650-656.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2