欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (9): 1338-1348.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.84172

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

利用DH和IF2群体检测油菜籽粒油酸、亚油酸、亚麻酸含量QTL

蒙姜宇1,傅鹰1,2,贺亚军1,*(),钱伟1   

  1. 1 西南大学农学与生物科技学院, 重庆 400716
    2 浙江省农业科学院作物与核技术利用研究所, 浙江杭州 310021
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-17 接受日期:2019-05-12 出版日期:2019-09-12 网络出版日期:2019-06-10
  • 通讯作者: 贺亚军
  • 作者简介:E-mail: 1131241810@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    本研究由国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFD0100202);国家自然科学基金项目(31671729);重庆市基础科学与前沿技术研究项目资助(cstc2017jcyjAX0391)

QTL mapping of oleic acid, linoleic acid and linolenic acid contents in Brassica napus L. using DH and IF2 populations

MENG Jiang-Yu1,FU Ying1,2,HE Ya-Jun1,*(),QIAN Wei1   

  1. 1 College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China
    2 Institute of Crop and Nuclear Technology Utilization, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, Zhejiang, China
  • Received:2018-12-17 Accepted:2019-05-12 Published:2019-09-12 Published online:2019-06-10
  • Contact: Ya-Jun HE
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2016YFD0100202);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(31671729);Chongqing Research Program of Basic Research and Frontier Technology(cstc2017jcyjAX0391)

RichHTML

14

PDF

552

摘要：

以德国冬性甘蓝型油菜Express和中国半冬性甘蓝型油菜SWU07为亲本构建包含261个株系的DH群体和包含234个株系的IF2群体, 检测不同年份条件下油菜籽粒油酸、亚油酸、亚麻酸含量相关的QTL。在DH群体4年环境下共检测出71个QTL, 在IF2群体2年环境下共检测出4个QTL。去掉在不同年份和群体中置信区间相互重叠的QTL之后, 共得到3个品质性状的51个QTL, 其中有15个在2年以上环境中被检测到。这些QTL分别分布在13个连锁群上, 其中与油酸含量相关的18个, 分布于A01、A02、A04、A05、A07、A09、C01连锁群, 揭示3.44%~13.97%的表型变异; 与亚油酸相关的12个, 分布于A02、A06、A09、C01、C02连锁群, 揭示3.84%~19.51%的表型变异; 与亚麻酸相关的21个, 分布于A01、A02、A03、A04、A05、A08、A09、C01、C02、C03、C06连锁群, 揭示2.86%~11.91%的表型变异。这些结果将为油菜脂肪酸品质改良提供更多遗传信息。

关键词: 甘蓝型油菜, 油酸, 亚油酸, 亚麻酸, 数量性状位点

Abstract:

DH and IF2 populations, consisting of 261 and 234 lines respectively, constructed using the German winter rapeseed cultivar ‘Express’ (female) and the Chinese semi-winter line ‘SWU07’ (male), were used to detect QTLs related to oleic acid, linoleic acid and linolenic acid contents in different years. A total of 71 QTLs were detected in DH population in four-year environment and 4 QTLs in IF2 population in two-year environment. After eliminating the overlapped QTLs detected in different years or different populations, totally 51 QTLs for the three traits were obtained, 15 QTLs of which were persistently detected in more than two years. These 51 QTLs were located on 13 linkage groups. Among them, 18 QTLs related to oleic acid content were located on A01, A02, A04, A05, A07, A09, and C01, respectively, explaining phenotypic variation ranging from 3.44% to 13.97%, 12 QTLs related to linoleic acid content were located on A02, A06, A09, C01, and C02, respectively, explaining phenotypic variation ranging from 3.84% to 19.51%, and 21 QTLs related to linolenic acid content were located on A01, A02, A03, A04, A05, A08, A09, C01, C02, C03, and C06, respectively, explaining phenotypic variation from 2.86% to 11.91%. These results provide more genetic information for the improvement of fatty acid quality in rapeseed breeding.

Key words: Brassica napus, oleic acid, linoleic acid, linolenic acid, QTL

表1

亲本油酸、亚油酸、亚麻酸含量的分析"

性状 Trait 油酸 OAC 亚油酸 Llei 亚麻酸 Llen
Express 61.89 19.97 7.70
SWU07 64.67 16.80 6.88
P t-test 0.016 0.018 0.166

表2

DH和IF2群体油酸、亚油酸、亚麻酸含量的分析"

年份
Year		 性状
Trait		 DH群体 DH population IF2群体 IF2 population
最小值
Min.		 最大值
Max.		 平均值
Average		 标准差
SD		 最小值
Min.		 最大值
Max.		 平均值
Average		 标准差
SD
2010 油酸 OAC 49.30 67.10 59.11 3.42 44.83 66.24 59.63 3.12
亚油酸 Llei 14.50 25.30 19.68 2.13 15.77 24.14 19.17 1.82
亚麻酸 Llen 5.44 11.08 8.28 1.06 6.43 11.08 8.36 0.88
2011 油酸 OAC 49.72 77.45 64.60 3.66 59.32 72.53 65.16 2.27
亚油酸 Llei 9.05 23.41 16.33 1.67 13.33 18.87 15.67 1.03
亚麻酸 Llen 4.77 11.40 6.71 0.84 5.21 7.71 6.38 0.54
2012 油酸 OAC 50.94 71.15 60.88 3.34 - - - -
亚油酸 Llei 15.14 25.83 19.81 2.19 - - - -
亚麻酸 Llen 5.19 10.92 8.47 0.97 - - - -
2013 油酸 OAC 52.00 71.37 63.12 3.41 - - - -
亚油酸 Llei 13.41 24.02 18.05 2.15 - - - -
亚麻酸 Llen 5.25 11.28 8.50 1.06 - - - -

图1

DH群体和IF2群体油酸、亚油酸、亚麻酸含量的频率分布"

表3

DH群体和IF2群体同一性状在不同年份间的相关性分析"

年份
Year		 性状
Trait		 DH群体 DH population IF2群体 IF2 population
2010 2011 2012 2013 2010 2011
油酸 OAC 2010
2011 0.4549** 0.3476**
2012 0.5305** 0.5495**
2013 0.4068** 0.5135** 0.5630**
亚油酸 Llei 2010
2011 0.5589** 0.4320**
2012 0.5549** 0.5663**
2013 0.4919** 0.5887** 0.5613**
亚麻酸 Llen 2010
2011 0.4686** 0.2548*
2012 0.5200** 0.4270**
2013 0.5463** 0.4194** 0.6067**

表4

DH 群体和 IF2 群体在同一年份下不同性状间的相关性分析"

年份
Year		 性状
Trait		 油酸
OAC		 亚油酸
Llei		 亚麻酸
Llen
2010 油酸 OAC -0.7018** -0.7200**
亚油酸 Llei -0.6353** 0.6839**
亚麻酸 Llen -0.6510** 0.6791**
2011 油酸 OAC -0.5899** -0.4682**
亚油酸 Llei -0.6439** 0.5080**
亚麻酸 Llen -0.6449** 0.6335**
2012 油酸 OAC
亚油酸 Llei -0.5119**
亚麻酸 Llen -0.6858** 0.5735**
2013 油酸 OAC
亚油酸 Llei -0.6612**
亚麻酸 Llen -0.5695** 0.6210**

表5

DH群体和IF2群体中检测到的与油酸含量相关的QTL"

QTL名称
QTL name		 位置
Position		 加性效应
Additive		 贡献率
R2(%)		 LOD 值
LOD score		 置信区间
Confidence interval
qA01-OAC-2010DH-1 10.31 -0.90 6.83 5.82 9.4-11.1
qA01-OAC-2010DH-2 24.21 -0.87 6.36 5.03 22.6-27.5
qA09-OAC-2010DH-3 48.21 0.79 5.02 4.30 45.3-49.5
qA09-OAC-2010DH-4 53.81 0.68 3.44 2.95 51.9-56.7
qA09-OAC-2010DH-5 76.91 -1.29 12.85 9.41 75.9-81.0
qA09-OAC-2010DH-6 82.41 -1.17 10.84 8.48 81.0-87.7
qA09-OAC-2010DH-7# 91.51 -1.04 8.96 6.33 88.5-98.5
qC01-OAC-2010DH-8# 27.41 -1.38 13.97 10.52 25.4-28.7
qC01-OAC-2010DH-9# 30.71 -1.41 13.72 10.91 29.9-31.0
qA09-OAC-2011DH-10# 94.51 -0.81 4.79 2.65 89.9-98.8
qC01-OAC-2011DH-11# 23.91 -1.09 6.88 4.62 22.6-24.4
qC01-OAC-2011DH-12# 29.31 -1.14 7.91 5.45 28.0-29.9
qA02-OAC-2012DH-13 42.71 0.80 5.52 2.95 41.6-43.4
qA02-OAC-2012DH-14 47.01 0.82 5.70 3.06 44.9-51.0
qA04-OAC-2012DH-15 40.51 -0.91 7.15 3.80 36.4-46.6
qA09-OAC-2012DH-16 70.21 -0.88 5.88 3.42 68.1-70.8
qC01-OAC-2012DH-17 12.71 -0.94 6.30 3.22 12.1-13.7
qC01-OAC-2012DH-18# 23.61 -1.34 11.22 5.33 22.6-23.9
qC01-OAC-2012DH-19# 30.71 -1.21 9.15 4.68 29.3-31.4
qA09-OAC-2013DH-20# 91.51 -0.91 7.02 3.97 89.6-98.8
qC01-OAC-2013DH-21# 25.41 -0.78 4.35 3.00 25.1-28.0
qA02-OAC-2010IF2-22 18.21 -0.91 5.78 2.63 16.2-19.4
qA05-OAC-2011IF2-23 108.51 0.51 4.94 2.50 90.3-115.5
qA07-OAC-2011IF2-24 5.01 0.63 6.42 3.64 1.1-8.1

图2

油酸、亚油酸、亚麻酸含量QTL在连锁群上的分布"

表6

DH群体中检测到的与亚油酸含量相关的QTL"

QTL名称
QTL name		 位置
Position		 加性效应
Additive		 贡献率
R2 (%)		 LOD值
LOD score		 置信区间
Confidence interval
qA09-Llei-2010DH-1 38.21 -0.42 3.84 2.93 34.8-39.5
qA09-Llei-2010DH-2# 68.51 0.77 11.85 8.61 68.1-69.7
qA09-Llei-2010DH-3# 77.81 0.87 15.76 11.77 76.5-81.0
qA09-Llei-2010DH-4# 83.41 0.77 12.24 8.06 81.4-88.5
qC01-Llei-2010DH-5# 26.41 0.74 10.57 7.35 26.0-28.6
qA06-Llei-2011DH-6 38.61 -0.34 4.00 2.83 34.6-41.2
qA09-Llei-2011DH-7# 78.81 0.64 11.61 8.45 77.2-81.2
qA09-Llei-2011DH-8# 94.51 0.48 7.65 4.26 88.5-98.5
qC01-Llei-2011DH-9 23.91 0.50 7.43 5.48 22.6-24.3
qA09-Llei-2012DH-10# 69.71 0.83 13.69 6.52 68.4-72.0
qA09-Llei-2012DH-11# 76.91 0.98 19.51 9.03 75.9-77.8
qA09-Llei-2012DH-12# 96.51 0.72 10.28 4.23 88.5-98.7
qC01-Llei-2012DH-13 6.01 0.55 4.98 2.54 0-12.1
qA02-Llei-2013DH-14 13.21 0.57 5.70 4.16 10.3-18.0
qA09-Llei-2013DH-15# 69.51 0.58 7.23 3.71 68.9-70.8
qA09-Llei-2013DH-16# 77.81 1.05 13.51 9.28 76.6-80.8
qA09-Llei-2013DH-17# 83.41 0.92 12.34 6.68 81.4-88.0
qC01-Llei-2013DH-18 16.11 0.51 4.68 3.31 14.7-17.2
qC01-Llei-2013DH-19# 25.41 0.63 7.33 5.29 25.1-28.0
qC02-Llei-2013DH-20 4.01 -0.51 5.37 3.12 0-8.2

表7

DH群体和IF2群体中检测到与亚麻酸含量相关的QTL"

QTL名称
QTL name		 位置
Position		 加性效应
Additive		 贡献率
R2 (%)		 LOD值
LOD score		 置信区间
Confidence interval
qA02-Llen-2010DH-1 38.11 -0.30 7.53 6.04 37.8-38.6
qA02-Llen-2010DH-2# 44.21 -0.33 9.51 7.88 43.4-44.9
qA08-Llen-2010DH-3 4.01 0.22 3.87 2.82 0-18.8
qA09-Llen-2010DH-4 68.51 0.25 5.60 4.59 68.1-69.7
qA09-Llen-2010DH-5 79.01 0.30 8.05 6.68 76.0-81.2
qC01-Llen-2010DH-6# 23.91 0.41 11.91 9.39 23.3-24.1
qC01-Llen-2010DH-7# 29.91 0.39 10.84 8.84 29.3-31.5
qC03-Llen-2010DH-8 17.61 0.20 2.86 2.62 13.3-20.8
qC06-Llen-2010DH-9 2.01 0.26 5.66 4.32 0-6.6
qC06-Llen-2010DH-10# 7.61 0.23 4.38 3.73 6.6-14.8
qA01-Llen-2011DH-11 63.01 -0.18 3.69 2.63 54.3-69.2
qA03-Llen-2011DH-12# 16.91 0.22 6.77 3.99 15.5-21.1
qA03-Llen-2011DH-13 27.11 0.21 5.95 4.52 25.2-29.0
qA04-Llen-2011DH-14 10.01 -0.16 3.52 2.72 0-20.4
qA05-Llen-2011DH-15 28.81 -0.24 7.92 5.81 25.8-33.1
qA05-Llen-2011DH-16 37.71 -0.18 4.65 3.34 35.5-39.7
qC01-Llen-2011DH-17# 23.91 0.21 4.82 3.61 22.8-24.5
qC01-Llen-2011DH-18 29.31 0.18 3.75 2.85 28.7-30.7
qC03-Llen-2011DH-19 4.01 -0.20 5.43 3.32 0-8.2
qC02-Llen-2011DH-20# 15.21 -0.21 6.32 4.49 9.7-22.8
qC06-Llen-2011DH-21# 7.61 0.17 3.76 2.99 6.6-18.8
qC01-Llen-2012DH-22# 23.61 0.30 6.96 3.23 17.4-23.9
qC01-Llen-2012DH-23# 29.91 0.34 9.16 4.68 28.0-31.1
qC01-Llen-2012DH-24 37.41 0.27 6.92 3.45 36.7-39.2
qC02-Llen-2012DH-25# 12.21 -0.26 6.89 2.73 8.2-14.2
qA02-Llen-2013DH-26# 43.41 -0.27 6.35 4.66 42.2-44.9
qA03-Llen-2013DH-27# 14.91 0.25 5.32 3.48 1.0-20.8
qC01-Llen-2013DH-28# 23.91 0.30 6.48 4.62 22.8-24.4
qC02-Llen-2013DH-29 5.01 -0.34 9.20 4.97 0.9-8.2
qC02-Llen-2013DH-30# 11.21 -0.30 8.07 4.83 8.2-16.9
qC02-Llen-2011IF2-31# 8.21 0.15 5.14 2.93 4.3-13.0
[1] 贺慧, 虢慧, 官春云 . 甘蓝型油菜BnACP5基因克隆及表达分析. 华北农学报, 2018,33(1):96-101.
He H, Guo H, Guan C Y . Cloning and expression analysis of BnACP5 in Brassica napus. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 2018,33(1):96-101 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[2] 尚国霞 . 甘蓝型油菜高油酸性状的遗传研究及近红外检测模型的建立. 西南大学硕士学位论文, 重庆, 2010.
Shang G X . Study on Inheritance and NIRS Model Establishing of High Oleic Acid Content in Brassica napus L. MS Thesis of Southwest University, Chongqing, China, 2010 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3] Simopoulos A P . The importance of the omega-6/omega-3 fatty acid ratio in cardiovascu1ar disease and other chronic diseases. Exp Biol Med, 2008,233:674-688.
[4] 刘后利 . 油菜的遗传与育种. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1985. pp 141-171.
Liu H L. Inheritance and Breeding on Rapeseed. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, 1985. pp 141-171(in Chinese).
[5] 官春云 . 油菜高油酸遗传育种研究进展. 作物研究, 2006, (1):1-8.
Guan C Y . Advances on rape breeding for higher content of oleic acid. Crop Res, 2006, (1):1-8 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[6] 王继变, 陈洪成, 陈玉波, 张晓玉, 徐海明, 赵坚义 . 通过条件QTL定位分析油菜不同脂肪酸组分对含油量性状的影响. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2013,39:504-512.
Wang J B, Chen H C, Chen Y B, Zhang X Y, Xu H M, Zhao J Y . Molecular dissection of oil content with respect to fatty acid compositions by conditional QTL analysis in oilseed rape. J Zhejiang Univ(Agric Life Sci), 2013, 39:504-512 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7] Tanhuanpää P, Vilkki J, Vihinen M . Mapping and cloning of FAD2 gene to develop allele-specific PCR for oleic acid in spring turnip rape(Brassica rapa ssp. oleifera). Mol Breed, 1998,4:543-550.
[8] Schierholt A, Becker H C, Ecke W . Mapping a high oleic acid mutation in winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Theor Appl Genet, 2000,101:897-901.
[9] Hu X, Sullivan-Gilbert M, Gupta M . Mapping of the loci controlling oleic and linolenic acid contents and development of fad2 and fad3 allele-specific markers in canola(Brassica napus L.). Theor Appl Genet, 2006,113:497-507.
[10] 张洁夫, 戚存扣, 浦惠明, 陈松, 陈锋, 高建芹, 陈新军, 顾慧, 傅寿仲 . 甘蓝型油菜主要脂肪酸组成的QTL定位. 作物学报, 2008,34:54-60.
Zhang J F, Qi C K, Pu H M, Chen S, Chen F, Gao J Q, Chen X J, Gu H, Fu S Z . QTL identification for fatty acid content in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Acta Agron Sin, 2008,34:54-60 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[11] 杨燕宇, 杨盛强, 陈哲红, 官春云, 陈社员, 刘忠松 . 无芥酸甘蓝型油菜十八碳不饱和脂肪酸含量的QTL定位. 作物学报, 2011,37:1342-1350.
Yang Y Y, Yang S Q, Chen Z H, Guan C Y. Chen S Y. Liu Z S . QTL analysis of 18-C unsaturated fatty acid contents in zero-erucic rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Acta Agron Sin, 2011,37:1342-1350 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12] 蔡东芳, 张书芬, 肖英杰, 吴江生, 刘克德 . 甘蓝型油菜油酸、亚油酸和亚麻酸含量的关联分析. 中国油料作物学报, 2016,38:397-405.
Cai D F, Zhang S F, Xiao Y J, Wu J S, Liu K D . Association mapping of oleic acid, linoleic acid and linolenic acid in Brassica napus. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2016,38:397-405 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] Yang Q, Fan C, Guo Z, Qin J, Wu J, Li Q, Fu T, Zhou Y . Identification of FAD2 and FAD3 genes in Brassica napus genome and development of allele-specific markers for high oleic and low linolenic acid contents. Theor Appl Genet, 2012,125:715-729.
[14] Fu Y, Lu K, Qian L W, Mei J Q, Wei D Y, Peng X, Xu X F, Li J N, Frauen M, Dreyer F, Snowdon R J, Qian W . Development of genic cleavage markers in association with seed glucosinolate content in canola. Theor Appl Genet, 2015,128:1029-1037.
[15] Hua J P, Xing Y Z, Wu W R, Xu C G, Sun X L, Yu S B, Zhang Q F . Single-locus heterotic effects and dominance by dominance interaction can adequately explain the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2003,100:2574-2579.
[16] 高建芹, 张洁夫, 浦惠明, 戚存扣, 傅寿仲 . 近红外光谱法在测定油菜籽含油量及脂肪酸组成中的应用. 江苏农业学报, 2007,23(3):189-195.
Gao J Q, Zhang J F, Pu H M, Qi C K, Fu S Z . Analysis of oil, oleic acid and erucic acid contents in rapeseed by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS). Jiangsu J Agric Sci, 2007,23(3):189-195 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17] Wang B H, Guo W Z, Zhu X F, Wu Y T, Huang T T, Zhang T Z . QTL mapping of fiber quality in an elite hybrid derived-RIL population of upland cotton. Euphytica, 2006,152:367-378.
[18] Churchill G A, Doerge R W . Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics, 1994,138:963-971.
[19] 刘列钊, 李加纳 . 利用甘蓝型油菜高密度SNP遗传图谱定位油酸、亚麻酸及芥酸含量QTL位点. 中国农业科学, 2014,47:24-32.
Liu L Z, Li J N . QTL mapping of oleic acid, linolenic acid and erucic acid content in Brassica napus by using the high density SNP genetic map. Sci Agric Sin , 2014,47:24-32 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20] 高建芹, 浦惠明, 戚存扣, 张洁夫, 龙卫华, 陈新军, 傅寿仲 . 高含油量油菜种子和果皮油份积累及主要脂肪酸的动态变化. 中国油料作物学报, 2009,31:173-179.
Gao J Q, Pu H M, Qi C K, Zhang J F, Long W H, Chen X J, Fu S Z . Dynamics of oil and major fatty acids accumulation in seed and silique husk of high oil content rape seed. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2009,31:173-179 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21] 李成磊, 付三雄, 戚存扣 . 甘蓝型油菜种子发育过程中主要脂肪酸的积累及相关分析. 江苏农业学报, 2011,27:258-263.
Li C L, Fu S X, Qi C K . Accumulation and correlation analysis of main fatty acids in developing seeds of Brassica napus L. Jiangsu J Agric Sci, 2011,27:258-263 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[22] 毛龙 . 甘蓝型油菜SNP遗传连锁图谱的构建及品质性状QTL定位. 华中农业大学硕士学位论文, 湖北武汉, 2013.
Mao L . Construction of a Genetic Linkage Map Using SNP Array and QTL Analysis of Quality Traits in Brassica napus. MS Thesis of Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China, 2013 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[23] Schierholt A, Rücker B, Becker H C . Inheritance of high oleic acid mutations in winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus, L.). Crop Sci, 2001,41:1444-1449.
[24] 周永明, 刘后利 . 甘蓝型油菜种子中几种主要脂肪酸含量的遗传. 作物学报, 1987,13:1-10.
Zhou Y M, Liu H L . Inheritance of fatty acid content in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Acta Agron Sin, 1987,13:1-10 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[25] 刘定富, 刘后利 . 甘蓝型油菜脂肪酸成分的基因作用形式和效应. 作物学报, 1990,16:193-199.
Liu D F, Liu H L . Gene action and effect of fatty acid in Brassica napus L. Acta Agron Sin, 1990,16:193-199 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[26] 戚存扣, 盖钧镒, 章元明 . 甘蓝型油菜芥酸含量的主基因+多基因遗传. 遗传学报, 2001,28:182-187.
Qi C K, Gai J Y, Zhang Y M . Major gene plus poly-gene inheritance of erucic acid content in Brassica napus L. Acta Genet Sin, 2001,28:182-187 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[27] Burns M J, Barnes S R, Bowman J G, Clarke M H E, Werner C P, Kearsey M J . QTL analysis of an intervarietal set of substitution lines in Brassica napus:(i) Seed oil content and fatty acid composition. Heredity, 2003,90:39-48.
[28] Zhao J Y, Dimov Z, Becker H C, Ecke W, Möllers C . Mapping QTL controlling fatty acid composition in a doubled haploid rapeseed population segregating for oil content. Mol Breed, 2008,21:115-125.
[29] Scheffler J A, Sharpe A G, Schmidt H, Sperling P, Parkin I A P, Lühs W, Lydiate D J, Heinz E . Desaturase multigene families of Brassica napus arose through genome duplication. Theor Appl Genet, 1997,94:583-591.
[30] Mikolajczy K, Dabert M, Karlowski W M, Spasibionek S, Nowakowska J, Cegielska-Taras T, Bartkowiak-Broda I . Allele-specific SNP markers for the new low linolenic mutant genotype of winter oilseed rape. Plant Breed, 2009,129:465-580.
[1] 陈松余, 丁一娟, 孙峻溟, 黄登文, 杨楠, 代雨涵, 万华方, 钱伟. 甘蓝型油菜BnCNGC基因家族鉴定及其在核盘菌侵染和PEG处理下的表达特性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1357-1371.
[2] 秦璐, 韩配配, 常海滨, 顾炽明, 黄威, 李银水, 廖祥生, 谢立华, 廖星. 甘蓝型油菜耐低氮种质筛选及绿肥应用潜力评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1488-1501.
[3] 袁大双, 邓琬玉, 王珍, 彭茜, 张晓莉, 姚梦楠, 缪文杰, 朱冬鸣, 李加纳, 梁颖. 甘蓝型油菜BnMAPK2基因的克隆及功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 840-850.
[4] 黄成, 梁晓梅, 戴成, 文静, 易斌, 涂金星, 沈金雄, 傅廷栋, 马朝芝. 甘蓝型油菜BnAPs基因家族成员全基因组鉴定及分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 597-607.
[5] 王瑞, 陈雪, 郭青青, 周蓉, 陈蕾, 李加纳. 甘蓝型油菜白花基因InDel连锁标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 759-769.
[6] 薛晓梦, 吴洁, 王欣, 白冬梅, 胡美玲, 晏立英, 陈玉宁, 康彦平, 王志慧, 淮东欣, 雷永, 廖伯寿. 低温胁迫对普通和高油酸花生种子萌发的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1768-1778.
[7] 王艳花, 刘景森, 李加纳. 整合GWAS和WGCNA筛选鉴定甘蓝型油菜生物产量候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1491-1510.
[8] 张旺, 冼俊霖, 孙超, 王春明, 石丽, 于为常. CRISPR/Cas9编辑花生FAD2基因研究[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1481-1490.
[9] 李杰华, 端群, 史明涛, 吴潞梅, 柳寒, 林拥军, 吴高兵, 范楚川, 周永明. 新型抗广谱性除草剂草甘膦转基因油菜的创制及其鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(5): 789-798.
[10] 王吴彬, 童飞, KHAN Mueen Alam, 张雅轩, 贺建波, 郝晓帅, 邢光南, 赵团结, 盖钧镒. 大豆根部水压胁迫耐逆指数遗传体系解析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(5): 847-859.
[11] 唐鑫, 李圆圆, 陆俊杏, 张涛. 甘蓝型油菜温敏细胞核雄性不育系160S花药败育的形态学特征和细胞学研究[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(5): 983-990.
[12] 周新桐, 郭青青, 陈雪, 李加纳, 王瑞. GBS高密度遗传连锁图谱定位甘蓝型油菜粉色花性状[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 587-598.
[13] 李书宇, 黄杨, 熊洁, 丁戈, 陈伦林, 宋来强. 甘蓝型油菜早熟性状QTL定位及候选基因筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 626-637.
[14] 张春, 赵小珍, 庞承珂, 彭门路, 王晓东, 陈锋, 张维, 陈松, 彭琦, 易斌, 孙程明, 张洁夫, 傅廷栋. 甘蓝型油菜千粒重全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 650-659.
[15] 唐婧泉, 王南, 高界, 刘婷婷, 文静, 易斌, 涂金星, 傅廷栋, 沈金雄. 甘蓝型油菜SnRK基因家族生物信息学分析及其与种子含油量的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(3): 416-426.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2