欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (01): 84-92.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.92016

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

施石灰和秸秆还田对双季稻产量和氮素吸收的互作效应

廖萍1,刘磊1,何宇轩1,唐刚1,张俊2,曾勇军1,吴自明1,黄山1,*()   

  1. 1 教育部和江西省作物生理生态与遗传育种重点实验室/江西农业大学, 江西南昌 330045
    2 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所, 北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-01 接受日期:2019-08-09 出版日期:2020-01-12 网络出版日期:2019-09-03
  • 通讯作者: 黄山
  • 作者简介:E-mail: 763979314@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(31701383);国家重点研发计划项目资助(2018YFD0301102)

Interactive effects of liming and straw incorporation on yield and nitrogen uptake in a double rice cropping system

LIAO Ping1,LIU Lei1,HE Yu-Xuan1,TANG Gang1,ZHANG Jun2,ZENG Yong-Jun1,WU Zi-Ming1,HUANG Shan1,*()   

  1. 1 Ministry of Education and Jiangxi Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Genetic Breeding, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, Jiangxi, China
    2 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2019-04-01 Accepted:2019-08-09 Published:2020-01-12 Published online:2019-09-03
  • Contact: Shan HUANG
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(31701383);National Key Research and Development Program of China(2018YFD0301102)

RichHTML

24

PDF

1384

摘要：

红壤稻田面临土壤酸化和肥力偏低的双重挑战。施石灰和秸秆还田分别是稻田土壤酸化改良和培肥的有效措施, 但二者的互作效应尚不清楚。本研究连续4年(2015—2018年)在江西省开展施石灰和秸秆还田双因素田间定位试验, 旨在探明施石灰和秸秆还田对红壤双季稻田水稻产量和氮素吸收的互作效应。结果表明, 施石灰和秸秆还田均显著提高了早、晚稻的产量和氮素吸收, 且二者具显著的协同促进效应。秸秆还田下, 施石灰使早稻产量和氮素吸收分别增加10.7%和15.5%; 而在秸秆不还田下, 增幅仅分别为4.4%和9.7%。秸秆还田下, 石灰使晚稻产量和氮素吸收分别提高18.7%和24.6%; 但在秸秆不还田下, 增幅则分别为10.5%和5.7%。施石灰对早、晚稻产量和氮素吸收的促进效应随试验年限的增加而减弱。石灰对土壤pH值的提升效应随试验年限的延长显著降低。试验4年后, 石灰对土壤有机质和全氮含量均无显著影响; 秸秆还田显著提高了土壤有机质含量, 而对全氮含量无显著影响。因此, 秸秆还田配施石灰能够协同实现双季稻增产、土壤酸化改良与培肥。本研究表明在此酸性的红壤双季稻田上每4年左右施用一次石灰为宜。

关键词: 土壤酸化, 秸秆还田, 石灰, 双季稻, 产量, 氮素吸收

Abstract:

Soil acidification and low fertility limit crop productivity in red paddy soils. Liming and straw incorporation are effective practices to alleviate soil acidification and improve soil fertility, respectively, while their interaction is still unclear. A four-year field experiment was conducted in a double rice cropping system with red paddy soil in Jiangxi province to examine the interactive effect of liming and straw incorporation on rice yield and nitrogen (N) uptake from 2015 to 2018. Either liming or straw incorporation increased grain yield and N uptake in both early and late rice seasons. Lime application increased yield and N uptake by 10.7% and 15.5% under straw incorporation, while by 4.4% and 9.7% with straw removal in the early rice season, respectively. In contrast, liming enhanced yield and N uptake by 18.7% and 24.6% in the straw-incorporated treatments in the late rice season, respectively, whereas only by 10.5% and 5.7% in the straw-removed treatments. The effect of liming on enhancing grain yield, N uptake and soil pH for both early and late rice diminished in the present of time. Neither soil organic matter nor total N content was significantly affected by liming after the four-year experiment. Straw incorporation significantly increased soil organic matter, but had no effect on total N. Therefore, limes should be applied along with straw incorporation to simultaneously increase double rice yield, alleviate soil acidification, and improve soil fertility on acidic paddies. Besides, our results suggest that limes should be applied approximately every four years in the double rice cropping system with acidic red soil.

Key words: soil acidification, straw incorporation, liming, double rice, grain yield, nitrogen uptake

表1

施石灰和秸秆还田对双季早稻产量及其构成、氮素吸收的影响(F值)"

变异来源
Source of variations		 有效穗
Effective panicle		 每穗粒数
Spikelets per panicle		 结实率
Seed-setting rate		 千粒重
1000-grain weight		 产量
Grain yield		 氮素吸收
N uptake
石灰 Liming (L) 16.0** 20.1** 0.2 1.3 33.5** 48.0**
秸秆还田 Straw incorporation (RS) 154.2** 15.6** 7.8** 0 111.3** 133.5**
年份 Year (Y) 100.0** 7.9** 87.8** 11.8** 64.1** 111.0**
石灰×秸秆还田 L×RS 3.0 1.0 0.9 0.6 7.2* 4.8*
石灰×年份 L×Y 2.1 3.4* 3.6* 0.3 4.6** 5.4**
秸秆还田×年份 RS×Y 1.4 4.8** 1.6 1.1 4.7** 5.2**
石灰×秸秆还田×年份 L×RS×Y 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.3 1.2 1.6

图1

施石灰和秸秆还田对双季早稻产量及其构成、氮素吸收的影响(2015-2018) CK、L、RS和L+RS分别表示对照、单施石灰、秸秆还田、秸秆还田配施石灰。误差线表示平均值的标准差(n = 3)。同一年份标的不同小写字母的柱值在不同处理间差异显著(P < 0.05)。"

表2

施石灰和秸秆还田对双季晚稻产量及其构成、氮素吸收的影响(F值) "

变异来源
Source of variations		 有效穗
Effective panicle		 每穗粒数
Spikelets per panicle		 结实率
Seed-setting rate		 千粒重
1000-grain weight		 产量
Grain yield		 氮素吸收
N uptake
石灰 Liming (L) 94.3** 45.2** 1.1 9.7** 125.7** 93.1**
秸秆还田 Straw incorporation (RS) 0.9 69.5** 22.2** 0.4 18.4** 65.7**
年份 Year (Y) 67.8** 15.6** 37.7** 11.5** 49.4** 26.1**
石灰×秸秆还田 L×RS 25.9** 0.4 0.6 0.3 10.4** 38.0**
石灰×年份L×Y 10.3** 5.5** 2.2 1.1 20.8** 15.2**
秸秆还田×年份RS×Y 2.3 3.6* 7.5** 1.9 0.7 10.3**
石灰×秸秆还田×年份 L×RS×Y 6.5** 0.1 0.7 0.2 1.2 6.1**

图2

石灰和秸秆还田对双季晚稻产量及其构成、氮素吸收的影响(2015-2018) 缩写同图1。误差线表示平均值的标准差(n = 3)。同一年份标的不同小写字母的柱值在不同处理间差异显著(P < 0.05)。"

图3

施石灰和秸秆还田对双季稻周年产量(a)、周年氮素吸收(b)、4年总产量(c)和总氮素吸收(d)的影响 缩写同图1。误差线表示平均值的标准差(n = 3)。同一年份标的不同小写字母的柱值在不同处理间差异显著(P < 0.05)。"

图4

施石灰和秸秆还田对土壤pH值的影响(2015-2018) 缩写同图1。误差线表示平均值的标准差(n = 3)。同一年份标的不同小写字母的柱值在不同处理间差异显著(P < 0.05)。"

图5

施石灰和秸秆还田对土壤有机质(a)和全氮(b)含量的影响(2018年) 缩写同图1。误差线表示平均值的标准差(n = 3)。同一年份标的不同小写字母的柱值在不同处理间差异显著(P < 0.05)。"

[1] Liu S L, Pu C, Ren Y X, Zhao X L, Zhao X, Chen F, Xiao X P, Zhang H L . Yield variation of double-rice in response to climate change in Southern China. Eur J Agron, 2016,81:161-168.
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2016.09.014
[2] Guo J H, Liu X J, Zhang Y, Shen J L, Han W X, Zhang W F, Christie P, Goulding K W, Zhang F S . Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands. Science, 2010,327:1008-1010.
doi: 10.1126/science.1182570 pmid: 20150447
[3] Miao Y X, Stewart B A, Zhang F S . Long-term experiments for sustainable nutrient management in China: a review. Agron Sustain Dev, 2011,31:397-414.
doi: 10.1051/agro/2010034
[4] 徐仁扣, 李九玉, 周世伟, 徐明岗, 沈仁芳 . 我国农田土壤酸化调控的科学问题与技术措施. 中国科学院院刊, 2018,33:160-167.
Xu R K, Li J Y, Zhou S W, Xu M G, Shen R F . Scientific issues and controlling strategies of soil acidification of croplands in China. China Acad J Electr Publish House, 2018,33:160-167 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[5] Holland J E, Bennett A E, Newton A C, White P J, McKenzie B M, George T S, Pakeman R J, Bailey J S, Fornara D A, Hayes R C . Liming impacts on soils, crops and biodiversity in the UK: a review. Sci Total Environ, 2018,610:316-332.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.020 pmid: 28806549
[6] Jiang Y, Liao P, van Gestel N, Sun Y N, Zeng Y J, Huang S, Zhang W J, van Groenigen K J . Lime application lowers the global warming potential of a double rice cropping system. Geoderma, 2018,325:1-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.03.034
[7] Ai C, Liang G Q, Sun J W, He P, Tang S H, Yang S H, Zhou W, Wang X B . The alleviation of acid soil stress in rice by inorganic or organic ameliorants is associated with changes in soil enzyme activity and microbial community composition. Biol Fert Soils, 2015,51:465-477.
doi: 10.1007/s00374-015-0994-3
[8] Liao P, Huang S, van Gestel N, Zeng Y J, Wu Z M, van Groenigen K J . Liming and straw retention interact to increase nitrogen uptake and grain yield in a double rice-cropping system. Field Crops Res, 2018,216:217-224.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.11.026
[9] Wang B, Shen X, Chen S, Bai Y C, Yang G, Zhu J P, Shu J C, Xue Z T . Distribution characteristics, resource utilization and popularizing demonstration of crop straw in Southwest China: a comprehensive evaluation. Ecol Indic, 2018,93:998-1004.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.081
[10] 张国, 逯非, 赵红, 杨广斌, 王效科, 欧阳志云 . 我国农作物秸秆资源化利用现状及农户对秸秆还田的认知态度. 农业环境科学学报, 2017,36:981-988.
Zhang G, Lu F, Zhao H, Yang G B, Wang X K, Ou-Yang Z Y . Residue usage and farmers’ recognition and attitude toward residue retention in China's croplands. J Agro-Environ Sci, 2017,36:981-988 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[11] Li H, Dai M W, Dai S L, Dong X J . Current status and environment impact of direct straw return in China’s cropland-A review. Ecotox Environ Safe, 2018,159:193-300.
[12] Han X, Xu C, Dungait J A, Bol R, Wang X J, Wu W L, Meng F Q . Straw incorporation increases crop yield and soil organic carbon sequestration but varies under different natural conditions and farming practices in China: a system analysis. Biogeosciences, 2018,15:1933-1946.
doi: 10.5194/bg-15-1933-2018
[13] Singh B, Shan Y H, Johnson-Beebout S E, Singh Y, Buresh R J . Crop residue management for lowland rice-based cropping systems in Asia. Adv Agron, 2008,98:117-199.
[14] 曾研华, 吴建富, 曾勇军, 范呈根, 谭雪明, 潘晓华, 石庆华 . 机收稻草全量还田减施化肥对双季晚稻养分吸收利用及产量的影响. 作物学报, 2018,44:454-462.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.00454
Zeng Y H, Wu J F, Zeng Y J, Fan C G, Tan X M, Pan X H, Shi Q H . Effects of straw incorporation with reducing chemical fertilizers on nutrient absorption and utilization and grain yield of double-cropping late rice under mechanical harvest. Acta Agron Sin, 2018,44:454-462 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.00454
[15] Pan F F, Yu W T, Ma Q, Zhou H, Jiang C M, Xu Y G, Ren J F . Influence of 15N-labeled ammonium sulfate and straw on nitrogen retention and supply in different fertility soils . Biol Fert Soils, 2017,53:303-313.
doi: 10.1007/s00374-017-1177-1
[16] 孟红旗, 刘景, 徐明岗, 吕家珑, 周宝库, 彭畅, 石孝均, 黄庆海, 王伯仁 . 长期施肥下我国典型农田耕层土壤的pH演变. 土壤学报, 2013,50:1109-1116.
Meng H Q, Liu J, Xu M G, Lyu J L, Zhou B K, Peng C, Shi X J, Huang Q H, Wang B R . Evolution of pH in top soils of typical Chinese croplands under long-term fertilization. Acta Pedol Sin, 2013,50:1109-1116 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17] 孟红旗, 吕家珑, 徐明岗, 蔡泽江, 王伯仁 . 有机肥的碱度及其减缓土壤酸化的机制. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012,18:1153-1160.
Meng H Q, Lyu J L, Xu M G, Cai Z J, Wang B R . Alkalinity of organic manure and its mechanism for mitigating soil acidification. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2012,18:1153-1160 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[18] Goulding K W T . Soil acidification and the importance of liming agricultural soils with particular reference to the United Kingdom. Soil Use Manage, 2016,32:390-399.
doi: 10.1111/sum.12270 pmid: 27708478
[19] 鲍士旦 . 土壤农化分析. 北京: 农业出版社, 2006.
Bao S D. Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2006 (in Chinese).
[20] 曾研华, 范呈根, 吴建富, 曾勇军, 周春火, 谭雪明, 潘晓华, 石庆华 . 等养分条件下稻草还田替代双季早稻氮钾肥比例的研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017,23:658-668.
Zeng Y H, Fan C G, Wu J F, Zeng Y J, Zhou C H, Tan X M, Pan X H, Shi Q H . Replacement ratio of nitrogen and potassium fertilizer by straw incorporation in early rice under the same nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium input. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2017,23:658-668 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21] 孙凯, 刘振, 胡恒宇, 李耕, 刘文涛, 杨柳, 宁堂原, 王彦玲 . 有机培肥与轮耕方式对夏玉米田土壤碳氮和产量的影响. 作物学报, 2019,45:401-410.
Sun K, Liu Z, Hu H Y, Li G, Liu W T, Yang L, Ning T Y, Wang Y L . Effect of organic fertilizer and rotational tillage practices on soil carbon and nitrogen and maize yield in wheat-maize cropping system. Acta Agron Sin, 2019,45:401-410 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[22] 李昊昱, 孟兆良, 庞党伟, 陈金, 侯永坤, 崔海兴, 金敏, 王振林, 李勇 . 周年秸秆还田对农田土壤固碳及冬小麦-夏玉米产量的影响. 作物学报, 2019,45:893-903.
Li H Y, Meng Z L, Pang D W, Chen J, Hou Y K, Cui H X, Jin M, Wang Z L, Li Y . Effect of annual straw return model on soil carbon sequestration and crop yields in winter wheat-summer maize rotation farmland. Acta Agron Sin, 2019,45:893-903 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[23] 陈玉章, 柴守玺, 程宏波, 柴雨葳, 杨长刚, 谭凯敏, 常磊 . 秸秆还田结合秋覆膜对旱地冬小麦耗水特性和产量的影响. 作物学报, 2019,45:256-266.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.71081
Chen Y Z, Chai S X, Cheng H B, Chai Y W, Yang C G, Tan K M, Chang L . Effects of straw-incorporation combined with autumn plastic mulching on soil water consumption characteristics and winter wheat yield in arid farming areas. Acta Agron Sin, 2019,45:256-266 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.71081
[24] 曾研华, 吴建富, 潘晓华, 石庆华, 朱德峰 . 稻草原位还田对双季稻田土壤理化与生物学性状的影响. 水土保持学报, 2013,27(3):150-155.
Zeng Y H, Wu J F, Pan X H, Shi Q H, Zhu D F . Effects of rice straw incorporation on soil physical, chemical and biological properties in double cropping paddy fields. J Soil Water Conserv, 2013,27(3):150-155 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[25] Xu Y Z, Nie L X, Buresh R J, Huang J L, Cui K H, Xu B, Gong W H, Peng S B . Agronomic performance of late-season rice under different tillage, straw, and nitrogen management. Field Crops Res, 2010,115:79-84.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.10.005
[26] Zhao Y C, Wang M Y, Hu S J, Zhang X D, Ou-Yang Z, Zhang G L, Huang B, Zhao S W, Wu J S, Xie D T, Zhu B, Yu D S, Pan X Z, Xu S X, Shi X Z . Economics- and policy-driven organic carbon input enhancement dominates soil organic carbon accumulation in Chinese croplands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2018,115:4045-4050.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1700292114 pmid: 29666318
[27] 唐海明, 肖小平, 李超, 汤文光, 郭立君, 汪柯, 程凯凯, 潘孝晨, 孙耿 . 不同土壤耕作模式对双季水稻生理特性与产量的影响. 作物学报, 2019,45:740-754.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.82030
Tang H M, Xiao X P, Li C, Tang W G, Guo L J, Wang K, Cheng K K, Pan X C, Sun G . Effects of different soil tillage systems on physiological characteristics and yield of double-cropping rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2019,45:740-754 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.82030
[28] Page K L, Allen D E, Dalal R C, Slattery W . Processes and magnitude of CO2, CH4 and N2O fluxes from liming of Australian acidic soils: a review. Aust J Soil Res, 2009,47:747-762.
[29] Kumar M, Kundu D K, Ghorai A K, Mitra S, Singh S R . Carbon and nitrogen mineralization kinetics as influenced by diversified cropping systems and residue incorporation in inceptisols of eastern Indo-Gangetic Plain. Soil Tillage Res, 2018,178:108-117.
doi: 10.1016/j.still.2017.12.025
[30] 侯文峰, 李小坤, 王思潮, 汪金平, 徐祥玉, 熊又升, 丛日环 . 石灰与秸秆配施对冷浸田水稻产量与土壤特性的影响. 华中农业大学学报, 2015,34(5):58-62.
Hou W F, Li X K, Wang S C, Wang J P, Xu X Y, Xiong Y S, Cong R H . Effects of combined application of lime and straw on rice yield and soil properties in cold waterlogged paddy field. J Huazhong Agric Univ, 2015,34(5):58-62 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[31] 曾廷廷, 蔡泽江, 王小利, 梁文君, 周世伟, 徐明岗 . 酸性土壤施用石灰提高作物产量的整合分析. 中国农业科学, 2017,50:2519-2527.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.13.011
Zeng T T, Cai Z J, Wang X L, Liang W J, Zhou S W, Xu M G . Integrated analysis of liming for increasing crop yield in acidic soils. Sci Agric Sin, 2017,50:2519-2527 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.13.011
[32] Li Y, Cui S, Chang S X, Zhang Q Q . Liming effects on soil pH and crop yield depend on lime material type, application method and rate, and crop species: a global meta-analysis. J Soil Sediment, 2019,19:1393-1406.
doi: 10.1007/s11368-018-2120-2
[1] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[6] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[7] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[10] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[11] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[12] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[13] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[14] 崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
[15] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2