欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (9): 1416-1429.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.94174

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

DPC+化学封顶对不同施氮量下棉花叶片光合生理特性的影响

时晓娟1(), 韩焕勇2,*(), 王方永2, 郝先哲1, 高宏云1, 罗宏海1,*()   

  1. 1 石河子大学农学院, 新疆石河子 832000
    2 新疆农垦科学院棉花研究所, 新疆石河子 832000
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-11 接受日期:2020-04-15 出版日期:2020-09-12 网络出版日期:2020-05-06
  • 通讯作者: 韩焕勇,罗宏海
  • 作者简介:E-mail: 1498975919@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    本研究由国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFD0101600);新疆兵团重点领域创新团队(2017CB011);新疆兵团重大专项资助(2016AA001-2,4)

Effects of chemical topping with fortified mepiquat chloride on photosynthetic characteristics of cotton leaves under different nitrogen rates

SHI Xiao-Juan1(), HAN Huan-Yong2,*(), WANG Fang-Yong2, HAO Xian-Zhe1, GAO Hong-Yun1, LUO Hong-Hai1,*()   

  1. 1 College of Agriculture, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, Xinjiang, China
    2 Cotton Institute, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science, Shihezi 832000, Xinjiang, China
  • Received:2019-11-11 Accepted:2020-04-15 Published:2020-09-12 Published online:2020-05-06
  • Contact: Huan-Yong HAN,Hong-Hai LUO
  • Supported by:
    National Key Research and Development Program of China(2017YFD0101600);Innovation Team in Key Areas of Xinjiang Production and Construction Crops(2017CB011);National Science and Technology Major of Xinjiang Production and Construction Crops(2016AA001-2,4)

RichHTML

11

PDF

640

摘要：

在北疆气候条件下, 为明确棉花对不同施氮量下增效缩节胺[DPC+, 25%甲哌鎓(1,1-dimethyl piperidinium chloride, DPC)水剂]化学封顶效应的响应, 以新陆早53号为试验材料, 在150(N1)、300(N2)和450(N3) kg hm-2施氮水平下, 以人工打顶(P0)为对照, 研究DPC+剂量[450(P1)、750(P2)和1050(P3) mL hm-2]对棉花叶绿素含量(Chl)、叶面积(LA)、气体交换参数、叶绿素荧光参数及干物质累积与分配的影响。结果表明, 同一DPC+剂量下, 随施氮量增加, Chl、LA、气体交换参数、叶绿素荧光参数和生殖器官干物质(RODM)均呈现先上升后下降的趋势; 同一施氮量下, 上述参数因DPC+剂量不同呈不同变化趋势, 其中N1水平下以P1处理、N2水平下以P2处理、N3水平下以P3处理表现出较高的RODM、Chl、净光合速率(Pn)、实际光化学效率(ФPSII)、电子传递速率(ETR), 较低的非光化学淬灭(NPQ)。DPC+与施氮量互作表现为, 与其他处理相比, Chl、Pn、蒸腾速率(Tr)、气孔导度(Gs)、ФPSII、ETR、RODM在N2P2处理下分别提高了15.52%、29.39%、27.97%、36.77%、23.28%、23.55%、8.41%~22.24%, NPQ降低了34.54%。相关分析表明, 干物质累积和Chl、LA、Pn、Gs、ФPSII均呈显著正相关, 与NPQ呈极显著负相关。因此, 在喷施DPC+(750 mL hm-2)条件下, 适量追施氮肥(300 kg hm-2)能改善棉花光合性能, 在增加干物质累积的基础上, 促进了光合产物向生殖器官分配。

关键词: 棉花, 施氮量, DPC+, 化学封顶, 干物质累积

Abstract:

This study aims to explore the effects of fortified mepiquat chloride (25% DPC, 1,1-dimethyl piperidinium chloride) on cotton leaf photosynthetic regulation under different nitrogen fertilizations. Field experiments were used Xinluzao 53 and conducted split plot arrangement with three nitrogen (N) fertilizer levels [150 (N1), 300 (N2), 450 (N3) kg hm-2] and three DPC+ doses [450 (P1), 750 (P2), 1050 (P3) mL hm-2]. Chlorophyll content, leaf area, gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and dry matter accumulation were investigated. With the increasing nitrogen application level, the chlorophyll content, leaf area, gas exchange parameters, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and reproductive organs dry matter accumulation were increased first and then decreased. P1N1, P2N2, and P3N3 treatments had greater reproductive organ dry matter accumulation, chlorophyll content, net photosynthetic rate (Pn), actual photochemical efficiency (ФPSII), electron transfer rate (ETR), and lower non-photochemical quenching (NPQ). N2P2 treatment increased chlorophyll content, Pn, Tr, Gs, ФPSII, ETR, reproductive organs dry matter accumulation by 15.52%, 29.39%, 27.97%, 36.77%, 23.28%, 23.55%, 8.41%-22.24% respectively, while reduced NPQ by 34.54%, compared with other counterparts. The correlation analysis showed that the dry matter accumulation was significantly positively correlated with chlorophyll content, leaf area, Pn, Gs, ФPSII, and significantly negatively correlated with NPQ. In conclusion, the application of nitrogen fertilizer at 300 kg hm-2 in combination with DPC+(750 mL hm-2) improved leaf photosynthetic characteristics and promoted the distribution of photosynthates to reproductive organs due to increased dry matter accumulation.

Key words: cotton, nitrogen application rate, DPC+, chemical topping, dry matter accumulation

图1

DPC+剂量对不同施氮量下棉花叶绿素的影响 FF: 盛花期; FB: 盛铃期; BO: 吐絮期; N1: 低氮(150 kg hm-2); N2: 中氮(300 kg hm-2); N3: 高氮(450 kg hm-2); P0: 人工打顶; P1: 低剂量DPC+(450 mL hm-2); P2: 中剂量DPC+(750 mL hm-2); P3: 高剂量DPC+(1050 mL hm-2)。"

表1

DPC+剂量对不同施氮量下棉花叶面积(m2 hm-2)的影响"

处理
Treatment		 2013 2014
盛花期
Full flowering		 盛铃期
Full boll		 吐絮期
Boll opening		 盛花期
Full flowering		 盛铃期
Full boll		 吐絮期
Boll opening
N1 22608 c 38656 c 36204 c 22207 c 38556 c 36604 c
N2 27345 b 41950 b 38904 b 26945 b 41900 b 39004 b
N3 28409 a 43090 a 40113 a 28298 a 43006 a 40127 a
P1 26635 a 42571 a 39506 a 26280 a 42238 a 39650 a
P2 26679 a 41392 ab 38495 ab 26398 a 41170 a 38379 b
P3 25022 b 39923 c 37555 b 24733 b 39795 b 37781 b
P0 26146 a 41041 bc 38072 b 25857 a 41413 a 38502 b
N1P0 22399 f 38269 bc 36059 e 21997 fg 38169 fg 36461 de
N1P1 23900 e 39967 b 37356 de 23498 e 39766 def 37959 cd
N1P2 22768 ef 39074 bc 36091 e 22371 ef 38776 efg 36489 de
N1P3 21365 f 37314 c 35307 e 20964 g 37514 g 35508 e
N2P0 27337 bcd 42502 a 39209 abcd 26938 cd 42003 abc 38611 bc
N2P1 26973 cd 43296 a 39713 abc 26575 cd 43196 ab 39912 abc
N2P2 28800 ab 42247 a 39237 abcd 28399 ab 42047abc 38936 bc
N2P3 26269 d 39753 b 37456 cde 25870 d 40354 cde 38556 bc
N3P0 28901 ab 42351 a 38947 bcd 28635 ab 44069 a 40435 ab
处理
Treatment		 2013 2014
盛花期
Full flowering		 盛铃期
Full boll		 吐絮期
Boll opening		 盛花期
Full flowering		 盛铃期
Full boll		 吐絮期
Boll opening
N3P1 29033 a 44451 a 41448 a 28766 a 43750 a 41081 a
N3P2 28469 abc 42854 a 40157 ab 28425 ab 42687 ab 39712 abc
N3P3 27747 bcd 42702 a 39902 ab 27366 bc 41517 bcd 39280 abc
N * * * * * *
P * * * * * *
N×P * ns ns * ns ns

图2

DPC+剂量对不同施氮量下棉花气体交换参数的影响(2014) 缩写同图1。"

图3

DPC+剂量对不同施氮量下棉花叶片Fv/Fm的影响 缩写同图1。"

表2

DPC+剂量对不同施氮量下棉花ФPSII的影响"

处理
Treatment		 2013 2014
盛花期
Full flowering		 盛铃期
Full boll		 吐絮期
Boll opening		 盛花期
Full flowering		 盛铃期
Full boll		 吐絮期
Boll opening
N1 0.49 a 0.38 a 0.32 b 0.36 c 0.29 c 0.16 c
N2 0.57 a 0.43 a 0.36 a 0.50 a 0.35 a 0.26 a
N3 0.49 a 0.38 a 0.34 ab 0.47 b 0.31 b 0.22 b
P1 0.50 a 0.40 a 0.35 a 0.45 b 0.31 b 0.22 b
P2 0.52 a 0.39 a 0.34 a 0.47 a 0.35 a 0.22 b
P3 0.52 a 0.39 a 0.33 a 0.43 bc 0.31 b 0.16 c
P0 0.53 a 0.40 a 0.35 a 0.41 c 0.29 b 0.25 a
N1P0 0.51 abc 0.38 a 0.33 a 0.33 ef 0.26 f 0.20 ef
N1P1 0.61 abc 0.42 a 0.37 a 0.43 cd 0.34 b 0.30 b
N1P2 0.44 abc 0.34 a 0.32 ab 0.36 e 0.31 cd 0.09 h
N1P3 0.39 c 0.33 a 0.28 b 0.30 f 0.25 f 0.05 i
N2P0 0.63 ab 0.42 a 0.37 a 0.47 bc 0.33 bc 0.30 b
N2P1 0.46 abc 0.40 a 0.34 a 0.51 b 0.31 bcd 0.19 fg
N2P2 0.68 a 0.43 a 0.37 a 0.59 a 0.41 a 0.34 a
N2P3 0.52 abc 0.41 a 0.37 a 0.42 d 0.34 bc 0.21 de
N3P0 0.42 abc 0.38 a 0.35 a 0.43 cd 0.29 de 0.24 c
N3P1 0.43 bc 0.34 a 0.33 a 0.41 d 0.27 ef 0.17 g
N3P2 0.44 abc 0.37 a 0.34 a 0.47 bc 0.32 bcd 0.23 cd
N3P3 0.64 ab 0.40 a 0.37 a 0.57 a 0.34 b 0.23 cd
N ns ns * * * *
P ns ns ns * * *
N×P * ns * * * *

表3

DPC+剂量对不同施氮量下棉花ETR的影响"

处理
Treatment		 2013 2014
盛花期
Full flowering		 盛铃期
Full boll		 吐絮期
Boll opening		 盛花期
Full flowering		 盛铃期
Full boll		 吐絮期
Boll opening
N1 112.09 b 106.81 a 97.03 a 101.04 b 65.97 b 43.58 b
N2 143.09 a 112.14 a 105.68 a 126.81 a 75.57 a 56.89 a
N3 127.59 ab 105.97 a 99.25 a 90.38 c 66.87 b 29.16 c
P1 128.25 a 104.69 a 100.76 a 106.24 b 72.16 b 42.74 a
P2 131.40 a 115.22 a 105.99 a 117.34 a 80.09 a 43.85 a
P3 135.10 a 113.61 a 103.08 a 116.19 a 70.02 b 42.95 a
P0 115.60 a 99.71 a 92.79 a 84.54 c 55.61 c 43.30 a
N1P0 104.98a 94.04 a 91.18 a 80.02 e 56.36 hi 37.98 fg
N1P1 126.54 a 112.10 a 104.41 a 115.28 bc 73.01 de 57.70 b
N1P2 112.45 a 111.15 a 102.10 a 105.79 cd 67.89 def 43.40 de
N1P3 104.41 a 106.76 a 90.44 a 103.08 d 66.61 ef 35.26 g
N2P0 120.29 a 103.01 a 96.47 a 100.36 d 58.92 gh 51.24 c
N2P1 143.82 a 112.36 a 106.52 a 123.42 b 79.42 bc 61.03 b
N2P2 159.12 a 120.85 a 113.79 a 143.76 a 89.66 a 69.17 a
N2P3 149.12 a 113.68 a 105.92 a 139.70 a 74.29 cd 46.11 d
N3P0 116.68 a 102.09 a 90.73 a 73.24 e 51.54 i 40.69 ef
N3P1 114.39 a 96.98 a 92.75 a 80.02 e 64.05 fg 9.49 i
N3P2 122.65 a 104.42 a 102.06 a 102.47 d 67.89 b 18.99 h
N3P3 151.76 a 120.39 a 112.87 a 105.79 cd 69.17 def 47.47 cd
N ns ns ns * * *
P ns ns ns * * ns
N×P ns ns ns * * *

表4

DPC+剂量对不同施氮量下棉花NPQ的影响"

处理
Treatment		 2013 2014
盛花期
Full flowering		 盛铃期
Full boll		 吐絮期
Boll opening		 盛花期
Full flowering		 盛铃期
Full boll		 吐絮期
Boll opening
N1 112.09 b 106.81 a 97.03 a 101.04 b 65.97 b 43.58 b
N2 143.09 a 112.14 a 105.68 a 126.81 a 75.57 a 56.89 a
N3 127.59 ab 105.97 a 99.25 a 90.38 c 66.87 b 29.16 c
P1 128.25 a 104.69 a 100.76 a 106.24 b 72.16 b 42.74 a
P2 131.40 a 115.22 a 105.99 a 117.34 a 80.09 a 43.85 a
P3 135.10 a 113.61 a 103.08 a 116.19 a 70.02 b 42.95 a
P0 115.60 a 99.71 a 92.79 a 84.54 c 55.61 c 43.30 a
N1P0 104.98a 94.04 a 91.18 a 80.02 e 56.36 hi 37.98 fg
N1P1 126.54 a 112.10 a 104.41 a 115.28 bc 73.01 de 57.70 b
N1P2 112.45 a 111.15 a 102.10 a 105.79 cd 67.89 def 43.40 de
N1P3 104.41 a 106.76 a 90.44 a 103.08 d 66.61 ef 35.26 g
处理
Treatment		 2013 2014
盛花期
Full flowering		 盛铃期
Full boll		 吐絮期
Boll opening		 盛花期
Full flowering		 盛铃期
Full boll		 吐絮期
Boll opening
N2P0 120.29 a 103.01 a 96.47 a 100.36 d 58.92 gh 51.24 c
N2P1 143.82 a 112.36 a 106.52 a 123.42 b 79.42 bc 61.03 b
N2P2 159.12 a 120.85 a 113.79 a 143.76 a 89.66 a 69.17 a
N2P3 149.12 a 113.68 a 105.92 a 139.70 a 74.29 cd 46.11 d
N3P0 116.68 a 102.09 a 90.73 a 73.24 e 51.54 i 40.69 ef
N3P1 114.39 a 96.98 a 92.75 a 80.02 e 64.05 fg 9.49 i
N3P2 122.65 a 104.42 a 102.06 a 102.47 d 67.89 b 18.99 h
N3P3 151.76 a 120.39 a 112.87 a 105.79 cd 69.17 def 47.47 cd
N ns ns ns * * *
P ns ns ns * * ns
N×P ns ns ns * * *

表5

DPC剂量对不同施氮量下对棉花地上部干物质质量、生殖器官干物质质量的影响"

图4

DPC+剂量对不同施氮量下生殖器官干重所占比例的影响 缩写同图1。"

表6

不同时期测定参数与单株地上部和生殖器官干物质重的相关参数"

生育时期
Growth stage		 参数
Parameter		 SDM RODM LA Chl Pn Tr Gs Fv/Fm ФPS II ETR NPQ
盛花期
Full flowering		 SDM 1
RODM 0.882** 1
LA 0.901** 0.838** 1
Chl 0.788** 0.894** 0.713** 1
Pn 0.941** 0.887** 0.764** 0.877** 1
Tr 0.353 0.536 0.113 0.602* 0.617* 1
Gs 0.837** 0.857** 0.638* 0.851** 0.955** 0.769** 1
Fv/Fm 0.300 0.346 0.101 0.248 0.273 0.122 0.236 1
ФPS II 0.649* 0.827** 0.499 0.870** 0.806** 0.718** 0.808** 0.333 1
ETR 0.427 0.584* 0.262 0.614* 0.620* 0.824** 0.742** -0.004 0.685* 1
NPQ -0.687* -0.884** -0.581* -0.879** -0.821** -0.811** -0.872** -0.316 -0.869** -0.782** 1
盛铃期
Full boll		 SDM 1
RODM 0.643* 1
LA 0.903** 0.552 1
Chl 0.506 0.693* 0.316 1
Pn 0.583* 0.834** 0.453 0.734** 1
Tr 0.173 0.711** 0.122 0.647* 0.665* 1
Gs 0.568 0.885** 0.521 0.719** 0.933** 0.607* 1
Fv/Fm 0.138 -0.181 0.210 -0.359 -0.308 -0.326 -0.350 1
ФPS II 0.344 0.786** 0.267 0.857** 0.640* 0.826** 0.683* -0.313 1
ETR 0.060 0.303 0.014 0.666* 0.419 0.681* 0.330 -0.137 0.667* 1
生育时期
Growth stage		 参数
Parameter		 SDM RODM LA Chl Pn Tr Gs Fv/Fm ФPS II ETR NPQ
盛铃期
Full boll		 NPQ -0.471 -0.828** -0.372 -0.912** -0.788** -0.847** -0.797** 0.246 -0.933** -0.683* 1
吐絮期
Boll opening		 SDM 1
RODM 0.809** 1
LA 0.864** 0.464 1
Chl 0.707* 0.888** 0.393 1
Pn 0.682* 0.806** 0.354 0.930** 1
Tr 0.373 0.714** 0.011 0.878** 0.782** 1
Gs 0.684* 0.954** 0.325 0.926** 0.863** 0.799** 1
Fv/Fm -0.083 0.163 -0.379 0.324 0.292 0.476 0.219 1
ФPS II 0.605* 0.735** 0.445 0.690* 0.514 0.571 0.692* -0.224 1
ETR 0.224 0.641* -0.113 0.772** 0.682* 0.916** 0.719** 0.376 0.520 1
NPQ -0.546 -0.866** -0.231 -0.888** -0.777** -0.825** -0.872** -0.233 -0.716** -0.888** 1
[1] Chen Z K, Ma H, Xia J, Hou F, Shi X J, Hao X Z, Hafeez A, Han H Y, Luo H H. Optimal pre-plant irrigation and fertilization can improve biomass accumulation by maintaining the root and leaf productive capacity of cotton crop. Sci Rep, 2017,7:17168.
pmid: 29215075
[2] 马春玥, 买买提·沙吾提, 依尔夏提·阿不来提, 姚杰. 新疆棉花种植业地理集聚特征及影响因素研究. 作物学报, 2019,45:1859-1867.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.94041
Ma C Y, Mamat S, Ablet E, Yao J. Characteristics and influencing factors of geographical agglomeration of cotton plantation in Xinjiang. Acta Agron Sin, 2019,45:1859-1867 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3] 戴翠荣, 赵晓雁, 余力, 王献礼, 练文明, 贺美球, 王文涛. 氟节胺化学打顶对南疆棉花农艺性状及产量的影响. 新疆农业科学, 2015,52:1394-1398.
Dai C R, Zhao X Y, Yu L, Wang X L, Lian W M, He M Q, Wang W T. Effect of chemical topping with flumetralin on the canopy and yield of cotton in Southern Xinjiang. Xinjiang Agric Sci, 2015,52:1394-1398 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] Chen Z, Niu Y, Zhao R, Han C, Han H, Luo H. The combination of limited irrigation and high plant density optimizes canopy structure and improves the water use efficiency of cotton. Agric Water Manage, 2019,218:139-148.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.037
[5] 董春玲, 罗宏海, 张亚黎, 张旺锋. 喷施氟节胺对棉花农艺性状的影响及化学打顶效应研究. 新疆农业科学, 2013,50:1985-1990.
Dong C L, Luo H H, Zhang Y L, Zhang W F. Research on cotton agronomic traits and chemical topping effect after spraying flumetralin. Xinjiang Agric Sci, 2013,50:1985-1990 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[6] Renou A, Téréta I, Togola M. Manual topping decreases bollworm infestations in cotton cultivation in Mali. Crop Prot, 2011,30:1370-1375.
doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2011.05.020
[7] Dai J L, Dong H Z. Intensive cotton farming technologies in China: Achievements, challenges and countermeasures. Field Crops Res, 2014,155:99-110.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.09.017
[8] 安静, 黎芳, 周春江, 田晓莉, 李召虎. 增效缩节安化学封顶对棉花主茎生长的影响及其相关机制. 作物学报, 2018,44:1837-1843.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.01837
An J, Li F, Zhou C J, Tian X L, Li Z H. Morpho-physiological responses of cotton shoot apex to the chemical top-ping with fortified mepiquat chloride. Acta Agron Sin, 2018,44:1837-1843 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[9] 何磊, 周亚立, 刘向新, 赵岩. 浅谈新疆兵团棉花打顶技术. 中国棉花, 2013,40(4):5-6.
He L, Zhou Y L, Liu X X, Zhao Y. Discussion of cotton-topping technology in Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps. Chin Cotton, 2013,40(4):5-6 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[10] 杨成勋, 张旺锋, 徐守振, 随龙龙, 梁福斌, 董恒义. 喷施化学打顶剂对棉花冠层结构及群体光合生产的影响. 中国农业科学, 2016,49:1672-1684.
Yang C X, Zhang W F, Xu S Z, Sui L L, Liang F B, Dong H Y. Effects of spraying chemical topping agents on canopy structure and canopy photosynthetic production in cotton. Sci Agric Sin, 2016,49:1672-1684 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[11] 韩焕勇, 王方永, 陈兵, 张旺锋, 李保成, 田晓莉, 李召虎. 灌水量对北疆棉花增效缩节胺化学封顶效应的影响. 棉花学报, 2017,29:70-78.
Han H Y, Wang F Y, Chen B, Zhang W F, Li B C, Tian X L, Li Z H. Effects of drip irrigation water amount on the regulation of cotton growth and yield by fortified 1,1-dimethyl-piperidinium chloride in Northern Xinjiang. Cotton Sci, 2017,29:70-78 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12] 王潭刚, 马丽, 李克富, 王冀川, 李慧琴, 吉光鹏, 郝全有, 崔建强, 胡宝. 不同密度下封顶方式对南疆棉花生长及产量性状的影响. 中国农业科技导报, 2019,21(6):110-116.
Wang T G, Ma L, Li K F, Wang J C, Li H Q, Ji G P, Hao Q Y, Cui J Q, Hu B. Influences of different topping methods on cotton growth and yield traits under different plant densities in Southern Xinjiang. J Agric Sci Technol Chin, 2019,21(6):110-116 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] 赵强, 张巨松, 周春江, 恽友兰, 李松林, 田晓莉. 化学打顶对棉花群体容量的拓展效应. 棉花学报, 2011,23:401-407.
Zhao Q, Zhang J S, Zhou C J, Yun Y L, Li S L, Tian X L. Chemical detopping increases the optimum plant density in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Cotton Sci, 2011,23:401-407 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14] 徐守振, 左文庆, 陈民志, 随龙龙, 董恒义, 酒兴丽, 张旺锋. 北疆植棉区滴灌量对化学打顶棉花植株农艺性状及产量的影响. 棉花学报, 2017,29:345-355.
Xu S Z, Zuo W Q, Chen M Z, Sui L L, Dong H Y, Jiu X L, Zhang W F. Effect of drip irrigation amount on the agronomic traits and yield of cotton grown with a chemical topping in Northern Xinjiang, China. Cotton Sci, 2017,29:345-355 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15] Zahoor R, Dong H, Abid M, Zhao W Q, Wang Y H, Zhou Z G. Potassium fertilizer improves drought stress alleviation potential in cotton by enhancing photosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism. Environ Exp Bot, 2017,137:73-83.
[16] Yang X Y, Geng J B, Li C L, Zhang M, Chen B C, Tian X F, Zheng W K, Liu Z G, Wang C. Combined application of polymer coated potassium chloride and urea improved fertilizer use efficiencies, yield and leaf photosynthesis of cotton on saline soil. Field Crops Res, 2016,197:63-73.
[17] Chen Z K, Niu Y P, Ma H, Hafeez A, Luo H H, Zhang W F. Photosynthesis and biomass allocation of cotton as affected by deep-layer water and fertilizer application depth. Photosynthetica, 2016,55:638-647.
[18] Yang G Z, Tang H Y, Nie Y C, Zhang X L. Responses of cotton growth, yield, and biomass to nitrogen split application ratio. Eur J Agron, 2011,35:164-170.
[19] Lichtenthaler H K, Wellburn A R. Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochem Soc Trans, 1983,11:591-592.
[20] 赵强, 周春江, 张巨松, 李松林, 恽友兰, 田晓莉. 化学打顶对南疆棉花(Gossypium hirsutum)农艺和经济性状的影响. 棉花学报, 2011,23:329-333.
Zhao Q, Zhou C J, Zhang J S, Li S L, Yun Y L, Tian X L. Effect of chemical detopping on the canopy and yield of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) in South Xinjiang. Cotton Sci, 2011,23:329-333 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21] Stewart D W, Costa C, Dwyer L, Smith D L. Canopy structure, light interception, and photosynthesis in maize. Agron J, 2003,95:1465-1474.
[22] 罗宏海, 赵瑞海, 杨新军, 张旺锋. 高产棉花叶面积载荷量与光合生产的关系及对冠层结构的影响. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2011,29(1):6-10.
Luo H H, Zhao R H, Yang X J, Zhang W F. The relationship of sink capacity of unit leaf area to photosynthetic production and its regulation effect on canopy structure in high-yield cotton. J Shihezi Univ (Nat Sci), 2011,29(1):6-10 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[23] 张巨松, 陈冰, 周抑强, 张勇, 孙国华, 侯玲. DPC对棉花群体发育调控效应的研究. 新疆农业大学学报, 1999,22(1):21-25.
Zhang J S, Chen B, Zhou Y Q, Zhang Y, Sun G H, Hou L. Regulating effect of DPC on cotton population development. J Xinjiang Agric Univ, 1999,22(1):21-25 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[24] 冯国艺, 姚炎帝, 杜明伟, 田景山, 罗宏海, 张亚黎, 张旺锋. 缩节胺(DPC)对干旱区杂交棉冠层结构及群体光合生产的调节. 棉花学报, 2012,24:44-51.
Feng G Y, Yao Y D, Du M W, Tian J S, Luo H H, Zhang Y L, Zhang W F. Dimethyl piperidinium chloride (DPC) regulation of canopy architecture and photosynthesis in a cotton hybrid in an arid region. Cotton Sci, 2012,24:44-51 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[25] 张守仁. 叶绿素荧光动力学参数的意义及讨论. 植物学通报, 1999,16:444-448.
Zhang S R. A discussion on chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics parameters and their significance. Chin Bull Bot, 1999,16:444-448 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[26] 武文明, 陈洪俭, 李金才, 魏凤珍, 王世济, 周向红. 氮肥运筹对孕穗期受渍冬小麦旗叶叶绿素荧光与籽粒灌浆特性的影响. 作物学报, 2012,38:1088-1096.
Wu W M, Chen H J, Li J C, Wei F Z, Wang S J, Zhou X H. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of flag leaf and grain filling in winter wheat suffered waterlogging at booting stage. Acta Agron Sin, 2012,38:1088-1096 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[27] Vijayalakshmi P, Vishnukiran T, Kumari B R, Srikanth B I, Rao S, Swamy K N, Surekha K, Sailaja N, Subbarao L V, Rao P R, Subrahmanyam D, Neeraja C N, Voleti S R. Biochemical and physiological characterization for nitrogen use efficiency in aromatic rice genotypes. Field Crops Res, 2015,179:132-143.
[28] Ciompi S, Gentili E, Guidi L, Soldatini G F. The effect of nitrogen deficiency on leaf gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in sunflower. Plant Sci(Shannon), 1996,118:177-184.
[29] 杨国正, 王德鹏, 聂以春, 张献龙. 钾肥用量对棉花生物量和产量的影响. 作物学报, 2013,39:905-911.
Yang G Z, Wang D P, Nie Y C, Zhang X L. Effect of potassium application rate on Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) biomass and yield. Acta Agron Sin, 2013,39:905-911 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[30] 薛晓萍, 王建国, 郭文琦, 陈兵林, 尤军, 周治国. 氮素水平对初花后棉株生物量、氮素累积特征及氮素利用率动态变化的影响. 生态学报, 2006,26:3631-3640.
Xue X P, Wang J G, Guo W Q, Chen B L, You J, Zhou Z G. Effect of nitrogen applied levels on the dynamics of biomass, nitrogen accumulationand nitrogen fertilization recovery rate of cotton after initial flowering. Acta Ecol Sin, 2006,26:3631-3640 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[31] 韩焕勇, 王方永, 陈兵, 李保成, 张旺锋, 田晓莉, 李召虎. 氮肥对棉花应用增效缩节胺封顶效果的影响. 中国农业大学学报, 2017,22(2):12-20.
Han H Y, Wang F Y, Chen B, Li B C, Zhang W F, Tian X L, Li Z H. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer on plant growth and yield formation of cotton applied with fortified DPC. J Chin Agric Univ, 2017,22(2):12-20 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[1] 周静远, 孔祥强, 张艳军, 李雪源, 张冬梅, 董合忠. 基于种子萌发出苗过程中弯钩建成和下胚轴生长的棉花出苗壮苗机制与技术[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1051-1058.
[2] 孙思敏, 韩贝, 陈林, 孙伟男, 张献龙, 杨细燕. 棉花苗期根系分型及根系性状的关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1081-1090.
[3] 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[4] 李鑫格, 高杨, 刘小军, 田永超, 朱艳, 曹卫星, 曹强. 播期播量及施氮量对冬小麦生长及光谱指标的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 975-987.
[5] 郑曙峰, 刘小玲, 王维, 徐道青, 阚画春, 陈敏, 李淑英. 论两熟制棉花绿色化轻简化机械化栽培[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 541-552.
[6] 袁嘉琦, 刘艳阳, 许轲, 李国辉, 陈天晔, 周虎毅, 郭保卫, 霍中洋, 戴其根, 张洪程. 氮密处理提高迟播栽粳稻资源利用和产量[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 667-681.
[7] 张艳波, 王袁, 冯甘雨, 段慧蓉, 刘海英. 棉籽油分和3种主要脂肪酸含量QTL分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 380-395.
[8] 张特, 王蜜蜂, 赵强. 滴施缩节胺与氮肥对棉花生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 396-409.
[9] 谢呈辉, 马海曌, 许宏伟, 徐郗阳, 阮国兵, 郭峥岩, 宁永培, 冯永忠, 杨改河, 任广鑫. 施氮量对宁夏引黄灌区麦后复种糜子生长、产量及氮素利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 463-477.
[10] 赵文青, 徐文正, 杨锍琰, 刘玉, 周治国, 王友华. 棉花叶片响应高温的差异与夜间淀粉降解密切相关[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1680-1689.
[11] 岳丹丹, 韩贝, Abid Ullah, 张献龙, 杨细燕. 干旱条件下棉花根际真菌多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1806-1815.
[12] 杨志远, 舒川海, 张荣萍, 杨国涛, 王明田, 秦俭, 孙永健, 马均, 李娜. 不同株型杂交籼稻对氮肥的耐受性差异比较[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1593-1602.
[13] 曾紫君, 曾钰, 闫磊, 程锦, 姜存仓. 低硼及高硼胁迫对棉花幼苗生长与脯氨酸代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1616-1623.
[14] 马欢欢, 方启迪, 丁元昊, 池华斌, 张献龙, 闵玲. 棉花GhMADS7基因正调控棉花花瓣发育[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(5): 814-826.
[15] 许乃银, 赵素琴, 张芳, 付小琼, 杨晓妮, 乔银桃, 孙世贤. 基于GYT双标图对西北内陆棉区国审棉花品种的分类评价[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 660-671.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2