欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (11): 1649-1658.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.04051

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 •    下一篇

甘薯抗旱相关基因IbNAC72的克隆与功能分析

张欢1(), 杨乃科1, 商丽丽2, 高晓茹1, 刘庆昌1, 翟红1, 高少培1, 何绍贞1,*()   

  1. 1 中国农业大学农业农村部甘薯生物学与生物技术重点实验室 / 教育部作物杂种优势研究与利用重点实验室, 北京 100193
    2 山东省烟台市农业科学研究院, 山东烟台 265500
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-29 接受日期:2020-07-02 出版日期:2020-11-12 网络出版日期:2020-07-13
  • 通讯作者: 何绍贞
  • 作者简介:E-mail:zhanghuan1111@cau.edu.cn, Tel: 010-62732559
  • 基金资助:
    本研究由国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFD1000700);本研究由国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFD1000704);北京粮经创新团队项目(BAIC09-2020);国家现代产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-10,甘薯)

Cloning and functional analysis of a drought tolerance-related gene IbNAC72 in sweet potato

ZHANG Huan1(), YANG Nai-Ke1, SHANG Li-Li2, GAO Xiao-Ru1, LIU Qing-Chang1, ZHAI Hong1, GAO Shao-Pei1, HE Shao-Zhen1,*()   

  1. 1 Key Laboratory of Sweet Potato Biology and Biotechnology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs / Laboratory of Crop Heterosis & Utilization and Joint Laboratory for International Cooperation in Crop Molecular Breeding, Ministry of Education, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
    2 Yantai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yantai 265500, Shandong, China
  • Received:2020-02-29 Accepted:2020-07-02 Published:2020-11-12 Published online:2020-07-13
  • Contact: Shao-Zhen HE
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2018YFD1000700);This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2018YFD1000704);the Beijing Food Crops Innovation Consortium Program(BAIC09-2020);the China Agriculture Research System(CARS-10,甘薯)

RichHTML

122

PDF

1242

摘要：

NAC (NAM/ATAF/CUC, NAC)转录因子是植物中特有的转录调控因子, 在植物体的生长发育与逆境胁迫响应等多种生理过程中起着重要的调控作用。本研究利用cDNA末端快速扩增技术(rapid amplification of cDNA ends, RACE)从甘薯品种栗子香中克隆到甘薯抗旱相关基因IbNAC72, 该基因cDNA长为1319 bp, 开放阅读框(open reading frame, ORF)为1008 bp, 编码335个氨基酸, 分子量为37.4 kD, 等电点为8.76, 基因组全长为1199 bp, 含有3个外显子、2个内含子。多重序列比对和系统进化树分析显示, IbNAC72基因与牵牛花中同源基因的亲缘关系最近。实时荧光定量PCR分析表明, IbNAC72基因在甘薯叶片中的表达量显著高于在茎段和根系中; 同时IbNAC72基因受到干旱和盐胁迫显著诱导表达。利用农杆菌介导法转化烟草, 获得过表达IbNAC72基因的转基因烟草植株。对IbNAC72转基因烟草植株的抗旱性分析表明, 在长时间干旱条件下, 转基因植株的根系更加发达, SOD活性显著提高, MDA的含量显著降低, 抗旱性显著提高。本研究表明, IbNAC72是与抗旱性密切相关的基因, 为深入探究IbNAC72抗旱的分子机制提供了基础。

关键词: 甘薯, NAC转录因子, IbNAC72, 过表达, 抗旱

Abstract:

NAC (NAM/ATAF/CUC) is a plant-specific transcription factor family, which plays an important role in plant growth, development and stress responses. In this study, we cloned IbNAC72, a drought tolerance-related gene from sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] variety Lizixiang by RACE method. The IbNAC72 cDNA of 1319 bp in length, had an open reading frame (ORF) of 1008 bp, and encoded a 335 amino acids polypeptide, with a molecular weight of 37.4 kD and an isoelectric point (pI) of 8.76. The genomic DNA of IbNAC72 gene was 1199 bp and was deduced to contain 3 exons and 2 introns. Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis revealed that IbNAC72 had a close relationship with the predicted protein products of Ipomoea nil. RT-qPCR analysis showed that IbNAC72 was expressed at the highest level in the leaves of sweet potato, and it was strongly induced by PEG-6000 and NaCl, respectively. IbNAC72 was transformed into tobacco via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Its overexpression significantly enhanced drought tolerance in the transgenic tobacco plants. Under drought stress, transgenic plants developed stronger root system; the SOD activity was significantly increased whereas the MDA content was significantly decreased in transgenic plants compared to those of wild type plants. This study showed that IbNAC72 gene was closely related to drought tolerance, providing a basis for in-depth study on the drought tolerance molecular mechanism of IbNAC72 in sweet potato.

Key words: sweet potato, NAC transcription factor, IbNAC72, overexpression, drought tolerance

表1

IbNAC72基因克隆和功能分析所用引物"

引物名称
Primer name		 引物序列
Primer sequence (5′-3′)		 用途
Function
NAC-1 CGGAAAGTTGGGATCAAGAA 3′-RACE扩增
NAC-2 CAGGAAGACCGGAAGTTCAA 3′-RACE amplification
NAC-3 TTGAACTTCCGGTCTTCCTG 5′-RACE扩增
NAC-4 ATTCGCCCTGCTAGGAAGAT 5′-RACE amplification
NAC-F ATGGGTGTGAAAGATATGGACC ORF、DNA序列扩增
NAC-R TTACTGCCTGAACGCTAAGCTAC ORF and DNA sequence amplification
NAC-QF TCTTCAACAAGACGACAAGTCAAG RT-qPCR检测
NAC-QR AGGAAAACTCAATGCCATTG RT-qPCR detection
Actin-F AGCAGCATGAAGATTAAGGTTGTAGCAC 甘薯内参基因检测
Actin-R TGGAAAATTAGAAGCACTTCCTGTGAAC Sweet potato internal control
NAC-OE-F (Xba I) GCTCTAGAATGGGTGTGAAAGATATGGACC 过表达载体构建
NAC-OE-R (Sac I) CGAGCTCTTACTGCCTGAACGCTAAGCTAC Construction of overexpression vector

图1

IbNAC72基因的序列分析 A: 不同物种中NAC72同源蛋白序列的多重比较; 红色线标注为a~e 5个亚结构域。B: 不同物种中NAC72蛋白序列的同源进化树分析。C: IbNAC72与拟南芥AtNAC72的基因组结构比较; 方框表示外显子, 直线表示内含子。"

图2

IbNAC72基因的表达分析 A: IbNAC72基因在栗子香试管苗不同组织中的表达分析; B: IbNAC72基因在栗子香大田植株不同组织中的表达分析; C: IbNAC72基因在100 mmol L-1 NaCl胁迫处理下的表达分析; D: IbNAC72基因在20% PEG-6000胁迫处理下的表达分析。数据表示为平均值 ± SD (n = 3)。采用单因素方差分析法对数据进行统计分析, 柱上不同的小写字母代表柱值在0.05水平差异显著。"

图3

IbNAC72基因过表达载体的构建与鉴定 A: IbNAC72基因ORF的PCR扩增; B: 过表达载体pC3301- 121-IbNAC72的酶切鉴定。"

图4

IbNAC72转基因烟草植株的获得及鉴定 A~D: IbNAC72基因转化烟草的转化、筛选和再生过程; E~I: 转基因烟草植株叶片、茎段和根系的GUS染色呈阳性, WT呈阴性; H: IbNAC72转基因烟草植株的PCR分析; I: 转基因烟草植株IbNAC72基因的表达分析。M: DL2000 marker; W: 水作为阴性对照; P: 质粒pCAMBIA3301-121-IbNAC72作为阳性对照; C: WT作为阴性对照; WT: 野生型烟草植株; T1~T3: 过表达IbNAC72烟草株系。数据表示为平均值 ± SD (n = 3)。** 表示用Student’s t-test在0.01水平差异显著。"

图5

IbNAC72基因的过表达提高了转基因烟草植株的抗旱性 A: 干旱胁迫4周后, 转基因烟草和野生型烟草植株的生长状态比较; B: 干旱胁迫4周后, 转基因烟草和野生型烟草植株株高的比较分析; C: 干旱胁迫4周后, 转基因烟草和野生型烟草植株根系的生长状态比较; D: 干旱胁迫4周后, 转基因烟草和野生型烟草植株根系鲜重的比较分析。数据表示为平均值 ± SD (n = 3)。** 表示用Student’s t-test在0.01水平差异显著。缩写同图4。"

图6

干旱胁迫对转基因植株中SOD活性和MDA积累量的影响 A: 干旱胁迫4周后, 转基因烟草和野生型烟草植株的超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)活性; B: 干旱胁迫4周后, 转基因烟草和野生型烟草植株的丙二醛(MDA)含量。数据表示为means ± SD (n = 3)。** 表示用Student’s t-test在0.01水平差异显著。缩写同图4。"

[1] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). http://www.fao.org/statistics/en/, 2020.5.
[2] 王莺, 赵文, 张强. 中国北方地区农业干旱脆弱性评价. 中国沙漠, 2019, (4):150-158.
Wang Y, Zhao W, Zhang Q. Evaluation of agricultural drought vulnerability in Northern China. J Desert Res, 2019, (4):150-158 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3] 贾敬敦, 张富. 依靠科技创新推进我国盐碱地资源可持续利用. 中国农业科技导报, 2014,16(5):1-7.
Jia J D, Zhang F. Sustainable utilization of saline-alkali land resources through scientific and technological innovation in China. J Agric Sci Technol, 2014,16(5):1-7 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] 胡兴旺, 金杭霞, 朱丹华. 植物抗旱耐盐机理的研究进展. 中国农学通报, 2015,31(24):137-142.
Hu X W, Jin H X, Zhu D H. Research progress of drought and salt resistant mechanism of plant. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2015,31(24):137-142 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[5] Duan M, Zhang R, Zhu F, Zhang Z, Gou L, Wen J, Dong J, Wang T. A lipid-anchored NAC transcription factor is translocated into the nucleus and activatesGlyoxalase I expression during drought stress. Plant Cell, 2017,29:1748-1772.
pmid: 28684428
[6] Elena B, Annamaria G, Eleonora C. Plant MYB transcription factors: their role in drought response mechanisms. Int J Mol Sci, 2015,16:15811-15851.
doi: 10.3390/ijms160715811 pmid: 26184177
[7] Eckardt N A. DREB duo defines distinct drought and cold response pathways. Plant Cell, 2019,6:1196-1197.
[8] Chen J, Nolan T M, Ye H, Zhang M, Tong H, Xin P, Chu J, Chu C, Li Z, Yin Y. Arabidopsis WRKY46, WRKY54, and WRKY70 transcription factors are involved in brassinosteroid-regulated plant growth and drought responses. Plant Cell, 2017,29:1425-1439.
pmid: 28576847
[9] Zhang H, Gao X, Zhi Y, Li X, Zhang Q, Niu J, Wang J, Zhai H, Zhao N, Li J, Liu Q, He S. A non-tandem CCCH-type zinc finger protein, IbC3H18, functions as a nuclear transcriptional activator and enhances abiotic stress tolerance in sweet potato. New Phytol, 2019,223:1918-1936.
pmid: 31091337
[10] 王芳, 孙立娇, 赵晓宇, 王婕婉, 宋兴舜. 植物NAC转录因子的研究进展. 生物技术通报, 2019,35(4):88-93.
Wang F, Sun L J, Zhao X Y, Wang J W, Song X S. Research progresses on plant NAC transcription factors. Biotechnol Bull, 2019,35(4):88-93 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[11] Nakashima K, Tran L, Van Nguyen D, Fujita M, Maruyama K, Todaka D, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Functional analysis of a NAC-type transcription factor OsNAC6 involved in abiotic and biotic stress-responsive gene expression in rice. Plant J, 2007,51:617-630.
pmid: 17587305
[12] Zheng X, Chen B, Lu G, Han B. Overexpression of a NAC transcription factor enhances rice drought and salt tolerance. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2009,379:985-989.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.12.163 pmid: 19135985
[13] Hu H, Dai M, Yao J, Xiao B, Li X, Zhang Q, Xiong L. Overexpressing a NAM, ATAF, and CUC (NAC) transcription factor enhances drought resistance and salt tolerance in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2006,103:12987-12992.
pmid: 16924117
[14] Yuan X, Wang H, Cai J, Bi Y, Song F. Rice NAC transcription factor ONAC066 functions as a positive regulator of drought and oxidative stress response. BMC Plant Biol, 2019,19:278-284.
doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1883-y pmid: 31238869
[15] Fujita M, Fujita Y, Maruyama K, Seki M, Hiratsu K, Ohme- Takagi M, Shinozaki K. A dehydration-induced NAC protein, RD26, is involved in a novel ABA-dependent stress-signaling pathway. Plant J, 2004,39:863-876.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02171.x pmid: 15341629
[16] Lu M, Zhang D, Shi Y, Song Y, Li Y, Wang T. Overexpression of a stress induced maize NAC transcription factor gene, ZmSNAC1, improved drought and salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. Acta Agron Sin, 2013,39:2177-2182.
[17] Xu Z, Kim S, Hyeon D, Kim D, Dong T, Park Y, Jin J, Joo S, Kim S, Hong J, Hwang D, Hwang I. The Arabidopsis NAC transcription factor ANAC096 cooperates with bZIP-type transcription factors in dehydration and osmotic stress responses. Plant Cell, 2013,25:4708-4724.
pmid: 24285786
[18] Sakuraba Y, Kim Y, Han S, Lee B, Paek N. The Arabidopsis transcription factor NAC016 promotes drought stress responses by repressing AREB1 transcription through a trifurcate feed- forward regulatory loop involving NAP. Plant Cell, 2015,27:1771-1787.
pmid: 26059204
[19] Thirumalaikumar V, Devkar V, Mehterov N, Ali S, Ozgur R, Turkan I, Mueller-Roeber B, Balazadeh S. NAC transcription factor JUNGBRUNNEN 1 enhances drought tolerance in tomato. Plant Biotechnol J, 2018,16:354-366.
doi: 10.1111/pbi.12776 pmid: 28640975
[20] Al Abdallat A, Ayad J, Elenein J, Al Ajlouni Z, Harwood W. Overexpression of the transcription factor HvSNAC1 improves drought tolerance in barley(Hordeum vulgare L.). Mol Breed, 2014,33:401-414.
[21] Wang B, Zhai H, He S, Zhang H, Ren Z, Zhang D, Liu Q. A vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter gene, IbNHX2, enhances salt and drought tolerance in transgenic sweetpotato. Sci Hortic, 2016,201:153-166.
[22] Zhai H, Wang F, Si Z, Huo J, Xing L, An Y, He S, Liu Q. A myo-inositol-1-phosphate synthase gene, IbMIPS1, enhances salt and drought tolerance and stem nematode resistance in transgenic sweet potato. Plant Biotechnol J, 2016,14:592-602.
pmid: 26011089
[23] Kang C, Zhai H, Xue L, Zhao N, He S, Liu Q. A lycopene β-cyclase gene, IbLCYB2, enhances carotenoid contents and abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic sweetpotato. Plant Sci, 2018,272:243-254.
doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.05.005 pmid: 29807598
[24] Zhu H, Zhou Y, Zhai H, He S, Zhao N, Liu Q. Transcriptome profiling reveals insights into the molecular mechanism of drought tolerance in sweetpotato. J Integr Agric, 2019,18:9-23.
[25] 王关林, 方宏筠. 植物基因工程(第2版). 北京: 科学出版社, 2002. pp 344-362.
Wang G L, Fang H J. Plant Genetic Engineering, 2nd edn. Beijing: Science Press, 2002. pp 344-362(in Chinese).
[26] Jefferson R A, Kavanagh T A, Bevan M W. GUS fusions: beta-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J, 1987,6:3901.
pmid: 3327686
[27] 李伟, 韩蕾, 钱永强, 孙振元. 植物NAC转录因子的种类、特征及功能. 应用与环境生物学报, 2011,17:596-606.
Li W, Han L, Qian Y Q, Sun Z Y. Characteristics and functions of NAC transcription factors in plants. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2011,17:596-606 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28] Li X, Li X, Li M, Yan Y, Liu X, Li L. Dual function of NAC072 in ABF3-mediated ABA-responsive gene regulation in Arabidopsis. Front Plant Sci, 2016,7:1075.
pmid: 27486475
[29] Guan H, Liu X, Niu F, Zhao Q, Fan N, Cao D, Fu Y. OoNAC72, a NAC-type Oxytropis ochrocephala transcription factor, conferring enhanced drought and salt stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. Front Plant Sci, 2019,10:890.
pmid: 31354764
[30] Wu H, Fu B, Sun P, Xiao C, Liu J. A NAC transcription factor represses putrescine biosynthesis and affects drought tolerance. Plant Physiol, 2016,172:1532-1547.
pmid: 27663409
[31] Mao H, Li S, Wang Z, Cheng X, Li F, Mei F, Chen N, Kang Z. Regulatory changes in TaSNAC8 are associated with drought tolerance in wheat seedlings. Plant Biotechnol J, 2019,10:1-15.
[32] Chen D, Chai S, Mcintyre C L, Xue G P. Overexpression of a predominantly root-expressed NAC transcription factor in wheat roots enhances root length, biomass and drought tolerance. Plant Cell Rep, 2017,37:225-237.
pmid: 29079898
[33] 王建华, 刘鸿先, 徐同. 超氧物歧化酶(SOD)在植物逆境和衰老生理中的作用. 植物生理通讯, 1989, (1):1-7.
Wang J H, Liu H X, Xu T. The role of superoxide dismutase (SOD) in stress physiology and senescence physiology of plant. Plant Physiol Commun, 1989, (1):1-7 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[34] Zhang H, Zhang Q, Zhai H, Gao S, Yang L, Wang Z, Xu Y, Huo J, Ren Z, Zhao N, Wang X, Li J, Liu Q, He S. IbBBX24 promotes the jasmonic acid pathway and enhances fusarium wilt resistance in sweet potato. Plant Cell, 2020,32:1102-1123.
pmid: 32034034
[1] 王文辕, 燕雪嘉, 刘玉霖, 孙晓彤, 李亚楠, 唐鑫华, 石瑛. 耐弱光马铃薯品种筛选及转录因子编码基因StPIF3的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1631-1645.
[2] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[3] 蒋嘉卉, 江炳志, 刘冠明, 王章英, 唐朝臣. 紫肉甘薯品质性状的近红外光谱预测模型构建与优化[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1088-1102.
[4] 王懿涵, 李富昌, 刘意, 朱国鹏. 甘薯IbOPR2基因启动子克隆及调控因子的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1268-1276.
[5] 汪玲, 胡好, 宋家凤, 程洁蓝, 陈颖, 郑婷婷, 吕钊彦, 朱晓彪, 侯华兰. 马铃薯UDP-糖基转移酶基因StUGT52的克隆及功能验证[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 665-676.
[6] 于永超, 刘明, 靳容, 赵鹏, 张强强, 王静, 朱晓亚, 唐忠厚. 甘薯高氮徒长的生理机制和转录组分析研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 813-824.
[7] 杨璇, 李健康, 何婉洁, 李友军, 程相涵, 侯文邦. 硒肥对甘薯鲜切后褐变的影响及其机理解析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 578-589.
[8] 朱金娟, 王慧萍, 杨国栋, 王宇诚, 杨晨, 王斌, Agustiani Nurwulan, 涂军明, 毕俊国, 崔克辉, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 水分管理和品种类型对再生稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 295-315.
[9] 王雅致, 杨飚, 季香林, 石瑛, 张丽莉. 二倍体马铃薯抗旱资源鉴定及抗旱基因初步筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 72-84.
[10] 李云香, 郭千纤, 侯万伟, 张小娟. 引进ICARDA小麦苗期根系抗旱性状的全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2387-2398.
[11] 胡润慧, 汪军成, 司二静, 张宏, 李兴茂, 马小乐, 孟亚雄, 王化俊, 刘青, 姚立蓉, 李葆春. 小麦苗期耐旱耐盐种质筛选及抗旱耐盐综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2371-2386.
[12] 张海燕, 解备涛, 董顺旭, 张立明, 段文学. 滴灌条件下不同水溶肥种类和配比对鲜食甘薯产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2485-2500.
[13] 尹雨萌, 王雁楠, 康志河, 乔守晨, 卞倩倩, 李亚蔚, 曹郭郑, 赵国瑞, 徐丹丹, 杨育峰. 甘薯谷胱甘肽S-转移酶基因IbGSTU7的克隆及功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1736-1746.
[14] 金欣欣, 宋亚辉, 苏俏, 杨永庆, 李玉荣, 王瑾. 冀花系列高油酸花生抗旱性鉴定与综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 797-811.
[15] 阳新月, 肖人滈, 张林茜, 唐铭均, 孙光燕, 杜康, 吕长文, 唐道彬, 王季春. 不同生育期涝渍对甘薯抗逆生理特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 744-754.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2