欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (4): 952-961.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.12007

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应

王吕1(), 崔月贞1, 吴玉红1, 郝兴顺1,*(), 张春辉1, 王俊义1, 刘怡欣2, 李小刚1, 秦宇航1   

  1. 1汉中市农业科学研究所, 陕西汉中 723000
    2云南大学数学与统计学, 云南昆明 650000
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-04 接受日期:2021-07-12 出版日期:2022-04-12 网络出版日期:2021-08-06
  • 通讯作者: 郝兴顺
  • 作者简介:E-mail: wanglv060693@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省农业协同创新与推广联盟(LM202001);陕西省重点研发计划项目资助(2019ZDLNY01-05-01)

Effects of rice stalks mulching combined with green manure (Astragalus smicus L.) incorporated into soil and reducing nitrogen fertilizer rate on rice yield and soil fertility

WANG Lyu1(), CUI Yue-Zhen1, WU Yu-Hong1, HAO Xing-Shun1,*(), ZHANG Chun-Hui1, WANG Jun-Yi1, LIU Yi-Xin2, LI Xiao-Gang1, QIN Yu-Hang1   

  1. 1Hanzhong Agricultural Research Institute, Hanzhong 723000, Shaanxi, China
    2School of Mathematics and Statistics, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650000, Yunnan, China
  • Received:2021-02-04 Accepted:2021-07-12 Published:2022-04-12 Published online:2021-08-06
  • Contact: HAO Xing-Shun
  • Supported by:
    Shaanxi Agricultural Collaborative Innovation and Extension Alliance(LM202001);Shaanxi Provincial Key Research and Devel-opment Program(2019ZDLNY01-05-01)

RichHTML

26

PDF

267

摘要：

稻田绿肥秸秆协同还田是稻田培肥地力的有效措施, 本文基于2年田间试验研究了绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量对水稻产量、产量构成要素及土壤养分含量的影响。试验于2018—2020年在陕西省汉中市汉台区进行, 设置5个处理: (1) 冬闲+水稻秸秆不还田+不施肥(CK); (2) 冬闲+水稻秸秆不还田+常规施氮(NPK); (3) 冬种紫云英+水稻秸秆还田+常规施氮(GRN1); (4) 冬种紫云英+水稻秸秆还田+减氮20% (GRN2); (5) 冬种紫云英+水稻秸秆还田+减氮30% (GRN3)。结果表明: 水稻产量方面, 年际间差异较大, 2019年度GRN1处理‘荃香优1521’产量最高为10,047 kg hm-2, 显著高于NPK处理, 增幅为6.7%; 其次为GRN2和GRN3, 但与NPK差异不显著; 2020年度GRN2和GRN3处理‘黄华占’产量较NPK处理显著增加, 增幅分别为6.6%和5.8%。绿肥稻秆协同还田处理均可以显著提高水稻产量, 较CK和NPK增幅分别为67.9%~83.0%和2.8%~6.7%。土壤养分方面, 紫云英稻秆协同还田提高了耕层0~20 cm土壤有机碳和速效磷, GRN2处理较NPK处理分别提高了6.8%~13.2%和9.9%~12.6%。相关分析表明, 水稻株高、单株鲜重、根茬鲜重、每穗实粒数及千粒重与水稻产量呈显著正相关, 与NPK相比, 2年GRN2处理可以显著提高水稻有效穗13.0%~29.3%, 每穗实粒数4.5%~14.3%; GRN2处理可以显著提高水稻株高10.4%, 单株鲜重23.6%, 根茬鲜重30.0%。紫云英-水稻轮作条件下, 绿肥稻秆协同还田同时氮肥减量20%, 提高了水稻产量性状及农艺性状, 增强了土壤汇碳功能, 增加了土壤养分, 从而有利于维持水稻稳产高产, 是适宜汉中地区的水稻绿色种植模式。

关键词: 紫云英-水稻轮作, 秸秆还田, 水稻产量, 产量构成因素, 土壤养分

Abstract:

Planting green manure and straw retention is an effective measure to improve soil fertility. Two-year field experiment were conducted to assess the effects of reduced nitrogen rate under the rice straw mulching combined with planting green manure (Astragalus sinicus L.) at full bloom stage on rice yield, yield components, and soil nutrient availability in Hantai district, Hanzhong city, Shaanxi province from 2018 to 2020. Five treatments were assigned: (1) CK, winter fallow, no straw mulching, no fertilization; (2) NPK, winter fallow, no straw mulching, conventional nitrogen fertilizer rate; (3) GRN1, planting green manure in winter, rice straw mulching with conventional N fertilizer rate; (4) GRN2, planting green manure in winter, rice straw mulching with 80% conventional N rate; (5) GRN3, green manure planting in winter, rice straw mulching with 70% conventional N rate. The results showed that: (I) rice yield (Quanxiangyou 1521) of GRN1 was 10,047 kg hm-2, which was higher 6.7% than that of NPK, and GRN2 and GRN3 had marginal effects in 2019. Moreover, the yield (Huanghuazhan) of GRN2 and GRN3 were significantly higher than that of NPK by 6.6% and 5.8% in 2020, respectively. Compared with CK and NPK, the rice straw mulching combined with planting green manure significantly enhanced the rice yield by 67.9%-83.0% and 2.8%-6.7%, respectively. (II) Planting green manure combined with rice straw mulching increased soil organic carbon content and available P content in 0-20 soil layer. Compared with NPK treatment, soil organic carbon and available P content of GRN2 increased 6.8%-13.2% and 9.9%-12.6%, respectively. Correlation analysis indicated that rice yield was significantly correlated with plant height, fresh weight per plant, fresh root stubble weight, filled grain number per panicle, and 1000-grain weight. Compared with NPK, GRN2 significantly increased effective panicle, effective grain number per panicle by 13.0%-29.3% and 4.5%-14.3%, respectively. Meanwhile, GRN2 significantly increased plant height, fresh weight per plant, and root fresh weight by 10.4%, 23.6%, and 30.0%, respectively. In conclusion, rice stalks mulching combined planting green manure with 20% reduced nitrogen rate can improve rice yield and agronomic performance, enlarge soil carbon sequestration capacity, and increase soil nutrients availability, which is a green rice cultural practice adapted to Hanzhong area.

Key words: Chinese milk vetch-rice rotation system, rice straw returning, rice yield, yield components, soil nutrient

图1

不同处理水稻产量的变化 CK: 冬闲+水稻秸秆不还田+不施肥; NPK: 冬闲+水稻秸秆不还田+常规施氮; GRN1: 冬种紫云英+水稻秸秆还田+常规施氮; GRN2: 冬种紫云英+水稻秸秆还田+减氮20%; GRN3: 冬种紫云英+水稻秸秆还田+减氮30%。不同字母表示在 0.05 水平上差异显著。"

表2

不同处理对土壤养分的影响"

年度
Season		 处理
Treatment		 pH 碱解氮
Alkali-resolving N (mg kg-1)		 速效磷
Available P
(mg kg-1)		 速效钾
Available K
(mg kg-1)		 土壤有机碳
TOC
(g kg-1)
2018-2019 CK 6.18±0.04 a 57.67±5.43 c 7.80±0.40 c 68.97±1.80 b 6.55±0.27 c
NPK 6.15±0.13 a 79.92±3.71 b 8.60±0.25 b 71.92±0.62 ab 7.37±0.86 b
GRN1 6.08±0.11 a 84.58±0.88 b 9.01±0.21 b 73.39±6.08 a 8.23±0.59 a
GRN2 6.07±0.09 a 95.08±2.67 a 11.42±0.62 a 75.82±3.62 a 8.34±0.53 a
GRN3 6.18±0.16 a 94.50±6.48 a 8.86±0.63 b 72.41±3.11 ab 7.71±0.78 ab
2019-2020 CK 6.31±0.02 ab 19.61±0.22 c 14.59±0.83 c 76.24±1.94 c 8.82±0.31 c
NPK 6.32±0.02 a 21.56±0.43 b 15.20±0.50 bc 76.37±1.54 c 9.14±0.11 bc
GRN1 6.23±0.05 c 21.97±0.09 ab 16.21±0.71 ab 81.66±1.39 b 9.24±0.31 bc
GRN2 6.26±0.04 bc 22.37±0.51 a 16.64±0.77 a 85.84±1.36 a 9.76±0.27 a
GRN3 6.34±0.01 a 22.25±0.21 a 15.94±0.69 ab 84.82±1.60 a 9.49±0.19 ab
方差分析ANOVA
年度Season (S) * — ** * *
氮肥Nitrogen (N) NS — ** ** **
年度×氮肥 S×N NS — ** ** NS

图2

水稻产量要素相关性分析 RY: 水稻产量; EP: 有效穗; FGPP: 每穗实粒数; KGW: 千粒重。"

表1

不同处理对水稻产量构成因素的影响"

年度
Season		 处理
Treatment		 有效穗
Effective panicle
(×104 hm-2)		 每穗实粒数
Filled grain number per panicle		 千粒重
1000-grain weight
(g)		 结实率
Seed setting rate
(%)
2018-2019 CK 150.15±2.50 c 120.11±1.45 c 30.60±0.18 b 93.34±1.06 a
NPK 254.80±2.95 b 137.96±0.93 b 31.00±0.56 ab 92.53±2.68 a
GRN1 280.80±6.35 a 153.36±6.08 a 31.54±0.56 a 91.76±2.31 a
GRN2 287.95±5.00 a 157.77±4.34 a 31.92±0.66 a 91.85±0.11 a
GRN3 279.82±5.85 a 136.86±7.13 b 31.68±0.44 a 90.86±0.21 a
2019-2020 CK 122.85±5.84 d 133.92±1.56 c 20.69±0.43 c 96.07±0.14 a
NPK 222.41±5.74 c 141.29±1.12 b 21.51±0.41 b 95.83±0.45 ab
GRN1 264.98±5.82 b 146.14±0.80 ab 22.12±0.63 ab 94.88±0.26 ab
GRN2 287.62±3.47 a 147.71±3.17 a 22.93±0.45 a 94.84±0.46 b
GRN3 259.35±7.95 b 143.24±1.02 ab 22.52±0.21 a 95.41±0.26 ab
方差分析ANOVA
年度Season (S) * NS ** *
氮肥Nitrogen (N) ** ** ** NS
年度×氮肥 S×N ** ** NS NS

图3

土壤养分含量相关性分析 RY: 水稻产量; AN: 碱解氮; MN: 矿质氮; AK: 速效钾; AP: 速效磷; TOC: 土壤有机碳。"

表3

不同处理对2019年水稻农艺性状的影响"

处理
Treatment		 株高
Plant height
(cm)		 单株鲜重
Plant fresh weight
(g)		 根茬鲜重
Root fresh weight
(g)		 根长
Root length
(cm)		 地上/地下部分
Aboveground/ underground		 草谷比
Straw/grain
CK 112.30±0.90 c 106.97±0.77 c 52.93±1.59 c 20.45±0.35 bc 1.02±0.07 ab 2.00±0.09 a
NPK 119.55±0.25 b 220.84±10.40 b 96.90±0.71 b 23.30±0.50 a 1.19±0.12 ab 2.15±0.26 a
GRN1 126.21±3.60 a 209.21±15.86 b 108.90±7.56 ab 17.95±1.15 c 0.92±0.01 b 1.94±0.01 a
GRN2 132.01±1.60 a 281.87±16.07 a 125.97±7.58 a 22.75±1.05 ab 1.25±0.01 a 2.04±0.06 a
GRN3 129.31±0.10 a 230.57±11.80 b 102.37±2.26 b 19.85±0.45 c 1.24±0.13 ab 1.97±0.01 a

图4

2019年水稻农艺性状相关性分析 RY: 水稻产量; PH: 株高; PFW: 单株鲜重; RFW: 根茬鲜重; RL: 根长; A/U: 地上部分/地下部分; S/G: 草谷比。"

[1] FAOSTAT. Rome, 2019. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. .
[2] IFA. Data of Fertilizer Consumption International Fertilizer Industry Association.France, 2019. http://ifadata.fertilizer.org/ucSearch.aspx.
[3] 张璐, 黄晶, 高菊生, 曹卫东, 高鹏, 杨志长. 长期绿肥与氮肥减量配施对水稻产量和土壤养分含量的影响. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(5):106-112.
Zhang L, Huang J, Gao J S, Cao W D, Gao P, Yang Z C. Effects of long-term green manure and reducing nitrogen applications on rice yield and soil nutrient content. Trans CSAE, 2020, 36(5):106-112 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] 高菊生, 徐明岗, 董春华, 黄晶, 曹卫东, 曾希柏, 文石林, 聂军. 长期稻-稻-绿肥轮作对水稻产量及土壤肥力的影响. 作物学报, 2013, 39:343-349.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.00343
Gao J S, Xu M G, Dong C H, Huang J, Cao W D, Zeng X B, Wen S L, Nie J. Effects of long-term rice-rice-green manure cropping rotation on rice yield and soil fertility. Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39:343-349 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[5] 曹卫东, 包兴国, 徐昌旭, 聂军, 高亚军, 耿明建. 中国绿肥科研60年回顾与未来展望. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23:1450-1461.
Cao W D, Bao X G, Xu C X, Nie J, Gao Y J, Geng M J. Reviews and prospects on science and technology of green manure in China. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2017, 23:1450-1461 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[6] 马艳芹, 钱晨晨, 邓丽萍, 黄国勤. 紫云英配施氮肥对双季稻产量、干物质量及氮素吸收利用的影响. 核农学报, 2017, 31:2399-2407.
Ma Y Q, Qian C C, Deng L P, Huang G Q. Effects of combining Chinese milk vetch with nitrogen fertilizer on grain and dry matter yield, nitrogen absorption and utilization of double-cropping rice. J Nucl Agric Sci, 2017, 31:2399-2407 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7] Lou Y L, Xu M G, Wang W, Sun X L, Zhao K. Return rate of straw residue affects soil organic C sequestration by chemical fertilization. Soil Tillage Res, 2011, 113:70-73.
doi: 10.1016/j.still.2011.01.007
[8] Yang L, Zhou X, Liao Y L, Lu Y H, Nie J, Cao W D. Co-incorporation of rice straw and green manure benefits rice yield and nutrient uptake. Crop Sci, 2019, 59:749-759.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2018.07.0427
[9] Zhou X, Li Z M, Xie J, Liao Y L, Yang Z P, Lu Y H, Nie J, Cao W D. Effect of reducing chemical fertilizer on rice yield, output value, content of soil carbon and nitrogen after utilizing the milk vetch. Agric Sci Technol, 2015, 16:266-271.
[10] 万水霞, 唐杉, 蒋光月, 李帆, 郭熙盛, 王允青, 曹卫东. 紫云英与化肥配施对土壤微生物特征和作物产量的影响. 草业学报, 2016, 25(6):109-117.
Wan S X, Tang S, Jiang G Y, Li F, Guo X S, Wang Y X, Cao W D. Effects of Chinese milk vetch manure and yield of rice. Acta Pratac Sin, 2016, 25(6):109-117 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[11] 石祖梁, 贾涛, 王亚静, 王久臣, 孙仁华, 王飞, 李想, 毕于运. 我国农作物秸秆综合利用现状及焚烧碳排放估算. 中国农业资源与区划, 2017, 38(9):32-37.
Shi Z L, Jia T, Wang Y J, Wang J C, Sun R H, Wang F, Li X, Bi Y Y. Comprehensive utilization status of crop straw and estimation of carbon from burning in China. Chin J Agric Res Reg Plan, 2017, 38(9):32-37 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12] 石祖梁, 刘璐璐, 王飞, 李想, 常志州. 我国农作物秸秆综合利用发展模式及政策建议. 中国农业科技导报, 2016, 18(6):16-22.
Shi Z L, Liu L L, Wang F, Li X, Chang Z Z. Development model and policy proposal for comprehensive utilization of crop straw in China. J Agric Sci Technol, 2016, 18(6):16-22 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] 曾宪楠, 高斯倜, 冯延江, 孙羽, 宋秋来, 王麒. 水稻秸秆还田对土壤培肥及水稻产量的影响研究进展. 江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(18):13-16.
Zeng X N, Gao S T, Feng Y J, Sun Y, Song Q L, Wang Q. Research progress on the effect of returning rice straw into the field on soil fertility and rice yield. J Jiangsu Agric Sci, 2018, 46(18):13-16 (in Chinese).
[14] 王保君, 程旺大, 陈贵, 沈亚强, 张红梅. 秸秆还田配合氮肥减量对稻田土壤养分、碳库及水稻产量的影响. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31:624-630.
Wang B J, Cheng W D, Chen G, Shen Y Q, Zhang H M. Effect of straw returning and nitrogen reduction on soil nutrition, carbon pool and rice yield in rice field. Acta Agric Zhejiangensis, 2019, 31:624-630 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15] 吕玉虎, 郭晓彦, 李本银, 刘春增, 张丽霞, 曹卫东, 潘兹亮. 翻压不同量紫云英配施减量化肥对土壤肥力和水稻产量的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2017, (5):94-98.
Lyu Y H, Guo X Y, Li B Y, Liu C Z, Zhang L X, Cao W D, Pan Z L. Effects of the incorporation of various amounts of Chinese milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus L.) and reducing chemical fertilizer on soil fertility and rice yield. Chin Soil Fert Sci, 2017, (5):94-98 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[16] 陈静蕊, 秦文婧, 王少先, 夏文建, 刘光荣, 曹卫东, 吕伟, 徐昌旭, 刘佳. 化肥减量配合紫云英还田对双季稻产量及氮肥利用率的影响. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(6):282-289.
Chen J R, Qin W J, Wang S X, Xia W J, Liu G R, Cao W D, Lyu W, Xu C X, Liu J. Effects of reduced chemical fertilizer combined with Chinese milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus L.) incorporation on rice yield a nitrogen use efficiency in double- rice cropping system. J Soil Water Conserv, 2019, 33(6):282-289 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17] 张娟琴, 郑宪清, 张翰林, 吕卫光, 李双喜. 长期秸秆还田与氮肥调控对稻田土壤质量及产量的影响. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(1):181-187.
Zhang J Q, Zheng X Q, Zhang H L, Lyu W G, Li S X. Effects of long-term straw returning and nitrogen fertilizer regulation on soil quality and yields of rice field. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 2019, 34(1):181-187 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[18] 周兴, 廖育林, 鲁艳红, 谢坚, 杨曾平, 聂军, 曹卫东. 肥料减施条件下水稻土壤有机碳组分对紫云英-稻草协同利用的响应. 水土保持学报, 2017, 31(3):283-290.
Zhou X, Liao Y L, Lu Y H, Xie J, Yang Z P, Nie J, Cao W D. Responses of contents of soil organic carbon fractions to Chinese milk vetch-rice straw synergistic dispatching under the condition of reducing fertilizer application. J Soil Water Conserv, 2017, 31(3):283-290 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[19] 周兴, 廖育林, 鲁艳红, 王宇, 聂军, 曹卫东. 减量施肥下紫云英与稻草协同利用对双季稻产量和经济效益的影响. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 43:469-474.
Zhou X, Liao Y L, Lu Y H, Wang Y, Nie J, Cao W D. Effects of Chinese milk vetch and rice straw synergistic dispatching on grain yield and economic benefit of double cropping rice system under fertilizer reduction. J Hunan Agric Univ (Nat Sci Edn), 2017, 43:469-474 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20] 艾可根. 施用秸秆和紫云英对水稻产量和土壤肥力影响. 农技服务, 2014, 31(6):145-145.
Ai K G. Effects of application of rice straw and Chinese milk vetch on rice yield and soil fertility. J Agric Technol Serv, 2014, 31(6):145-145 (in Chinese).
[21] 刘颖颖, 卜容燕, 唐杉, 韩上, 王慧, 李敏, 程文龙, 李晓韦, 武际, 朱林. 连续秸秆-紫云英协同还田对双季稻产量、养分积累及土壤肥力的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26:1008-1016.
Liu Y Y, Bu R Y, Tang S, Han S, Wang H, Li M, Cheng W L, Li X W, Wu J, Zhu L. Effect of continuous straw-Chinese milk vetch synergistic return to the field on yield, nutrient accumulation and soil fertility of double cropping rice. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2020, 26:1008-1016 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[22] Wang G H, Dobermann A, Witt C, Sun Q Z, Fu R X. Performance of site-specific nutrient management for irrigated rice in southeast China. J Agron, 2001, 93:869-878.
doi: 10.2134/agronj2001.934869x
[23] 刘天学, 纪秀娥. 焚烧秸杆对土壤有机质和微生物的影响研究. 土壤, 2003, 35:347-348.
Liu T X, Ji X E. Effects of crop straw burning on soil organic matter and soil microbes. Soils, 2003, 35:347-348 (in Chinese).
[24] 李奥. 不同施肥模式稻米产量、品质及水稻生产碳足迹的研究. 沈阳农业大学硕士学位论文,辽宁沈阳, 2019.
Li A. Study on Rice Yield, Quality and Rice Production Carbon Footprint in Different Fertilization Treatments. MS Thesis of Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, Liaoning,China, 2019 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[25] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析(第3版). 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. pp 14-38.
Bao S D. Soil Agrochemical Analysis,3rd edn. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000. pp 14-38(in Chinese).
[26] 张英利, 许安民, 尚浩博, 马爱生. AA3型连续流动分析仪测定土壤和植物全氮的方法研究. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 34(10):128-132.
Zhang Y L, Xu A M, Shang H B, Ma A S. Determination study of total nitrogen in soil and plant by continuous flow analytical system. J Northwest Agirc For Univ (Nat Sci Edn), 2006, 34(10):128-132 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[27] 廖育林, 周兴, 鲁艳红, 方宝华, 刘洋, 聂军. 双季稻产量和肥料效益对减量施肥下紫云英与稻草协同利用的响应. 湖南农业科学, 2017, (12):52-56.
Liao Y L, Zhou X, Lu Y H, Fang B H, Liu Y, Nie J. Yield and Fertilizer Efficiency of double cropping riceinresponse to synergistic use of Chinese milk vetch and rice straw under reduced fertilizer application. Hunan Agric Sci, 2017, (12):52-56 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28] 高菊生, 黄晶, 杨志长, 曹卫东, 张会民, 高鹏, 高学成. 绿肥和稻草联合还田提高土壤有机质含量并稳定氮素供应. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26:472-480.
Gao J S, Huang J, Yang Z C, Cao W D, Zhang H M, Gao P, Gao X C. Improving organic matter content and nitrogen supply stability of double cropping rice field through co-incorporation of green manure and rice straw. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2020, 26:472-480 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[29] Lafarge T, Bueno C S. Higher crop performance of rice hybrids than of elite inbreds in the tropics: 2. Does sink regulation, rather than sink size, play a major role? Field Crops Res, 2009, 112:238-244.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.03.007
[30] 高帅, 潘勇辉, 孙玉明, 郭俊杰, 王成孜, 凌宁, 张燕, 郭世伟. 不同供氮水平对常规稻与杂交稻产量及氮素利用效率的影响. 南京农业大学学报, 2018, 41:1061-1069.
Gao S, Pan Y H, Sun Y M, Guo J J, Wang C Z, Ling N, Zhang Y, Guo S W. Effects of different nitrogen supply on yield and nitrogen utilization of conventional rice and hybrid rice. J Nanjing Agric Univ, 2018, 41:1061-1069 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[31] 沈亚强, 程旺大, 张红梅. 绿肥及秸秆还田对水稻生长和产量的影响. 中国稻米, 2011, 17(4):27-29.
Shen Y Q, Cheng W D, Zhang H M. Effects of green manure and straw return on rice growth and yield. J Chin Rice, 2011, 17(4):27-29 (in Chinese).
[32] 赵娜, 赵护兵, 鱼昌为, 曹群虎, 李敏, 曹卫东, 高亚军. 旱地豆科绿肥腐解及养分释放动态研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17:1179-1187.
Zhao N, Zhao H B, Yu C W, Cao Q H, Li M, Cao W D, Gao Y J. Nutrient releases of leguminous green manures in rainfed lands. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2011, 17:1179-1187 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[33] 郭晓彦, 宋晓华, 刘春增, 潘兹亮, 吕玉虎, 张丽霞, 王琴. 紫云英翻压量和化肥用量对水稻生长、产量及经济效益的影响. 山地农业生物学报, 2014, 33(5):7-12.
Guo X Y, Song X H, Liu C Z, Pan Z L, Lyu Y H, Zhang L X, Wang Q. Effects of astragalus sinicus manure application and chemical fertilizer dosage on growth, yield and economic efficiency of rice. J Mount Agric Biol, 2014, 33(5):7-12 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[34] 周国朋, 曹卫东, 白金顺, 聂军, 徐昌旭, 曾闹华, 高嵩涓, 王艳秋, 志水胜好. 多年紫云英-双季稻下不同施肥水平对两类水稻土有机质及可溶性有机质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49:4096-4106.
Zhou G P, Cao W D, Bai J S, Nie J, Xu C X, Zeng N H, Gao S J, Wang Y Q, Ahimizu K. Effects of different fertilization levels on soil organic matter and dissolved organic matter in two paddy soils after multi-years’ rotation of Chinese milk vetch and double-cropping rice. Sci Agric Sin, 2016, 49:4096-4106 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[35] 吕茹洁, 商庆银, 陈乐, 曾勇军, 胡水秀, 杨秀霞. 基于临界氮浓度的水稻氮素营养诊断研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24:1396-1405.
Lyu R J, Shang Q Y, Chen L, Zeng Y J, Hu S X, Yang X X. Study on diagnosis of nitrogen nutrition in rice based on critical nitrogen concentration. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2018, 24:1396-1405 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[36] 卜容燕, 任涛, 廖世鹏, 李小坤, 丛日环, 张洋洋, 鲁剑巍. 不同轮作和氮肥分配季节下土壤氮素供应和油菜氮素吸收差异. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25:412-420.
Bu R Y, Ren T, Liao S P, Li X K, Cong R H, Zhang Y Y, Lu J W. Difference of soil nitrogen supply and rapeseed nitrogen uptake under different rotation systems and seasonal distribution of nitrogen fertilizer. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2019, 25:412-420 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[37] 赵小军, 李志洪, 刘龙, 崔婷婷. 种还分离模式下玉米秸秆还田对土壤磷有效性及其有机磷形态的影响. 水土保持学报, 2017, 31(1):243-247.
Zhao X J, Li Z H, Liu L, Cui T T. Effects of maize straw returning on soil phosphorus availability and organic phosphorus under the mode of planting and returning. J Soil Water Conserv, 2017, 31(1):243-247 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[1] 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[2] 闫宇婷, 宋秋来, 闫超, 刘爽, 张宇辉, 田静芬, 邓钰璇, 马春梅. 连作秸秆还田下玉米氮素积累与氮肥替代效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 962-974.
[3] 刘磊, 廖萍, 邵华, 刘劲松, 杨星莲, 王静, 王海媛, 张俊, 曾勇军, 黄山. 施石灰和秸秆还田对双季稻田土壤钾素表观平衡的互作效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 226-237.
[4] 吴春花, 普雪可, 周永瑾, 勉有明, 苗芳芳, 李荣. 宁南旱区沟垄集雨结合覆盖对土壤水热肥与马铃薯产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(11): 2208-2219.
[5] 吴玉红,郝兴顺,田霄鸿,陈浩,张春辉,崔月贞,秦宇航. 秸秆还田与化肥配施对汉中盆地稻麦轮作农田土壤固碳及经济效益的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(02): 259-268.
[6] 廖萍,刘磊,何宇轩,唐刚,张俊,曾勇军,吴自明,黄山. 施石灰和秸秆还田对双季稻产量和氮素吸收的互作效应[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(01): 84-92.
[7] 李昊昱,孟兆良,庞党伟,陈金,侯永坤,崔海兴,金敏,王振林,李勇. 周年秸秆还田对农田土壤固碳及冬小麦-夏玉米产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(6): 893-903.
[8] 陈玉章,柴守玺,程宏波,柴雨葳,杨长刚,谭凯敏,常磊. 秸秆还田结合秋覆膜对旱地冬小麦耗水特性和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(2): 256-266.
[9] 汤文光，肖小平，张海林，黄桂林，唐海明，李超，刘胜利，汪柯. 轮耕对双季稻田耕层土壤养分库容及Cd含量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(01): 105-114.
[10] 白伟,张立祯,逄焕成,孙占祥,牛世伟,蔡倩,安景文. 秸秆还田配施氮肥对东北春玉米光合性能和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(12): 1845-1855.
[11] 陈金,庞党伟,韩明明,尹燕枰,郑孟静,骆永丽,王振林*,李勇*. 耕作模式对土壤生物活性与养分有效性及冬小麦产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(08): 1245-1253.
[12] 秦都林,王双磊,刘艳慧,聂军军,赵娜,毛丽丽,宋宪亮,孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田对土壤理化性质及棉花产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(07): 1030-1042.
[13] 陈丹梅,袁玲,黄建国,冀建华,侯红乾,刘益仁. 长期施肥对南方典型水稻土养分含量及真菌群落的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(02): 286-295.
[14] 庞党伟,陈金,唐玉海,尹燕枰,杨东清,崔正勇,郑孟静,李勇,王振林. 玉米秸秆还田方式和氮肥处理对土壤理化性质及冬小麦产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(11): 1689-1699.
[15] 谢迎新,靳海洋,李梦达,翟羽雪,王永华,谢耀丽,李向东,夏来坤,王晨阳,郭天财,贺德先. 周年耕作方式对砂姜黑土农田土壤养分及作物产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(10): 1560-1568.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2