[1]傅廷栋. 中国油菜生产和品种改良的现状与前景. 安徽农学通报, 2000, 6(1): 2–8
Fu T D. Chinese rapeseed production and the improvement of the status and prospects. Anhui Agric Sci Bull, 2000, 6(1): 2–8 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]刘祖祺, 张石城. 植物抗性生理学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1994. pp 222–223
Liu Z Q, Zhang S C. Plant Resistance Physiology. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1994. pp 222–223 (in Chinese)
[3]戴清明, 吕爱钦, 何维君, 谢年保, 陈欣, 张志远, 匡朝凌, 瞿科. 洞庭湖区油菜主要气象灾害发生规律与减灾避灾对策. 作物研究, 2006, (1): 60–63
Dai Q M, Lü A Q, He W J, Xie N B, Chen X, Zhang Z Y, Kuang C L, Qu K. Thearising regulation and the decreasing and avoiding strategies of the main meteorological disasters on rapeseed in Dongting lake region. Crop Res, 2006, (1): 60–63 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]Lombard V, Delourme R. A consensus linkage map for rapeseed (Brassica napus L.): construction and integration of three individual maps from DH populations. Theor Appl Genet, 2001, 103: 491–507
[5]Ecke W, Uzunova M, Weissleder K. Mapping the genome of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.): II. Localization of genes controlling erucic acid synthesis and seed oil content. TheorAppl Genet, 1995, 91: 972–977
[6]Thormann C E, Romero J, Mantet J, Osborn T C. Mapping loci controlling the concentrations of erucic and linolenic acids in seed oil of Brassica napus L. Theor Appl Genet, 1996, 93: 282–286
[7]Toroser D, Thormann C E, Osborn T C, Mithen R. RFLP mapping of quantitative trait loci controlling seed aliphatic-glucosinolate content in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L). TheorAppl Genet, 1995, 91: 802–808
[8]Howell P M, Sharpe A G, Lydiate D J. Homoeologous loci control the accumulation of seed glucosinolates in oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Genome Res, 2003, 46: 454–460
[9]Zhao J Y, Becker H C, Zhang D Q, Zhang Y F, Ecke W. Conditional QTL mapping of oil content in rapeseed with respect to protein content and traits related to plant development and grain yield. Theor Appl Genet, 2006, 113: 33–38
[10]Zhao J W, Meng J L. Genetic analysis of loci associated with partial resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Theor Appl Genet, 2003, 106: 759–764
[11]Foolad M R, Lin G Y, Chen F Q. Comparison of QTLs for seed germination under non-stress, cold stress and salt stress in tomato. Plant Breed, 1999, 118: 167–173
[12]Bettey M, Finch-Savage W E, King G J, Lynn J R. Quantitative genetic analysis of seed vigour and pre-emergence seedling growth traits in Brassicaoleracea. New Phytol, 2000, 148: 277–286
[13]Krishnasamy V, Seshu D V. Seed germination rate and associated characters in rice. Crop Sci, 1989, 29: 904–908
[14]许耀照, 孙万仓, 曾秀存, 李彩霞, 周喜旺. 盐碱胁迫冬油菜的主导因素分析. 草业科学, 2013, (3): 423–429
Xu Y Z, Sun W C, Zen X C, Li C X, Zhou X W. Analysis of the key stress factors in winter rape under simulated salinity-alkalinity mixed condition. Pratac Sci, 2013, (3): 423–429 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]原小燕, 符明联, 何晓莹. 不同抗旱性油菜种子萌发期抗旱指标比较研究. 干旱地区农业研究, 2012, 30(5): 77–81
Yuan XY, Fu ML, He XY.The comparative study on drought resistance index of rape with different drought resistance in germination. Agric Res Arid Areas, 2012, 30(5): 77–81 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]谢小玉, 张兵, 陈思岑. 油菜发芽期和苗期抗旱性鉴定评价方法. 农机化研究, 2013, (2): 112–116
Xie XY, Zhang B, Chen S C. Method of identification for characteristics of drought-against on germination and seedling growth of rape materials. J Agric Mechaniz Res, 2013, (2): 112–116 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]Nguyen T, Friedt W, Snowdon R. Cloning and mapping of a candidate gene for germination and seedling vigour in yellow-seeded oilseed rape. In: Fu T D ed. The 12th International Rapeseed Congress, Wuhan, 2007. p 4
[18]刘丹, 刘贵华, 王汉中. 油菜抗性相关基因的分离及其基因工程研究进展. 中国农业科技导报, 2008, 8(3): 6–11
Liu D, Liu G H, Wang H Z. Isolation of resistant genes and their gene engineering research development in rapeseed. J Agric Sci Technol, 200, 8(3): 6–11 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]Liu L, Qu C, Wittkop B, Yi B, Xiao Y, He Y, Snowdon R J, Li J. A high-density SNP map for accurate mapping of seed fibre QTL in Brassica napus L. PLoS ONE, 2013 8(12): e83052. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0083052
[20]Wang S, Basten C J, Zeng Z B. Windows QTL Cartographer. Ver. 2.5 [computer program] Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 2006. Available from http://statgen.ncsu.edu/qtlcart/WQTLCart.htm
[21]Lander E S, Botstein D. Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics, 1989, 121: 185–199
[22]Mccouch S R, Cho Y G, Yano M, Paul E, Blinstrub M, Morishima H, Kinoshita T. Report on QTL nomenclature. Rice Genet Newsl, 1997, 14
[23]Ganal M W, Altmann T, Roder M S. SNP identification in crop plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2009, 12: 211–217
[24]Mcnally K L, Childs K L, Bohnert R, Davidson R M, Zhao K, Ulat V J, Zeller G, Clark R M, Hoen D R, Bureau T E, Stokowski R, Ballinger D G, Frazer K A, Cox D R, Padhukasahasram B, Bustamante C D, Weigel D, Mackill D J, Bruskiewich R M, Ratsch G, Buell C R, Leung H, Leach J E. Genomewide SNP variation reveals relationships among landraces and modern varieties of rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2009, 106: 12273–12278
[25]Rafalski A. Applications of single nucleotide polymorphisms in crop genetics. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2002, 5: 94–100
[26]孙玉燕, 刘磊, 郑峥, 张春芝, 周龙溪, 宗园园, 李涛, 李君明. 番茄耐旱和耐盐遗传改良的研究进展及展望. 园艺学报, 2012, 39: 2061–2074
Sun YY, Liu L, Zheng Z, Zhang CZ, Zhou LX, Zomh YY, Li T, Li JM. A review and perspectives on genetic improvement of salt and drought tolerance in tomato. Acta Hortic Sin, 2012, 39: 2061–2074 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]郝岗平, 吴忠义, 陈茂盛, 曹鸣庆, Brunnel D, Pelletier G, 黄丛林, 杨清. 拟南芥CBF4基因位点的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)变化与抗旱表型的相应性. 农业生物技术学报, 2004, 12: 122–131
Hao G P, Wu Z Y, Chen MS, Cao MQ, Brunnel D, Pelletier G, Hang CL, Yang Q. Single nucleotide polymorphisms of CBF4 locus region of Arabidopsis thaliana correspond to drought tolerance. J Agric Biotechnol, 2004, 12: 122–131 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]Verslues P E, Agarwal M, Katiyar-Agarwal S, Zhu J H, Zhu J K. Methods and concepts in quantifying resistance to drought, salt and freezing, abiotic stresses that affect plant water status. Plant J, 2006, 45: 523–539 |