利用陆地棉MAGIC群体定位产量、生育期和株高性状的QTL

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.01320

Abstract

Abstract:

The yield, growth period and plant height are important agronomic traits that decide the economic value and planting pattern of cotton (Gossypium spp.). In order to dissect the genetic basic of these traits, an 8-way upland cotton MAGIC (multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross) population and SSR markers were used for association mapping. Eight traits of this MAGIC population were phenotyped in five environments (three years and three locations), showing wider variations than these of the founder parents. The broad-sense heritability (H ²) of the eight traits ranged from 0.17 to 0.71. Association analysis based on mix linear model was performed using 284 polymorphic SSR markers. There were 51, 27, and 9 markers significantly associated with yield, growth period and plant height traits respectively. All identified loci had minor effect for controlling the phenotypic variations, showing a higher powerful ability of the MAGIC population in association mapping. Furthermore, 20 loci were found to be associated with multiple traits acting as pleiotropism. In addition, chromosome hot spots were found for effective boll number, lint weight, first fruit spur branch number and plant height, which provided references for deeply genetically studying these loci. The elite MAGIC lines and the valuable SSR loci lay a foundation for the genetic improvement of upland cotton.

Key words: upland cotton, MAGIC population, yield, growth period, plant height, SSR, association mapping

Cong HUANG,Xiao-Fang LI,Ding-Guo LI,Zhong-Xu LIN. QTL Mapping for Yield, Growth Period and Plant Height Traits Using MAGIC Population in Upland Cotton[J].Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(9): 1320-1333.

Figures/Tables 10

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Table 4

Significant SSR markers associated with the eight traits"

性状 Trait	SSR标记 SSR marker	染色体 Chromosome	遗传位置 Position (cM)	P值 P-value	解释率 R²(%)	环境 Environment
开花期	NBRI_HQ527566	1	150.22	4.24E-03 ^{(*, #)}	1.45	BLUP
FT	MON_CGR5525	6	49.08	3.91E-03 ^{(*, #)}	1.20	BLUP
	MON_DC20094	8	101.49	1.33E-03 ^(**)	1.12	BLUP
	MON_CER0167	10	101.22	9.83E-03 ^{(*, #)}	0.81	BLUP
	MON_CGR5113	11	10.25	1.38E-03 ^{(**, #)}	5.44	BLUP
	MON_CGR5390	13	55.20	7.07E-03 ^{(*, #)}	1.10	BLUP
	MON_DPL0522	21	16.34	1.35E-03 ^{(**, #)}	1.52	BLUP
	MON_DC30015	23	85.25	1.04E-05 ^{(**, #)}	7.23	BLUP
	DPL0461	24	63.21	6.98E-03 ^{(*, #)}	0.78	BLUP, E5
	MON_SHIN0607	26	137.12	2.09E-03 ^{(**, #)}	1.52	BLUP
第一果枝节位	NBRI_HQ527566	1	150.22	5.85E-03 ^(*)	1.28	BLUP
FFSBN	MON_CGR5534	2	17.30	5.68E-03 ^{(*, #)}	1.24	BLUP
性状 Trait	SSR标记 SSR marker	染色体 Chromosome	遗传位置 Position (cM)	P值 P-value	解释率 R²(%)	环境 Environment
	NAU2858	2	133.14	1.64E-03 ^{(**, #)}	2.03	BLUP
	MON_CER0086b	6	106.70	5.23E-05 ^{(**, #)}	2.48	BLUP
	MON_CGR5001b	7	22.05	8.69E-03 ^{(*, #)}	0.73	BLUP
	MON_DC20094	8	101.49	6.08E-03 ^{(*, #)}	0.80	BLUP, E2
	BNL3442	11	31.48	6.41E-03 ^{(*, #)}	0.79	BLUP
	HAU2489	15	44.81	5.03E-03 ^(*)	0.84	BLUP
	MUSS422b	15	115.63	2.58E-08 ^{(**, #)}	3.33	BLUP
	MON_CGR5001a	16	39.66	1.26E-03 ^{(**, #)}	1.10	BLUP
	HAU3069	19	206.66	3.92E-03 ^{(*, #)}	1.18	BLUP, E3
	NAU7153	21	59.03	9.20E-05 ^{(**, #)}	1.97	BLUP
	BNL3171	21	72.70	4.07E-03 ^(*)	1.89	BLUP
	MON_DC30015	23	85.25	8.21E-08 ^{(**, #)}	7.27	BLUP
	MON_CGR5423	24	10.95	2.18E-03 ^{(**, #)}	1.43	BLUP
	HAU3812	24	43.09	5.18E-03 ^{(*, #)}	1.12	BLUP
	MON_CER0086a	25	86.68	1.69E-03 ^{(**, #)}	1.49	BLUP
株高	miR393-Me4	8	67.26	9.45E-03 ^(*)	0.71	BLUP
PH	MON_CGR5113	11	10.25	8.72E-03 ^{(*, #)}	4.02	BLUP
	MON_CGR6580a	11	78.45	7.93E-03 ^{(*, #)}	1.21	BLUP
	MON_SHIN1343	17	40.41	6.26E-03 ^{(*, #)}	1.11	BLUP
	HAU3069	19	206.66	7.38E-03 ^{(*, #)}	1.04	BLUP, E3
	MON_DPL0522	21	16.34	1.61E-03 ^{(**, #)}	1.40	BLUP
	DPL0461	24	63.21	7.63E-05 ^{(**, #)}	1.66	BLUP
	MON_DC20035	24	198.85	1.49E-03 ^{(**, #)}	1.36	BLUP
	MON_DPL0811a	25	113.14	6.02E-03 ^{(*, #)}	0.79	BLUP
单株有效铃数	MON_DC40052	1	51.96	5.92E-03 ^{(*, #)}	1.69	BLUP
EBN	NBRI_HQ527566	1	150.22	2.93E-03 ^(**)	1.52	BLUP
	CIR381	2	38.87	3.97E-04 ^{(**, #)}	1.68	BLUP
	CCRI523	5	39.95	9.49E-03 ^(*)	0.72	BLUP
	BNL584	6	17.52	7.51E-03 ^{(*, #)}	1.26	BLUP
	MON_CER0086b	6	106.70	1.34E-03 ^{(**, #)}	1.61	BLUP
	HAU2147	10	4.91	4.40E-03 ^(*)	0.87	BLUP
	BNL511	10	59.83	9.83E-03 ^{(*, #)}	0.71	BLUP
	HAU3909	10	63.97	6.86E-06 ^{(**, #)}	2.63	BLUP
	MON_CGR5352b	13	22.19	9.17E-04 ^{(**, #)}	1.85	BLUP
	MON_CGR5390	13	55.20	2.17E-03 ^{(**, #)}	1.36	BLUP
	MON_DC30178	13	90.51	6.32E-03 ^(*)	0.80	BLUP
	MON_DPL0535	13	97.44	2.52E-03 ^{(**, #)}	2.01	BLUP
	MON_CER0157	13	148.92	1.41E-03 ^{(**, #)}	1.09	BLUP
	MON_CGR5001a	16	39.66	7.63E-03 ^(*)	0.76	BLUP
	HAU0197	17	61.97	5.67E-04 ^{(**, #)}	2.04	BLUP
	BNL3875	19	125.78	3.76E-03 ^{(*, #)}	1.45	BLUP
	MON_CGR5845	19	177.05	1.72E-05 ^{(**, #)}	4.55	BLUP
	NAU7153	21	59.03	6.31E-05 ^{(**, #)}	2.05	BLUP
性状 Trait	SSR标记 SSR marker	染色体 Chromosome	遗传位置 Position (cM)	P值 P-value	解释率 R²(%)	环境 Environment
	HAU2959	21	107.97	3.53E-03 ^{(*, #)}	0.89	BLUP
	MUSS298	23	29.08	3.94E-03 ^{(*, #)}	0.86	BLUP, E5
	MON_DPL0524	23	31.92	4.30E-03 ^(*)	1.44	BLUP, E3
	MON_DC30015	23	85.25	6.46E-07 ^{(**, #)}	6.19	BLUP
	HAU4497	24	185.64	5.50E-05 ^{(**, #)}	2.05	BLUP
	MON_DC40117	26	62.97	6.25E-03 ^{(*, #)}	1.05	BLUP, E2
单铃籽棉重	HAU1619a	1	168.64	3.66E-03 ^(*)	0.92	BLUP
BW	CIR381	2	38.87	9.59E-04 ^{(**, #)}	1.48	BLUP
	HAU0800a	2	142.99	9.39E-03 ^(*)	0.73	BLUP
	MON_CER0086b	6	106.70	1.74E-03 ^{(**, #)}	1.74	BLUP
	MUSB0812	8	107.81	7.25E-03 ^{(*, #)}	1.42	BLUP
	HAU0119	17	0.00	4.71E-03 ^{(*, #)}	1.75	BLUP
	HAU3986	17	100.50	3.67E-03 ^{(*, #)}	1.68	BLUP
	MUSB1135a	18	140.00	5.50E-05 ^{(**, #)}	1.73	BLUP
	MON_CGR5845	19	177.05	2.16E-03 ^(**)	3.63	BLUP
	MON_DC40103	20	60.87	3.84E-03 ^{(*, #)}	1.17	BLUP
单铃皮棉重	HAU2959	21	107.97	3.16E-03 ^{(**, #)}	0.91	BLUP
LW	NAU5418	21	108.18	8.76E-04 ^{(**, #)}	1.63	BLUP
	HAU3640	24	175.90	6.59E-03 ^{(*, #)}	1.09	BLUP
	HAU0800a	2	142.99	6.07E-03 ^(*)	0.79	BLUP
	BNL3034	14	66.47	5.81E-03 ^{(*, #)}	1.67	BLUP
	MUSB1135a	18	140.00	2.51E-03 ^{(**, #)}	0.95	BLUP
	HAU3640	24	175.90	1.62E-03 ^{(**, #)}	1.37	BLUP
	MON_DPL0811a	25	113.14	1.75E-03 ^{(**, #)}	1.02	BLUP
衣分	MON_CGR5707	9	61.36	2.37E-03 ^{(**, #)}	1.32	BLUP
LP	MON_DPL0095b	17	78.11	3.67E-03 ^{(*, #)}	1.34	BLUP
	MON_DC30015	23	85.25	8.92E-03 ^{(*, #)}	3.60	BLUP
籽指	CIR381	02	38.87	5.35E-06 ^{(**, #)}	2.60	BLUP
SI	HAU1321	12	29.33	7.26E-03 ^(*)	2.12	BLUP
	MON_SHIN1558	13	54.09	9.94E-03 ^(*)	0.71	BLUP
	MON_C2-0118	14	135.20	7.01E-03 ^{(*, #)}	0.78	BLUP
	NAU6468	16	28.49	8.77E-04 ^{(**, #)}	2.51	BLUP

Table 4

Fig. 4

Table 5

Table 6

Comparison of the loci in this study with these in previously reported studies"

SSR标记 SSR marker	本研究定位到的性状 Associated traits in this study	已报道定位到的性状 Identified traits in reported studies
BNL3034	单铃皮棉重LW	籽壳比重, 籽指, 纤维舒适度, 纤维2.5%跨距长度, 株高 HP, SI, WF, SL2.5, PH
BNL3171	第一果枝节位FFSBN	纤维50%跨距长度, 纤维2.5%跨距长度, 纤维长度, 纤维强度 SL50, SL2.5, FL, FS
BNL3442	第一果枝节位FFSBN	纤维50%跨距长度, 纤维2.5%跨距长度, 纤维长度 SL50, SL2.5, FL
		单株籽棉产量, 单株有效铃数 SY, EBN
BNL3875	单株有效铃数EBN	纤维长度, 纤维强度, 纤维伸长率, 纤维整齐度FL, FU, FE, FS
BNL584	单株有效铃数EBN	衣指, 马克隆值LI, MV
CIR381	单铃籽棉重, 单株有效铃数, 籽指 LW, EBN, SI	纤维周长, 纤维舒适度, 纤维2.5%跨距长度, 纤维强度 PER, WF, SL2.5, FS
HAU0119	单铃籽棉重BW	纤维强度, 耐盐性 FS, ST
HAU1321	籽指SI	单株铃数, 棉籽含油量 EBN, OC
HAU1619a	单铃籽棉重BW	马克隆值 MV
HAU2147	单株有效铃数BW	籽指, 纤维长度 SI, FL
HAU2489	第一果枝节位FFSBN	纤维伸长率, 纤维整齐度 FE, FU
SSR标记 SSR marker	本研究定位到的性状 Associated traits in this study	已报道定位到的性状 Identified traits in reported studies
HAU3069	第一果枝节位, 株高 FFSBN, PH	单铃籽棉重, 籽指, 根系面积 BW, SI, RSA
MON_CGR5001a	单株有效铃数EBN	棉籽含油量, 棉籽蛋白含量 OC, PC
MON_CGR5423	第一果枝节位FFSBN	主根长 RL
MON_CGR5525	开花期FT	果枝长度 FBL
MON_CGR5534	第一果枝节位FFSBN	衣分, 株高, 果枝数, 籽指, 第一果枝长度 LP, PH, FSBN, SI, BFBL
MON_CGR5707	衣分LP	单铃种子数, 衣分 BSN, LP
MON_DC30015	单株有效铃数, 第一果枝节位, 开花期, 衣分 EBN, FFSBN, FT, LP	籽指 SI
MON_DC30178	单株有效铃数EBN	籽指 SI
MON_DC40052	单株有效铃数EBN	棉籽棕榈酸含量 PAC
MON_DC40117	单株有效铃数EBN	腺体 Gl
MON_DPL0095b	衣分LP	衣分, 籽棉产量, 籽指 LP, SY, SI
MON_DPL0522	开花期, 株高FT, PH	第一果枝节位 FFSBN
MON_DPL0524	单株有效铃数EBN	开花期, 果枝始节高 FT, FFSH
MON_DPL0535	单株有效铃数EBN	根系面积, 根系体积 RSA, RV
MUSB0812	单铃籽棉重EBN	枯萎病抗性 FW
MUSS298	单株有效铃数EBN	棉仁蛋白含量, 纤维马克隆值, 纤维强度 EPP, MV, FS
MUSS422b	第一果枝节位FFSBN	株高, 果枝数, 秋桃数, 纤维长度, 纤维强度 PH, FSBN, AB, FL, FS
NAU5418	单铃籽棉重EBN	棉籽含油量 OC
NAU6468	籽指SI	果枝数, 纤维长度 FSBN, FL

Table 6

References 49

[1]	李培良, 雷亚平, 李亚兵, 魏晓文 . 中国棉花产业发展现状与未来展望. 农业展望, 2016, ( 12):38-45
	Li P L, Lei Y P, Li Y B, Wei X W . Development status quo of China's cotton industry and its outlook. Agric Outlook, 2016, ( 12):38-45 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	李雪源, 王俊铎, 郑巨云, 梁亚军, 艾先涛, 龚照龙, 买买提·莫明, 郭江平., 新疆棉花产业发展与供给侧改革. 中国棉花, 2017,44(8):1-7
	Li X Y, Wang J D, Zheng J Y, Liang Y J, Ai X T, Gong Z L, Maimaiti M M, Guo J P . Cotton industry development and the supply-side reform in Xinjiang, China. China Cotton, 2017,44(8):1-7 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	陈美华 . 提高机采棉质量的几点对策. 中国棉花加工, 2013, ( 4):19-20
	Chen H M . Several countermeasures to improve the quality of machine pick cotton. China Cotton Process, 2013, ( 4):19-20 (in Chinese)
[4]	Huang C, Nie X, Shen C, You C, Li W, Zhao W, Zhang X, Lin Z . Population structure and genetic basis of the agronomic traits of upland cotton in China revealed by a genome-wide association study using high-density SNPs. Plant Biotechnol J, 2017,15:1374-1386
[5]	Liu R, Wang B, Guo W, Qin Y, Wang L, Zhang Y, Zhang T . Quantitative trait loci mapping for yield and its components by using two immortalized populations of a heterotic hybrid in Gossypium hirsutum L. Mol Breed, 2011,29:297-311
[6]	Zhang S, Wang T, Liu Q, Gao X, Zhu X, Zhang T, Zhou B . Quantitative trait locus analysis of boll-related traits in an intraspecific population of Gossypium hirsutum. Euphytica, 2014,203:121-144
[7]	Xu Y, Lu Y, Xie C, Gao S, Wan J, Prasanna B M . Whole-genome strategies for marker-assisted plant breeding. Mol Breed, 2012,29:833-854
[8]	Wang H, Huang C, Zhao W, Dai B, Shen C, Zhang B, Li D, Lin Z . Identification of QTL for fiber quality and yield traits using two immortalized backcross populations in upland cotton. PLoS One, 2016,11:e0166970
[9]	Said J I, Song M, Wang H, Lin Z, Zhang X, Fang D D, Zhang J . A comparative meta-analysis of QTL between intraspecific Gossypium hirsutum and interspecific G. hirsutum × G. barbadense populations. Mol Genet Genomics, 2015,290:1003-1025
[10]	Yan J, Shah T, Warburton M L, Buckler E S, McMullen M D,Crouch J. , Genetic characterization and linkage disequilibrium estimation of a global maize collection using SNP markers. PLoS One, 2009,4:e8451
[11]	冯建英, 温阳俊, 张瑾, 章元明 . 植物关联分析方法的研究进展. 作物学报, 2016,42:945-956
	Feng J Y, Wen Y J, Zhang J, Zhang Y M . Advances on methodologies for genome-wide association studies in plants. Acta Agron Sin, 2016,42:945-956 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	杨小红, 严建兵, 郑艳萍, 余建明, 李建生 . 植物数量性状关联分析研究进展. 作物学报 2007,33:523-530
	Yang X H, Yan J B, Zheng Y P, Yu J M, Li J S . Reviews of association analysis for quantitative traits in plants. Acta Agron Sin, 2007,33:523-530 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	Crowell S, Korniliev P, Falcao A, Ismail A, Gregorio G, Mezey J , McCouch S. Genome-wide association and high-resolution phenotyping link Oryza sativa panicle traits to numerous trait-specific QTL clusters. Nat Commun, 2016,7:10527
[14]	Remington D L, Thornsberry J M, Matsuoka Y, Wilson L M, Whitt S R, Doebley J, Kresovich S, Goodman M M, Buckler E S . Structure of linkage disequilibrium and phenotypic associations in the maize genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2001,98:11479-11484
[15]	Fang D D, Hinze L L, Percy R G, Li P, Deng D, Thyssen G . A microsatellite-based genome-wide analysis of genetic diversity and linkage disequilibrium in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars from major cotton-growing countries. Euphytica, 2013,191:391-401
[16]	Larsson S J, Lipka A E, Buckler E S . Lessons from Dwarf8 on the strengths and weaknesses of structured association mapping. PLoS Genet, 2013,9:e1003246 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003246 pmid: 23437002
[17]	Mackay I, Powell W . Methods for linkage disequilibrium mapping in crops. Trends Plant Sci, 2007,12:57-63 doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.12.001 pmid: 17224302
[18]	Xiao Y, Liu H, Wu L, Warburton M, Yan J . Genome-wide association studies in Maize: praise and stargaze. Mol Plant, 2017,10:359-374 doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.12.008 pmid: 28039028
[19]	Fragoso C A, Moreno M, Wang Z H, Heffelfinger C, Arbelaez L J, Aguirre J A, Franco N, Romero L E, Labadie K, Zhao H Y, Dellaporta S L, Lorieux M . Genetic architecture of a rice nested association mapping population. G3-Genes Genom Genet, 2017,7:1913-1926 doi: 10.1534/g3.117.041608 pmid: 5473768
[20]	Kump K L, Bradbury P J, Wisser R J, Buckler E S, Belcher A R ,Oropeza-Rosas M A, Zwonitzer J C, Kresovich S, McMullen M D, Ware D, Balint-Kurti P J, Holland J B. , Genome-wide association study of quantitative resistance to southern leaf blight in the maize nested association mapping population. Nat Genet, 2011,43:163-168
[21]	Maurer A, Draba V, Pillen K . Genomic dissection of plant development and its impact on thousand grain weight in barley through nested association mapping. J Exp Bot, 2016,67:2507-2518
[22]	Tian F, Bradbury P J, Brown P J, Hung H, Sun Q, Flint-Garcia S, Rocheford T R ,McMullen M D, Holland J B, Buckler E S. , Genome-wide association study of leaf architecture in the maize nested association mapping population. Nat Genet, 2011,43:159-162
[23]	Yu J, Holland J B ,McMullen M D, Buckler E S. , Genetic design and statistical power of nested association mapping in maize. Genetics, 2008,178:539-551
[24]	Zhang N, Gibon Y, Wallace J G, Lepak N, Li P, Dedow L, Chen C, So Y S, Kremling K, Bradbury P J, Brutnell T, Stitt M, Buckler E S . Genome-wide association of carbon and nitrogen metabolism in the maize nested association mapping population. Plant Physiol, 2015,168:575-583
[25]	Pan Q, Li L, Yang X, Tong H, Xu S, Li Z, Li W, Muehlbauer G J, Li J, Yan J . Genome-wide recombination dynamics are associated with phenotypic variation in maize. New Phytol, 2016,210:1083-1094 doi: 10.1111/nph.13810 pmid: 26720856
[26]	Xiao Y, Tong H, Yang X, Xu S, Pan Q, Qiao F, Raihan M S, Luo Y, Liu H, Zhang X, Yang N, Wang X, Deng M, Jin M, Zhao L, Luo X, Zhou Y, Li X, Liu J, Zhan W, Liu N, Wang H, Chen G, Gai Y, Xu G, Wang W, Zheng D, Yan J . Genome-wide dissection of the maize ear genetic architecture using multiple populations. New Phytol, 2016,210:1095-1106 doi: 10.1111/nph.13814 pmid: 26715032
[27]	Huang B E, Verbyla K L, Verbyla A P, Raghavan C, Singh V K, Gaur P, Leung H, Varshney R K, Cavanagh C R . MAGIC populations in crops: current status and future prospects. Theor Appl Genet, 2015,128:999-1017 doi: 10.1007/s00122-015-2506-0 pmid: 25855139
[28]	王建康, 李慧慧, 张学才, 尹长斌, 黎裕, 马有志, 李新海, 邱丽娟, 万建民 . 中国作物分子设计育种. 作物学报, 2011,37:191-201
	Wang J K, Li H H, Zhang X C, Yin C B, Li Y, Ma Y Z, Li X H, Qiu L J, Wan J M . Molecular design breeding in crops in China. Acta Agron Sin, 2011,37:191-201 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	申聪聪, 朱亚军, 陈凯, 陈慧珍, 吴志超, 孟丽君, 徐建龙 . 利用水稻MAGIC群体关联定位抽穗期和株高QTL. 作物学报, 2017,43:1611-1621
	Shen C C, Zhu Y J, Chen K, Chen H Z, Wu Z C, Meng L J, Xu J L . Mapping of QTLs for heading date and plant height using MAGIC populations of rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2017,43:1611-1621 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	Huang B E, George A W, Forrest K L, Kilian A, Hayden M J, Morell M K, Cavanagh C R . A multiparent advanced generation inter-cross population for genetic analysis in wheat. Plant Biotechnol J, 2012,10:826-839
[31]	Dell’Acqua M, Gatti D M, Pea G, Cattonaro F, Coppens F, Magris G, Hlaing A L, Aung H H, Nelissen H, Baute J, Frascaroli E, Churchill G A, Inze D, Morgante M, Pe M E . Genetic properties of the MAGIC maize population: a new platform for high definition QTL mapping in Zea mays. Genome Biol, 2015,16:167
[32]	Bandillo N, Raghavan C, Muyco P A, Sevilla M A L, Lobina I T, Dilla-Ermita C J, Tung C W, McCouch S, Thomson M, Mauleon R, Singh R K, Gregorio G, Redona E, Leung H. , Multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (MAGIC) populations in rice: progress and potential for genetics research and breeding. Rice, 2013,6:11
[33]	Islam M S, Thyssen G N, Jenkins J N, Zeng L, Delhom C D ,McCarty J C, Deng D D, Hinchliffe D J, Jones D C, Fang D D. , A MAGIC population-based genome-wide association study reveals functional association of GhRBB1_A07 gene with superior fiber quality in cotton. BMC Genomics, 2016,17:903
[34]	Li D G, Li Z X, Hu J S, Lin Z X, Li X F . Polymorphism analysis of multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (MAGIC) populations of upland cotton developed in China. Genet Mol Res, 2016,15:4
[35]	Huang C, Shen C, Wen T, Gao B, Zhu D, Li X, Ahmed M M, Li D, Lin Z . SSR-based association mapping of fiber quality in upland cotton using eight-way MAGIC population. Mol Genet Genomics, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s00438-018-1419-4
[36]	Bradbury P J, Zhang Z, Kroon D E, Casstevens T M, Ramdoss Y, Buckler E S . TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics, 2007,23:2633-2635
[37]	Bland J M, Altman D G . Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. BMJ, 1995,310:170
[38]	Li F, Fan G, Lu C, Xiao G, Zou C, Kohel R J, Ma Z, Shang H, Ma X, Wu J, Liang X, Huang G, Percy R G, Liu K, Yang W, Chen W, Du X, Shi C, Yuan Y, Ye W, Liu X, Zhang X, Liu W, Wei H, Wei S, Huang G, Zhang X, Zhu S, Zhang H, Sun F, Wang X, Liang J, Wang J, He Q, Huang L, Wang J, Cui J, Song G, Wang K, Xu X, Yu J Z, Zhu Y, Yu S . Genome sequence of cultivated Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum TM-1) provides insights into genome evolution. Nat Biotechnol, 2015,33:524-530
[39]	Zhang T, Hu Y, Jiang W, Fang L, Guan X, Chen J, Zhang J, Saski C A, Scheffler B E, Stelly D M ,Hulse-Kemp A M, Wan Q, Liu B, Liu C, Wang S, Pan M, Wang Y, Wang D, Ye W, Chang L, Zhang W, Song Q, Kirkbride R C, Chen X, Dennis E, Llewellyn D J, Peterson D G, Thaxton P, Jones D C, Wang Q, Xu X, Zhang H, Wu H, Zhou L, Mei G, Chen S, Tian Y, Xiang D, Li X, Ding J, Zuo Q, Tao L, Liu Y, Li J, Lin Y, Hui Y, Cao Z, Cai C, Zhu X, Jiang Z, Zhou B, Guo W, Li R, Chen Z J. , Sequencing of allotetraploid cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L. acc. TM-1) provides a resource for fiber improvement. Nat Biotechnol, 2015,33:531-537
[40]	王娟, 董承光, 刘丽, 孔宪辉, 王旭文, 余渝 . 陆地棉主要产量相关性状的SSR标记关联分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2017,18:720-727
	Wang J, Dong C G, Liu L, Kong X H, Wang X W, Yu Y . Association analysis of yield-related traits with SSR markers in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). . J Plant Genet Resour, 2017,18:720-727 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[41]	刘其宝, 李黎贝, 张驰, 宿俊吉, 魏恒玲, 王寒涛, 喻树迅 . 陆地棉叶片叶绿素含量与SSR标记的关联分析及优异等位变异的挖掘. 中国农业科学, 2017,50:3439-3449
	Liu Q B, Li L B, Zhang C, Su J J, Wei H L, Wang H T, Yu S X . Association analysis of leaf chlorophyll content with SSR markers and exploration of superior alleles in upland cotton. Sci Agric Sin, 2017,50:3439-3449 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[42]	郭志军, 赵云雷, 陈伟, 李运海, 王红梅, 龚海燕, 桑晓慧 . 陆地棉SSR标记遗传多样性及其与农艺性状的关联分析. 棉花学报,2014, 26:420-430
	Guo Z J, Zhao Y L, Chen W, LI Y H, Wang H M, Gong H Y, Sang X H . Genetic diversity and association analysis of upland cotton based on SSR markers. Cotton Sci, 2014,26:420-430 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[43]	Zhao Y, Wang H, Chen W, Li Y, Gong H, Sang X, Huo F, Zeng F . Genetic diversity and population structure of elite cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) germplasm revealed by SSR markers. Plant Syst Evol, 2014,301:327-336
[44]	Wang M, Li C, Wang Q . Quantitative trait loci mapping and genetic dissection for lint percentage in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). J Genet, 2014,93:371-378
[45]	Xia Z, Zhang X, Liu Y Y, Jia Z F, Zhao H H, Li C Q, Wang Q L . Major gene identification and quantitative trait locus mapping for yield-related traits in upland cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.). J Integr Agric, 2014,13:299-309
[46]	Liu D X, Liu F, Shan X R, Zhang J, Tang S Y, Fang X M, Liu X Y, Wang W W, Tan Z Y, Teng Z H, Zhang Z S, Liu D J . Construction of a high-density genetic map and lint percentage and cottonseed nutrient trait QTL identification in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Mol Genet Genomics, 2015,290:1683-1700
[47]	Li C, Zhang J, Hu G, Fu Y, Wang Q . Association mapping and favorable allele mining for node of first fruiting/sympodial branch and its height in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Euphytica, 2016,210:57-68
[48]	吕海舟, 刘琬菁, 何柳, 徐志超, 罗红梅 . 植物次生代谢基因簇研究进展. 植物科学学报, 2017,35:609-621
	Lyu H Z, Liu W J, He L, Xu Z C, Luo H M . Advances on the study of gene clusters involved in plant secondary metabolism. Plant Sci J, 2017,35:609-621 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[49]	Said J I, Lin Z, Zhang X, Song M, Zhang J . A comprehensive meta QTL analysis for fiber quality, yield, yield related and morphological traits, drought tolerance, and disease resistance in tetraploid cotton. BMC Genomics, 2013,14:776

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

亲本编号 Parent code	杂交编号 Cross code	材料名 Name	品系名称 Strain	农艺性状 Agronomic trait	材料来源 Material sources
PM1	A	GY5	鄂棉15选系 Emian 15 inbred lines	优质, 高产 High yield and fibre quality	长江大学农学院 College of Agriculturel, Yangtze University
PM2	B	KB10	鄂抗棉10号 Ekangmian 10	抗枯萎病、耐黄萎病 Fusarium wilt-resistant and Verticillium wilt-tolerance	中国农业科学院棉花研究所 Cotton Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
PM3	C	GY2	苏棉16 Sumian 16	优质高产 High yield and fibre quality	江苏省太仓农场 Taicang City Cotton Seed Farm in Jiangsu province
PM4	D	KC9	DP410B	抗虫 Pest-resistant	湖北省种子管理中心 Hubei Province Seed Management Station
PM5	E	CQ13	GK-12	抗虫 Pest-resistant	中国农业科学院棉花研究所 Cotton Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
PM6	F	GY6	鄂棉15 Emian 15	优质高产 High yield and fibre quality	长江大学农学院 College of Agriculture, Yangtze University
PM7	G	CQ2	KC160	抗虫 Pest-resistant	湖北省种子管理中心 Hubei Province Seed Management Station
PM8	H	GY4	鄂荆1号选系 Ejing 1 inbred lines	优质高产 High yield and fibre quality	长江大学农学院 College of Agriculture, Yangtze University

性状 Trait	平方和 Sum of squares			均方 Mean of square			P值显著性 Significance by P-value
性状 Trait	G	E	G×E	G	E	G×E	G	E	G×E
开花期FT	28792	276730	9815	30	138365	7		***
第一果枝节位FFSBN	27900	19	11088	29.12	18.92	15.73
株高PH	212681	770794	100555	222	770794	145		***
单株有效铃数EBN	44434	78050	68598	46	39025	37	*	***
单铃籽棉重BW	672.5	1949.1	460.3	0.7	974.6	0.3	***	***	***
单铃皮棉重LW	129.5	435.3	108.8	0.13	217.67	0.06	***	***	***
衣分LP	14719	3611	10178	15.3	1805.4	5.7	***	***	*
籽指SI	1679.2	321.9	502.3	1.7	321.9	0.6	***	***

性状 Trait	均值 Mean		变异范围 Range		标准差 SD	变异系数 CV (%)	偏度 Skewness	峰度 Kurtosis	遗传力 H²
性状 Trait	PMs	MLs	PMs	MLs	MLs	MLs	MLs	MLs	PMs	MLs
开花期FT (d)	76.52	77.93	74.41-78.39	76.71-80.44	0.55	0.70	0.93	1.35	0.87	0.46
第一果枝节位FFSBN	6.03	5.59	5.68-6.32	5.44-5.76	0.06	1.07	0.35	-0.37	0.45	0.20
株高PH (cm)	102.04	104.36	98.22-103.61	98.44-108.96	1.32	1.26	-0.23	0.88	0.59	0.29
单株有效铃数EBN	27.75	24.77	25.16-29.41	23.71-26.29	0.39	1.56	0.37	0.44	0.57	0.17
单铃籽棉重BW (g)	5.04	5.46	4.84-5.36	4.73-6.34	0.21	3.88	-0.02	0.23	0.66	0.64
单铃皮棉重LW (g)	2.17	2.23	2.15-2.20	1.90-2.50	0.08	3.48	-0.21	0.59	0.22	0.54
衣分LP (%)	43.14	40.74	42.34-43.87	35.31-44.49	1.04	2.54	-0.55	2.00	0.56	0.60
籽指SI (g)	10.87	10.63	10.60-11.35	9.23-12.07	0.48	4.48	0.18	0.01	0.62	0.71

QTL Mapping for Yield, Growth Period and Plant Height Traits Using MAGIC Population in Upland Cotton

RichHTML336

PDF

PDF

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 49

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

多效性SSR标记 Multi-effect SSR marker	染色体 Chromosome	位置 Position (cM)	性状 Trait
NBRI_HQ527566	1	150.22	单株有效铃数, 第一果枝节位, 开花期 EBN, FFSBN, FT
CIR381	2	38.87	单铃籽棉重, 单株有效铃数, 籽指 BW, EBN, SI
HAU0800a	2	142.99	单铃籽棉重, 单铃皮棉重 BW, LW
MON_CER0086b	6	106.70	单铃籽棉重, 单株有效铃数, 第一果枝节位 BW, EBN, FFSBN
MON_DC20094	8	101.49	第一果枝节位, 开花期 FFSBN, FT
MON_CGR5113	11	10.25	开花期, 株高 FT, PH
MON_CGR5390	13	55.20	单株有效铃数, 开花期 EBN, FT
MON_CGR5001a	16	39.66	单株有效铃数, 第一果枝节位 EBN, FFSBN
MUSB1135a	18	140.00	单铃籽棉重, 单铃皮棉重 BW, LW
MON_CGR5845	19	177.05	单铃籽棉重, 单株有效铃数 BW, EBN
HAU3069	19	206.66	第一果枝节位, 株高 FFSBN, PH
MON_DPL0522	21	16.34	开花期, 株高 FT, PH
NAU7153	21	59.03	单株有效铃数, 第一果枝节位 EBN, FFSBN
HAU2959	21	107.97	单铃籽棉重, 单株有效铃数 BW, EBN
MON_DC30015	23	85.25	单株有效铃数, 第一果枝节位, 开花期, 衣分 EBN, FFSBN, FT, LP
DPL0461	24	63.21	开花期, 株高 FT, PH
HAU3640	24	175.90	单铃籽棉重, 单铃皮棉重 BW, LW
MON_DPL0811a	25	113.14	单铃皮棉重, 株高 LW, PH
MON_CGR5390	13	55.20	单株有效铃数, 开花期 EBN, FT
HAU2959	21	107.97	单铃籽棉重, 单株有效铃数 BW, EBN

[1]	Hu Chuan, Zhao Kai-Nan, Huang Xiu-Li, Wu Jin-Zhi, Ren Kai-Ming, Wang He-Zheng, Fu Guo-Zhan, Huang Ming, Li You-Jun. Effects of tillage methods and nitrogen rates on yield and quality of dryland wheat under one-off irrigation [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2]	Peng Jia-Luo, Li Ying, Li Dan-Dan, Yang Jun-Ning, Guo Xue-Feng, Zhang Wen-Jiao, Yu Xiao-Xue, Zhou Ya-Rong, Wang Zhen-Yu, Wang Cai-Xiang, Ma Xiong-Feng, Su Jun-Ji. Identification of class I LBD family members in upland cotton and function and haplotype analyses of GhLBD6 in regulating flowering period [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(6): 1682-1697.
[3]	Ma Sheng-Qian, Wang Zhi-Ping, Chen Hao-Tian, Dou Shu-Xian, Zhang Yan, Deng Ai-Xing, Zhang Wei-Jian, Yuan Xiang-Yang, Song Zhen-Wei. Effects of tillage methods and nitrogen application rate on maize yield and soil aggregates in northeastern China under straw returning [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[4]	Tang Kuan-Qiang, Li Gong-Yun, Song Mei-Yi, Zhao Xue, Chang Chun-Ling. Genome-wide association analysis and prediction model construction for soybean plant height [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[5]	Wang Yu-Cheng, Zhang Lu, Liu A-Kang, Huang Jian-Liang, Peng Shao-Bing, Yuan Shen. Strategies and prospects for large-scale crop yield improvement based on yield gap [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[6]	Zhang Si-Si, Zhao Xiang-Hui, Zhou Yang, Yao Yun-Feng, Zhu Rong-Yu, Dong Yuan-Jie, Hu Guo-Qing, Xu Tong, Liu Zhao-Xin. Effects of plowing and green manure returning in winter fallow period on soil physicochemical properties and yield in continuously cropped peanut [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[7]	Zhang Ning-Ning, Teng Yu-Fei, Ren Na-Na, Wei Xing-Zhuo, Yan Shu-Hao, Fan Ke-Xin, Wang Yong-Hong, Chen Wen-Kang, Zhang Xing-Hua, Zhu Wan-Chao, Xu Shu-Tu, Xue Ji-Quan. Phenotypic evaluation and plasticity analysis of drought resistance in 201 maize inbred lines [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[8]	Zhang Ying-Xing, Bheel Chander Kumar, Song Yu-Zhen, Wang Yue, Cao Yue, Khound Rituraj, Santra Dipak Kumar, Cao Xiao-Ning, Wang Rui-Yun. Screening and phenotypic characterization of EMS-induced mutants with elite agronomic traits in broomcorn millet [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1388-1400.
[9]	Zhao Jia-Xue, Zhou Long-Hao, Guo Qi-Yuan, Shang Lun-Xiao, Wang Han, Liu Zhi-Tao, Chen Xi, Zhang Xiao-Pei, Song Xian-Liang, Ahmedov Miraziz Baltaevich, Mao Li-Li. Long-term stubble return and subsoiling enhance cotton yields in coastal saline-alkali soils by improving soil conditions and photosynthetic characteristics [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[10]	Guo Xing-Yu, Hu Dan, Lin Su-Qi, Wang Meng-Kai, Tan Wen-Feng, Huang Chuan-Qin. Biochar combined with chemical fertilizer increases maize yield and soil ecosystem multifunctionality in an intercropped maize-soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[11]	Zhang Zhen, Feng Lian-Jie, Shi Yu, Yu Zhen-Wen, Zhang Yong-Li. Yield formation of wheat with different ear types under water-saving supplementary irrigation conditions [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[12]	Yan An, Jiang Kun-Wei, Wang Rong-Yuan, Tian Lin, Zhang Lu, Wang Yun, Xu Jian-Long. Identification and cloning of SVN7 controlling small vascular bundle number in the rice flag leaf [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[13]	Liu Xin-Meng, Ren Hao, Zhang Ji-Bo, Zhang Ji-Wang, Zhao Bin, Ren Bai-Zhao, Liu Peng, Wang Hong-Zhang. Physiological mechanisms of methyl jasmonate (MeJA) alleviating the effects of heat stress on ear differentiation in maize [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[14]	Wang Zhuang-Zhuang, Wu Zi-Jun, Zhang Yong-Xin, Zhang Xin-Yuan, Yuan Li-Xue, Chen Ru-Xue, Liu Shi-Ju, Duan Jian-Zhao, Feng Wei, Wang Tong-Chao, Wang Yong-Hua. Optimized water-nitrogen synergy enhances winter wheat yield and nitrogen use efficiency in clay-loam fluvo-aquic soils of southeastern Henan, China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[15]	Zhang Hong-Rong, Wang Fei-Er, Li Pan, Qiu Hai-Long, Zhu Jing, Zhao Lian-Hao, Nan Yun-You, He Wei, Fan Zhi-Long, Hu Fa-Long, Chai Qiang, Yin Wen. Photosynthetic characteristics of 20% reduced irrigation combined with 25% organic substitution for chemical fertilizer in increasing silage maize yield [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.