Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica，

Acta Agronomica Sinica ›› 2020, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (02): 269-279.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.93015

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION · PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effect of different film-forming agents on the persistence and safety of thiacloprid suspension concentrate for seed coating for maize

YAO Chen-Tao1,2,4,QIAO Zhi-Hua1,2,SONG Xue-Hui1,2,ZHANG Feng-Wen1,2,SUN Xiao1,2,LI Gang1,LI Xiang-Dong1,ZHANG Ji-Wang3,JIANG Xing-Yin1,2,*()   

  1. 1 College of Plant Protection, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, Shandong, China
    2 College of Plant Protection, Shandong Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Pesticide Toxicology & Application Technique, Tai’an 271018, Shandong, China
    3 Shandong Agricultural University, State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Tai’an 271018, Shandong, China
    4 Suzhou FMC Plant Protection Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201203, China
  • Received:2019-03-08 Accepted:2019-09-26 Online:2020-02-12 Published:2019-10-12
  • Contact: Xing-Yin JIANG E-mail:xyjiang@sdau.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Project(2018YFD0200604);the Provincial Major Technological Innovation Program of Agricultural Application in Shandong, the Shandong “Double First-class” Award(SYL2017XTTD11);the National Modern Agricultural Technology & Industry System(SDAIT-02-10)

RichHTML362

4

PDF

189

Abstract:

To definite the persistence of thiacloprid seed coating with different film-forming agents in soil and plants and the efficacy in controling piercing-sucking insects, we tested the effects of the thiacloprid FS, with three different film-forming agents at a concentration of 400 g a.i. 100 kg -1, on the emergence rate, growth, physiological and biochemical characteristics of maize at laboratory and in the field respectively, and evaluated controlling effect on piercing-sucking insects by high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). The ZY904-3 and ZY904-5 film-forming agent treatments had no influence on emergence rate of maize. The seedling growth and activities in physiology and biochemistry were promoted to various degrees by thiacloprid seed dressing with three different film-forming agents. Compared with no film-forming agent treatments, the persistent periods of ZY904-1, ZY904-3, and ZY904-5 treatments were extended by 20-40 days, 20-30 days, and 10-20 days in leaves of maize and in the soil respectively. The maize piercing-sucking insects were controlled significantly by three film-forming agent treatments. ZY904-1 and ZY904-3 treatments had good control effects on the amount of piercing-sucking insects in the growth stage of maize which coat still over 50% at 80 d (laboratory test) and 60 d (field test) after sowing, respectively. However, ZY904-1 treatment delayed the emergence of seeds. Taking all factors as a whole, ZY904-3 film-forming agent has the best seed dressing effect.

Key words: thiacloprid, maize, film-forming agent, persistent period, safety, liquid chromatography-mass

Table 1

Gradient elution procedures"

时间
Time
(min)		 流速
Flow rate
(mL min-1)		 流动相 Mobile phase (%)
0.1%甲酸水溶液
0.1% formic acid
solution		 乙腈
Acetonitrile
0 0.50 90 10
1 0.50 90 10
2 0.50 10 90
3 0.50 10 90
4 0.50 90 10
5 0.50 90 10

Table 2

Effects of thiacloprid suspension concentrate with different film-forming agents for seed coating on the emergence rate of maize (%)"

成膜剂
Film-forming agent		 有效成分
Active ingredients
(g a.i. 100 kg-1)		 室内试验
Laboratory
test		 大田试验Field test
2 d 4 d 6 d 8 d 10 d
ZY904-1 400 80.27±1.35 b 56.26±1.65 b 76.81±2.67 c 78.56±2.30 c 84.31±1.74 b 84.63±1.32 b
ZY904-3 400 96.58±2.26 a 63.17±2.64 a 85.60±1.62 a 92.61±0.98 a 93.48±3.19 a 93.48±1.19 a
ZY904-5 400 95.42±1.74 a 63.40±1.37 a 85.35±2.09 a 91.49±1.35 a 92.24±2.34 a 92.24±2.34 a
未添加成膜剂对照NCK 400 96.33±2.88 a 64.24±0.96 a 86.77±1.79 a 91.70±3.36 a 93.38±3.18 a 93.38±3.18 a
清水对照CK — 97.31±2.57 a 58.63±4.74 b 82.91±1.42 b 86.56±2.34 b 90.77±1.54 ab 90.77±4.54 ab

Table 3

Effects of thiacloprid suspension concentrate with different film-forming agents for seed coating on growth indexes of maize seedlings (laboratory test)"

成膜剂
Film-forming agent		 有效成分
Active ingredients
(g a.i. 100 kg-1)		 株高
Plant height
(cm)		 根长
Root length
(cm)		 茎粗
Stem thick
(cm)		 须根数
Fibrous root number		 鲜重
Fresh weight
(g)
ZY904-1 400 30.60±2.31 b 18.62±2.46 a 6.18±0.53 a 5.2±0.32 a 4.91±0.28 a
ZY904-3 400 32.35±1.34 a 19.85±1.28 a 6.42±0.47 a 5.7±0.62 a 5.07±0.46 a
ZY904-5 400 32.26±1.86 a 18.23±3.25 a 6.23±0.38 a 5.3±0.35 a 4.73±0.19 ab
未添加成膜剂对照NCK 400 33.21±1.81 a 18.64±2.45 a 6.55±0.41 a 5.2±0.28 a 4.63±0.24 ab
清水对照CK — 33.47±1.69 a 18.98±3.12 a 6.83±0.48 a 5.1±0.19 a 4.25±0.64 b

Table 4

Effects of thiacloprid suspension concentrate with different film-forming agents for seed coating on growth indexes of maize seedlings (field test)"

成膜剂
Film-forming agent		 有效成分
Active ingredients
(g a.i. 100 kg-1)		 株高
Plant height
(cm)		 根长
Root length
(cm)		 茎粗
Stem thick
(cm)		 须根数
Fibrous root number		 鲜重
Fresh weight
(g)
ZY904-1 400 29.64±1.32 a 11.65±0.56 a 7.80±0.35 a 6.1±0.02 a 4.76±0.33 a
ZY904-3 400 27.32±0.82 a 11.85±0.36 a 8.61±0.56 a 5.8±0.06 a 4.83±0.54 a
ZY904-5 400 29.47±0.66 a 11.42±1.10 a 9.00±0.44 a 6.0±0.00 a 5.04±0.28 a
未添加成膜剂对照NCK 400 30.36±1.98 a 12.56±0.45 a 8.55±0.32 a 6.0±0.03 a 5.06±0.42 a
清水对照CK — 23.24±1.33 b 8.71±1.32 b 5.83±0.24 a 5.2±0.05 a 3.77±0.74 b

Table 5

Effects of thiacloprid suspension concentrate with different film-forming agents for seed coating on physiological indexes of maize"

成膜剂
Film-forming agent		 有效成分
Active
ingredient
(g a.i. 100 kg-1)		 叶绿素
Chlorophyll
(mg g-1 FW)		 根系活力
Root activity
(g h-1 FW)		 游离脯氨酸
Free proline accumulation
(μg g-1 DW)
室内试验
Laboratory		 田间试验
Field		 室内试验
Laboratory		 田间试验
Field		 室内试验
Laboratory		 田间试验
Field
ZY904-1 400 2.21±0.11 a 2.34±0.03 a 0.35±0.04 a 0.54±0.01 a 57.24±0.94 b 87.37±1.21 a
ZY904-3 400 2.16±0.27 a 2.33±0.02 a 0.38±0.08 a 0.55±0.03 a 62.39±1.32 a 87.11±1.29 a
ZY904-5 400 2.19±0.09 a 2.34±0.03 a 0.37±0.08 a 0.52±0.02 ab 59.22±0.72 b 86.82±0.65 a
未添加成膜剂对照NCK 400 2.04±0.07 ab 2.23±0.08 a 0.32±0.02 a 0.50±0.06 a 57.49±1.32 b 80.46±0.95 a
清水对照CK — 1.94±0.11 b 1.85±0.07 b 0.24±0.02 b 0.46±0.03 b 42.16±0.64 c 54.90±1.47 b

Table 6

Effects of thiacloprid suspension concentrate with different film-forming agents for seed coating on the antioxidant enzymes activity of maize"

成膜剂
Film-forming agent		 有效成分
Active ingredient
(g a.i. 100 kg-1)		 超氧化物歧化酶活性
SOD activity
(U g-1 FW min-1)		 过氧化氢酶活性
CAT activity
(U g-1 FW min-1)		 过氧化物酶活性
POD activity
(U g-1 FW min-1)
室内试验
Laboratory		 田间试验
Field		 室内试验
Laboratory		 田间试验
Field		 室内试验
Laboratory		 田间试验
Field
ZY904-1 400 71.36±2.32 a 50.85±0.96 a 134.23±4.28 a 81.74±2.47 a 64.82±4.53 a 55.30±2.12 a
ZY904-3 400 76.53±3.46 a 51.62±1.30 a 147.65±6.42 a 79.84±0.30 a 60.17±5.26 a 55.06±3.45 a
ZY904-5 400 80.32±2.49 a 50.06±0.84 a 130.27±8.24 a 80.70±2.44 a 64.22±2.79 a 54.23±1.41 a
未添加成膜剂对照NCK 400 74.21±4.12 a 46.32±1.31 a 140.59±7.33 a 74.33±2.44 a 62.47±4.62 a 45.29±2.63 ab
清水对照CK — 58.34±1.91 b 35.64±1.09 b 80.69±9.28 b 64.64±1.62 b 47.82±4.33b 36.53±2.34 c

Table 7

Fortified recovery of thiacloprid in maize leaves and soil"

添加水平
Spiked level
(mg kg-1)		 标准曲线
Calibration curve		 土壤Soil 玉米植株Maize plant
平均回收率
Average recovery (%)		 相对标准偏差
RSD (%)		 平均回收率
Average recovery (%)		 相对标准偏差
RSD (%)
0.01 y = 3775.92x + 6978240
R2 = 0.9931		 89.42 6.4 86.07 7.9
0.1 94.64 3.4 95.36 2.9
1.0 96.78 3.2 95.36 5.6

Fig. 1

Mass spectrogram of thiacloprid"

Fig. 2

Dispelling dynamics of thiacloprid suspension concentrate with different film-forming agents for seed coating in maize leaves"

Fig. 3

Dispelling dynamics ofthiacloprid suspension concentrate with different film-forming agents for seed coating in soil"

Fig. 4

Effects of thiacloprid suspension concentrate with different film-forming agents for seed coating on the amount of piercing- sucking insects"

[1] 张学林, 徐钧, 安婷婷, 侯小畔, 李潮海 . 不同氮肥水平下玉米根际土壤特性与产量的关系. 中国农业科学, 2016,49:2687-2699.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.14.004
Zhang X L, Xu J, An T T, Hou X P, Li H C . Relationship between rhizosphere soil properties and yield of maize at different nitrogen levels. Sci Agric Sin, 2016,49:2687-2699 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.14.004
[2] 刘微, 张晓翔, 彭辉, 王彪, 王永生, 仪美芹, 王晶杰, 杜鹏, 宋震洋 . 不同药剂配方种子包衣对玉米出苗安全性及玉米丝黑穗病和蚜虫的防治效果. 植物保护, 2017,43:224-229.
Liu W, Zhang X X, Peng H, Wang B, Wang Y S, Yi M Q, Wang J J, Du P, Song Z Y . Safety of different seed coating formulations to maize seeding and the control effect against maize head smut and aphids. Plant Prot, 2017,43:224-229 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3] 王坤 . 马铃薯、玉米邻作对大豆田刺吸式害虫的生态调控. 东北农业大学硕士学位论文, 黑龙江哈尔滨, 2017.
Wang K . Potato and Corn Neighbors Regulate Insect Pests in Soybean Fields. MS Thesis of Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China, 2017 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] Asin L, Pons X . Effect of high temperature on the growth and reproduction of corn aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae) and implications for their population dynamics on the northeastern Iberian peninsula. Environ Entomol, 2001,30:1127-1134.
doi: 10.1603/0046-225X-30.6.1127
[5] Manandhar R, Wright M G . Effects of interplanting flowering plants on the biological control of corn earworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in sweet corn. J Econ Entomol, 2016,109:113-119.
doi: 10.1093/jee/tov306 pmid: 26500338
[6] 杨菲, 张爱红, 闫冲, 孟凡思, 霍良占, 邸垫平, 苗洪芹, 王锡锋 . 人工饲养不同世代灰飞虱群体传播水稻黑条矮缩病毒的比较. 植物病理学报, 2017,47:551-557.
Yang F, Zhang A H, Yan C, Meng F S, Huo Z L, Di D P, Miao H Q, Wang T F . Comparison of RBSDV bearing rates and transmission rates among different generations of artificial reared Laodelphax striatellus Fallén. Acta Phytopathol Sin, 2017,47:551-557 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7] 田体伟, 王丽莎, 王燕, 郭线茹, 闫凤鸣, 李洪连 . 3种新烟碱类种子处理剂对玉米及其主要害虫的影响. 河南农业科学, 2015,44(11):73-78.
Tian T W, Wang L S, Wang Y, Guo X R, Yan F M, Li H L . Effects of seed coating with imidacloprid and thiamethoxam on maize and main pests. J Henan Agric Sci, 2015,44(11):73-78 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[8] 高志山, 张学峰, 刘海涛, 张文娟, 慕卫 . 新烟碱类杀虫剂种子包衣防治麦蚜的可行性评价. 植物保护学报, 2016,43:864-872.
Gao Z S, Zhang X F, Liu H T, Zhang W J, Mu W . Feasibility evaluation of neonicotinoid insecticide seed coating for the control of wheat aphid. Plant Prot, 2016,43:864-872 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[9] 卜成成, 姜兴印, 芦勇, 李刚, 邢则森, 张吉旺, 王振林 . 噻虫啉拌种对小麦种子及幼苗生长的生理效应. 中国农学通报, 2017,33(21):1-6.
Bu C C, Jiang X Y, Lu Y, Li G, Xing Z S, Zhang J W, Wang Z L . Thiacloprid seed dressing: the physiological effect on seed and seedling growth of wheat. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2017,33(21):1-6 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[10] Brandt A, Gorenflo A, Siede R, Meixner M, Büchler R . The neonicotinoids thiacloprid, imidacloprid, and clothianidin affect the immunocompetence of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). J Insect Physiol, 2016,86:40-47.
doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2016.01.001 pmid: 26776096
[11] Poletti M, Maia A, Omoto C . Toxicity of neonicotinoid insecticides to Neoseiulus californicus and Phytoseiulus macropilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and their impact on functional response to Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). Biol Control, 2007,40:30-36.
doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2006.09.001
[12] 季守民, 程传英, 袁传卫, 周秀玲, 姜兴印 . 7种新烟碱类杀虫剂对意大利蜜蜂的急性毒性及风险评价. 农药, 2015,54(4):282-285.
Ji S M, Cheng C Y, Yuan C W, Zhou X L, Jiang X Y . Acute toxicity and risk assessment of seven neonicotinoid insecticides on honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). Agrochemicals, 2015,54(4):282-285 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] 蔺哲广, 孟飞, 郑火青, 周婷, 胡福良 . 新烟碱类杀虫剂对蜜蜂健康的影响. 昆虫学报, 2014,57:607-615.
Lin Z G, Meng F, Zheng H Q, Zhou T, Hu F L . Effects of neonicotinoid insecticides on honeybee health. Acta Entomol Sin, 2014,57:607-615 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14] 齐麟, 王昱翔, 王宁, 段一鸣, 张盈, 王娅, 肖璐璐, 李晓刚 . 40%噻虫嗪·吡唑醚菌酯悬浮种衣剂成膜及生物学特性. 中国农业科学, 2017,50:1624-1634.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.09.008
Qi L, Wang Y X, Wang N, Duan Y M, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Xiao L L, Li X G . Film formation and biological properties of 40% thiamethoxam•pyraclostrobin flowable concentrate for seed coating. Sci Agric Sin, 2017,50:1624-1634 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.09.008
[15] Zeng D, Shi Y . Preparation and application of a novel environmentally friendly organic seed coating for rice. J Sci Food Agric, 2010,89:2181-2185.
doi: 10.1002/jsfa.v89:13
[16] 邓理楠, 李保同, 徐月明, 石庆华, 潘晓华 . 2种氟虫双酰胺复配制剂拌种对直播晚稻蓟马的控制效果及水稻生长的影响. 中国农学通报, 2011,27(12):286-290.
Deng L N, Li B T, Xu M Y, Shi Q H, Pan X H . Effects of mixed preparation of two kinds of fluorophora diamide on control effect and growth of rice in late rice thistle. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2011,27(12):286-290 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17] Liu Z, Dai Y, Huang G, Gu Y, Ni J, Wei H, Yuan S . Soil microbial degradation of neonicotinoid insecticides imidacloprid, acetamiprid, thiacloprid and imidaclothiz and its effect on the persistence of bioefficacy against horsebean aphidAphis craccivora Koch after soil application. Pest Manage Sci, 2011,67:1245-1252.
doi: 10.1002/ps.2174 pmid: 21538797
[18] 齐麟, 王昱翔, 王宁, 段一鸣, 张盈, 肖璐璐, 王娅, 李晓刚 . 水稻种衣剂成膜助剂的研究进展. 种子, 2017,36(6):54-60.
Qi L, Wang Y X, Wang N, Duan Y M, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Xiao L L, Li X G . Research progress of film forming assistant of rice seed coat agent. Seed, 2017,36(6):54-60 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[19] 董永义, 韩宁宁 . 种衣剂对玉米出苗和幼苗生长的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2016,44(4):149-151.
Dong Y Y, Han N N . Effects of seed dressing on seedling growth and seedling growth of maize. Jiangsu Agric Sci, 2016,44(4):149-151 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20] 张梦晗, 杨换玲, 郭线茹, 雷彩燕, 闫凤鸣 . 吡虫啉种衣剂对小麦种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响及相关生理机制. 河南农业科学, 2015,44(8):76-79.
Zhang M H, Yang H L, Guo X R, Lei C Y, Yan F M . Effects of imidacloprid seed coating agent on wheat seeds germination and seedlings growth and related physiological mechanism. J Henan Agric Sci, 2015,44(8):76-79 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21] Huang G B, Chai Q, Feng F X, Yu A Z . Effects of different tillage systems on soil properties, root growth, grain yield, and water use efficiency of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in arid northwest China. J Integr Agric, 2012,11:1286-1296.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(12)60125-7
[22] 程传英, 袁传卫, 殷万元, 张风文, 姜兴印 . 3种甲氧基丙烯酸酯类杀菌剂拌种对花生幼苗生长及生理作用的影响. 植物生理学报, 2015,51:337-344.
Cheng C Y, Yuan C W, Yin W Y, Zhang F W, Jiang X Y . Effects of seed dressing with three kinds of strobilurin fungicides on the growth and physiological function of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) seedling. Plant Physiol J, 2015,51:337-344 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[23] Anjum S, Farooq M, Wang L C, Xue L, Wang S G, Wang L C, Zhang S . Gas exchange and chlorophyll synthesis of maize cultivars are enhanced by exogenously-applied glycinebetaine under drought conditions. Plant Soil Environ, 2011,57:326-331.
[24] Jiang M, Zhang J . Water stress-induced abscisic acid accumulation triggers the increased generation of reactive oxygen species and up-regulates the activities of antioxidant enzymes in maize leaves. J Exp Bot, 2002,53:2401-2410.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erf090 pmid: 12432032
[25] Suzuki N, Katano K . Coordination between ROS regulatory systems and other pathways under heat stress and pathogen attack. Front Plant Sci, 2018,9:490.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00490 pmid: 29713332
[26] Westhuizen A J V D, Qian X M, Botha A M . Differential induction of apoplastic peroxidase and chitinase activities in susceptible and resistant wheat cultivars by Russian wheat aphid infestation. Plant Cell Rep, 1998,18:132-137.
doi: 10.1007/s002990050545
[27] 袁传卫 . 吡唑醚菌酯拌种对玉米生理特性及土壤微生物的影响. 山东农业大学硕士学位论文, 山东泰安, 2015.
Yuan C W . The Effect of Seed Coating of Pyraclostrobin on Physiological Characteristics of Maize and Soil Microbial. MS Thesis of Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an, Shandong, China, 2015 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28] 李金玉, 刘桂英 . 良种包衣新产品: 药肥复合型种衣剂. 种子, 1990, ( 6):53-56.
Li J Y, Liu G Y . New product of fine seed coat: compound seed coat of medicine and fertilizer. Seed, 1990, ( 6):53-56 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[29] 董飒, 张秀焕, 王杰, 夏晓明, 王开运 . 36%噻虫啉水分散粒剂对番茄幼苗根系活力及生理生化指标的影响. 农药学学报, 2014,16(1):35-40.
Dong S, Zhang X H, Wang J, Xia X M, Wang K Y . Effects of thiacloprid 360WG on physiological indices and root vigor in tomato seedling. Chin J Pestic Sci, 2014,16(1):35-40 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[30] 董国政 . 典型农药对设施菜地土壤质量与番茄生长的影响. 中国农业科学院硕士学位论文, 北京, 2012.
Dong G Z . Effects of Typical Pesticides on Soil Quality and Tomato Growth in Vegetable Fields. MS Thesis of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China, 2012 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[1] Liang Jin-Yu, Yin Jia-De, Wang Hong-Li, Zhang Guo-Ping, Hou Hui-Zhi, Dong Bo, Ma Ming-Sheng. Estimation of leaf nitrogen content in dryland forage maize using UAV-based hyperspectral imaging and machine learning [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[2] Yang Yang, Chang Shi-Hui, Tian Hong-Li, Yi Hong-Mei, Wang Lu, Ren Jie, Fan Ya-Ming, Liu Ya-Wei, Wang Feng-Ge, Zhao Jiu-Ran. Genetic diversity analysis of nationally approved maize varieties in different ecological regions [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[3] Yang Xin-Yu, Cui Wen-Tao, Dilinigeer Alimu, Wang Kai-Xiang, Wu Peng-Hao, Ren Jiao-Jiao. Genome-wide association and genomic selection analysis of the number of leaves above the ear in maize [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[4] Han Ya-Xin, He Guan-Hua, Zhang Xiao-Qiong, Zhang Deng-Feng, Li Yong-Xiang, Liu Xu-Yang, Wang Tian-Yu, Li Yu, Zou Hua-Wen, Li Chun-Hui. Identification of maize lateral root density genes resources through integrated RNA-seq and BSA-seq analyses [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[5] Sun Shu-Feng, Xu Zhen-Nan, Huang Jia-Xin, Weng Jian-Feng, Li Xin-Hai. Genome-wide identification of the maize MAPK gene family and its response to Fusarium verticillioides infection [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[6] Zhang Ning-Ning, Teng Yu-Fei, Ren Na-Na, Wei Xing-Zhuo, Yan Shu-Hao, Fan Ke-Xin, Wang Yong-Hong, Chen Wen-Kang, Zhang Xing-Hua, Zhu Wan-Chao, Xu Shu-Tu, Xue Ji-Quan. Phenotypic evaluation and plasticity analysis of drought resistance in 201 maize inbred lines [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[7] Zhang Hong-Rong, Wang Fei-Er, Li Pan, Qiu Hai-Long, Zhu Jing, Zhao Lian-Hao, Nan Yun-You, He Wei, Fan Zhi-Long, Hu Fa-Long, Chai Qiang, Yin Wen. Photosynthetic characteristics of 20% reduced irrigation combined with 25% organic substitution for chemical fertilizer in increasing silage maize yield [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[8] Cai Hong-Wei, Yu Ai-Zhong, Jiang Ke-Qiang, Wang Peng-Fei, Wang Yu-Long, Huo Jian-Zhe, Pang Xiao-Neng, Yin Bo, Shang Yong-Pan. Key mechanisms underlying the enhancement of sweet maize yield through partial substitution of chemical fertilizers with organic manure in arid irrigation districts [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[9] Tian Hong-Li, Yang Yang, Fan Ya-Ming, Yi Hong-Mei, Guo Dan-Dan, Wang Feng-Ge, Zhao Jiu-Ran. A novel set of tri-allelic variant SNP loci suitable for maize variety identification [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
[10] Guo Xiang-Yang, Tu Liang, Wang Dong, Liu Peng-Fei, Wang An-Gui, Yi Qiang, Ren Hong, Li Gang, Zhu Yun-Fang, Wu Xun, Jiang Yu-Lin, Tian Feng, Chen Ze-Hui. Application and prospects of Suwan germplasm in maize breeding in China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(3): 655-664.
[11] Meng Cheng, Wang Zhe. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the ZmPFK gene family under biotic and abiotic stresses in maize [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(3): 764-779.
[12] Li Xin-Hao, Xing Meng-Ke, Zhou Zi-Hui, Li Si-Ye, Ren Hao, Wang Hong-Zhang, Lai Hua-Jiang. Exogenous melatonin enhances heat tolerance of maize at the seedling stage by coordinating light and dark reactions [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(3): 839-856.
[13] Ma Liang, Ma Lu, Zhang Shu-Yu, Zhang Hui-Min, Wang Ren-Ming, Song Xu-Dong, Zhang Zhen-Liang, Mao Yu-Xiang, Lu Hu-Hua, Chen Guo-Qing, Hao De-Rong, Zhou Guang-Fei. Transcriptome analysis and identification of candidate genes associated with husk number in maize [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(3): 790-801.
[14] Liu Ji-Chang, Li Si-Ye, Li Xue-Ting, Wang Hong-Zhang, Liu Peng, Zhang Ji-Wang, Zhao Bin, Ren Bai-Zhao, Ren Hao. Effects of salt stress on root growth and nutrient absorption efficiency of different salt-tolerant summer maize varieties [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(2): 565-577.
[15] Lin Zi-Qing, Zhong Xing-Yu, Liu Fan, Ren Zi-Ao, Ma Rui, Deng Xiu-Feng, Wang Dong-Wei, Liu Shao-Peng, Chen Kang, Zhang Ming-Cai, Li Zhao-Hu, Zhou Yu-Yi, Duan Liu-Sheng. Development of ultra-high-yield technology for a wheat-maize double cropping system achieving a 2-ton annual grain yield per mu in the coastal plain of Northern Shandong peninsula, China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(2): 631-643.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Add: No. 80 Xueyuan South Rd, Beijing 100081, P. R. China E-mail: zwxb301@caas.cn
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd