聚-γ-谷氨酸对水稻产量、品质和养分吸收的影响

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2025.42022

Abstract

Abstract:

This experiment aimed to investigate the effects of poly-γ-glutamic acid (γ-PGA) on rice yield, quality, and nutrient absorption, providing a theoretical basis and technical reference for cultivating rice with high yield, superior quality, and efficient nutrient utilization. The field experiment was conducted in Huaqiao town, Wuxue county, Hubei province, from 2022 to 2023, using a randomized block design. The study included three rice varieties (Heixiandao (B), Gangteyou 8024 (R), and Huanghuazhan (H)) and two γ-PGA treatments (no application of γ-PGA fermentation solution (P0) and 25 kg hm^-2 γ-PGA fermentation solution (P1)). Dry matter mass, nitrogen accumulation, phosphorus accumulation, yield, appearance quality, grain protein content, and amylose content were analyzed. The results showed that γ-PGA application had a significant effect on rice yield in 2022, with P1 treatments increasing yield by 3.2%-10.8% compared to P0 treatments. However, there was no significant effect on yield in 2023. The dry matter mass of varieties B and R treated with γ-PGA was significantly higher than those without γ-PGA. Compared to BP0, the BP1 treatment significantly increased dry matter mass by 7.5%-8.5% at the full heading stage and by 5.9%-7.2% at the mature stage. Similarly, compared to RP0, the RP1 treatment significantly increased dry matter mass by 8.5%-8.8% at the full heading stage and by 3.3%-3.5% at the mature stage. γ-PGA application had no significant effect on the dry matter mass of variety H. Furthermore, γ-PGA significantly increased nitrogen and phosphorus accumulation. Compared to P0, the P1 treatments increased nitrogen accumulation by 12.5%-19.0% and phosphorus accumulation by 13.4%-20.3% at the full heading stage, and increased nitrogen accumulation by 7.2%-16.5% and phosphorus accumulation by 9.2%-29.0% at the mature stage. γ-PGA application also significantly enhanced amylose and protein content while reducing chalkiness degree and gel consistency, though it had no significant effects on grain length, grain width, or alkali spreading value. In conclusion, the application of γ-PGA significantly improved dry matter mass, nitrogen and phosphorus accumulation, and rice quality.

Key words: rice, poly-γ-glutamic acid (γ-PGA), yield, dry matter accumulation, nutrient absorption

YANG Cui-Hua, LI Shi-Hao, YI Xu-Xu, ZHENG Fei-Xiong, DU Xue-Zhu, SHENG Feng. Effects of poly-γ-glutamic acid on rice yield, quality, and nutrient uptake[J].Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(3): 785-796.

Figures/Tables 7

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Table 4

References 40

[1]	Wei X Y, Yang L J, Chen Z, Xia W H, Chen Y B, Cao M F, He N. Molecular weight control of poly-γ-glutamic acid reveals novel insights into extracellular polymeric substance synthesis in Bacillus licheniformis. Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod, 2024, 17: 60.
[2]	Zhang Q, Chen Y Z, Gao L, Chen J G, Ma X, Cai D B, Wang D, Chen S W. Enhanced production of poly-γ-glutamic acid via optimizing the expression cassette of Vitreoscilla hemoglobin in Bacillus licheniformis. Synth Syst Biotechnol, 2022, 7: 567-573. doi: 10.1016/j.synbio.2022.01.006 pmid: 35155838
[3]	Yan S, Yao H S, Chen Z, Zeng S Q, Xi X, Wang Y P, He N, Li Q B. Poly-γ-glutamic acid produced from Bacillus licheniformis CGMCC 2876 as a potential substitute for polyacrylamide in the sugarcane industry. Biotechnol Prog, 2015, 31: 1287-1294.
[4]	史文娟, 梁嘉平, 陶汪海, 谭帅, 王全九. 添加γ-聚谷氨酸减少土壤水分深层渗漏提高持水能力. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(23): 94-100.
	Shi W J, Liang J P, Tao W H, Tan S, Wang Q J. γ-PGA additive decreasing soil water infiltration and improving water holding capacity. Trans CSAE, 2015, 31(23): 94-100 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[5]	Zhang L, Yang X M, Gao D C, Wang L L, Li J, Wei Z B, Shi Y L. Effects of poly-γ-glutamic acid (γ-PGA) on plant growth and its distribution in a controlled plant-soil system. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 6090. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06248-2 pmid: 28729559
[6]	徐良菊, 李俊良, 金圣爱. 喷施不同种类叶面肥对晚播冬小麦氮磷钾养分积累及产量的影响. 山东农业科学, 2021, 53(1): 77-81.
	Xu L J, Li J L, Jin S A. Effects of spraying different kinds of foliar fertilizer on NPK nutrient accumulation and yield of late-sown winter wheat. Shandong Agric Sci, 2021, 53(1): 77-81 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7]	Bai N L, Zhang H L, Li S X, Zheng X Q, Zhang J Q, Sun L N, Lv W G. Effects of application rates of poly-γ-glutamic acid on vegetable growth and soil bacterial community structure. Appl Soil Ecol, 2020, 147: 103405.
[8]	柴虹, 吕春花, 王智刚, 宁明茹, 吴袁园, 管文彬, 胡浩. 含有γ-聚谷氨酸的高效微生物肥料的应用研究. 农业与技术, 2019, 39(3): 8-10.
	Chai H, Lyu C H, Wang Z G, Ning M R, Wu Y Y, Guan W B, Hu H. Study on the application of efficient microbial fertilizer containing γ-polyglutamic acid. Agric Technol, 2019, 39(3): 8-10 (in Chinese).
[9]	褚群, 董春娟, 尚庆茂. γ-聚谷氨酸对番茄穴盘育苗基质矿质养分供应及幼苗生长发育的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22: 855-862.
	Chu Q, Dong C J, Shang Q M. Effects of γ-poly glutamic acid on substrate mineral nutrient supply and growth of tomato plug seedlings. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2016, 22: 855-862 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[10]	张静静, 白由路, 杨俐苹, 卢艳丽, 王磊, 李格, 张银杰. 喷施γ-聚谷氨酸提高夏玉米产量和养分吸收的机制. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25: 1856-1867.
	Zhang J J, Bai Y L, Yang L P, Lu Y L, Wang L, Li G, Zhang Y J. Mechanism of spraying γ-poly glutamic acid increasing yield and nutrient uptake of summer maize. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2019, 25: 1856-1867 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[11]	Xu Z Q, Lei P, Feng X H, Xu X J, Xu H, Yang H B, Tang W Q. Effect of poly (γ-glutamic acid) on microbial community and nitrogen pools of soil. Acta Agric Scand Sect B Soil Plant Sci, 2013, 63: 657-668.
[12]	郭建忠. γ-聚谷氨酸及其吸水树脂对土壤性质和冬小麦生长的影响研究. 西安理工大学博士学位论文, 陕西西安, 2021.
	Guo J Z. Effects of γ-polyglutamic Acid and Its Absorbent Resin on Soil Properties and Winter Wheat Growth. PhD Dissertation of Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China, 2021 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13]	武国慧, 刘汉文, 高德才, 高纪超, 张蕾, 段刚强, 王玲莉, 石元亮. 聚-γ-谷氨酸与不同形态氮肥共施对油菜生长的影响. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(15): 48-54. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17040153
	Wu G H, Liu H W, Gao D C, Gao J C, Zhang L, Duan G Q, Wang L L, Shi Y L. Effects of co-application of poly-γ-glutamic acid and different forms of nitrogen fertilizer on rape growth. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2018, 34(15): 48-54 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17040153
[14]	刘端义, 梅金先, 张旅峰, 魏宗林, 黎银忠, 张似松, 柯云华, 陈守文, 姜玲. 聚-γ-谷氨酸及其增效肥在水稻上的应用. 湖北农业科学, 2010, 49: 2390-2394.
	Liu D Y, Mei J X, Zhang L F, Wei Z L, Li Y Z, Zhang S S, Ke Y H, Chen S W, Jiang L. Effects of poly-(γ-glutamic acid) synergist and beneficiate complex fertilizer on rice. Hubei Agric Sci, 2010, 49: 2390-2394 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15]	刁倩, 王斌, 曹辉, 赵飞, 徐晗, 闫红玲, 龙力刚, 杨振军. γ-聚谷氨酸对水稻､玉米､大豆生长及产量的影响. 南方农业, 2020, 14(28): 48-52.
	Diao Q, Wang B, Cao H, Zhao F, Xu H, Yan H L, Long L G, Yang Z J. Effects of γ-polyglutamic acid on the growth and yield of rice, maize and soybean. South China Agric, 2020, 14(28): 48-52 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[16]	Liang J P, Shi W J. Poly-γ-glutamic acid improves water-stable aggregates, nitrogen and phosphorus uptake efficiency, water-fertilizer productivity, and economic benefit in barren desertified soils of Northwest China. Agric Water Manag, 2021, 245: 106551.
[17]	Bai Y, Tan R, Yan Y R, Chen T, Feng Y T, Sun Q W, Li J K, Wang Y F, Liu F T, Wang J W, Zhang Y, Cheng X H, Wu G C. Effect of addition of γ-poly glutamic acid on bacterial nanocellulose production under agitated culture conditions. Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod, 2024, 17: 68.
[18]	Peng Y Y, Jiang B, Zhang T, Mu W M, Miao M, Hua Y F. High-level production of poly (γ-glutamic acid) by a newly isolated glutamate-independent strain, Bacillus methylotrophicus, Bacillus methylotrophicus. Proc Biochem, 2015, 50: 329-335.
[19]	Ma H Z, Li P P, Xiao N, Xia T. Poly-γ-glutamic acid promoted maize root development by affecting auxin signaling pathway and the abundance and diversity of rhizosphere microbial community. BMC Plant Biol, 2022, 22: 521. doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03908-y pmid: 36352394
[20]	魏全全, 张萌, 芶久兰, 胡华群, 何池, 卢宗云, 刘藜. 聚谷氨酸增效肥料对贵州黄壤区露天茄子生物效应及肥料利用率的影响. 河南农业科学, 2022, 51(5): 53-61.
	Wei Q Q, Zhang M, Gou J L, Hu H Q, He C, Lu Z Y, Liu L. Effect of polyglutamic acid-enhanced fertilizer on the biological effect and fertilizer utilization of open-air eggplant in yellow soil area of Guizhou. J Henan Agric Sci, 2022, 51(5): 53-61 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21]	Xu Z, Wan C, Xu X, Feng X, Xu H. Effect of poly (γ-glutamic acid) on wheat productivity, nitrogen use efficiency and soil microbes. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 2013, 13: 744-755.
[22]	彭碧琳, 李妹娟, 胡香玉, 钟旭华, 唐湘如, 刘彦卓, 梁开明, 潘俊峰, 黄农荣, 傅友强, 胡锐. 轻简氮肥管理对华南双季稻产量和氮肥利用率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54: 1424-1438. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.07.009
	Peng B L, Li M J, Hu X Y, Zhong X H, Tang X R, Liu Y Z, Liang K M, Pan J F, Huang N R, Fu Y Q, Hu R. Effects of simplified nitrogen managements on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of double-cropping rice in South China. Sci Agric Sin, 2021, 54: 1424-1438 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.07.009
[23]	Inbaraj B S, Wang J S, Lu J F, Siao F Y, Chen B H. Adsorption of toxic mercury (II) by an extracellular biopolymer poly (gamma-glutamic acid). Bioresour Technol, 2009, 100: 200-207.
[24]	Xu Z Q, Lei P, Feng X H, Xu X J, Liang J F, Chi B, Xu H. Calcium involved in the poly (γ-glutamic acid) -mediated promotion of Chinese cabbage nitrogen metabolism. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2014, 80: 144-152.
[25]	闫洪奎, 王欣然. 长期定位试验下秸秆还田配套深松对土壤性状及玉米产量的影响. 华北农学报, 2017, 32(增刊1): 250-255.
	Yan H K, Wang X R. The effects of straw returned form a complete set of deep scarification to soil properties and maize yield under a long-term trial. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 2017, 32(S1): 250-255 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2017.S1.043
[26]	黄巧义, 唐拴虎, 李苹, 付弘婷, 张木, 黄旭, 易琼, 张发宝. 包膜材料γ-聚谷氨酸对菜心的农学效应. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22: 1645-1654.
	Huang Q Y, Tang S H, Li P, Fu H T, Zhang M, Huang X, Yi Q, Zhang F B. Agronomic effects of coating material γ-polyglutamic acid on Chinese flowering cabbage. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2016, 22: 1645-1654 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[27]	史文娟, 王培华, 林凤妹, 李曼, 王瀚. γ-聚谷氨酸在农田系统应用的研究进展及展望. 灌溉排水学报, 2022, 41(5): 1-7.
	Shi W J, Wang P H, Lin F M, Li M, Wang H. The application of poly-γ glutamic acid in agriculture: a review. J Irrig Drain, 2022, 41(5): 1-7 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28]	Liu L, Shi W J, Pang L N. Effects of water-nitrogen coupling on soil water and nitrogen, photosynthesis, yield and water use of lettuce under different application rates of poly-γ-glutamic acid. Irrig Drain, 2023, 72: 105-118.
[29]	Yin A M, Jia Y P, Qiu T L, Gao M, Cheng S T, Wang X M, Sun Y M. Poly-γ-glutamic acid improves the drought resistance of maize seedlings by adjusting the soil moisture and microbial community structure. Appl Soil Ecol, 2018, 129: 128-135.
[30]	Wang G L, Liu Q, Wang Y, Li J Y, Chen Y, Wen Q L, Zheng D W, Kang W, Quan H L. The application and functional progress of γ-poly-glutamic acid in food: a mini-review. Curr Pharm Des, 2020, 26: 5347-5352.
[31]	何宇, 吕卫光, 李双喜, 郑宪清, 张翰林, 张娟琴, 张海韵, 白娜玲, 刘善良. γ-聚谷氨酸发酵液对小白菜生长及氮磷肥料利用率的影响. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35: 329-337. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.02.10
	He Y, Lyu W G, Li S X, Zheng X Q, Zhang H L, Zhang J Q, Zhang H Y, Bai N L, Liu S L. Effects of γ-polyglutamic acid fermentation broth on growth of pakchoi and utilization rate of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer. Acta Agric Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35: 329-337 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[32]	刘磊, 宋娜娜, 齐晓丽, 崔克辉. 水稻根系特征与氮吸收利用效率关系的研究进展. 作物杂志, 2022, (1): 11-19.
	Liu L, Song N N, Qi X L, Cui K H. Research advances on the relationship between root characteristics and nitrogen uptake and utilization efficiency in rice. Crops, 2022, (1): 11-19 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[33]	Lipson D, Näsholm T. The unexpected versatility of plants: organic nitrogen use and availability in terrestrial ecosystems. Oecologia, 2001, 128: 305-316. doi: 10.1007/s004420100693 pmid: 24549899
[34]	郭立. 不同水稻品种氮素吸收与利用的差异及生理基础. 广西大学硕士学位论文, 广西南宁, 2007.
	Guo L. Differences in Nitrogen Absorption and Utilization among Different Rice Varieties and Their Physiological Basis. MS Thesis of Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi, China, 2007 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[35]	单玉华. 不同类型水稻品种氮素吸收利用的差异及控制. 扬州大学博士学位论文, 江苏扬州, 2002.
	Shan Y H. Difference and Control of Nitrogen Absorption and Utilization of Different Types of Rice Varieties. PhD Dissertation of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China, 2002 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[36]	Liang J P, Shi W J, He Z J, Pang L N, Zhang Y C. Effects of poly-γ-glutamic acid on water use efficiency, cotton yield, and fiber quality in the sandy soil of southern Xinjiang, China. Agric Water Manag, 2019, 218: 48-59.
[37]	张雪洁. 聚谷氨酸调控草莓生长和果实品质的生理机制. 河南科技学院硕士学位论文, 河南新乡, 2023.
	Zhang X J. Physiological Mechanism of Polyglutamic Acid Regulating Strawberry Growth and Fruit Quality. MS Thesis of Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang, Henan, China, 2023 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[38]	张文. γ-聚谷氨酸制备及其农用效果. 中国农业科学院硕士学位论文, 北京, 2014.
	Zhang W. Preparation of γ-polyglutamic Acid and Its Agricultural Effect. MS Thesis of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China, 2014 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[39]	刘方丹, 刘榴, 高久林, 谢金长, 姜玲. 聚-γ-谷氨酸提高藤稔葡萄品质的研究. 中国南方果树, 2014, 43(1): 23-27.
	Liu F D, Liu L, Gao J L, Xie J C, Jiang L. Improving the fruit quality of fujiminori grape using poly-γ-glutamic acid. South China Fruits, 2014, 43(1): 23-27 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[40]	夏朵, 周浩, 何予卿. 稻米品质的遗传研究及分子育种进展. 华中农业大学学报, 2022, 41(1): 48-61.
	Xia D, Zhou H, He Y Q. Progress on genetic study and molecular breeding of rice quality. J Huazhong Agric Univ, 2022, 41(1): 48-61 (in Chinese with English abstract).

Related Articles 15

[1]	Hu Chuan, Zhao Kai-Nan, Huang Xiu-Li, Wu Jin-Zhi, Ren Kai-Ming, Wang He-Zheng, Fu Guo-Zhan, Huang Ming, Li You-Jun. Effects of tillage methods and nitrogen rates on yield and quality of dryland wheat under one-off irrigation [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2]	Ma Sheng-Qian, Wang Zhi-Ping, Chen Hao-Tian, Dou Shu-Xian, Zhang Yan, Deng Ai-Xing, Zhang Wei-Jian, Yuan Xiang-Yang, Song Zhen-Wei. Effects of tillage methods and nitrogen application rate on maize yield and soil aggregates in northeastern China under straw returning [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3]	Hu Zhao, Qian Run, Xie Feng-Pu, Ying Su-Ping. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the SPX gene family in rice under phosphorus treatment [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(6): 1902-1912.
[4]	Zou Yi-Mei, Xu Min, Wang Hai-Yang, Yao Hui, Wang Jia-Feng, Liu Hao, Ren Dai-Sheng. Analysis of transcription factor regulatory networks in two-line male sterile rice seedling roots in response to salt stress [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742.
[5]	Zhang Si-Si, Zhao Xiang-Hui, Zhou Yang, Yao Yun-Feng, Zhu Rong-Yu, Dong Yuan-Jie, Hu Guo-Qing, Xu Tong, Liu Zhao-Xin. Effects of plowing and green manure returning in winter fallow period on soil physicochemical properties and yield in continuously cropped peanut [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[6]	Zhang Ning-Ning, Teng Yu-Fei, Ren Na-Na, Wei Xing-Zhuo, Yan Shu-Hao, Fan Ke-Xin, Wang Yong-Hong, Chen Wen-Kang, Zhang Xing-Hua, Zhu Wan-Chao, Xu Shu-Tu, Xue Ji-Quan. Phenotypic evaluation and plasticity analysis of drought resistance in 201 maize inbred lines [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[7]	Wang Yu-Cheng, Zhang Lu, Liu A-Kang, Huang Jian-Liang, Peng Shao-Bing, Yuan Shen. Strategies and prospects for large-scale crop yield improvement based on yield gap [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[8]	Zhang Zhen, Feng Lian-Jie, Shi Yu, Yu Zhen-Wen, Zhang Yong-Li. Yield formation of wheat with different ear types under water-saving supplementary irrigation conditions [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[9]	Yan An, Jiang Kun-Wei, Wang Rong-Yuan, Tian Lin, Zhang Lu, Wang Yun, Xu Jian-Long. Identification and cloning of SVN7 controlling small vascular bundle number in the rice flag leaf [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[10]	Liu Xin-Meng, Ren Hao, Zhang Ji-Bo, Zhang Ji-Wang, Zhao Bin, Ren Bai-Zhao, Liu Peng, Wang Hong-Zhang. Physiological mechanisms of methyl jasmonate (MeJA) alleviating the effects of heat stress on ear differentiation in maize [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[11]	Wang Zhuang-Zhuang, Wu Zi-Jun, Zhang Yong-Xin, Zhang Xin-Yuan, Yuan Li-Xue, Chen Ru-Xue, Liu Shi-Ju, Duan Jian-Zhao, Feng Wei, Wang Tong-Chao, Wang Yong-Hua. Optimized water-nitrogen synergy enhances winter wheat yield and nitrogen use efficiency in clay-loam fluvo-aquic soils of southeastern Henan, China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[12]	Zhang Hong-Rong, Wang Fei-Er, Li Pan, Qiu Hai-Long, Zhu Jing, Zhao Lian-Hao, Nan Yun-You, He Wei, Fan Zhi-Long, Hu Fa-Long, Chai Qiang, Yin Wen. Photosynthetic characteristics of 20% reduced irrigation combined with 25% organic substitution for chemical fertilizer in increasing silage maize yield [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[13]	Zhao Jia-Xue, Zhou Long-Hao, Guo Qi-Yuan, Shang Lun-Xiao, Wang Han, Liu Zhi-Tao, Chen Xi, Zhang Xiao-Pei, Song Xian-Liang, Ahmedov Miraziz Baltaevich, Mao Li-Li. Long-term stubble return and subsoiling enhance cotton yields in coastal saline-alkali soils by improving soil conditions and photosynthetic characteristics [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[14]	Guo Xing-Yu, Hu Dan, Lin Su-Qi, Wang Meng-Kai, Tan Wen-Feng, Huang Chuan-Qin. Biochar combined with chemical fertilizer increases maize yield and soil ecosystem multifunctionality in an intercropped maize-soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[15]	Chen Wei, Wei Wan-Juan, Zhao Qi-Bing, Chang Dong-Wei, Yu Ling-Bo, Zhai Peng-Fei, Feng Zhi-Ming, Chen Zong-Xiang, Ren Yang-Tao, Yang Peng, Liu Hai-Lang, Li Zhen-Fu, Yang Yong-Le, Jin Yan-Gang, Zuo Shi-Min. Developing new germplasm of high-quality and early-maturing rice by editing Hd6 via CRISPR/Cas9 [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(4): 1046-1056.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

年份 Year	生育期 Growth stage	指标 Indicator	品种 Variety	γ-PGA treatment	品种 × γ-PGA Variety × γ-PGA
2022		产量 Yield	871.738^**	1.229^*	7.416
		有效穗 Effective panicle	30.662^**	1.299	0.091
		穗粒数 Spikelets per panicle	34.814^**	0.218	0.003
		千粒重 1000-kernel weight	3796.451^**	3.589	0.084
	I	干物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation	133.636^**	48.374^**	0.112
	II	干物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation	50.072^**	4.408	0.060
	I	氮素积累量 Nitrogen accumulation	182.658^**	82.530^**	2.395
	II	氮素积累量 Nitrogen accumulation	86.224^**	26.157^**	0.167
	I	磷素积累量 Phosphorus accumulation	268.848^**	126.361^**	0.278
	II	磷素积累量 Phosphorus accumulation	149.059^**	87.727^**	2.036
2022		产量 Yield	15.815^*	0.119	0.176
		有效穗 Effective panicle	70.308^**	0.962	0.154
		穗粒数 Spikelets per panicle	28.351^**	1.082	0.412
		千粒重 1000-kernel weight	8131.307^**	0.910	0.474
	I	干物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation	517.003^**	77.750^**	1.665
	II	干物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation	30.725^**	2.121	0.160
	I	氮素积累量 Nitrogen accumulation	185.366^**	41.353^**	1.061
	II	氮素积累量 Nitrogen accumulation	39.619^**	6.928^*	0.492
	I	磷素积累量 Phosphorus accumulation	549.982^**	188.645^**	5.115^*
	II	磷素积累量 Phosphorus accumulation	60.943^**	8.543^*	0.354

年份 Year	处理 Treatment	有效穗 Effective panicle (×10⁴ hm^-2)	穗粒数 Spikelets per panicle	千粒重 1000-kernel weight (g)	结实率 Seed-setting rate (%)	产量 Grain yield (t hm^-2)
2022	BP0	306.67 ± 1.67 bc	153.92 ± 1.84 b	25.59 ± 0.01 a	79.79 ± 0.60 a	9.13 ± 0.26 b
	BP1	310.00 ± 0 b	155.13 ± 0.42 b	25.69 ± 0.09 a	80.51 ± 0.73 a	10.12 ± 0.33 a
	RP0	285.00 ± 10.41 d	177.77 ± 7.60 a	25.59 ± 0.02 a	78.96 ± 0.28 a	10.40 ± 0.34 a
	RP1	290.00 ± 8.66 cd	184.47 ± 4.90 a	25.66 ± 0.08 a	79.37 ± 0.51 a	10.74 ± 0.18 a
	HP0	330.00 ± 5.00 a	157.52 ± 0.77 b	21.88 ± 0 b	71.44 ± 0.31 b	7.45 ± 0.36 c
	HP1	338.33 ± 1.67 a	159.28 ± 1.04 b	21.93 ± 0.02 b	72.01 ± 0.40 b	7.77 ± 0.34 c
2023	BP0	302.14 ± 2.03 c	154.12 ± 1.18 b	25.19 ± 0.03 a	78.33 ± 0.38 a	8.56 ± 0.26 a
	BP1	308.22 ± 4.06 bc	155.15 ± 1.08 b	25.19 ± 0.03 a	78.89 ± 0.85 a	8.99 ± 0.27 a
	RP0	318.36 ± 4.06 b	175.02 ± 2.63 a	25.11 ± 0.05 a	73.74 ± 0.56 bc	9.15 ± 0.30 a
	RP1	320.39 ± 7.31 b	175.74 ± 2.67 a	25.17 ± 0.04 a	74.65 ± 0.43 b	9.50 ± 0.13 a
	HP0	352.83 ± 3.51 a	144.43 ± 4.69 c	21.21 ± 0.01 b	70.90 ± 1.05 d	7.78 ± 0.68 a
	HP1	354.86 ± 2.03 a	149.71 ± 3.03 bc	21.22 ± 0.04 b	72.02 ± 0.29 cd	8.18 ± 0.93 a

年份 Year	处理Treatment	干物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation (t hm^-2)		转运量 Transport (t hm^-2)	转运率 Transport rate (%)	收获指数 Harvest index (%)	对籽粒贡献率 Contribution to grain (%)
年份 Year	处理Treatment	齐穗期 Full heading stage	成熟期 Mature stage	转运量 Transport (t hm^-2)	转运率 Transport rate (%)	收获指数 Harvest index (%)	对籽粒贡献率 Contribution to grain (%)
2022	BP0	14.84 ± 0.09 b	20.94 ± 0.65 c	6.10 ± 0.66 b	28.99 ± 2.26 b	43.66 ± 1.64 a	66.79 ± 6.63 a
	BP1	15.96 ± 0.15 a	22.19 ± 0.28 bc	6.23 ± 0.17 b	28.06 ± 0.47 b	45.64 ± 2.01 a	61.78 ± 3.50 a
	RP0	14.86 ± 0.06 b	23.83 ± 0.60 ab	8.98 ± 0.66 a	37.57 ± 1.76 a	43.63 ± 0.46 a	86.08 ± 3.56 a
	RP1	16.13 ± 0.12 a	24.66 ± 0.58 a	8.53 ± 0.52 a	34.54 ± 1.34 ab	43.60 ± 1.34 a	79.55 ± 5.44 a
	HP0	12.01 ± 0.36 d	17.68 ± 0.39 d	5.66 ± 0.28 b	32.04 ± 1.39 ab	42.16 ± 2.29 a	76.80 ± 7.56 a
	HP1	13.10 ± 0.27 c	18.72 ± 0.92 d	5.62 ± 1.06 b	29.58 ± 4.48 b	41.87 ± 3.69 a	73.36 ± 15.90 a
2023	BP0	14.83 ± 0.09 d	22.42 ± 0.71 cd	7.59 ± 0.75 a	32.69 ± 2.34 a	38.26 ± 1.52 a	88.73 ± 9.39 a
	BP1	16.09 ± 0.09 c	24.02 ± 1.52 bc	7.93 ± 1.44 a	33.54 ± 3.75 a	37.77 ± 3.00 a	88.79 ± 17.26 a
	RP0	17.46 ± 0.32 b	26.43 ± 0.38 ab	8.97 ± 0.67 a	32.89 ± 2.09 a	34.66 ± 1.41 a	98.29 ± 8.60 a
	RP1	19.00 ± 0.06 a	27.30 ± 0.43 a	8.29 ± 0.48 a	31.35 ± 1.28 a	34.84 ± 1.03 a	87.46 ± 6.22 a
	HP0	12.23 ± 0.21 f	19.66 ± 0.87 d	7.02 ± 0.72 a	32.30 ± 2.37 a	40.62 ± 4.38 a	92.79 ± 16.31 a
	HP1	13.15 ± 0.09 e	20.32 ± 0.85 d	6.76 ± 0.71 a	32.80 ± 2.35 a	41.49 ± 5.96 a	87.21 ± 20.24 a

年份 Year	处理 Treatment	粒长 Length (mm)	粒宽 Width (mm)	垩白度Chalkiness degree (%)	胶稠度 Gel consistency (mm)	碱消值 Alkali spreading value (mm)	直链淀粉Amylose content (%)	蛋白质 Protein content (%)
2022	BP0	6.34±0.03 b	1.90±0.01 b	6.77±0.11 ab	81.50±1.04 a	5.17±0.15 bc	12.48±0.07 bc	8.67±0.04 ab
	BP1	6.43±0.04 a	1.91±0.01 b	6.65±0.28 b	80.00±0.29 ab	5.28±0.16 abc	12.88±0.29 b	8.85±0.13 a
	RP0	6.09±0.02 c	2.13±0.01 a	6.88±0.26 ab	79.83±0.60 ab	4.83±0.15 c	11.90±0.10 c	8.62±0.23 ab
	RP1	6.17±0.01 c	2.14±0.01 a	6.42±0.07 b	78.17±0.93 b	5.08±0.12 bc	12.32±0.20 bc	8.80±0.16 a
	HP0	6.18±0.04 c	1.79±0.01 c	7.50±0.23 a	70.50±0.58 c	5.65±0.21 a	14.02±0.23 a	8.07±0.20 c
	HP1	6.30±0.02 b	1.80±0.02 c	7.17±0.38 ab	68.50±0.29 c	5.72±0.13 a	14.32±0.21 a	8.22±0.16 bc
2023	BP0	6.61±0.04 ab	2.02±0.04 b	6.73±0.12 bc	82.83±0.73 a	4.68±0.04 c	12.28±0.08 bc	8.62±0.09 abc
	BP1	6.70±0.04 a	2.02±0.04 b	6.40±0.20 cd	81.17±0.44 a	4.87±0.15 bc	12.43±0.03 b	8.82±0.19 a
	RP0	6.22±0.03 d	2.19±0.03 a	7.55±0.10 a	81.67±0.44 a	4.88±0.04 bc	11.77±0.09 c	8.45±0.08 bc
	RP1	6.31±0.04 d	2.21±0.04 a	7.05±0.21 b	80.33±1.17 a	5.10±0.15 b	12.12±0.12 b	8.67±0.12 ab
	HP0	6.50±0.03 c	1.90±0.03 c	6.42±0.09 cd	71.17±1.76 b	6.15±0.08 a	14.20±0.24 a	8.08±0.02 d
	HP1	6.56±0.01 bc	1.91±0.01 c	6.18±0.10 d	69.50±1.76 b	6.32±0.12 a	14.48±0.27 a	8.32±0.04 cd

Effects of poly-γ-glutamic acid on rice yield, quality, and nutrient uptake

RichHTML434

PDF