Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica,

Acta Agronomica Sinica ›› 2026, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (10): 3084-3094.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2026.63017

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of mixed sowing of leguminous forages on quality, yield and compensatory effect of nitrogen-reduced silage maize

Peng Ya(), Wang Di-Cheng, Ren Qiang, Lu Hao, Zhang Ming-Long, Li Hai-Long, Fan Zhi-Long, Yin Wen, Wang Feng, Hu Fa-Long(), Chai Qiang   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Arid Land Crop Science / Agronomy College, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China
  • Received:2026-02-02 Accepted:2026-06-11 Online:2026-10-12 Published:2026-06-22
  • Contact: Hu Fa-Long, E-mail: hufl@gsau.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Gansu Longyuan Youth Talent Project(LYYC-2025-05);Gansu Provincial Science and Technology Support Project(KJZC-2026-26);National Key Research and Development Program(2022YFD1900200);National Natural Science Foundation of China(U21A20218)

Abstract:

To address the urgent need for nitrogen (N) fertilizer reduction in the sustainable silage maize production in the Hexi oasis irrigation area, while mitigating the associated decline in forage yield and quality, under reduced N conditions, this study investigated the effects and compensatory mechanism of intercropping with leguminous forages on the yield and quality of silage maize under nitrogen-reduced conditions, aiming to provide a scientific basis for the sustainable production of silage maize in this region. The experiment was conducted in 2023-2024 at the Wuwei Oasis agricultural comprehensive experimental station using a split-plot design. The main plots consisted of three planting patterns: monocropped silage maize (M), silage maize-millet bean intercropping (MH), and silage maize-lablab bean intercropping (ML). The subplots included four nitrogen application rates: conventional nitrogen application (N3, 360 kg hm-2), 15% nitrogen reduction (N2, 306 kg hm-2), 30% nitrogen reduction (N1, 252 kg hm-2), and no nitrogen application (N0, 0 kg hm-2). The results showed that under 30% nitrogen reduction (N1), compared to monoculture (M), the MH and ML patterns increased crude protein content by 24.7% and 27.6%, starch content by 35.6% and 37.3%, and crude ash content by 26.5% and 72.2%, respectively, neutral detergent fiber content decreased by 11.9% and 14.0%, the acid detergent fiber content decreased by 10.5% and 14.9%, and the relative feed value increased by 18.6% and 22.3%, respectively. Under N1, dry matter accumulation and forage yield of silage maize in the MH and ML were significantly higher than in M, with dry matter accumulation increasing by 18.8% (MH) and 31.5% (ML) and the forage yield by 28.9% (MH) and 45.2% (ML), respectively. Furthermore, under N1, the MH and ML patterns exhibited compensatory effects for crude protein, starch, crude ash, RFV and forage yield compared to the conventional nitrogen monoculture (N3+M), with ML showing stronger compensation than MH. Therefore, silage maize-lablab bean intercropping combined with a nitrogen application rate of 252 kg hm-2 (30% reduction) can improve both forage quality and yield, representing a suitable planting pattern and nitrogen application rate for sustainable silage maize production in the oasis irrigation area.

Key words: silage maize, mixed production, nitrogen reduction, forage quality, compensation effect

Fig. 1

Average air temperature and precipitation at the experimental station"

Fig. 2

Effects of intercropping with forage legumes and reducing nitrogen fertilizer application on the contents of crude protein (A), crude (B), starch (C), and crude ash (D) in silage maize cropping systems M: sole silage maize; MH: silage maize intercropped with fodder soybean; ML: silage maize intercropped with lablab bean. N3: conventional N application (360 kg hm-2); N2: 15% N reduction (306 kg hm-2); N1: 30% N reduction (252 kg hm-2); N0: zero N application (0 kg hm-2). C: planting pattern; N: nitrogen application rate; C×N: interaction between planting pattern and nitrogen application rate. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments within the same planting pattern in the same year (P < 0.05). *: P < 0.05; **: P < 0.01; NS: P > 0.05."

Table 1

Effects of intercropping forage legumes and reduced nitrogen fertilizer application on relative feed value in silage maize cropping systems (%)"

种植模式
Cropping pattern
施氮水平
N fertilizer rate
2023 2024
中性洗涤纤维
Neutral detergent fiber
酸性洗涤纤维
Acid detergent fiber
相对饲用价值
Relative feed value
中性洗涤纤维
Neutral detergent fiber
酸性洗涤纤维
Acid detergent fiber
相对饲用价值
Relative feed
value
M N3 48.92±1.89 ab 28.77±1.30 ab 125.47±5.36 de 50.92±2.30 ab 30.59±1.39 ab 117.87±3.91 fg
N2 48.58±3.11 ab 27.86±1.77 abc 127.85±5.91 cde 50.91±5.45 ab 29.63±1.88 abc 119.96±10.88 fg
N1 48.72±0.65 ab 27.17±0.58 bcde 128.32±1.93 cd 49.05±0.88 abc 28.89±0.62 bcd 124.86±2.96 efg
N0 50.11±1.09 a 29.12±0.59 a 121.87±3.08 e 53.45±3.16 a 30.97±0.63 a 111.90±5.91 g
MH N3 47.66±1.19 abc 26.73±0.41 cde 131.89±3.42 cde 43.99±3.55 de 28.42±0.43 cde 140.59±11.57 bcd
N2 45.52±1.40 bcd 25.56±0.28 ef 140.03±4.43 abcd 43.52±2.28 de 27.17±0.30 def 143.89±7.98 abc
N1 44.08±5.06 cd 24.31±1.24 f 148.17±20.37 ab 42.08±4.05 e 25.85±1.32 fg 151.90±16.34 ab
N0 47.97±0.17 abc 27.52±0.72 abcd 129.75±1.54 cde 47.97±0.17 bcd 29.26±0.77 abc 127.05±1.60 def
ML N3 46.81±1.19 abcd 25.75±0.83 ef 135.84±3.87 bcde 43.48±1.93 de 27.38±0.88 def 143.56±5.15 abc
N2 45.36±2.37 bcd 24.87±0.27 f 141.82±7.56 abc 42.70±0.18 e 26.71±0.29 ef 147.19±0.46 abc
N1 43.22±2.50 d 22.78±0.81 g 152.52±9.32 a 40.89±2.13 e 24.96±0.89 g 157.11±6.61 a
N0 47.31±1.27 abcd 25.96±0.63 def 134.05±2.72 bcde 45.31±1.96 cde 28.45±0.69 cde 136.02±6.32 cde
显著性Significance (P-value)
种植模式C ** ** ** ** ** **
施氮水平N * ** ** ** ** **
C×N NS NS NS NS NS NS

Fig. 3

Effects of intercropping forage legumes and reduced nitrogen fertilizer application on dry matter accumulation in silage maize Treatments and abbreviations are the same as those given in Fig. 2. The error line above the figureindicates the LSD value (P < 0.05). **: P < 0.01."

Fig. 4

Effects of intercropping forage legumes and reduced nitrogen fertilizer application on dry matter accumulation in legume crops Treatments and abbreviations are the same as those given in Fig. 2. H indicates fodder soybean; L indicates lablab bean. The error line above the figure indicates the LSD value (P < 0.05). **: P < 0.01."

Fig. 5

Effects of intercropping forage legumes and reduced nitrogen fertilizer application on forage yield in silage maize cropping systems Treatments and abbreviations are the same as those given in Fig. 2. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments within the same planting pattern in the same year (P < 0.05). **: P < 0.01."

Table 2

Compensation index of forage quality and yield in silage maize cropping systems under intercropping with forage legumes and reduced nitrogen fertilizer application (%)"

年份
Year
种植模式
Cropping pattern
施氮水平
N fertilizer rate
粗蛋白
Crude protein
粗脂肪
Crude fat
淀粉
Starch
粗灰分
Crude ash
相对饲用价值
Relative feed value
饲草产量
Forage yield
2023 MH N2 1.18 b 1.02 b 1.00 ab 1.06 c 1.12 b 1.16 c
N1 1.16 b 1.03 b 1.02 a 1.06 c 1.18 ab 1.21 b
N0 0.87 d 0.98 c 0.61 c 0.84 e 1.03 d 0.87 d
ML N2 1.07 c 1.02 b 1.00 ab 1.30 b 1.13 b 1.23 b
N1 1.25 a 1.11 a 1.04 a 1.44 a 1.22 a 1.36 a
N0 0.92 d 1.00 bc 0.62 c 0.95 d 1.07 c 0.84 d
2024 MH N2 1.04 bc 1.01 b 1.00 b 1.07 c 1.22 c 1.14 c
N1 1.08 b 1.04 a 1.03 a 1.07 c 1.29 b 1.16 bc
N0 0.64 d 0.89 d 0.61 c 0.85 e 1.08 e 0.77 d
ML N2 1.03 c 1.02 ab 1.00 b 1.32 b 1.25 bc 1.19 b
N1 1.11 a 1.06 a 1.04 a 1.46 a 1.33 a 1.26 a
N0 0.65 d 0.92 c 0.62 c 0.97 d 1.15 d 0.78 d
[1] 孙建好, 赵建华, 李伟绮, 等. 施氮对玉米||大豆间作产量稳定性的影响. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2025, 33: 1138-1145.
Sun J H, Zhao J H, Li W Q, et al. Effect of nitrogen application on yield stability of maize||soybean intercropping system. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2025, 33: 1138-1145 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[2] 卢怡宁, 谷晓博, 杜娅丹, 等. 保护性耕作和施氮促进土壤碳氮矿化提高玉米光合特性和产量. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58: 3051-3063.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.15.009
Lu Y N, Gu X B, Du Y D, et al. Conservation tillage and nitrogen application promote soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization and improve maize photosynthetic characteristics and yield. Sci Agric Sin, 2025, 58: 3051-3063 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.15.009
[3] 王永栋, 李利利, 王宏凯, 等. 长期不同施肥措施对旱作春玉米干物质积累和水氮利用效率的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2025(8): 182-191.
Wang Y D, Li L L, Wang H K, et al. Effects of long-term different fertilization measures on dry matter accumulation and water-nitrogen utilization efficiency of spring maize in dryland of the Loess plateau. Soil Fert Sci China, 2025(8): 182-191 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] 代新俊, 杨雪琴, 雷镇宁, 等. 生物炭和不同形态氮肥对玉米氮素吸收及土壤肥力的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2026, 54(1): 137-139.
Dai X J, Yang X Q, Lei Z N, et al. Effects of biochar and different forms of nitrogen fertilizers on nitrogen uptake in maize and soil fertility. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2026, 54(1): 137-139 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[5] 王鹏飞, 于爱忠, 王凤, 等. 干旱地区绿肥还田条件下减氮对玉米农艺性状、产量及籽粒品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58: 2552-2563.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.13.005
Wang P F, Yu A Z, Wang F, et al. Effects of reducing nitrogen application on maize agronomic traits, grain yield and quality under green manure returning to field system in arid areas. Sci Agric Sin, 2025, 58: 2552-2563 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.13.005
[6] Zhang W, Lu J S, Bai J, et al. Introduction of soybean into maize field reduces N2O emission intensity via optimizing nitrogen source utilization. J Clean Prod, 2024, 442: 141052.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141052
[7] 张建喜, 李广, 王钰煐, 等. 水氮协同对河西走廊青贮玉米土壤氮含量及酶活性的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2024(10): 16-25.
Zhang J X, Li G, Wang Y Y, et al. Effects of water and nitrogen synergies on soil nitrogen content and enzyme activity of maize silage in Hexi Corridor. Soil Fert Sci China, 2024(10): 16-25 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[8] 武涛, 宋福超, 曹文侠, 等. 不同套种行数比对紫花苜蓿/玉米混合青贮品质的影响. 草地学报, 2025, 33: 1961-1971.
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2025.06.027
Wu T, Song F C, Cao W X, et al. Effects of different interplanting row ratio on rilage quality of alfalfa/corn mixed silage. Acta Agrestia Sin, 2025, 33: 1961-1971 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[9] 付浩川, 李成, 李贺男, 等. 不同禾豆间作模式对作物产量及水氮利用的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2025, 43(3): 200-209.
Fu H C, Li C, Li H N, et al. Effects of different cereal-legume intercropping systems on crop yield, water usage, and nitrogen utilization. Agric Res Arid Areas, 2025, 43(3): 200-209 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[10] 刘娜, 吴明玥, 纪旭, 等. 塔里木河流域牧草植物分布格局与养分分析. 草业学报, 2026, 35(3): 26-42.
Liu N, Wu M Y, Ji X, et al. Analysis of the distribution pattern and nutrition profiles of forage plants in the Tarim River Basin. Acta Pratac Sin, 2026, 35(3): 26-42 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[11] 鲍根生, 李媛, 冯晓云, 等. 施氮量和混播方式对燕麦/饲用豌豆间作系统氮素吸收和干物质产量的影响. 草业学报, 2025, 34(11): 161-173.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb2024452
Bao G S, Li Y, Feng X Y, et al. Effects of intercropping planting patterns and nitrogen addition level on nitrogen absorption and biomass within oat-pea intercropping systems. Acta Pratac Sin, 2025, 34(11): 161-173 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12] 金江, 黄依妮, 刘鸿宇, 等. 减施氮肥及玉米间作绿肥对混合饲草产量及品质的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2024(9): 61-69.
Jin J, Huang Y N, Liu H Y, et al. Effects of reduced nitrogen fertilizer and green manure intercropping of maize on yield and quality of mixed forage. Soil Fert Sci China, 2024(9): 61-69 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] 尚俊秀, 姚晓华, 谢德庆, 等. 饲用小黑麦与豆科作物混作生产性能及饲用品质分析. 草业科学, 2024, 41: 2143-2154.
Shang J X, Yao X H, Xie D Q, et al. Analysis of performance and quality of forage Triticale mixed with leguminous crops. Pratac Sci, 2024, 41: 2143-2154 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14] 王斌, 史佳梅, 王腾飞, 等. 施氮对饲用高粱/拉巴豆混播草地生产性能和氮肥贡献率的影响. 草业学报, 2025, 34(4): 53-63.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb2024210
Wang B, Shi J M, Wang T F, et al. Effect of nitrogen application on production performance and nitrogen fertilizer contribution of forage sorghum/Lablab mixed cropping. Acta Pratac Sin, 2025, 34(4): 53-63 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15] 王恕平, 齐帅, 陈彦龙, 等. 河西灌区不同青贮玉米品种生产性能与发酵品质的综合评价. 草地学报, 2025, 33: 3099-3107.
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2025.09.033
Wang S P, Qi S, Chen Y L, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of the production performance and fermentation quality of different silage maize varieties in Hexi irrigated area. Acta Agrestia Sin, 2025, 33: 3099-3107 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[16] 崔莹莹, 吴水欣, 李西良, 等. 补播饲用燕麦对天然草原打草场饲草生产性能及土壤养分的影响. 中国草地学报, 2025, 47(12): 87-95.
Cui Y Y, Wu S X, Li X L, et al. Effects of reseeding forage oats on forage production performance and soil nutrients in natural grassland hay field. Chin J Grassland, 2025, 47(12): 87-95 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17] 刘永, 冯志远. 青贮玉米饲料不同调制方式对其营养价值及反刍动物消化率的影响. 畜禽业, 2026, 37(2): 9-12.
Liu Y, Feng Z Y. Effects of different preparation methods of silage corn feed on its nutritional value and digestibility of ruminants. Livest Poult Ind, 2026, 37(2): 9-12 (in Chinese).
[18] 连晓荣, 何海军, 李永生, 等. 不同种植模式对玉米光合特性、产量及品质的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2024, 42(4): 167-177.
Lian X R, He H J, Li Y S, et al. Effects of different planting patterns on photosynthesis characteristic, grain yield and quality of maize. Agric Res Arid Areas, 2024, 42(4): 167-177 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[19] 张明龙, 柴强, 韩梅, 等. 氮肥减施及绿肥混作对土壤质量和小麦产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58: 4718-4731.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.22.012
Zhang M L, Chai Q, Han M, et al. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction and green manure mixed cropping on soil quality and wheat yield. Sci Agric Sin, 2025, 58: 4718-4731 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.22.012
[20] 张玉, 马维伟, 李广, 等. 水氮耦合对河西灌区青贮玉米田土壤养分及酶活性的影响. 国土与自然资源研究, 2026(2): 81-87.
Zhang Y, Ma W W, Li G, et al. Effects of water and nitrogen coupling on soil nutrient and enzyme activities of silage maize in Hexi irrigation area, Gansu province. Territ Nat Resour Study, 2026(2): 81-87 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21] 张译尹, 肖爱萍, 王斌, 等. 饲用高粱/拉巴豆混播模式下施氮量对草地生产力和能量利用效率的影响. 草业学报, 2026, 35(1): 40-52.
Zhang Y Y, Xiao A P, Wang B, et al. Effect of nitrogen application on grass productivity and energy use efficiency in a mixed forage sorghum/Lablab planting. Acta Pratac Sin, 2026, 35(1): 40-52 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[22] 李燕楠, 张振宇, 秦树平, 等. 长期施氮耦合短期玉米间作豆科作物对土壤团聚体组成及碳氮分布的影响. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2025, 33: 1831-1846.
Li Y N, Zhang Z Y, Qin S P, et al. Effects of long-term different nitrogen application rates coupled with short-term maize||legume crop intercropping on soil aggregate composition and carbon- nitrogen distribution. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2025, 33: 1831-1846 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[23] 闫喆林, 任强, 樊志龙, 等. 氮肥后移优化绿洲灌区小麦间作玉米种间关系提高氮素利用效率. 作物学报, 2025, 51: 2190-2203.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2025.53003
Yan Z L, Ren Q, Fan Z L, et al. Postponed nitrogen application optimizes interspecific interactions and enhances nitrogen use efficiency in wheat-maize intercropping systems in an oasis irrigation region. Acta Agron Sin, 2025, 51: 2190-2203 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2025.53003
[24] 侯岳, 王红亮, 李杰, 等. 禾本科与豆科饲草作物间套作对饲草品质及氮素吸收影响的研究进展. 作物杂志, 2025(3): 1-10.
Hou Y, Wang H L, Li J, et al. Research advances on the effects of cereal/legume forage intercropping on forage quality and nitrogen uptake. Crops, 2025(3): 1-10 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[25] 张辰煜, 葛军勇, 褚俊聪, 等. 燕麦红芸豆带状间作的产量效应及根系形态与土壤酶活性. 作物学报, 2025, 51: 459-469.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2025.41019
Zhang C Y, Ge J Y, Chu J C, et al. Yield effect and its root and soil enzyme characteristics of oat and red kidney bean strip intercropping. Acta Agron Sin, 2025, 51: 459-469 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2025.41019
[26] 杜木林, 陈莉莉, 杨靓, 等. 不同基因型青贮玉米混作对产量及品质的影响. 草地学报, 2025, 33(1): 273-282.
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2025.01.030
Du M L, Chen L L, Yang L, et al. Effects of mixed cropping of different varieties of silage maize on yield and quality. Acta Agrest Sin, 2025, 33(1): 273-282 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[27] 王弟成, 柴强, 樊志龙, 等. 混作豆科饲草及减氮对青贮玉米生产系统土壤理化特性和产量的影响. 草业学报, 2025, 34(12): 97-110.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb2024527
Wang D C, Chai Q, Fan Z L, et al. Effects of mixed cropping of leguminous forage and reduced nitrogen fertilizer on soil physicochemical properties and forage yield in a silage maize production system. Acta Pratac Sin, 2025, 34(12): 97-110 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28] 吕亮雨, 施建军, 蔡宗程, 等. 高海拔地区禾豆混播对土壤理化性质及饲草生长的影响. 西北农业学报, 2025, 34: 817-825.
Lyu L Y, Shi J J, Cai Z C, et al. Effects of mixed sowing of ‘baiyan No. 7’ and leguminous forages on forage yield and soil physical and physicochemical properties in a high-altitude region. Acta Agric Boreali-Occident Sin, 2025, 34: 817-825 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[29] 刘亚龙, 王鹏飞, 于爱忠, 等. 绿肥还田条件下减氮对河西绿洲灌区玉米产量及N2O排放的影响. 作物学报, 2025, 51: 771-784.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2025.43034
Liu Y L, Wang P F, Yu A Z, et al. Effects of nitrogen reduction on maize yield and N2O emission under green manure returning in Hexi oasis irrigation area. Acta Agron Sin, 2025, 51: 771-784 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2025.43034
[30] 霍倩倩, 宋洋洋, 冯斌, 等. 高丹草与田菁不同行比带状种植模式下饲草产量与品质研究. 中国草地学报, 2025, 47(7): 83-95.
Huo Q Q, Song Y Y, Feng B, et al. Study on forage yield and quality under strip planting patterns with different row ratios of sorghum-sudangrass and Sesbania. Chin J Grassland, 2025, 47(7): 83-95 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[31] 李帅兵, 李晨欣, 任丽, 等. 种植大豆促进后茬小麦磷吸收和土壤磷形态转化. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58: 3932-3945.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.19.010
Li S B, Li C X, Ren L, et al. Effects of soybean planting on phosphorus absorption of wheat and phosphorus transformation in soil. Sci Agric Sin, 2025, 58: 3932-3945 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.19.010
[32] 郭馨怡, 杨珍, 王佳, 等. 我国旱区乡土豆科植物根际促生菌的应用潜力. 植物学报, 2026, 61: 170-178.
doi: 10.11983/CBB25126
Guo X Y, Yang Z, Wang J, et al. The application potential of the rhizobacteria of the native leguminous plants in the arid regions of China. Chin Bull Bot, 2026, 61: 170-178 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[33] 尤根基, 谢昊, 梁毓文, 等. 氮肥减施措施对江淮春玉米产量和氮素吸收利用的影响. 作物学报, 2025, 51: 2152-2163.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2025.53017
You G J, Xie H, Liang Y W, et al. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction measures on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of spring maize in Jianghuai region. Acta Agron Sin, 2025, 51: 2152-2163 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2025.53017
[34] 苏乐乐, 王曌敏, 刘勇, 等. 高寒区燕麦-箭筈豌豆混播草地的生产力及氮磷利用率. 草业科学, 2025, 42: 1794-1805.
Su L L, Wang Z M, Liu Y, et al. Productivity and nitrogen and phosphorus utilization efficiency in oat: common vetch mixed grassland of Alpine area. Pratac Sci, 2025, 42: 1794-1805 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[35] 王海琪, 王荣荣, 蒋桂英, 等. 施氮量对滴灌春小麦叶片光合生理性状的影响. 作物学报, 2023, 49: 211-224.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.11100
Wang H Q, Wang R R, Jiang G Y, et al. Effect of amount of nitrogen fertilizer applied on photosynthetic physiological characteristics of drip irrigated spring wheat leaves. Acta Agron Sin, 2023, 49: 211-224 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.11100
[36] 张欢欢, 张刁亮, 王晓丽, 等. 绿肥联合麦秸还田对减量施氮春小麦光合特性和产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58: 3461-3472.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.17.008
Zhang H H, Zhang D L, Wang X L, et al. Effects of green manure and wheat straw combined returning application on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of spring wheat under reduced nitrogen levels. Sci Agric Sin, 2025, 58: 3461-3472 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.17.008
[37] 桑会哲, 王超, 樊志龙, 等. 氮肥减施对青贮玉米豆科饲草间作系统水分利用特征的影响. 作物学报, 2024, 50: 2848-2859.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.43003
Sang H Z, Wang C, Fan Z L, et al. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction on water use characteristics of silage maize leguminous forage intercropping system. Acta Agron Sin, 2024, 50: 2848-2859 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.43003
[1] Wang Ya-Feng, Nan Yun-You, Zhang Huan-Huan, Zhang Diao-Liang, Jiang Long-Xiu, Zhu Dong-Yang, Li Han-Ting, Chai Qiang, Hu Fa-Long, Yin Wen, Fan Zhi-Long. Response of spring wheat nitrogen utilization to green manure combined with wheat straw returning and nitrogen application rates [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(8): 2410-2423.
[2] Liu Feng, Dong Hong-Wei, Zhang Yue, Li Ran, Sun Ruo-Nan, Liu Jia-Cheng, Sun Shu-Jie, Zhang Xu-Dong, Han Qing-Fang. Photosynthetic mechanisms underlying yield stability under reduced nitrogen in maize-soybean intercropping: enhanced conversion efficiency of photosynthates [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(7): 2095-2108.
[3] Zhang Hong-Rong, Wang Fei-Er, Li Pan, Qiu Hai-Long, Zhu Jing, Zhao Lian-Hao, Nan Yun-You, He Wei, Fan Zhi-Long, Hu Fa-Long, Chai Qiang, Yin Wen. Photosynthetic characteristics of 20% reduced irrigation combined with 25% organic substitution for chemical fertilizer in increasing silage maize yield [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[4] Wang Zhuang-Zhuang, Wu Zi-Jun, Zhang Yong-Xin, Zhang Xin-Yuan, Yuan Li-Xue, Chen Ru-Xue, Liu Shi-Ju, Duan Jian-Zhao, Feng Wei, Wang Tong-Chao, Wang Yong-Hua. Optimized water-nitrogen synergy enhances winter wheat yield and nitrogen use efficiency in clay-loam fluvo-aquic soils of southeastern Henan, China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[5] Zhang Yi-Yin, Wang Bin, Wang Teng-Fei, Xiao Ai-Ping, Hu Hai-Ying, Lan Jian. Yield advantage of the silage maize ‖ lablab intercropping system in response to spatial configuration [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(2): 552-564.
[6] Shi Lyu, Shi Xiao-Xu, Han Xiao, Shan Hai-Yong, Liu Xu-Jie, Zhang Jin, Yan Yi-Ni, Li Ying, Liu Hai-Cui, Wei Ya-Feng, Yang Mei-Ying, Xue Ya-Guang, Liu Jian, Zhang Zu-Jian. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction and topdressing methods on wheat yield, nitrogen use efficiency, and N2O emissions in wheat fields [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(1): 202-220.
[7] WANG Fei-Er, GUO Yao, LI Pan, WEI Jin-Gui, FAN Zhi-Long, HU Fa-Long, FAN Hong, HE Wei, YIN Wen, CHEN Gui-Ping. Compensation mechanism of increased maize density on yield with water and nitrogen reduction supply in oasis irrigation areas [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(6): 1616-1627.
[8] WANG Lyu, WU Yu-Hong, QIN Yu-Hang, DAN Ya-Bin, CHEN Hao, HAO Xing-Shun, TIAN Xiao-Hong. Effects of rice straw mulching combined with green manure retention and nitrogen reduction applications on dry matter quality accumulation, nitrogen transport and grain yield of rice [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(3): 756-770.
[9] WEI Jin-Gui, MAO Shou-Fa, JIANG Yu-Xin, FAN Zhi-Long, HU Fa-Long, CHAI Qiang, YIN Wen. Compensation mechanism of green manure on grain yield and nitrogen uptake of wheat with reduced nitrogen supply [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(12): 3129-3143.
[10] MAO Shou-Fa, WEI Jin-Gui, CHAI Qiang, FAN Zhi-Long, HU Fa-Long, YIN Wen, WANG Qi-Ming. Compensation mechanism of wheat yield with green manure returned to the field under reduced irrigation water in oasis irrigation areas [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(11): 2818-2830.
[11] SANG Hui-Zhe, WANG Chao, FAN Zhi-Long, YIN Wen, FAN Hong, HE Wei, HU Fa-Long, CHAI Qiang. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction on water use characteristics of silage maize leguminous forage intercropping system [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(11): 2848-2859.
[12] WEI Jin-Gui, GUO Yao, CHAI Qiang, YIN Wen, FAN Zhi-Long, HU Fa-Long. Yield and yield components of maize response to high plant density under reduced water and nitrogen supply [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(7): 1919-1929.
[13] ZHANG Xiang-Yu, HU Xin-Hui, GU Shu-Bo, Lin Xiang, YIN Fu-Wei, WANG Dong. Effects of staged potassium application on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of winter wheat under reduced nitrogen conditions [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(2): 447-458.
[14] ZHAO Cai-Xia, SHEN Ji-Cheng, YIN Shu-Xiang, YE Fa-Hui, YANG Miao-Si, LIU Rui-Juan, LIU De-Mei, ZHANG Huai-Gang, SHEN Yu-Hu, CHEN Wen-Jie. Evaluation of the forage performance of polish wheat on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(11): 3017-3028.
[15] XU Long-Long, YIN Wen, HU Fa-Long, FAN Hong, FAN Zhi-Long, ZHAO Cai, YU Ai-Zhong, CHAI Qiang. Effect of water and nitrogen reduction on main photosynthetic physiological parameters of film-mulched maize no-tillage rotation wheat [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(2): 437-447.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!