Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica，

Acta Agron Sin ›› 2011, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (11): 2066-2074.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.02066

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Two Row Spaces and Intercropping on Forage and Crude Protein Yields of Oat (Avena sativa L.) and Common Vetch (Vicia sativa L.)

CHEN Gong1,GUO Li-Mei1, **,REN Chang-Zhong2,GUO Lai-Chun2,ZHAO Guo-Jun2,HU Yue-Gao1,*,ZENG Zhao-Hai1,*   

  1. 1 College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; 2 Baicheng Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Baicheng 137000, China
  • Received:2011-03-23 Revised:2011-06-25 Online:2011-11-12 Published:2011-07-28
  • Contact: 曾昭海, E-mail: zengzhaohai@cau.edu.cn; 胡跃高, E-mail: huyuegao@cau.edu.cn E-mail:samanthapizi@gmail.com

PDF

1059

Cited

3

Abstract: Intercropping of oat (Avena sativa L.) and common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) is a widely used forage production system in Northwestern China. Due to different cropping managements, whether intercropped crops can yield higher than mono-cropped oat was not consistent in previous studies. This experiment was carried out at Baicheng Academy of Agricultural Science in Jilin province in 2009–2010. The quantity and quality of forage yield were justified with mono-cropped oat (B1) and common vetch (B2) as well as their intercropping (B3) under two different row spaces (A1: 33 cm and A2: 16.5 cm). In 2009, seeding rate of each row was the same for A1 and A2, so the total seeding rate for A2 was doubled; in 2010, the total seeding rate was the same for A1 and A2. The results showed that dry matter yields under intercropping system increased by 24% and 30% compared with those under the mono-cropping of oat and common vetch respectively. Crude protein yield in intercropped system was much higher (100%) than that in mono-cropped oat, but 20% less than that in mono-cropped vetch. A2 produced 13% and 29% more forage yield in 2009 and 2010 than A1. The effects of row spaces were less noticed in crude protein yield.With 16.5 cm of row spaces, oat seeding rate at 87.5 kg ha–1 and common vetch seeding rate at 75 kg ha–1, highest forage yield of 19.8 t ha–1 and crude protein yield of 2.43 t ha–1 were achieved with LER 1.55. Intercropping of oat and vetch could be a promising intercropping system in the studied area and the mentioned seeding rate and row space would be the best combination for forage production.

Key words: Oat, Common vetch, Intercropping, Row space, Yield

[1]Duke J A. Handbook of Legumes of World Economic Importance. New York: Plenum Press, 1981. pp 122?130
[2]Zhou Q-P(周青平). Forage structure and yield of oat and common vetch mixed cropping system. Grassland & Turf (草原与草坪), 2002, (3): 43?45 (in Chinese)
[3]Zhao C-X(赵彩霞), He W-Q(何文清), Hu Y-G(胡跃高), Dong H-M(董慧明), She X-L(佘小玲). Effect of intercropping or mixture and harvest time on forage yield and quality of oat and pea under low soil nitrogen environment. Agric Res Arid Area (干旱地区农业研究), 2006, 24(5): 5?9 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]Cao Z-H(曹仲华), Wei J(魏军), Yang F-Y(杨富裕), Cao S-H(曹社会). Effects of the common vetch-oat mixture in the Shannan Region of Tibet. Acta Agric Boreali-occident Sin (西北农业学报), 2007, 16(5): 67?71 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]Sun A-H(孙爱华), Lu H-P(鲁鸿佩), Ma S-H(马绍慧). Experimental study of vetch + oat mixture system in highland region. Pratac Sci (草业科学), 2003, 20(8): 37?38 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]Wang X(王旭), Zeng Z-H(曾昭海), Zhu B(朱波), Hu Y-G(胡跃高). Effect of different intercropping and mixture modes on  forage yield and quality of oat and common vetch. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(11): 1892?1895 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]Ji W-Z(姬万忠). The study on improving yield effect for mix-sowing of oat and vetch on alpine artificial grassland in Tianzhu county in Gansu province. Chin J Grassland (中国草地学报), 2008, 30(5): 106?109 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]Chen G(陈功), He L-F(贺兰芳). Study on physiological and ecological characteristics of oat + vetch mixed artificial grassland. Grassland & Turf (草原与草坪), 2005, (4): 47?50 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]Bao C-L(包成兰), Zhang S-C(张世财). Trial report of mixture oat and Vicia sativa in Datong county. Qinghai Pratac (青海草业), 2002, 11(1): 5?6 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]Assefa G, Ledin I. Effect of variety, soil type and fertilizer on the establishment, growth, forage yield, quality and voluntary intake by cattle of oats and vetches cultivated in pure stands and mixtures. Anim Feed Sci Technol, 2001, 92: 95?111
[11]Dhima K V, Lithourgidis A S, Vasilakoglou I B, Doras C A. Competition indices of common vetch and cereal intercrops in two seeding ratio. Field Crops Res, 2007, 100: 249?256
[12]Vasilakoglou I, Dhima K, Lithourgidis A, Eleftherohorinos I. Competitive ability of winter cereal-common vetch intercrops against sterile oat. Exp Agric, 2008, 44: 509?520
[13]Ma C-H(马春晖), Han J-G(韩建国), Zhang L(张玲). Dynamic study on competitive interaction between two annual forage crops in high-cold pasturing area. Pratac Sci (草业科学), 2001, 18(1): 22?24 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]Caballero R, Goicoechea E L, Hernaiz P J. Forage yields and quality of common vetch and oat sown at varying seeding ratios and seeding rates of vetch. Field Crops Res, 1995, 41: 135?140
[15]Mason W K, Pritchard K E. Intercropping in a temperate environment for irrigated fodder production. Field Crops Res, 1987, 16: 243?253
[16]GB/T 5511-2008. Cereals and Pulses—Determination of the Nitrogen Content and Calculation of the Crude Protein Content—Kjeldahl Method (谷物和豆类氮含量测定和粗蛋白质含量计算——凯氏法). Beijing: Standard Press of China, 2008 (in Chinese)
[17]SAS Institute SAS/STAT User’s Guide. Version 8.2. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, 2001
[18]Darrell A M. Forage Crops. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1984. pp 241?245
[19]Neumann A, Schmidtke K, Rauber R. Effects of crop density and tillage system on grain yield and N uptake from soil and atmosphere of sole and intercropped pea and oat. Field Crops Res, 2007, 100: 285?293
[20]Andersen M K, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Ambus P, Jensen E S. Biomass production, symbiotic nitrogen fixation and inorganic N use in dual and tri-component annual intercrops. Plant Soil, 2005, 266: 273?287
[21]Wang X(王旭), Zeng Z-H(曾昭海), Hu Y-G(胡跃高), Chen Z-G(陈宗光), Zhu B(朱波), Lin Y-C(林叶春). Effect of oat intercropped with common vetch on aftercrop yield. Acta Agrest Sin (草地学报), 2009, 17: 63?67 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]Bedoussac L, Justes E. Dynamic analysis of competition and complementarity for light and N use to understand the yield and the protein content of a durum wheat-winter pea intercrop. Plant Soil, 2010, 330: 37?54
[23]Jensen E S. Grain yield, symbiotic N2 fixation and interspecific competition for inorganic N in pea-barley intercrops. Plant Soil, 1996, 182: 25?38
[24]Mariotti M, Masoni A, Ercoli L, Arduini I. Above- and below-ground competition between barley, wheat, lupin and vetch in a cereal and legume intercropping system. Grass Forage Sci, 2009, 64: 401?412
[1] WANG Dan, ZHOU Bao-Yuan, MA Wei, GE Jun-Zhu, DING Zai-Song, LI Cong-Feng, ZHAO Ming. Characteristics of the annual distribution and utilization of climate resource for double maize cropping system in the middle reaches of Yangtze River [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2] WANG Wang-Nian, GE Jun-Zhu, YANG Hai-Chang, YIN Fa-Ting, HUANG Tai-Li, KUAI Jie, WANG Jing, WANG Bo, ZHOU Guang-Sheng, FU Ting-Dong. Adaptation of feed crops to saline-alkali soil stress and effect of improving saline-alkali soil [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[3] YAN Jia-Qian, GU Yi-Biao, XUE Zhang-Yi, ZHOU Tian-Yang, GE Qian-Qian, ZHANG Hao, LIU Li-Jun, WANG Zhi-Qin, GU Jun-Fei, YANG Jian-Chang, ZHOU Zhen-Ling, XU Da-Yong. Different responses of rice cultivars to salt stress and the underlying mechanisms [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[4] YANG Huan, ZHOU Ying, CHEN Ping, DU Qing, ZHENG Ben-Chuan, PU Tian, WEN Jing, YANG Wen-Yu, YONG Tai-Wen. Effects of nutrient uptake and utilization on yield of maize-legume strip intercropping system [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5] CHEN Jing, REN Bai-Zhao, ZHAO Bin, LIU Peng, ZHANG Ji-Wang. Regulation of leaf-spraying glycine betaine on yield formation and antioxidation of summer maize sowed in different dates [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6] LI Yi-Jun, LYU Hou-Quan. Effect of agricultural meteorological disasters on the production corn in the Northeast China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[7] SHI Yan-Yan, MA Zhi-Hua, WU Chun-Hua, ZHOU Yong-Jin, LI Rong. Effects of ridge tillage with film mulching in furrow on photosynthetic characteristics of potato and yield formation in dryland farming [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[8] PENG Xi-Hong, CHEN Ping, DU Qing, YANG Xue-Li, REN Jun-Bo, ZHENG Ben-Chuan, LUO Kai, XIE Chen, LEI Lu, YONG Tai-Wen, YANG Wen-Yu. Effects of reduced nitrogen application on soil aeration and root nodule growth of relay strip intercropping soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1199-1209.
[9] YAN Xiao-Yu, GUO Wen-Jun, QIN Du-Lin, WANG Shuang-Lei, NIE Jun-Jun, ZHAO Na, QI Jie, SONG Xian-Liang, MAO Li-Li, SUN Xue-Zhen. Effects of cotton stubble return and subsoiling on dry matter accumulation, nutrient uptake, and yield of cotton in coastal saline-alkali soil [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[10] KE Jian, CHEN Ting-Ting, WU Zhou, ZHU Tie-Zhong, SUN Jie, HE Hai-Bing, YOU Cui-Cui, ZHU De-Quan, WU Li-Quan. Suitable varieties and high-yielding population characteristics of late season rice in the northern margin area of double-cropping rice along the Yangtze River [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[11] LI Rui-Dong, YIN Yang-Yang, SONG Wen-Wen, WU Ting-Ting, SUN Shi, HAN Tian-Fu, XU Cai-Long, WU Cun-Xiang, HU Shui-Xiu. Effects of close planting densities on assimilate accumulation and yield of soybean with different plant branching types [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[12] WANG Lyu, CUI Yue-Zhen, WU Yu-Hong, HAO Xing-Shun, ZHANG Chun-Hui, WANG Jun-Yi, LIU Yi-Xin, LI Xiao-Gang, QIN Yu-Hang. Effects of rice stalks mulching combined with green manure (Astragalus smicus L.) incorporated into soil and reducing nitrogen fertilizer rate on rice yield and soil fertility [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[13] DU Hao, CHENG Yu-Han, LI Tai, HOU Zhi-Hong, LI Yong-Li, NAN Hai-Yang, DONG Li-Dong, LIU Bao-Hui, CHENG Qun. Improving seed number per pod of soybean by molecular breeding based on Ln locus [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 565-571.
[14] CHEN Yun, LI Si-Yu, ZHU An, LIU Kun, ZHANG Ya-Jun, ZHANG Hao, GU Jun-Fei, ZHANG Wei-Yang, LIU Li-Jun, YANG Jian-Chang. Effects of seeding rates and panicle nitrogen fertilizer rates on grain yield and quality in good taste rice cultivars under direct sowing [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
[15] YUAN Jia-Qi, LIU Yan-Yang, XU Ke, LI Guo-Hui, CHEN Tian-Ye, ZHOU Hu-Yi, GUO Bao-Wei, HUO Zhong-Yang, DAI Qi-Gen, ZHANG Hong-Cheng. Nitrogen and density treatment to improve resource utilization and yield in late sowing japonica rice [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 667-681.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Add: No.12 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing 100081,China Email:xbzw@chinajournal.net.cn
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd