甜荞株高和茎粗的遗传分析

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.01185

作物学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (8): 1185-1195.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.01185

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇下一篇

甜荞株高和茎粗的遗传分析

李英双^1,^**(),胡丹^3,^**,聂蛟¹,黄科慧¹,张玉珂¹,张园莉¹,佘恒志¹,方小梅^1,²,阮仁武^1,²,易泽林^1,^2,^*()

1 西南大学农学与生物科技学院, 重庆 400716
2 重庆市荞麦产业体系创新团队, 重庆 400716
3 甘肃省种子管理局, 甘肃兰州 730000

收稿日期:2017-11-09 接受日期:2018-04-11 出版日期:2018-08-10 网络出版日期:2018-06-11
通讯作者: 李英双,胡丹,易泽林
基金资助:
中央高校基本业务费专项(XDJK2017D071);重庆市荞麦产业体系创新团队建设项目(CQCYT2017001);荞麦抗倒伏栽培技术集成与示范推广项目(cstc2017shms-xdny80024);中国博士后科学基金项目(2017M622944);重庆市博士后科研项目(Xm2017176)

Genetic Analysis of Plant Height and Stem Diameter in Common Buckwheat

Ying-Shuang LI^1,^**(),Dan HU^3,^**,Jiao NIE¹,Ke-Hui HUANG¹,Yu-Ke ZHANG¹,Yuan-Li ZHANG¹,Heng-Zhi SHE¹,Xiao-Mei FANG^1,²,Ren-Wu RUAN^1,²,Ze-Lin YI^1,^2,^*()

1 College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China
2 Innovation Team of Chongqing Buckwheat Industry System, Chongqing 400716, China
3 Seed Administration Station of Gansu, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, China

Received:2017-11-09 Accepted:2018-04-11 Published:2018-08-10 Published online:2018-06-11
Contact: Ying-Shuang LI,Dan HU,Ze-Lin YI
Supported by:
the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(XDJK2017D071);Chongqing Buckwheat Industry System Innovation Team(CQCYT2017001);Integration and Demonstration Promotion for the Buckwheat Lodging-resistant Cultivation Technique(cstc2017shms-xdny80024);Chinese Postdoctoral Science Foundation(2017M622944);Chongqing Postdoctoral Science Foundation(Xm2017176)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

甜荞极易倒伏, 而株高和茎粗是影响甜荞倒伏的重要性状。以高秆健壮品种酉荞2号和矮秆纤细品种乌克兰大粒荞为亲本配制正、反交组合, P₁、P₂、F₁、B₁、B₂和F₂群体株高和茎粗的遗传分析表明, 株高和茎粗的最适遗传模型均为2对加性-显性-上位性主基因+加性-显性多基因模型。株高正交组合中2对主基因加性效应均为-1.39, 显性效应分别为-6.59和-7.91, B₁、B₂和F₂群体主基因遗传率分别是45.73%、63.49%和81.12%, 多基因遗传率分别是27.41%、0.95%和0; 反交组合中2对主基因加性效应值均为-1.63, 显性效应分别为-7.03和-4.19, B₁、B₂和F₂群体中主基因遗传率是41.51%、66.18%和81.81%, 多基因遗传率分别是11.19%、0和0。茎粗正交组合中2对主基因加性效应均为0.03, 显性效应分别为-0.50和-0.08, B₁、B₂和F₂群体中主基因遗传率分别是37.26%、48.80%和72.10%, 多基因遗传率分别是11.18%、0和0; 反交组合中2对主基因加性效应均为-0.15, 显性效应分别为-0.30和-0.16, B₁、B₂和F₂群体中主基因遗传率是76.22%、47.12%和82.51%, 多基因遗传率分别为0、14.53%和0。可见, 株高的主基因+多基因遗传率在80%以上, 可在低世代进行选择; 茎粗的主基因+多基因遗传率在80%以下, 采取合理的栽培措施可以提高荞麦抗倒伏能力。

关键词: 甜荞, 株高, 茎粗, 数量性状, 遗传分析

Abstract:

Common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum M.) is susceptible to lodging, and plant height and stem diameter are recognized as important traits for lodging resistance. In this study, we developed the P_l, P₂, F_l, F₂, B_l, and B₂ populations from the reciprocal crosses between Youqiao 2 (YQ2, lodging-resistance) and Ukraine daliqiao (UD, lodging-susceptible) and analyzed the genetic effects of plant height and stem diameter. The heredity of both traits optimally fitted to the genetic model for two major genes with additive-dominance-epistatic effects plus polygenes with additive-dominance effects. For plant height in the orthogonal combination, additive effects of both two major genes were -1.39 and the dominant effects were -6.59 and -7.91. Heritability values of the major genes in B₁, B₂, and F₂ were 45.73%, 63.49%, and 81.12%, and those of polygenes were 27.41%, 0.95%, and 0, respectively. For plant height in the back cross, additive effects of both two major genes were -1.63 and the dominant effects were -7.03 and -4.19, respectively. Heritability values of the major genes in B₁, B₂, and F₂ were 41.51%, 66.18%, and 81.81%, and those of polygenes were 11.19%, 0, and 0, respectively. For stem diameter in the orthogonal combination, the two major genes had 0.03 and 0.03 of additive effect and -0.50 and -0.08 of dominant effect. Heritability values of the major genes in B₁, B₂ and F₂ were 37.26%, 48.80%, and 72.10%, and those of polygenes were 11.18%, 0, and 0, respectively. For stem diameter in the back cross, the two major genes possessed -0.15 and -0.15 of additive effect and -0.30 and -0.16 of dominant effect. The estimated heritability values in B₁, B₂, and F₂ were 76.22%, 47.12%, and 82.51%, respectively, for the major genes and 0, 14.53%, and 0, respectively, for the polygenes. These results suggest that plant height can be selected in early generations because the heritability of major genes plus polygenes was larger than 80%, whereas proper cultivation practice may enhance lodging resistance of buckwheat because the heritability of major genes plus polygenes was lower than 80%.

Key words: common buckwheat, plant height, stem diameter, quantitative trait, genetic analysis

李英双,胡丹,聂蛟,黄科慧,张玉珂,张园莉,佘恒志,方小梅,阮仁武,易泽林. 甜荞株高和茎粗的遗传分析[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(8): 1185-1195.

Ying-Shuang LI,Dan HU,Jiao NIE,Ke-Hui HUANG,Yu-Ke ZHANG,Yuan-Li ZHANG,Heng-Zhi SHE,Xiao-Mei FANG,Ren-Wu RUAN,Ze-Lin YI. Genetic Analysis of Plant Height and Stem Diameter in Common Buckwheat[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(8): 1185-1195.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.01185

https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/Y2018/V44/I8/1185

图/表 9

表1

附图1

附图2

附图3

附图4

附表1

正反交组合株高与茎粗表型分布的极大对数似然函数值和AIC值"

模型 Model	模型含义 Implication of model	P₁ × P₂		P₂ × P₁
模型 Model	模型含义 Implication of model	株高 Plant height	茎粗 Stem diameter	株高 Plant height	茎粗 Stem diameter
极大对数似然函数值 log max likelihood value
A-1	1MG-AD	-2471.03	-911.79	-2221.06	-831.34
A-2	1MG-A	-2471.27	-913.18	-2220.93	-835.71
A-3	1MG-EAD	-2517.11	-912.04	-2252.92	-831.55
A-4	1MG-AEND	-2542.66	-907.83	-2287.76	-841.14
B-1	2MG-ADI	-2462.85	-854.59	-2190.52	-814.82
B-2	2MG-AD	-2466.77	-910.59	-2221.34	-832.65
B-3	2MG-A	-2524.10	-934.20	-2281.29	-874.56
B-4	2MG-EA	-2466.05	-913.57	-2213.12	-837.46
B-5	2MG-AED	-2499.91	-911.93	-2230.42	-833.39
B-6	2MG-EEAD	-2499.91	-911.93	-2230.42	-833.39
C-0	PG-ADI	-2473.89	-859.01	-2175.84	-809.55
C-1	PG-AD	-2467.03	-905.21	-2214.12	-838.68
D-0	MX1-AD-ADI	-2461.91	-853.03	-2174.53	-803.64
D-1	MX1-AD-AD	-2466.94	-906.60	-2215.13	-838.79
D-2	MX1-A-AD	-2461.37	-893.08	-2214.78	-825.99
D-3	MX1-EAD-AD	-2466.32	-908.12	-2215.29	-838.44
D-4	MX1-AEND-AD	-2466.40	-905.01	-2215.31	-837.98
E-0	MX2-ADI-ADI	-2454.25	-843.30	-2174.53	-803.63
E-1	MX2-ADI-AD	-2450.50	-844.42	-2161.64	-791.16
E-2	MX2-AD-AD	-2466.33	-908.12	-2215.29	-838.44
E-3	MX2-A-AD	-2467.93	-906.89	-2214.68	-930.84
E-4	MX2-EA-AD	-2466.25	-908.12	-2215.29	-838.44
E-5	MX2-AED-AD	-2466.32	-908.12	-2215.29	-838.44
E-6	MX2-EEAD-AD	-2466.32	-908.12	-2215.29	-838.44
AIC值 AIC value
A-1	1MG-AD	4950.06	1831.59	4450.11	1670.67
A-2	1MG-A	4948.55	1832.36	4447.86	1677.43
A-3	1MG-EAD	5040.22	1830.08	4511.84	1669.09
A-4	1MG-AEND	5091.33	1821.66	4581.52	1688.29
B-1	2MG-ADI	4945.70	1729.19	4401.03	1649.64
B-2	2MG-AD	4945.53	1833.19	4454.67	1677.30
B-3	2MG-A	5056.20	1876.39	4570.58	1757.12
B-4	2MG-EA	4938.09	1833.14	4432.25	1680.93
B-5	2MG-AED	5007.81	1831.85	4468.85	1674.77
模型 Model	模型含义 Implication of model	P₁ × P₂		P₂ × P₁
模型 Model	模型含义 Implication of model	株高 Plant height	茎粗 Stem diameter	株高 Plant height	茎粗 Stem diameter
B-6	2MG-EEAD	5005.81	1829.85	4466.85	1672.78
C-0	PG-ADI	4967.78	1738.03	4371.69	1639.09
C-1	PG-AD	4948.06	1824.42	4442.24	1691.36
D-0	MX1-AD-ADI	4947.82	1730.07	4373.05	1631.28
D-1	MX1-AD-AD	4951.88	1831.20	4448.26	1695.57
D-2	MX1-A-AD	4938.73	1802.15	4445.57	1667.97
D-3	MX1-EAD-AD	4948.64	1832.24	4446.58	1692.87
D-4	MX1-AEND-AD	4948.81	1826.03	4446.63	1691.95
E-0	MX2-ADI-ADI	4944.51	1722.60	4385.05	1643.27
E-1	MX2-ADI-AD	4931.01	1718.83	4353.28	1612.32
E-2	MX2-AD-AD	4954.65	1838.24	4452.58	1698.87
E-3	MX2-A-AD	4953.87	1831.77	4447.37	1879.68
E-4	MX2-EA-AD	4948.50	1832.24	4446.58	1692.87
E-5	MX2-AED-AD	4950.64	1834.24	4448.58	1694.87
E-6	MX2-EEAD-AD	4948.65	1832.24	4446.58	1692.87

附表1

表2

表3

表4

参考文献 38

[1]	Gondola I, Papp P . Origin, geographical distribution and polygenic relationship of common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench.). Eur Plant Sci Biotechnol, 2010,4:17-33
[2]	Alamprese C, Casiraghi E, Pagani M A . Development of gluten-free fresh egg pasta analogues containing buckwheat. Eur Food Res Technol, 2007,225:205-213 doi: 10.1007/s00217-006-0405-y
[3]	Awatsuhara R, Harada K, Maeda T . Antioxidative activity of the buckwheat polyphenol rutin in combination with ovalbumin. Mol Med Rep, 2010,3:121-125 doi: 10.3892/mmr_00000228 pmid: 21472210
[4]	Griffith J Q, Couch J F, Lindauer M A . Effect of rutin on increased capillary fragility in man. Exp Biol Med, 1944,55:228-229 doi: 10.3181/00379727-55-14532
[5]	Jiang P, Burczynski F, Campbell C, Pierce G, Austria J A, Briggs C J . Rutin and flavonoid contents in three buckwheat species Fagopyrum esculentum, F. tataricum, and F. homotropicum and their protective effects against lipid peroxidation. Food Res Int, 2007,40:356-364
[6]	Wieslander G, Fabjan N, Vogrincic M, Kreft I, Janson C, Spetz-Nystrom U . Eating buckwheat cookies is associated with the reduction in serum levels of myeloperoxidase and cholesterol: a double blind crossover study in day-care centre staffs. Tohoku J Exp Med, 2011,225:123-130 doi: 10.1620/tjem.225.123
[7]	何健, 张国治, 张虹, 次仁欧珠 . 荞麦营养成分的检测及分析. 河南农业大学学报, 2002,36:302-304 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2340.2002.03.025
	He J, Zhang G Z, Zhang H , Ci-Ren-Ou-Zhu. Determination and analysis of nutrient ingredients of buckwheat. J Henan Agric Univ, 2002,36:302-304 (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2340.2002.03.025
[8]	杨海霞, 赵丽芹, 付媛, 候文娟, 张美莉 . 甜荞主要贮藏蛋白的分离纯化及功能特性研究. 中国食品学报, 2009,9(1):72-76
	Yang H X, Zhao L Q, Fu Y, Hou W J, Zhang M L . Extraction, purification and functional properties of main protein from buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) seeds. J Chin Inst Food Sci Technol, 2009,9(1):72-76 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	Koyama M, Nakamura C, Nakamura K . Changes in phenols contents from buckwheat sprouts during growth stage. J Food Sci Technol, 2013,50:86-93 doi: 10.1007/s13197-011-0316-1 pmid: 24425891
[10]	Hagiwara M, Izusawa H, Inoue N, Matano T . Varietal differences of shoot growth characters related to lodging in Tartary buckwheat. Fagopyrum, 1999,16:67-72
[11]	郭志利, 孙常青 . 北方旱地荞麦抗倒栽培技术研究. 杂粮作物, 2007,27:364-366 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0896.2007.05.018
	Guo Z L, Sun C Q . Study on resistance cultivation techniques of buckwheat in Northern Dryland. Rain Fed Crops, 2007,27:364-366 (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0896.2007.05.018
[12]	Dunn G J, Briggs K G . Variation in culm anatomy among barley cultivars differing in lodging resistance. Can J Bot, 2011,67:1838-1843 doi: 10.1139/b89-232
[13]	Yoshida S . Physiological aspects of grain yield. Annu Rev Plant Physiol, 2003,23:437-464 doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.23.060172.002253
[14]	罗茂春, 田翠婷, 李晓娟, 林金星 . 水稻茎秆形态结构特征和化学成分与抗倒伏关系综述. 西北植物学报, 2007,27:2346-2353 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4025.2007.11.034
	Luo M C, Tian C T, Li X J, Lin J X . Relationship between morpho-anatomical traits together with chemical components and lodging resistance of stem in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Acta Bot Boreal-Occident Sin, 2007,27:2346-2353 (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4025.2007.11.034
[15]	杨惠杰, 杨仁崔, 李义珍, 姜照伟, 郑景生 . 水稻茎秆性状与抗倒性的关系. 福建农业学报, 2000,15(2):1-7
	Yang H J, Yang R C, Li Y Z, Jiang Z W, Zheng J S . Relationship between culm traits and lodging resistance of rice cultivars. Fujian J Agric Sci, 2000,15(2):1-7 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	杨守仁, 张龙步, 王进民 . 水稻理想株形育种的理论和方法初论. 中国农业科学, 1984, ( 3):6-13
	Yang S R, Zhang L B, Wang J M . The theory and method of ideal plant morphology in rice breeding. Sci Agric Sin, 1984, ( 3):6-13 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	Wang C, Ruan R W, Yuan X H, Hu D, Yang H, Li Y, Yi Z L . Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and planting density on the lignin synthesis in the culm in relation to lodging resistance of buckwheat. Plant Prod Sci, 2015,18:218-227 doi: 10.1626/pps.18.218
[18]	刘星贝, 吴东倩, 汪灿, 胡丹, 杨浩, 佘恒志, 阮仁武, 袁晓辉, 易泽林 . 喷施烯效唑对甜荞茎秆抗倒性能及产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2015,48:4903-4915
	Liu X B, Wu D Q, Wang C, Hu D, Yang H, She H Z, Ruan R W, Yuan X H, Yi Z L . Effects of spraying uniconazole on lodging resistance of culm and yield in common buckwheat. Sci Agric Sin, 2015,48:4903-4915 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	Hu D, Liu X B, She H Z, Gao Z, Ruan R W, Wu D Q, Yi Z L . The lignin synthesis related genes and lodging resistance of Fagopyrum esculentum. Biol Plant, 2017,61:138-146
[20]	汪灿, 阮仁武, 袁晓辉, 胡丹, 杨浩, 林婷婷, 何沛龙, 李燕, 易泽林 . 荞麦茎秆解剖结构和木质素代谢及其与抗倒性的关系. 作物学报, 2014,40:1846-1856
	Wang C, Ruan R W, Yuan X H, Hu D, Yang H, Lin T T, He P L, Li Y, Yi Z L . Relationship of anatomical structure and lignin metabolism with lodging resistance of culm in buckwheat. Acta Agron Sin, 2014,40:1846-1856 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	盖钧镒, 章元明, 王建康 . 植物数量性状遗传体系. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003
	Gai J Y, Zhang Y M, Wang J K. Genetic System of Quantitative Traits in Plants. Beijing: Science Press, 2003 ( in Chinese)
[22]	朱世杨, 郭媛, 洪德林 . 水稻种子抗老化遗传分析. 遗传, 2008,30:217-224 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9772.2008.02.016
	Zhu S Y, Guo Y, Hong D L . Genetic analysis on aging-resistant in rice seed. Hereditas ( Beijing), 2008,30:217-224 (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9772.2008.02.016
[23]	袁有禄, 张天真, 郭旺珍 , John Y, Russell J K. 棉花高品质纤维性状的主基因与多基因遗传分析. 遗传学报, 2002,29:827-834
	Yuan Y L, Zhang T Z, Guo W Z, John Y, Russell J K . Major-polygene effect analysis of super quality fiber properties in upland cotton (G. hirsutum L.). Acta Genet Sin, 2002,29:827-834 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	兰海, 余月, 王凤格, 潘光堂, 赵久然, 李新海, 荣廷昭 . 玉米种子休眠性数量遗传体系的判别. 玉米科学, 2007,15(2):5-8 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0906.2007.02.002
	Lan H, Yu Y, Wang F G, Pan G T, Zhao J R, Li X H, Rong T Z . Detection quantitative inheritance system of seed dormancy in maize (Zea mays L.). J Maize Sci, 2007,15(2):5-8 (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0906.2007.02.002
[25]	张立平, 赵昌平, 单福华, 张凤廷, 叶志杰 . 小麦光温敏雄性不育系BS210育性的主基因+多基因混合遗传分析. 作物学报, 2007,33:1553-1557 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2007.09.025
	Zhang L P, Zhao C P, Shan F H, Zhang F T, Ye Z J . The mixed genetic analysis of photoperiod-temperature sensitive male sterility of BS210 in wheat. Acta Agron Sin, 2007,33:1553-1557 (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2007.09.025
[26]	刘莹, 盖钧镒, 吕慧能, 王永军, 陈受宜 . 大豆耐旱种质鉴定和相关根系性状的遗传与QTL定位. 遗传学报, 2005,32:855-863 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8631.2012.05.014
	Liu Y, Gai J Y, Lyu H N, Wang Y J, Chen S Y . Identification of drought tolerant germplasm and inheritance and QTL mapping of related root traits in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Acta Genet Sin, 2005,32:855-863 (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8631.2012.05.014
[27]	Zhang X Y, Han S Y, Tang F S, Xu J, Liu H, Yan M, Dong W Z, Huang B Y, Zhu S J . Genetic analysis of yield in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) using mixed model of major gene plus polygene. Afr J Biotechnol, 2013,10:7126-7130
[28]	顾慧, 戚存扣 . 甘蓝型油菜(Brassica napus L.)抗倒伏性状的主基因+多基因遗传分析. 作物学报, 2008,34:376-381 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2008.03.005
	Gu H, Qi C K . Genetic analysis of lodging resistance with mixed model of major gene plus polygene in Brassica napus L. Acta Agron Sin, 2008,34:376-381 (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2008.03.005
[29]	周清元, 李军庆, 崔翠, 卜海东, 阴涛, 颜银华, 李加纳, 张正圣 . 油菜半矮杆新品系10D130株型性状的遗传分析. 作物学报, 2013,39:207-215 doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.00207
	Zhou Q Y, Li J Q, Cui C, Bu H D, Yin T, Yan Y H, Li J N, Zhang Z S . Genetic analysis of plant type in semi-dwarf new line (10D130) of rapeseed. Acta Agron Sin, 2013,39:207-215 (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.00207
[30]	田露申, 牛应泽, 余青青, 郭世星, 柳丽 . 甘蓝型油菜白花性状的主基因+多基因遗传分析. 中国农业科学, 2009,42:3987-3995
	Tian L S, Niu Y Z, Yu Q Q, Guo S X, Liu L . Genetic analysis of white flower color with mixed model of major gene plus polygene in Brassica napus L. Sci Agric Sin, 2009,42:3987-3995 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	Akaike H. On entropy maximum principles. In: Krishnaiag G, ed. Applications of Statistics. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North Holland Publishing, 1977. pp 27-41
[32]	陈桂华, 邓化冰, 张桂莲, 唐文帮, 黄璜 . 水稻茎秆性状与抗倒性的关系及配合力分析. 中国农业科学, 2016,49:407-417
	Chen G H, Deng H B, Zhang G L, Tang W B, Huang H . The correlation of stem characters and lodging resistance and combining ability analysis in rice. Sci Agric Sin, 2016,49:407-417 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]	朱新开, 王祥菊, 郭凯泉, 郭文善, 封超年, 彭永欣 . 小麦倒伏的茎秆特征及对产量与品质的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2006,26(1):87-92 doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2006.01.024
	Zhu X K, Wang X J, Guo K Q, Guo W S, Feng C N, Peng Y X . Stem characteristics of wheat with stem lodging and effects of lodging on grain yield and quality. J Triticeae Crops, 2006,26(1):87-92 (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2006.01.024
[34]	丰光, 景希强, 李妍妍, 王亮, 黄长玲 . 玉米茎秆性状与倒伏性的相关和通径分析. 华北农学报, 2010,25(增刊):72-74
	Feng G, Jing X Q, Li Y Y, Wang L, Huang C L . Correlation and path analysis of lodging resistance with maize stem characters. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 2010,25(suppl):72-74 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35]	刘星贝, 汪灿, 胡丹, 杨浩, 佘恒志, 阮仁武, 吴东倩, 易泽林 . 烯效唑干拌种对甜荞茎秆抗倒性能的影响. 作物学报, 2016,42:93-103
	Liu X B, Wang C, Hu D, Yang H, She H Z, Ruan R W, Wu D Q, Yi Z L . Effects of seed dressing with uniconazole powder on lodging resistance of culm in common buckwheat. Acta Agron Sin, 2016,42:93-103 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[36]	包和平, 李颖, 李春成 . 高淀粉玉米“郑单958”主要农艺性状主基因+多基因遗传分析. 吉林农业大学学报, 2010,32:245-248
	Bao H P, Li Y, Li C C . Inheritance analysis of main agronomic traits of major genes + poly-genes of high-starch corn Zhengdan 958. J Jilin Agric Univ, 2010,32:245-248 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[37]	张倩 . 甘蓝型油菜主要株型性状的遗传分析和QTL初步定位. 西南大学硕士学位论文, 重庆, 2013
	Zhang Q . Genetic Effects Analysis and QTL Mapping of Major Plant-Type Traits in Brassica napus L. MS Thesis of Southwest University, Chongqing, China, 2013 ( in Chinese with English abstract)
[38]	王春娥, 盖钧镒, 傅三雄, 喻德跃, 陈受宜 . 大豆豆腐和豆乳得率的遗传分析与QTL定位. 中国农业科学, 2008,41:1274-1282
	Wang C E, Gai J Y, Fu S X, Yu D Y, Chen S Y . Inheritance and QTL mapping of tofu and soymilk output in soybean. Sci Agric Sin, 2008,41:1274-1282 (in Chinese with English abstract)

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

亲本组合 Parent combination	世代 Generation	株数 No. of plants	株高 Plant height		茎粗 Stem diameter
亲本组合 Parent combination	世代 Generation	株数 No. of plants	平均值±标准差 Mean±SD (cm)	变异系数 CV (%)	平均值±标准差 Mean±SD (mm)	变异系数 CV (%)
亲本 Parent	P₁	25	106.08±8.05	7.59	6.10±0.94	6.49
	P₂	25	75.32±6.01	7.98	4.80±0.59	8.14
P₁ × P₂	F₁	28	93.04±8.64	9.29	5.30±0.70	7.57
	B₁	153	100.12±10.21	10.20	5.99±0.91	6.58
	B₂	165	84.87±8.90	10.49	6.02±0.82	7.34
	F₂	274	94.67±10.23	10.81	6.50±1.00	6.50
P₂ × P₁	F₁	28	87.54±6.62	7.56	5.10±0.64	7.97
	B₁	136	87.04±5.96	6.85	5.10±0.70	7.29
	B₂	133	91.51±6.36	6.95	5.40±0.70	7.71
	F₂	303	90.17±7.61	8.44	5.73±0.75	7.64

遗传参数 Genetic parameter	P₁ × P₂			P₂ × P₁
遗传参数 Genetic parameter	株高 Plant height	茎粗 Stem diameter		株高 Plant height	茎粗 Stem diameter
m	102.81		7.01	97.10	6.53
d_a	-1.39		0.03	-1.63	-0.15
d_b	-1.39		0.03	-1.63	-0.15
h_a	-6.59		-0.50	-7.03	-0.30
h_b	-7.91		-0.08	-4.19	-0.16
i	-12.06		-1.55	-6.30	-1.13
j_ab	8.44		0.04	6.82	-0.27
j_ba	-9.48		-0.41	10.88	0.86
l	10.86		-0.63	8.06	0.07
[d]	18.13		0.31	-11.46	-0.32
[h]	-6.03		-0.23	-6.24	-1.31
h_a/d_a	4.73		-15.53	4.31	2.04
h_b/d_b	5.68		-2.35	2.57	1.08

组合 Combination	遗传参数 Genetic parameter	B₁		B₂		F₂
组合 Combination	遗传参数 Genetic parameter	株高 Plant height	茎粗 Stem diameter	株高 Plant height	茎粗 Stem diameter	株高 Plant height	茎粗 Stem diameter
P₁ × P₂	σ_p²	104.83	0.82	79.15	0.76	113.91	1.16
	σ_mg²	47.94	0.31	50.25	0.33	85.76	0.74
	σ_pg²	28.74	0.09	0.75	0	0	0
	σ_e²	28.15	0.42	28.15	0.42	28.15	0.42
	h_mg² (%)	45.73	37.26	63.49	48.80	81.12	72.10
	h_pg² (%)	27.41	11.18	0.95	0	0	0
P₂ × P₁	σ_p²	35.55	0.63	43.58	0.56	64.19	0.68
	σ_mg²	14.76	0.42	26.76	0.26	47.37	0.47
	σ_pg²	3.98	0	0	0.08	0	0
	σ_e²	16.82	0.21	16.82	0.21	16.82	0.21
	h_mg² (%)	41.51	76.22	66.18	47.12	81.81	82.51
	h_pg² (%)	11.19	0	0	14.53	0	0

甜荞株高和茎粗的遗传分析

Genetic Analysis of Plant Height and Stem Diameter in Common Buckwheat

RichHTML

PDF

PDF

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 38

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

关于本刊

在线期刊

作者中心

相关单位

联系我们

模型含义 Implication of model	株高 Plant height						茎粗 Stem diameter
模型含义 Implication of model	模型 Model	U₁²	U₂²	U₃²	_nW²	D_n	模型 Model	U₁²	U₂²	U₃²	_nW²	D_n
P₁ × P₂
2MG-EA	B-4	0	0	0	0	0	B-1	0	0	2	0	0
MX1-A-AD	D-2	0	0	0	0	0	E-0	0	0	0	0	0
MX2-ADI-AD	E-1	0	0	0	0	0	E-1	0	0	0	0	0
P₂ × P₁
2MG-EA	C-0	0	2	0	1	0	C-0	1	2	0	2	0
MX1-A-AD	D-0	0	0	0	0	0	D-0	0	0	0	0	0
MX2-ADI-AD	E-1	0	0	0	0	0	E-1	0	0	0	0	0

[1]	唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[2]	张胜忠, 李国卫, 戈立江, 王菲菲, 胡晓辉, 苗华荣, 李燕, 钟文, 陈静. 花生机械脱壳损伤相关农艺指标筛选与QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 644-652.
[3]	杨思杰, 杜启迪, 柴守玺, 熊宏春, 谢永盾, 赵林姝, 古佳玉, 郭会君, 刘录祥. 小麦小旗叶突变性状基因定位与遗传分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1548-1557.
[4]	郭绪虎, 李灵芝, 李凤, 马博岩, 贾晓宇. I型MADS-box基因SlMADS79调控番茄株型的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 982-991.
[5]	王晓琳, 刘忠松, 康雷, 杨柳. 甘蓝型油菜角果长度和每角粒数基因定位以及角果皮转录组动态分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 888-899.
[6]	徐建霞, 丁延庆, 曹宁, 程斌, 高旭, 李文贞, 张立异. 中国高粱株高和节间数全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 568-585.
[7]	赵海红, 李梦媛, 刘锦婧, 王园园, 杜磊, 王娟, 董承光, 李成奇. 利用3VmrMLM方法检测陆地棉株高QTN及QTN-环境互作(QEI)[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2619-2631.
[8]	马骏, 陈锋, 殷贵鸿, 胡海燕, 魏学宁, 解超杰, 孔令让. 小麦抗茎基腐病遗传育种研究的现状与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2559-2569.
[9]	刘薇, 王玉斌, 李伟, 张礼凤, 徐冉, 王彩洁, 张彦威. 过量表达大豆异丙基苹果酸脱氢酶基因GmIPMDH促进植株开花和生长[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(3): 613-622.
[10]	宋健, 熊亚俊, 陈伊洁, 徐瑞新, 刘康林, 郭庆元, 洪慧龙, 高华伟, 谷勇哲, 张丽娟, 郭勇, 阎哲, 刘章雄, 关荣霞, 李英慧, 王晓波, 郭兵福, 孙如建, 闫龙, 王好让, 姬月梅, 常汝镇, 王俊, 邱丽娟. 大豆巢式关联作图(NAM)群体构建及花色和种皮色遗传分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(3): 556-575.
[11]	刁现民, 王立伟, 智慧, 张俊, 李顺国, 程汝宏. 谷子中矮秆资源创制、遗传解析和育种利用[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(2): 265-279.
[12]	阳世杰, 王华智, 潘怡敏, 黄蕊, 侯森, 秦慧彬, 穆志新, 王海岗. 山西谷子种质资源株高全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(12): 2984-2997.
[13]	赵阳, 李龙, 杨进文, 景蕊莲, 孙黛珍, 王景一. 小麦E3泛素连接酶基因TaSINA-3A与多种环境下的株高和千粒重相关[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(10): 2654-2664.
[14]	夏秀忠, 张宗琼, 农保选, 冯锐, 郭辉, 陈灿, 梁树辉, 荘洁, 廖祖宇, 宋国显, 杨行海, 李丹婷. 深水稻全生育期耐盐性状的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(10): 2493-2502.
[15]	杨晨曦, 周文期, 周香艳, 刘忠祥, 周玉乾, 刘芥杉, 杨彦忠, 何海军, 王晓娟, 连晓荣, 李永生. 控制玉米株高基因PHR1的基因克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(1): 55-66.