欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (12): 1923-1932.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.04071

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

华北寒旱区作物轮作的生产效应

姚兆磊1(), 张继宗1,2, 杜玉琼1, 刘玉华1,2, 张立峰1,2,*()   

  1. 1河北农业大学农学院, 河北保定 071000
    2农业农村部张北农业资源与生态环境重点野外科学观测试验站, 河北张家口 076450
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-18 接受日期:2020-07-02 出版日期:2020-08-18 网络出版日期:2020-11-25
  • 通讯作者: 张立峰
  • 基金资助:
    本研究由国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项项目(201503120);河北省重点研发计划项目(18227004D)

Productivity evaluation of crop rotation in cold and arid region of Northern China

Zhao-Lei YAO1(), Ji-Zong ZHANG1,2, Yu-Qiong DU1, Yu-Hua LIU1,2, Li-Feng ZHANG1,2,*()   

  1. 1College of Agronomy, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071000, Hebei, China
    2Zhangbei Agricultural Resource and Ecological Environment Key Field Research Station, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Zhangjiakou 076450, Hebei, China
  • Received:2020-03-18 Accepted:2020-07-02 Published:2020-08-18 Published online:2020-11-25
  • Contact: Li-Feng ZHANG
  • Supported by:
    Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest(201503120);Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest(18227004D)

RichHTML

19

PDF

653

摘要：

为明确华北寒旱区主栽作物的茬口适应性机制与轮作效果, 提出适宜区域种植的轮作组合, 本研究于2015—2019年采用交叉式设计, 对马铃薯、蚕豆、饲用玉米、莜麦、甜菜5种作物进行了以年际间为重复的轮作定位试验。结果表明, 各茬口马铃薯、莜麦、甜菜产量分别是连作的1.30~1.68、1.28~1.48、1.25~1.48倍, 甜菜茬蚕豆产量较连作减产10.58%, 莜麦茬、甜菜茬饲用玉米产量较连作减产9.10%~15.42%; 10种轮作组合的轮作土地当量比(LERr)值为1.09~1.68, 与连作相比, 均表现为有利效应, 其中莜麦→马铃薯、甜菜→马铃薯、饲用玉米→马铃薯、蚕豆→马铃薯、莜麦→甜菜的LERr值较高。蚕豆、饲用玉米作物耐连作; 就产量而言, 华北寒旱区适宜种植的轮作组合为莜麦→马铃薯、甜菜→马铃薯、饲用玉米→马铃薯、蚕豆→马铃薯和莜麦→甜菜。

关键词: 华北寒旱区, 作物, 轮作, 土地当量比

Abstract:

To understand mechanisms of crop adaptability to various previous crop croppings, evaluate crop performance on the croppings, and identify suitable crop combinations for rotation of major crops in the cold and arid region of Northern China. A five-year field experiment was conducted using five crops from 2015 to 2019, including potato (Solanum tuberosum), faba bean (Vicia faba), forage maize (Zea mays), oat (Avena sativa), and beet (Beta vulgarwas). Yields of potato, oat, and beet in rotation were 1.30-1.68, 1.28-1.48, and 1.25-1.48 times of those in continuous cropping of single crops, respectively. Yield of faba bean on beet cropping was 10.58% lower than that of continuous faba bean while yield of forage maize on oat or beet stubble was 9.10%-15.42% lower than that of continuous forage maize. The LERr of 10 crop combinations was 1.09-1.68, indicating positive effects of rotation. Combinations of oat → potato, beet → potato, forage maize → potato and faba bean → potato had higher LERr, indicating faba bean and forage maize might be more durable of continuous cropping. In terms of productivity, suitable crop combinations for rotation in the area were oat → potato, beet → potato, forage maize → potato, faba bean → potato and oat → beet.

Key words: the cold and arid region of Northern China, crop, rotation, land equivalent ratio

表1

试验小区种植方式"

试验小区
Experimental plot		 年份Year 试验小区
Experimental plot		 年份Year
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
1 B P B P B 14 FB FM FB FM FB
2 O P O P O 15 P FM P FM P
3 FM P FM P FM 16 B O B O B
4 FB P FB P FB 17 O O O O O
5 P P P P P 18 FM O FM O FM
6 B FB B FB B 19 FB O FB O FB
7 O FB O FB O 20 P O P O P
8 FM FB FM FB FM 21 B B B B B
9 FB FB FB FB FB 22 O B O B O
10 P FB P FB P 23 FM B FM B FM
11 B FM B FM B 24 FB B FB B FB
12 O FM O FM O 25 P B P B P
13 FM FM FM FM FM — — — — — —

表2

试验作物播种期与收获期"

作物
Crop		 播种与收获日期 Sowing and harvesting date (month/day)
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
播种
Sowing
date		 收获
Harvesting
date		 播种
Sowing
date		 收获
Harvesting
date		 播种
Sowing
date		 收获
Harvesting
date		 播种
Sowing
date		 收获
Harvesting
date		 播种
Sowing
date		 收获
Harvesting
date
马铃薯Potato 04/30 09/18 05/02 08/25 04/25 09/16 04/28 09/12 05/03 09/17
蚕豆Faba bean 05/04 08/21 05/04 08/24 05/19 08/26 05/15 09/09 05/14 09/16
饲用玉米Forage maize 05/26 09/20 05/22 08/26 05/19 09/11 05/15 09/15 05/14 09/21
莜麦Oat 05/31 09/16 05/21 09/03 05/25 09/08 05/23 09/01 05/23 09/18
甜菜Beet 05/23 10/07 05/25 10/01 05/27 10/01 05/29 10/03 05/20 09/28

表3

各茬口作物的经济产量"

作物
Crop		 年份
Year		 茬口Cropping
马铃薯茬
Potato cropping		 蚕豆茬
Faba bean cropping		 饲用玉米茬
Forage maize cropping		 莜麦茬
Oat cropping		 甜菜茬
Beet cropping
马铃薯
Potato		 2016 2163.07 4254.37 4238.45 5833.94 4308.85
2017 2801.63 3776.77 4504.18 4358.62 3416.63
2018 3592.31 5504.73 6470.60 6405.94 5898.10
2019 4711.07 5725.97 5339.61 5714.08 3615.10
平均Average 3317.02 a 4815.46 ab 5138.21 b 5578.15 b 4309.67 ab
蚕豆
Faba bean		 2016 1684.84 1775.89 3289.14 1838.42 1758.38
2017 2207.77 1540.77 1739.20 1570.79 1288.98
2018 1333.05 1435.22 1750.29 1533.71 966.93
2019 2771.22 1978.16 1858.91 1915.53 2003.43
平均Average 1999.22 a 1682.51a 2159.39a 1714.61a 1504.43a
饲用玉米
Forage maize		 2016 13,861.37 14,350.51 12,467.90 11,515.76 8099.60
2017 17,271.16 16,558.21 16,776.81 13,681.24 12,204.87
2018 19,993.85 16,922.10 16,420.76 17,487.80 16,897.30
2019 17,130.04 18,201.34 14,700.37 12,189.03 13,858.04
平均Average 17,064.11 b 16,508.04 ab 15,091.46 ab 13,718.46 ab 12,764.95 a
莜麦
Oat		 2016 3151.58 2601.30 2101.05 1950.98 2451.23
2017 2486.32 2090.49 2646.33 1525.14 1597.04
2018 2207.76 2059.03 1854.65 1148.67 1316.63
2019 2206.59 2173.76 2298.03 2162.77 3353.97
平均Average 2513.06 a 2231.15 a 2225.02 a 1696.89 a 2179.72 a
甜菜
Beet		 2016 12173.89 10865.77 9355.20 9456.63 8393.31
2017 11,378.05 9843.94 11,423.90 9293.52 7019.03
2018 9471.98 9519.76 9543.03 8795.43 6151.40
2019 11,485.23 10,670.61 9484.93 10,160.39 8583.51
平均Average 11,127.29 c 10,225.02 bc 9951.77 bc 9426.49 b 7536.81 a

图1

各茬口马铃薯、甜菜的病情指数"

表4

不同种植模式下作物土地当量比"

作物
Crop		 年份
Year		 马铃薯茬
Potato cropping		 蚕豆茬
Faba bean cropping		 饲用玉米茬
Forage maize cropping		 莜麦茬
Oat cropping		 甜菜茬
Beet cropping
作物土地
当量比
LERc		 效应Effect 作物土地当量比LERc 效应Effect 作物土地
当量比
LERc		 效应
Effect		 作物土地
当量比
LERc		 效应Effect 作物土地
当量比
LERc		 效应Effect
马铃薯 2016 1.00 0 1.97 + 1.96 + 2.70 + 1.99 +
Potato 2017 1.00 0 1.35 + 1.61 + 1.56 + 1.22 +
2018 1.00 0 1.53 + 1.80 + 1.78 + 1.64 +
2019 1.00 0 1.22 + 1.13 + 1.21 + 0.77 -
Average 1.00 a 0 1.52 ab + 1.63 ab + 1.81 b + 1.41 ab +
蚕豆 2016 0.95 - 1.00 0 1.85 + 1.04 + 0.99 -
Faba bean 2017 1.43 + 1.00 0 1.13 + 1.02 + 0.84 -
2018 0.93 - 1.00 0 1.22 + 1.07 + 0.67 -
2019 1.40 + 1.00 0 0.94 - 0.97 - 1.01 +
Average 1.18 ab + 1.00 ab 0 1.29 b + 1.03 ab + 0.88 a -
饲用玉米 2016 1.11 + 1.15 + 1.00 0 0.92 - 0.65 -
Forage 2017 1.03 + 0.99 - 1.00 0 0.82 - 0.73 -
maize 2018 1.22 + 1.03 + 1.00 0 1.06 + 1.03 +
2019 1.17 + 1.24 + 1.00 0 0.83 - 0.94 -
Average 1.13 b + 1.10 b + 1.00 ab 0 0.91 a - 0.84 a -
莜麦 2016 1.62 + 1.33 + 1.08 + 1.00 0 1.26 +
Oat 2017 1.63 + 1.37 + 1.74 + 1.00 0 1.05 +
2018 1.92 + 1.79 + 1.61 + 1.00 0 1.15 +
2019 1.02 + 1.01 + 1.06 + 1.00 0 1.55 +
Average 1.55 b + 1.38 ab + 1.37 ab + 1.00 a 0 1.25 ab +
甜菜 2016 1.45 + 1.29 + 1.11 + 1.13 + 1.00 0
Beet 2017 1.62 + 1.40 + 1.63 + 1.32 + 1.00 0
2018 1.54 + 1.55 + 1.55 + 1.43 + 1.00 0
2019 1.34 + 1.24 + 1.11 + 1.18 + 1.00 0
Average 1.49 b + 1.37 b + 1.35 b + 1.27 b + 1.00 a 0

表5

作物种植模式的轮作土地当量比"

种植模式
Cropping pattern		 年份
Year		 轮作土地当量比LERr 效应Effect 种植模式
Cropping pattern		 年份
Year		 轮作土地当量比LERr 效应Effect
连作马铃薯 2016 1.00 0 甜菜→马铃薯 2016 1.72 ++
Continuous cropping potato 2017 1.00 0 Beet→Potato 2017 1.42 ++
2018 1.00 0 2018 1.59 ++
2019 1.00 0 2019 1.06 +-
Average 1.00 a 0 Average 1.45 cd +
连作蚕豆
Continuous cropping
faba bean		 2016 1.00 0 饲用玉米→蚕豆 2016 1.50 ++
2017 1.00 0 Forage maize→Faba bean 2017 1.06 +-
2018 1.00 0 2018 1.13 ++
2019 1.00 0 2019 1.09 +-
Average 1.00 a 0 Average 1.20 abc +
连作饲用玉米
Continuous cropping
forage maize		 2016 1.00 0 莜麦→蚕豆 2016 1.19 ++
2017 1.00 0 Oat→Faba bean 2017 1.20 ++
2018 1.00 0 2018 1.43 ++
2019 1.00 0 2019 0.99 +-
Average 1.00 a 0 Average 1.20 abc +
连作莜麦 2016 1.00 0 甜菜→蚕豆 2016 1.14 +-
Continuous cropping oat 2017 1.00 0 Beet→Faba bean 2017 1.12 +-
2018 1.00 0 2018 1.11 +-
2019 1.00 0 2019 1.13 ++
Average 1.00 a 0 Average 1.13 ab +
连作甜菜 2016 1.00 0 莜麦→饲用玉米 2016 1.00 0
Continuous cropping beet 2017 1.00 0 Oat→Forage maize 2017 1.28 +-
2018 1.00 0 2018 1.34 ++
2019 1.00 0 2019 0.95 +-
Average 1.00 a 0 Average 1.14 ab +
蚕豆→马铃薯 2016 1.46 +- 甜菜→饲用玉米 2016 0.88 +-
Faba bean→Potato 2017 1.39 ++ Beet→Forage maize 2017 1.18 +-
2018 1.23 +- 2018 1.29 ++
2019 1.31 ++ 2019 1.03 +-
Average 1.35 bc + Average 1.10 ab +
饲用玉米→马铃薯 2016 1.54 ++ 甜菜→莜麦 2016 1.20 ++
Forage maize→Potato 2017 1.32 ++ Beet→Oat 2017 1.19 ++
2018 1.51 ++ 2018 1.29 ++
2019 1.15 ++ 2019 1.37 ++
Average 1.38 bc + Average 1.26 abc +
莜麦→马铃薯 2016 2.16 ++
Oat→Potato 2017 1.6 ++
2018 1.85 ++
2019 1.12 ++
Average 1.68 d +
[1] 张立峰, 徐长金 . 北方高寒半干旱农牧交错带资源环境障碍与农牧生产力开发. 资源科学, 1999,21(5):64-67.
Zhang L F, Xu C J . Environmental problems and development of agricultural and pastoral productivity in the semi-arid alpine and pastoral ecotone in northern China. Resour Sci, 1999,21(5):64-67 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[2] 张立峰, 边秀举, 刘玉华 . 冀北高原作物耗水特性与倒茬效应研究. 中国农业科学, 2001,34:56-60.
Zhang L F, Bian X J, Liu Y H . Studies on water consumption characteristics and effects of crops rotation in plateau of North Hebei province. Sci Agric Sin, 2001,34:56-60 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3] 于高波, 吴凤芝, 周新刚 . 小麦、毛苕子与黄瓜轮作对土壤微生态环境及产量的影响. 土壤学报, 2011,48:175-184.
Yu G B, Wu F Z, Zhou X G . Effect of rotations of cucumber with wheat and hairy vetch on soil micro-ecological environment. Acta Pedol Sin, 2011,48:175-184 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] 郭秀娟, 杨建春, 冯学金, 姜超 . 不同前茬作物对胡麻干物质积累规律、品质及产量构成因子的影响. 作物杂志, 2016, ( 2):165-167.
Guo X J, Yang J C, Feng X J, Jiang C . Effects of different previous crops in rotation system on dry matter accumulation, quality and yield in fax. Crops, 2016, ( 2):165-167 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[5] 杨宁, 赵护兵, 王朝辉, 张达斌, 高亚军 . 豆科作物-小麦轮作方式下旱地小麦花后干物质及养分累积、转移与产量的关系. 生态学报, 2012,32:4827-4835.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201107221085
Yang N, Zhao H B, Wang Z H, Zhang D B, Gao Y J . Accumulation and translocation of dry matter and nutrients of wheat rotated with legumes and its relation to grain yield in a dryland area. Acta Ecol Sin, 2012,32:4827-4835 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[6] Munkholm L J, Heck R J, Deen B . Long-term rotation and tillage effects on soil structure and crop yield. Soil Tillage Res, 2013,127:85-91.
doi: 10.1016/j.still.2012.02.007
[7] Ren T, Li H, Lu J W, Bu R Y, Li X K, Cong R H, Lu M X . Crop rotation-dependent yield responses to fertilization in winter oilseed rape ( Brassica napus L.). Crop J, 2015,3:396-404.
doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2015.04.007
[8] 韩丽娜, 丁静, 韩清芳, 丁瑞霞, 聂俊峰, 贾志宽, 李文静 . 黄土高原区草粮(油)翻耕轮作的土壤水分及作物产量效应. 农业工程学报, 2012,28(24):129-137.
Han L N, Ding J, Han Q F, Ding R X, Nie J F, Jia Z K, Li W J . Effects of alfalfa-grain (oil) crop plowing rotation on soil moisture and crop yield in Loess Plateau. Trans CSAE, 2012,28(24):129-137 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[9] 吴艳飞, 张雪艳, 李元, 魏文杰, 高丽红 . 轮作对黄瓜连作土壤环境和产量的影响. 园艺学报, 2008,35:357-362.
Wu Y F, Zhang X Y, Li Y, Wei W J, Gao L H . Influence of rotation continuous cropping soil environment and cucumber yield. Acta Hortic Sin, 2008,35:357-362 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[10] 孙剑, 李军, 王美艳, 王学春, 方新宇, 任晶晶 . 黄土高原半干旱偏旱区苜蓿-粮食轮作土壤水分恢复效应. 农业工程学报, 2009,25(6):33-39.
Sun J, Li J, Wang M Y, Wang X C, Fang X Y, Ren J J . Effects of alfalfa-grain rotation on soil moisture restoration in semi-arid and drought-inclined areas of Loess Plateau. Trans CSAE, 2009,25(6):33-39 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[11] Naab J B, Mahama G Y, Yahaya I Prasad P V V . Conservation agriculture improves soil quality, crop yield, and incomes of smallholder farmers in North Western Ghana. Front Plant Sci, 2017,8:996.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00996 pmid: 28680427
[12] 张伟, 张冬梅, 韩彦龙, 刘化涛, 赵聪, 姜春霞, 李娜娜 . 不同前茬下旱地玉米的水分动态及产量效应. 山西农业科学, 2017,45:749-752.
Zhang W, Zhang D M, Han Y L, Liu H T, Zhao C, Jiang C X, Li N N . Effects of different previous crops on soil moisture and crop yield of maize in dryland. J Shanxi Agric Sci, 2017,45:749-752 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] 李戌清, 张雅, 田忠玲, 吴根良 . 茄子连作与轮作土壤养分、酶活性及微生物群落结构差异分析. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2017,43:561-569.
Li X Q, Zhang Y, Tian Z L, Wu G L . Difference analysis of soil nutrients, enzymatic activities and microbial community structure between eggplant continuous cropping and rotation. J Zhejiang Univ (Agric Life Sci), 2017,43:561-569 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14] 杨祥田, 周翠, 李建辉, 李伟龙, 林俊 . 不同轮作方式下大棚草莓产量及土壤生物学特性. 中国生态农业学报, 2010,18:312-315.
Yang X T, Zhou C, Li J H, Li W L, Lin J . Effect of cropping system on yield of strawberry and soil biological property under plastic greenhouse condition. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2010,18:312-315 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15] 剡斌 . 胡麻轮作模式对农田土壤养分、生物特性及作物产量的影响. 甘肃农业大学博士学位论文, 甘肃兰州, 2018.
Yan B . Effects of Different Oilseed Flax Rotation on the Soil Nutrient、Biological Characteristics and Crop Yield. PhD Dissertation of Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China, 2018 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[16] Crookston R K, Kurle J E, Copland P J, Ford H J, Lueschen W E . Rotational cropping sequence affects yield of corn and soybean. Agron J, 1991,83:108-113.
doi: 10.2134/agronj1991.00021962008300010026x
[17] 晋艳, 杨宇虹, 段玉琪, 孔光辉 . 烤烟轮作、连作对烟叶产量质量的影响. 西南农业学报, 2004,17(增刊1):267-271.
Jin Y, Yang Y H, Duan Y Q, Kong G H . Effects of rotation cropping and continuous cropping on yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco. Southwest China J Agric Sci, 2004,17(S1):267-271 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[18] 黄光荣 . 不同轮作方式对烤烟病虫害及产量品质的影响. 河南农业科学, 2009, ( 5):40-42.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3268.2009.05.011
Huang G R . The influence concerning different crop rotation models to pests and diseases of flue-cured tobacco, yield and quality of products. J Henan Agric Sci, 2009, ( 5):40-42 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[19] Tucker B B, Cos M B, Eck H V . Effects of rotation, tillage methods, and N fertilization on winter wheat production. Agron J, 1971,63:699-702.
doi: 10.2134/agronj1971.00021962006300050012x
[20] 王欣英 . 前茬作物玉米和甘薯对烟草的轮作效应及其机理的研究. 山东农业大学硕士学位论文, 山东泰安, 2006 .
Wang X Y . Effects of Corn and Sweet Potato on Tobacco Growth and Quality as Fore-rotating Crops. MS Thesis of Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an, Shandong, China, 2006 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21] 陈阜 . 农业生态学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2011. pp 77-78.
Chen F . Agricultural Ecology. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2011. pp 77-78(in Chinese).
[22] 崔婷茹 . 坝上地区农业气候资源特征及高效利用策略. 河北农业大学硕士学位论文, 河北保定, 2017.
Cui T R . Characteristics of Agricultural Climatic Resources and Effective Utilization Strategy in Bashang Area. MS Thesis of Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, Hebei, China, 2017 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[23] Willey R W, Osiru D S O . Studies on mixtures of maize and beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris) with particular reference to plant population. J Agric Sci, 1972,79:517-529.
[24] 刘玉华, 张立峰, 边秀举 . 土地当量比计算方法的改进与应用. 河北农业大学学报, 1999,22(2):19-21.
Liu Y H, Zhang L F, Bian X J . Improvement and application of calculating method of Land Equivalent Ratio. J Hebei Agric Univ, 1999,22(2):19-21 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[25] 李继明, 李城德 . 定西市旱作区马铃薯引种试验初报. 甘肃农业科技, 2017, ( 10):59-62.
Li J M, Li C D . Preliminary report of potato introduction experiment in dryland area of Dingxi city. Gansu Agric Sci Technol, 2017, ( 10):59-62 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[26] 杨安沛, 曹禹, 孙桂荣, 马俊义 . 不同甜菜品种对褐斑病的抗性分析. 中国糖料, 2014, ( 4):48-49.
Yang A P, Cao Y, Sun G R, Ma J Y . Resistance analysis of different beet varieties to brown spot disease. Sugar Crops China, 2014, ( 4):48-49 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[27] 宋素芳, 秦豪荣, 赵聘 . 生物统计学. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2008. pp 59-60.
Song S F, Qin H R, Zhao P. Biostatistics. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 2008. pp 59-60(in Chinese).
[28] 谢奎忠, 陆立银, 罗爱花, 胡新元 . 长期连作对马铃薯土传病害和产量的影响. 中国种业, 2018, ( 2):65-67.
Xie K Z, Lu L Y, Luo A H, Hu X Y . Effects of long-term continuous cropping on soil-borne diseases and yield of potato. China Seed Ind, 2018, ( 2):65-67 (in Chinese).
[29] 宋树慧, 何梦麟, 任少勇, 肖强, 蒙美莲, 陈有君, 杨丽辉, 魏翠果 . 不同前茬对马铃薯产量、品质和病害发生的影响. 作物杂志, 2014, ( 2):123-126.
Song S H, He M L, Ren S Y, Xiao Q, Meng M L, Chen Y J, Yang L H, Wei C G . Effect of different preceding crops on yield, quality and disease of potato. Crops, 2014, ( 2):123-126 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[30] 王长魁, 陈晓军, 贾瑞存 . 甜菜不同轮作方式效应及对后茬作物的影响. 甘肃农业科技, 1998, ( 9):11-13.
Wang C K, Chen X J, Jia R C . Effects of different rotation patterns of sugar beet and its effect on post-crop crops. Gansu Agric Sci Technol, 1998, ( 9):11-13 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[31] 谭雪莲, 郭天文, 刘高远 . 马铃薯连作土壤微生物特性与土传病原菌的相互关系. 灌溉排水学报, 2016,35(8):30-35.
Tan X L, Guo T W, Liu G Y . Relationship between microbial characteristics of potato continuous cropping soil and soil-borne pathogens. J Irrig Drainage, 2016,35(8):30-35 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[32] 王俊, 刘文兆, 李凤民 . 半干旱区不同作物与苜蓿轮作对土壤水分恢复与肥力消耗的影响. 土壤学报, 2007,44:179-183.
Wang J, Liu W Z, Li F M . Effects of crop rotation and alfalfa on soil water recovery and fertility consumption in Semi-arid areas. Acta Pedol Sin, 2007,44:179-183 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[33] 夏红梅, 杨宇博, 韩新文, 罗成飞, 史淑芝 . 甜菜褐斑病的危害及防治. 中国甜菜糖业, 2003, ( 1):53-55.
Xia H M, Yang Y B, Han X W, Luo C F, Shi S Z . The harm and prevention of beet brown spot. China Beet Sugar, 2003, ( 1):53-55 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[34] 孙彦彬 . 茬口特性对甜菜产量的影响. 新疆农业科技, 1999, ( 6):7.
Sun Y B . Effects of stubble characteristics on sugar beet yield. Xinjiang Agric Sci Technol, 1999, ( 6):7 (in Chinese).
[35] 孙友萍, 王洪英, 王艳丽 . 作物的茬口特性与大田轮作. 吉林农业, 2004, ( 5):9.
Sun Y P, Wang H Y, Wang Y L . Characteristics of crop stubble and field rotation. Agric Jilin, 2004, ( 5):9 (in Chinese).
[1] 李心怡, 陈欣童, 赵闯, 王茜, 丛佳慧, 林若薇, 邱渝欣, 杨晓光. 气候变化对作物病虫害影响的研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 331-348.
[2] 高园, 李霞, 魏少博, 田小海, 周文彬. 植物光合午休研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2253-2265.
[3] 武斌, 曹永刚, 胡发龙, 殷文, 樊志龙, 范虹, 柴强. 免耕轮作对减氮小麦产量下降的补偿效果[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1959-1968.
[4] 闫知兰, 赵芹, 常甜达, 王一鸣, 王碧辉, 王鹏, 黄春国, 张会, 王利祥, 郝晓鹏, 赵波. 豆科作物AOX基因鉴定及其在普通菜豆响应非生物胁迫中的表达模式研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1769-1783.
[5] 盛倩男, 方娅婷, 赵剑, 杜思垚, 胡行珍, 余秋华, 朱俊, 任涛, 鲁剑巍. 不同养分管理措施对稻田和旱地油菜产量的影响及其对冻害的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1286-1298.
[6] 王崇铭, 陆志峰, 闫金垚, 宋毅, 王昆昆, 方娅婷, 李小坤, 任涛, 丛日环, 鲁剑巍. 磷肥用量对油稻轮作系统作物产量与磷素吸收量及其稳定性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 447-458.
[7] 唐永严, 尹俊杰, 侯青青, 冯俊彦, 李俊, 杨武云, 陈学伟, 胡培松, 万建民. 四川省农作物种业发展现状与对策[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2845-2859.
[8] 王子琳, 关裴奕, 黄翠, 陈键, 方佳创, 刘晨瑞, 郭章玺, 王梓鸣, 王朝辉, 刘金山, 田汇, 石美. 小麦锰锌吸收累积对锌肥的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2836-2842.
[9] 刘志鹏, 苟志文, 柴强, 殷文, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 范虹, 王琦明. 干旱灌区绿肥对多样化种植小麦玉米产量性能指标的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2415-2424.
[10] 刘陈, 王昆昆, 廖世鹏, 杨佳群, 丛日环, 任涛, 李小坤, 鲁剑巍. 氮肥用量对玉米-油菜和水稻-油菜轮作模式下油菜产量及氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(8): 2067-2077.
[11] 刘春燕, 张利影, 周杰, 许依, 杨亚东, 曾昭海, 臧华栋. 豆科作物轮作强化农田生态系统功能的研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(8): 1885-1895.
[12] 曹馨元, 杜明利, 王宇诚, 陈欣华, 陈佳欣, 凌霄霞, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 邓南燕. 稻油系统周年产量差及形成因素探究: 以湖北省武穴市为例[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(5): 1287-1299.
[13] 王宇, 郜耿东, 葛萌萌, 常影, 谭静, 葛贤宏, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 钙在作物生长发育中的功能及应用[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 793-807.
[14] 车品高, 陈国徽, 曹国军, 高冰可, 陈艳芳, 熊文, 应治宏, 周庆友. 稻油轮作下秸秆还田对土壤养分和作物产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(12): 3118-3128.
[15] 杨博文, 梁修仁, 秦明广, 曹英健, 熊航, 展茗. 基于能量效率与碳效率的长江中游不同水旱轮作系统可持续性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(11): 2801-2817.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2