欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (05): 772-778.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同类型氮肥对夏玉米氮素累积、转运与氮肥利用的影响

易镇邪;王璞;申丽霞;张红芳;刘明;戴明宏   

  1. 中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院,北京100094
  • 收稿日期:2005-03-29 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-05-12 网络出版日期:2006-05-12
  • 通讯作者: 王璞

Effects of Different Types of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Nitrogen Accumulation, Translocation and Nitrogen Fertilizer Utilization in Summer Maize

YI Zhen-Xie; WANG Pu*; SHEN Li-Xia; ZHANG Hong-Fang; LIU Ming and DAI Ming-Hong   

  1. College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China
  • Received:2005-03-29 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-05-12 Published online:2006-05-12
  • Contact: WANG Pu

摘要:

在较低施氮量下,研究了3种类型氮肥(普通尿素、包膜尿素和复合肥)不同施用量(0、90和180 kg N/hm2)对夏播玉米郑单958与农大108氮素吸收、累积、转运及氮肥利用的影响。结果表明,在本试验范围内,施氮量增大,植株氮素累积量增加,氮生理效率、氮肥效率与氮肥利用率(NUE)下降。同等施氮量下包膜尿素与复合肥较普通尿素NUE高,郑单958施90 kg N/hm2与农大108施180 kg N/hm2时尤为明显;氮素阶段性累积规律,两品种在不施氮和施氮条件下均具有基因型差异。播种至吐丝后21 d氮素累积量太大对夏玉米灌浆中后期氮素累积有一定抑制作用,郑单958表现特别明显;氮收获指数(NHI)具明显基因型差异,郑单958较农大108高近6个百分点。施氮使郑单958 NHI显著降低,农大108变化不明显。与普通尿素相比,包膜尿素与复合肥处理NHI较低,在郑单958施90 kg N/hm2与农大108施180 kg N/hm2时差异达显著水平;叶、茎鞘氮素转运量及其对籽粒氮贡献率随施氮量增大而增大,叶氮素转运主要在吐丝后21 d至成熟期,茎鞘氮素转运主要在吐丝至吐丝后21d;肥料氮主要在吐丝前发挥作用,且最主要是在12叶展至吐丝期,施氮与不施氮处理的氮素累积量差异在吐丝前后达最大。

关键词: 夏玉米, 氮肥类型, 氮素累积, 氮素转运, 氮肥利用率

Abstract:

In recent years, nitrogen over fertilization has become an unassailable fact in summer maize-winter wheat cropping system in north China plain, especially in summer maize growing season, resulting in N use efficiency (NUE) rapidly decrease and causing a series of ecological and environmental problems, such as underground water pollution, acid rain, global warming and stratospheric ozone depletion, and so on. The objective of this experiment was to study the effects of three application rates (0, 90 and 180 kg N/ha) of three types of nitrogen fertilizer (common urea, coated urea and compound fertilizer) on N absorption, accumulation, translocation and nitrogen fertilizer (NF) utilization of summer maize cultivars, Zhengdan 958 and ND 108 under condition of lower NF application rate, and to provide some beneficial references for ameliorating the fertilization techniques and increasing NUE of summer maize in this area. The main results showed that N accumulation amount was increased but nitrogen physiological efficiency, nitrogen fertilizer efficiency and NUE descended with the increment of N application rate from 0 to 180 kg N/hm2. Under condition of the same N application rate, NUEs of coated urea and compound fertilizer treatments were bigger than that of common urea treatments, especially in the treatments of 90 kg N/ha for Zhengdan 958 and 180 kg N/ha for ND 108 (Table 2, 5 and 6). Difference existed in N staggered accumulation trends between two cultivars under zero N application, and their alternation under N application showed genotypic difference likewise (Table 2). In N application treatments, N accumulation amount was increased before silking stage, but descended in middle and late filling stage, and this trend was more evident for Zhengdan 958. N absorption of summer maize, especially of Zhengdan 958 in the middle and late filling stage could be restrained if N accumulation amount was too much in the stage of sowing to 21 d after silking. There was a genotypic difference in nitrogen harvest index (NHI), nearly 6% more in Zhengdan 958 than in ND 108. With NF application, NHI of Zhengdan 958 was descended evidently, but that of ND 108 changed unconspicuously. Compared to NHI under common urea application, NHI under coated urea and compound fertilizer application was lower and the difference was significant at 0.05 probability level when N application rate was 90 kg N/ha for Zhengdan 958 and 180 kg N/ha for ND 108 (Table 2). Translocation amount of leaf N and stem-sheath N and their contribution rates to grain N were increased with the increment of N application. Leaf N was translocated to grain mainly from 21 d after silking to maturing stage, but stem–sheath N did mainly from silking to 21 d after silking stage (Table 4). Fertilizer-N played the role mainly before silking, especially from 12–leaf to silking stage, and the difference of N accumulation amount between N application treatments and zero N treatment reached to the maximum around silking stage.

Key words: Summer maize, Type of nitrogen fertilizer, N accumulation, N transshipment, N use efficiency

中图分类号: 

  • S513
[1] 于天一, 王春晓, 肖丽, 钟召迪, 王宣仓, 赵勇, 路亚, 吴月, 吴正锋. 不同结瘤特性花生品种氮素累积、产量及品质特性对氮肥用量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 881-894.
[2] 刘宁, 樊平, 王成, 陈琪琪, 成庆悦, 铁夏娜, 汤菁莎, 刘彬彬, 谢鸿堃, 王嘉悦, 施园青, 马均. 减氮配施有机肥对机插稻产量形成与氮素利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 866-880.
[3] 刘吉昌, 李思烨, 李雪婷, 王洪章, 刘鹏, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 任昊. 盐胁迫对不同耐盐型夏玉米品种根系生长及养分吸收效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 565-577.
[4] 孟凡琦, 房孟颖, 罗艺, 卢霖, 董学瑞, 王亚菲, 郭丽娜, 闫鹏, 董志强, 张凤路. 乙烯利-甜菜碱-水杨酸合剂对夏玉米耐热性和产量的调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1299-1311.
[5] 宋利, 刘广周, 张华, 卢庭启, 卿春燕, 杨云山, 郭晓霞, 胡单, 李少昆, 侯鹏. 密植滴灌水肥一体化对西南夏玉米产量及土壤细菌群落的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 992-1004.
[6] 辛雨宁, 任昊, 王洪章, 梁明磊, 于涛, 刘鹏. 喷施6-苄氨基腺嘌呤(6-BA)对授粉后高温胁迫下夏玉米籽粒灌浆及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 418-431.
[7] 王媛, 许佳茵, 董二伟, 王劲松, 刘秋霞, 黄晓磊, 焦晓燕. 有机肥替代化肥氮对谷子氮素累积、产量及品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 149-160.
[8] 孙照华, 任昊, 王洪章, 王子强, 姚海燕, 辛爱美, 赵斌, 张吉旺, 任佰朝, 刘鹏. 叶面喷施硅制剂对滨海盐碱地夏玉米叶片光合性能及籽粒产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2383-2395.
[9] 岳海旺, 魏建伟, 刘朋程, 陈淑萍, 卜俊周. 基于GYT双标图分析对黄淮海生态区玉米品种综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 836-856.
[10] 赵荣荣, 丛楠, 赵闯. 基于Landsat 8影像提取豫中地区冬小麦和夏玉米分布信息的最佳时相选择[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(3): 721-733.
[11] 徐冉, 陈松, 徐春梅, 刘元辉, 章秀福, 王丹英, 褚光. 施氮量对籼粳杂交稻甬优1540产量和氮肥利用效率的影响及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(6): 1630-1642.
[12] 张振博, 贾春兰, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 赵斌, 张吉旺. 氮磷配施对夏玉米产量和叶片衰老特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(6): 1616-1629.
[13] 李慧, 王旭敏, 刘苗, 刘朋召, 李巧丽, 王小利, 王瑞, 李军. 基于夏玉米产量和氮素利用的水氮减量方案优选[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(5): 1292-1304.
[14] 张俊杰, 陈金平, 汤钰镂, 张锐, 曹红章, 王丽娟, 马梦金, 王浩, 王泳超, 郭家萌, KRISHNA SV Jagadish, 杨青华, 邵瑞鑫. 花期前后干旱胁迫对复水后夏玉米光合特性与产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(5): 1397-1409.
[15] 岳海旺, 韩轩, 魏建伟, 郑书宏, 谢俊良, 陈淑萍, 彭海成, 卜俊周. 基于GYT双标图分析对黄淮海夏玉米区域试验品种综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(5): 1231-1248.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!